1 [4.1]a Criteria for successful consolidation SDOThreshold/Foundation/Launch After/During Formation, Near-Term Comment Summary of discussions Verticals need to be engaged. Significant support and participation across vertical segments, taking into account: At least two vertical market/industry segments At least two global (balance) Prefer to engage market representatives (organizations and/or companies) Rules of engagement with other organizations/fora/consortia Identify and invite list of relevant organizations/fora/consortia for “participation” (AI) : E.g., BBF, OMA, etc. Development of technical scope To be discussed in 4.3 Timeline to launch (including milestones) To be discussed in 4.4 Basic structure (in principle) Funding (cost effective), Organization, IPR, Secretariat, etc. To be discussed in 4.7 High-level information During formation - Engage all relevant organizations/fora/consortia to “participate”: Other key organizations Detailed/Implementation aspects of high-level information Detailed Structure M2MCons02_24r1

SDOThreshold/Foundation/LaunchAfter/During Formation, Near-TermComment ARIB/ TTC Collaboration with many vertical kindsRelationships with other organizations (incl ITU-T) Openness and transparency Effective operation (support by minimum cost) ATIS at least 3 significant verticals* Tech Scope* 1 st activity: analyze Common Svc Layer other SDO/fora willing to share/input Agree on approximate/target timeframe How to work with SDOs (agree on list) Verticals participate in structure forming Agree in principle on major structure item Work to get more verticals to participate/join Determine relationships to government/regulators ID, integrate government/regulator requirement Determine Phase 2 or additional scope Detailed workplan and timeline for initial scope How to work with SDOs (not in mandatory list) Create and execute formal agreement *“Significant Verticals” - prefer they be global - equal participation/rights - balance among industries - ratio of verticals per 01(11)17 - region identifies verticals *“Tech Scope” (access agnostic) - Svc Layer, interop, conformnc CCSA Key verticals engaged (Seoul: 2 or 3)Balance (geographical & verticals) Cost effective End-to-end Fairness Not overlapping other organizations Easy meeting access Assignment to priority categories is TBD. CCSA does not think a clear idea of the “criteria” is set yet. Should verticals be part of the “criteria” discussion (for example in meeting #3)? ETSI Verticals engaged Global approach Time is critical (fast) Cost effective Verticals engaged Global approach Time is critical (fast) Cost effective List from Seoul. Assignment to priority categories is TBD. [4.1]b Criteria for successful consolidation

3 [4.1]c Criteria for successful consolidation SDOThreshold/Foundation/LaunchAfter/During Formation, Near-TermComment TIA Enough industry interest Agreed structure and operation Global participation by telecom SDOs Broad support from multiple verticals Agreed IPR policy, budget, funding, Secrty Agreed relationship to other organization Success criteria 1 – 2 years out - global leader in M2M - specifications are published - standards are published by SDOs - vertical participation - use of standards TTA 2 vertical industries participation* Global approach Agree relationships: international SDOs Agree on relationships: M2M SDOs/fora* 3GPP telecom SDOs to join Tech Scope will be Svc Layer Tech Scope will include terminals aspects Open (voting rights is example) Balance (committee leadership is example) * Which categories? And should they join before or after decision to start consolidation initiative? * OMA, 3GPP as examples