Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 2 - Consortia Michelle Winters LISC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State of Illinois Neighborhood Stabilization Program Illinois Department of Human Services March 2009.
Advertisements

1 The Development Process An Overview Forming the development concept Forming the development concept Evaluating your capacity and the needs of your community.
NSP Plan Introduction Activity/ Strategy Estimated Amount Estimated Units A.Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed.
Targeting NSP Funds Todd Richardson HUD Office of Policy Development and Research.
Neighborhood Stabilization The Effect of the Foreclosure Crisis on Asset- Building in Minority Communities Insight Center for Community Economic Development.
CDBG Supplemental Assistance For The Redevelopment of Abandoned And Foreclosed Homes Title III, Section 2301 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of.
NeighborWorks ® America Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program State of Montana Community Development Division Community Development Block Grant Program.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 An Overview for our Communities Compiled by: Building Opportunities for Self-Sufficiency.
HUD PERSPECTIVES FOR TACOMA-PIERCE COUNTY AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSORTIUM Jack Peters, Director Office of Community Planning and Development
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
Federal Reserve Survey of Neighborhood Stabilization Program Paul Wenske Senior Community Affairs Advisor January 27, 2010.
City of Muncie Community Development Department
The Neighborhood Stabilization Program, a CDBG Component US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Office of Community Planning and Development Neighborhood.
OV # - 1 Michigan Neighborhood Stabilization Program December 3, 2008.
Town of Davie Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Applicant Workshop January 30, 2010.
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AREA CONSORTIUM NSP2 BRIEFING Neighborhood Stabilization Program 2 (NSP2)
JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE HEARING SENATE BUDGET and FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Delivering Energy Savings for California AMERICAN RECOVERY & Karen.
City of Palm Coast Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program August 6, 2013 City Council Public Hearing.
Vermont Neighborhood Stabilization Program (VT NSP) Approved Plan Agency of Commerce and Community Development Department of Housing and Community Affairs.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Request for Qualifications (RFQ) Property Management Companies November 4, 2009.
Georgia Department of Community Affairs Mike Beatty, Commissioner
Thinking strategically about the NSP program Alan Mallach Nonresident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution and Senior Fellow, National Housing Institute.
1 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM Title III, Section 2301 of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HR3221)
IPED Annual Affordable Housing & Development Update: Opportunities in a Changing Economy The Fairmont Miramar Hotel Santa Monica, CA June 4 - 5, 2009.
California Department of Housing and Community Development Deputy Director Chris Westlake - Division of Financial Assistance Neighborhood Stabilization.
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM A Component of HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program October 23, 2008.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Tim Waddell, Division Administrator Elyse Shindelar—Program Manager
March 25, Presentation Outline Background Program Accomplishments Community Partnerships Summary.
CDBG Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) January 28, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
Project Administration Agreement with the Heart of Florida United Way, Inc. September 22, 2009 Homelessness Prevention & Rapid Re-housing Program (HPRP)
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Quarterly Report August 25, 2009.
Delaware Community Investment Fund Committee of 100 Economic Roundtable June 26, 2015.
Presentation Outline Background Program Requirements Orange County HPRP Plan HPRP Timeline Action Requested.
1 Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: A Guide for Public Entity and Non- Profit Buyers.
Los Angeles Housing Department Affordable Housing Trust Fund Notice of Funding Availability 2010 Round 3 Douglas Guthrie General Manager Helmi HisserichTim.
Key Features of NSP 2 Beyond the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Training Session Reclaiming Vacant Properties Conference Louisville, KY June 1, 2009.
Module 8 – Eligible Use B Scenarios: Homebuyer and Rental Housing Purchase and Rehabilitation.
1 Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: Overview for Homebuyer Assistance Program Administrators.
We’ve Done It Our Way Carolyn Rice County Treasurer & Board Chair Montgomery County Land Reutilization Corporation.
Overview of the National Housing Trust Fund June 3, 2015 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
The HERA Neighborhood Stabilization Program: Converting Liabilities into Assets Professor Frank S. Alexander Emory Law School  Frank S. Alexander 2008.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Orange County, Florida.
Module 7: Land Banking and Demolition 1. 2 Module 7 Contents 1. Land Banks defined under NSP 2. National Trends 3. Establishing a Land Bank 4. Managing.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Update February 16, 2010.
Consolidated Plan Amendment #16 Neighborhood Stabilization Program.
New York State HALT Task Force (“Halt Abusive Lending Transactions”) 1.Since 2007, the Governor’s HALT Task Force has led the coordination of foreclosure.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program. NSP Program Basics Established under the Housing & Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (not ARRA) Based on CDBG regulations.
Georgia’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program Grants Process, Procedures and Timelines.
Presentation Outline Background NSP Plan Requirements Orange County NSP Plan NSP Implementation Strategies Timeline Action Requested.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Redevelopment of Abandoned and Foreclosed Homes.
Land Banking Breakout HUD Housing Summit October 7, 2008 Salvatore Sclafani.
Community Stabilization in the Wake of the Foreclosure Crisis Ali Solis, Vice President, Public Policy & Industry Relations Enterprise Community Partners.
February 17, 2009 Orange County Neighborhood Stabilization Program Update.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Welco EPA TRIBAL PROGRAMS Cathy Villa, EPA Tribal Coordinator EPA’s Tribal Programs leads the effort to protect human health and the environment of federally.
Neighborhood Stabilization Program “The Power of Community”
Neighborhood Stabilization Program Real Estate Owned (REO) Disposition Process December 9, 2009.
Module 1: Eligible Uses, Activities and Properties, and Income Rules.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
Section 811 Webinar During the webinar, we will be holding a Q and A session through the GoToWebinar phone system. If you would like to ask questions.
HOME Commitments, Grant Based Accounting, and Managing HOME Deadlines March 14, 2016 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Wyoming Community Development Authority Financing Affordable Housing in Wyoming Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Public Hearing June 9, 2016 State of Wyoming Citizen.
1.882 million total persons Most of Northeast States combined would fit in Nebraska geographically 0ver 600,000 persons live in 2 nd District (Omaha area)
National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan Input Meeting Brittney Daise  07/13/2016.
HOME Underwriting and Subsidy Layering Training
Partnerships in Neighborhood Revitalization
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 2 - Consortia Michelle Winters LISC

Neighborhood Stabilization Program Background NSP 1 established in Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008  $3.92 billion NSP 2 established in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009  $1.93 billion Purpose is for purchase and rehabilitation of foreclosed and abandoned properties Purpose is NOT foreclosure prevention Primarily targeted to families at 120% of AMI 25% of funds must be for families at 50% of AMI Long term affordability – at least HOME standards Discounted purchase price requirements

NSP Eligible Uses New items for NSP 2 are underlined: Financing Mechanisms for purchase and redevelopment of foreclosed homes and residential properties Purchase, Rehab and Resale of abandoned or foreclosed homes and residential properties Establish and Operate Land Banks for foreclosed homes and residential properties Demolish Blighted Structures Redevelop demolished or vacant properties as housing

Major Differences Between NSP1 and NSP2 NSP 1NSP 2 AllocationFormulaCompetition EligibilityGovernmentsGovernments, Nonprofits, and Consortia, with for-profit partners Timing of Use of Funds All funds obligated within 18 months of the grant agreement 50% expended within 2 years of receipt, 100% within 3 years Discount Requirements 15% average, 5% minimum (soon to be updated to 1%) Recently updated to 1% minimum Geographic Targeting Grantees may decide targetingSpecific census tract criteria DemolitionNo limit10% limit; no public housing demolition Green RehabRecommendedRequired

NSP 2 NOFA Requirements Minimum of $5 million and 100 homes Applicants must demonstrate capacity to perform proposed activities 75 units of each type of proposed activity within prior 24 months Geographic eligibility is deeply targeted Average of 18 on a 1-20 needs scale

NSP 2 NOFA Priorities Revitalize target neighborhoods and reconnect with the economy, market, social networks, and metropolitan region Rapidly arrest neighborhood decline Assure deep targeting to 50% of AMI Longest feasible continued affordability Optimize economic activity and jobs Leverage resources or remove destabilizing influences Set aggressive and achievable goals Ensure accountability and citizen input

NSP 2 NOFA Priorities, Cont. Coordinate planning and resources with other Federal priorities: energy efficiency and conservation, sustainable and transit-oriented development, metro-wide planning and coordination, improve public education, improve access to healthcare.

Consortia Applications Consortia may include both public and private nonprofit entities Governments, nonprofits, housing authorities Applicants cannot be lead for more than one application, or in more than one application for a target geography Government entities or HUD manage environmental reviews Must be a single lead applicant Execute grant agreement and assume responsibility on behalf of consortium for compliance with all program requirements Consortia must collectively have the capacity to carry out proposed activities Defined as having done 75 units of each proposed activity in past 24 months

Consortia Applications Single Integrated Program Application must reflect an overall consortium program design NOT a collection of disparate programs Must propose a single program including: Proposed activities and timeline Continued affordability standards Community outreach Performance and monitoring Leveraging funds Green building and rehab standards

Consortia Applications Points awarded in application for activities that are consistent with established comprehensive, regional, multi-jurisdiction plan such as: Transportation Sustainable development Economic revitalization Floodplain management Proposed activities must relate to and increase effectiveness of established plan for maximum points

For-Profit Partners Firm commitment required with application All for-profit partners must be identified in application Requires a cost analysis and a separate written agreement with each partner

Consortia – Two Stage Process Consortium Agreement submitted with the application Signed by all members Members must cooperatively carry out program Authorizes lead entity Authorizes internal audit function Consortium Funding Agreement submitted by December 1, 2009 Authorizes govt. members to carry out environmental reviews Lead member enters into separate agreement with each member of consortium Describes members’ specific activities, timetables, and other program responsibilities/compliance

Bottom Line HUD is encouraging regional applications, but it must be a truly regional program rather than a collection of local programs Many decisions must be made prior to application – July 17th

NSP 2 Process Applications are Due July 17 th HUD will execute consortium funding agreements no later than December 1 HUD must obligate all funds to recipients by September 30, 2010 Recipients must expend 50% within 2 years Recipients must expend 100% within 3 years