Assessment Literacy Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Jennifer Putman, Liaison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Advertisements

Curington Elementary School March 5, WHAT WE WANT STUDENTS TO BECOME… Life Long Learners, Problem-Solvers, & Decision Makers! IT IS ABOUT PREPARING.
Confidence and Competence meeting the needs of ALL learners Association for Compensatory Educators of Texas Ervin Knezek, lead4ward.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Using lead4ward Resources to Inform IEP Development
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
STAAR 7 th Grade Released Question 4 First the student has to decide whether to multiply or divide 24,000 gallons by 40 gallons per minute. If the student.
New assessment program for
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Test Design.
Comprehensive Assessment and Data System in GCISD Summative Assessment—1 time per year Data about Learner— 2-4 times per year (purchased assessments) District.
What Parents Need to Know  TABS (Texas Assessment of Basic Skills)  TEAMS (Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills)  TAAS (Texas Assessment.
Dallas Independent School District Conrad High School August 2013.
STAAR 3-8 Performance Standards ALAST… 3-8 Phase In Standards.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness TM An Overview of the Program Victoria Young Director of Reading, Writing, and Social Studies Assessments.
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Classroom Assessment FOUN 3100 Fall Assessment is an integral part of teaching.
Curriculum-Based Assessment and Other Informal Measures
PACT Tests Administration Guide. What is the PACT Test? Palmetto Achievement Challenge Test Standards-based accountability For curriculum and teaching.
Twinkle, Twinkle, Little STAAR K-2 Connections
W E L C O M Magrill Elementary STAAR Informational Night Date.
ELEMENTARY MATH AND SCIENCE. The STAAR in Our Future: Math and Science Readiness/Supporting Think-Pair-Share Exploring Readiness Standards: Curriculum.
September 12, 2014 Lora M. McCalister-Cruel BDS District Data Coach Bay District Schools Data Analysis Framework.
Writing Assignments On the small sheet of paper write down the most fun or funniest summer memory. On the lined sheet of paper write your name and date.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
STAAR Overview Desert Hills Elementary School
Project-Based Learning ITECH 711 Summer 2007 Trena Noval, Instructor.
Use of Reading Data to Drive Instruction in District 200 April 13, 2012.
Professional Learning Communities. Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can unwrap a standard. ✓ I can identify.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 5 Module 2.
Predicting Patterns: Lenawee County's Use of EXPLORE and PLAN DataDirector 2011 User Conference Dearborn, Michigan.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
A process to collect information about content, assessment and thinking processes currently in place with a school. What concepts, skills, knowledge and.
Instructional Coach Training September 30, 2010 AIMS: Generating Reports to Use with CFIP 1.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
APS Algebra Summit1 Algebra in APS Christina Fritz Franny Dever Mitchell Ross January 31,2008.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
LNHS CASL Training Tuesday, December 16th, Classroom Assessment For Learning A Quick Review Key 1: Clear Assessment Purpose Key 2: Clear Learning.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
SW1 FOS Networking Session Dec. 16, 2011 David Hornell Junior School.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
KEDC KLA Leadership Network March Meeting Tonya May ELA Regional Content Specialist Charles Rutledge Mathematics Content Specialist.
*Please sit with your grade level. You will leave today with a clear picture of…  What Math Workshop looks like (review)  How to integrate the Common.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
K-5 Math Adoption Day 2. Problems of the Day! Math Perception Impacts Performance Where do you think besides TV, that kids get negative messages about.
Science Understanding the Transition from TAKS to STAAR An Opportunity to Focus on Transitions from Elementary to Middle School Science (and Math)
What is Learning-Focused?
Literacy-Based Promotion Act & 3 rd Grade Summative Assessment Parent Information Night September 29, 2015.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
Instruction & Learning Plan PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES: INSTRUCTION & ASSESSMENT PLAN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Balanced Math Overview
New School Year Preview HISD Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Tools & Resources TEAM HISD Literacy Support Network/Job Alike August 17, 2010.
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
Summer Assessment Institute: Linking Data Teams & Quality Assessment August 2015.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
ACA Intermediate March 23, 2017
K-2 Math Countywide Data May 2016
P ! A L S Interpreting Student Data to
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Literacy Tuesday, August 20, 2013 Jennifer Putman, Liaison

Comprehensive Assessment and Data System in GCISD Summative Assessment—1 time per year Data about Learner—2-4 times per year (purchased assessments) District Common Assessments—End of Unit and/or grading period (District Created) Curriculum Based Assessments—1-4 times per month (Teacher/Team created) Formative Classroom Assessments (AFL Strategies) Daily Benchmarks & Cornerstone Tasks MAP, TELPAS, CogAT, DRA2, progress monitoring STAAR, End of Unit, Sem. Exams, ACT/SAT Assessments for Learning

Performance Indexes that determine Accountability: 1.% of students passing state assessment 2.% of students who met progress or exceeded progress (STAAR Level II and III) 3.% of students in performance gap groups passing state assessment 4.Graduation rate/DAP Rate (not applicable to us) Accountability

 What do students learn in the previous two grades to prepare them?  How will students use the learning next year?  Readiness Standards  Supporting Standards  Process Standards TEKS Literacy

 Essential for success in current grade level  Prepares students for success in next grade level  Require in-depth instruction  Addresses broad and deep ideas Readiness Standards

 Introduced OR reinforced in the current grade level  May be emphasized in the previous grade level OR the next grade level  Prepares students for success in the next grade level  Addresses narrow ideas Supporting Standards

Readiness vs. Supporting

 The “process” of how students gain and demonstrate knowledge  Represents strategies students use to access learning  Represents the way a student communicates learning Process Standards

 Levels of Concern  Challenging (red) = < 70%  Moderate (orange) = 70 – 79%  Low-Risk (yellow) = 80 – 100% Heat Maps

1.Analyze data – what percentage change do you notice for each standard? (+ or - ) 2.Find areas of strength – what are we doing that works? Keep doing it! Which kids still need support? 3.Find areas of concern – what do we need to do and learn before we teach this again? Which kids still need support? 4.Determine focus standards (3 lowest standards) 5.Create and implement CBAs 6.Follow up with Data Teams Process in PLCs Data Teams Process

Determining our Focus Standards Vertical Teams: 30 minutes  Reading – Library  Math – Jami’s room  Science – Art room

 Grade Level Teams –discuss and chart 3 focus standards for the year  Be ready to share! Determining our Focus Standards

Quality Assessments Friday, August 23, 2013

  Accessing questions based on standard  Creating tests DMAC

 Grades 3 – 5: in team leader’s room, use DMAC and 3 focus standards (Tuesday) to create a CBA  Grades K – 2: in library with Jennifer and Jami for types of assessments and how to create quality assessments using focus standards (Tuesday) Developing Quality Assessments

 Selected Response – multiple choice, true/false, matching, fill-in the blank with answer choices provided  Constructed Response (Open Ended Response) – open ended questions, fill in the blank with no answer choices provided, students are asked to reason or justify thinking Types of Assessment Responses

IDP – The Intentional Design Process

The student applies mathematical process standards to represent and compare whole numbers, the relative position and magnitude of whole numbers, and relationships within the numeration system related to place value. The student is expected to: (B) use concrete and pictorial models to compose and decompose numbers up to 120 in more than one way as so many hundreds, so many tens, and so many ones; TEKS 1.2B – Number and Operations

What number does this picture represent? (selected response question) A) 12 B) 39 C) 40 D) 38

True or False? (Selected Response) =

Lisa built the number 42 using the blocks below. Is she correct? How do you know?

 Rubrics for constructed response  Can be scored quickly and results used right away  4-7 questions total Curriculum Based Assessments

 Use focus standards (choose 1)  Use the IDP-short cut to IDP with your team  Create a curriculum based assessment with 3 questions (selected response and constructed response) Curriculum Based Assessment K-2

We can not accomplish all that we need to do without working together. -Bill Richardson Reflection