1 Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Development Project April 21, 2008 Paul Wattles, ERCOT Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO New England.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement and Verification Standards for Demand Response in Wholesale Electric Markets September 30, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project Manager, Demand.
Advertisements

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 30, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
NAESB UPDATE MEETING MAY 30, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
July 14, 2009 Prepared by the North American Energy Standards Board 1 North American Energy Standards Board NAESB Review with the Demand Response Coordinating.
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
Aggregating Small Loads to provide Ancillary Services
NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Data Collection Project and Lessons Learned Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG March 2014.
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
Energy Efficiency Implementation Project # Load Management Subcommittee Report to: ERCOT Demand Side Working Group August 8, 2008.
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Distributed Energy Resources Concept Document Discussion ERCOT Staff DREAM Task Force Aug. 25,
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal Market Trials and Data Verification ROS Meeting By Steve Grendel, ERCOT Thursday, 01/11/2007.
Making the Most of Responsive Electricity Customers
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Distributed Generation/Demand Resources in ISO New England’s Wholesale Markets 2nd Annual Distributed Energy Conference - Building Resilient Communities.
2007 ERCOT SOM Report Recommendations Dan L. Jones Vice President Director, ERCOT IMM Potomac Economics ERCOT Wholesale Market Subcommittee Austin, Texas.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
1 Confidential The information contained in this presentation is for the exclusive and confidential use of the recipient. Any other distribution, use,
NAESB Wholesale Demand Response Standards 1/14/09 NAESB Wholesale Electric Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO-New.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Measurement & Verification at the Wholesale Market Level David Kathan FERC NAESB DSM/EE Business Practices Washington, DC April 11, 2007 The author’s views.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) TITLE: Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin March.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
NAESB Conference Call October 10, 2008 DSM EE RETAIL GROUP.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
1 NAESB Standards Request R04016 Summary of Strawman Proposal of The New Jersey Companies January 24-25, 2005.
ERS Overview of Upcoming Changes.  Procedure Changes – ERS Generator Resources  Reporting Requirements – ERS Load Resources with Back-Up Generators.
Demand Response, Planning, and Regional Markets NASUCA Conference June 30, 2009 Joe Rosenthal, CT OCC.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
1 New MO Projects June COMS Extract, Report & Web Services Monitoring & Usage Statistics Jackie Ashbaugh.
SGR issues associated with ICCP. 2 ICCP handbook update Split Generation Resources Split Generation Resources are modeled separately by each.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Nodal Transitional Qualification Approach to Qualifications for the Nodal Market August 16, 2007.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
THE NEW GENERATION TRANSMISSION By Ashroo M. Das 6 th sem, EEE & Deepak Kumar 6 th sem, EEE.
© 2010 by Elster. All rights reserved. Virginia Submetering Program: Benefits and Solutions Contact Bob Jennings at Energy ICT/Westridge Energy
DSM/EE Scoping Taskforce Update August 18, 2009 DRAFT.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 14, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
Virginia Submetering Program: Benefits and Solutions Contact Bob Jennings at Energy ICT/Westridge Energy © 2010 by Elster. All rights reserved.
Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO-New England Donna Pratt, New York ISO
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
Presentation transcript:

1 Demand Response Measurement & Verification Standards Development Project April 21, 2008 Paul Wattles, ERCOT Eric Winkler, Ph.D., ISO New England

2 Goals Respond to recommendations from the FERC, the NAESB, and the industry Standardize vocabulary, concepts and some processes to enhance cross-regional market entry for Demand Response providers Lead NAESB initiative on wholesale market Demand Response measurement & verification standards

3 Scope Our work focuses on: Demand Response Wholesale Programs/Services ISO/RTO Administered

4 IRC Members

5 Demand Response Measurement and Verification (M&V) Equipment, technology, and procedures used to quantify net energy and demand. M&V includes elements such as telemetry and metering data collection and analyses, baseline calculations, statistical sample design.

6 ISO/RTO DR Programs and Services Product Categories: Regulation (7) Reserves (16) (Spinning Reserves & Non-Spinning Reserves) Energy (19) Capacity (8)

7 ISO/RTO DR Matrix (example)

8 Standards Development Published by Product Type (4) Major Standards Categories –Qualification, Testing & Auditing –Telemetry –After-The-Fact Measurement –Customer Baselines

9 Qualification Testing and Audit Aggregation Eligibility –Indication of if composite / aggregate assets are allowed. Reduction Deadline: –Time at which the requested or contracted level of response is completely "off the system" (in minutes)

10 Timing Terminology

11 Telemetry Measurements –Measurement of the real-time demand –Separate telemetry of on-site generation, if present –Measurement of net energy injection to the grid (if allowed) –Secondary measurements (e.g. quality flags, breaker status) Accuracy –Composite of metering and communications Reporting Interval –The time between signals (typically seconds or minutes) Communication Protocol –The IT protocol used to collect the data, such as ICCP

12 After-The-Fact Measurements Meter Accuracy –Accuracy of the energy measurement –Accuracy of the time measurement, if applicable Data Reporting –How often the data is sent to the ISO/RTO –Level of detail required Data Validation, Estimation & Editing (VEE) Statistical Sampling Requirements

13 Performance: Customer Baseline Characteristics of Baseline –Comprehensible –Accurate –Flexible –Reproducible Baseline Types –Firm Service Level Drop –Metering before and after instruction –Statistical Modeling –Comparable Day –On-site Generation Data (behind the meter)

14 Baseline Concept Measured Load TIME ELECTRICITY USAGE Baseline Expected or Contracted Load Reduction Reduction deadline Release Deployment instruction Normal operations

15 Two face to face meetings (Austin TX and Holyoke MA) Numerous conference calls Ad-hoc organization of Demand Response personnel IRC Demand Response Coordination

16 Accomplishments for IRC Jan 07: NAESB DSM-EE Project initiated Mar 07: Multiple ISO/RTOs engage with NAESB project Sept 07: Subgroup convenes; IRC commits personnel and funding; Scope statement for wholesale programs/services developed Nov 07: Draft Matrix of ISO/RTO programs completed Jan 08: Status report provided to NAESB Mar 08: Outline of draft standard provided to NAESB DSM/EE working group

17 Upcoming Milestones Q2 08: ISO NE host to NAESB DSM/EE Meeting Q3 08: ERCOT host to NAESB DSM/EE Meeting Q3 08: Draft Standards to be delivered to NAESB On-Going Participation in NAESB standards development process IRC Program/Service comparison matrix –Includes information beyond data related to M&V Standards

18 Contact Information IRC Program Manager Scott ISO/RTO DR Regional Contacts Paul Eric WinklerISO Gordon John Donna Mike Gerrud Pete John George