NW Area Committee Meeting Region 10 Regional Response Team October 7 th, 2014 Jami Goldman and Joseph Rinella.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey The Use of Calculated Stream Metabolism in Understanding Nutrients and Algal Measures in Agricultural.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy Contingency Management in Wetlands Paul R. Krause, Ph.D. Knowledge Management Program Sensitive Ecosystem.
Great Lakes Observing System GLRI Tributary Monitoring Project
Panel 1 - Role of Science Charlie Henry Director, NOAA’s GOM Disaster Response Center.
Presentation to RRT/NWAC Spills Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program Dale Jensen, Program Manager March 10, 2011.
In-situ fluorometry for oil-spills Chris Fuller Jim Bonner Department of Civil Engineering Texas A&M University ABSTRACT The current SMART protocol used.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Figure 1. Photograph looking upstream at the south fish ladder and training spill from bay 18, Bonneville Dam, April 4, Spill bay 18 South fish ladder.
GSWA Stream Team A sub-committee of the GSWA Land and Water Stewardship Committee.
Estimation of Nitrate Removal in the Lamprey River Using Longitudinal Profiling with High Frequency Sensors Jeffrey Rano Gopal Mulukutla Department of.
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Spatial and temporal trends in dissolved oxygen concentrations and dissolved oxygen depletion (hypoxia) in the Delaware River Basin Demonstration Area.
Observing and Forecasting Systems for Water Quality Alan Blumberg 1 and Eugenia Naranjo 2 1 Stevens Institute of Technology 2 EPA Region II May 13, 2008.
Sensing Security— Advances in Water-Quality Monitoring Glenn G. Patterson U.S. Geological Survey.
ET ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES ET - ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES OPK - Oil Spill Protection Kit  Spills can happen in the open sea, close to shores, or.
 How are the data used  New data collection technologies  New ways to make the data available.
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Overview of Continuous Water-Quality Monitoring. Purpose of Monitoring Define the objectives of the water quality monitoring project 1. Environmental.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Methodology for Environmental monitoring of aquaculture.
1 NCR Water Security Monitoring Network In the NCR Presented by Jim Shell Principal Water Resources Planner Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey British Geological Survey 175th Anniversary.
Japan Tsunami Marine Debris: Information and Action May 17 th, 2012 Marine Resource Committee Science Fair, Long Beach, WA Washington State Emergency Management.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
UNCW Ocean Observing: Providing Infrastructure, Data, and Products to Support State and Federal Agency Needs AQUARIUS NOAA’s Undersea Research Center (NIUST,
LOGO Feasibility Test of Applying Complex Remediation Technology for Diesel Contamination in Soil and Groundwater 2012 International Conference on Environmental.
Spills/Incident Management Monitoring, Mapping and Contingency Planning Jerry Schulte, Manager Source Water Protection and Emergency Response for ORSANCO.
Continuous Water-Quality Field Methods Micelis Doyle & Joe Rinella U.S. Geological Survey &
Water quality and river plume monitoring in the Great Barrier Reef: an overview of methods based on ocean colour satellite data Michelle Devlin 1, Caroline.
1 Application of Surface-water Modeling System (SMS) on River Stream: A Case Study in Brantas River Mohammad Sholichin (1), Faridah Othman (2) (1) Lecturer,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
REDUCING DISASTER RISK THROUGH EFFECTIVE USE OF EARTH OBSERVATIONS Helen M. Wood Chair, U.S. Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction August.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
OHHI Beach Modeling Group Meeting March 23, 2006 GLERL, Ann Arbor, MI Project Summary Project Title: Predicting Pathogen Fate in the Great Lakes Coastal.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
OPRC-HNS Technical Group International Maritime Organization.
BP Oil Spill Response US EPA Roles and Activities.
Automated Continuous Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in the Blackstone River at the Massachusetts-Rhode Island State Line U.S. Geological Survey.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Monitoring and Modelling in the Malé Declaration Kevin Hicks Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), UK Bangkok, March 2008 Malé Declaration 6 th Monitoring.
Managing aquatic systems using in-situ sensor technologies Background: Lakes and rivers are used for a range of ecosystem services including supply of.
James S. Ellis National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) OFCM Special Session Atmospheric.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Incident Command Tool for Protecting Drinking Water (ICWater) Doug Ryan USDA Forest Service Olympia, WA.
Pollution and Monitoring
USGS Response to Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill USGS/NWS/COE Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting October 5-6, 2010 Brainerd, MN George Arcement, Jr. Louisiana.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
A. Hangan, L. Vacariu, O. Cret, H. Hedesiu Technical University of Cluj-Napoca A Prototype for the Remote Monitoring of Water Parameters.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
Maine DEP Division of Response Services Peter Blanchard, Director Division of Response Services Maine Department of Environmental Protection MAINE DEPARTMENT.
Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.
Water quality sensors provide insight into the suspended solids dynamics during high flow events in the Lamprey River, NH Nicholas K. Shonka and William.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
The office is independent of, but funded by the ACT Government State of ACT Water Presentation for AUSSI water workshop Becky Smith Senior Manager Office.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
In Situ Burning Mark Gregory – USCG Eleventh District Response Advisory Team Response Advisory Team.
OPRC Level 3 The Contingency Planning Process. OPRC Level 3.
FISHERIES POSTER SESSION
Babes-Bolyai University, RO - General and scientific background -
A. low levels of salt B. low levels of arsenic
Welcome to the Gulf Of Mexico Disaster Response Center
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
EXPANDED UNDERWATER ROBOTICS READY FOR OIL SPILL
David Herring (NOAA) Ed Laine (Bowdoin College)
Puget Sound Seabird Survey and Early On-Scene Oil Reconnaissance
Presentation transcript:

NW Area Committee Meeting Region 10 Regional Response Team October 7 th, 2014 Jami Goldman and Joseph Rinella

So why is USGS interested in Oil Spills? Work coincides closely with our Mission Areas Assessing Hazards to Ecosystems and Reducing Losses Identifying Environmental Risk to Public Health Assessing the Quantity and Quality of Water for meeting future needs Understanding Ecosystems and Predicting Ecosystem Change

Columbia River Oil Monitoring 1.Need early detection of a spill event 2.Need to quickly respond to leaks and spill events (including nights, weekends, and holidays—i.e. 24/7) 3. Need a mobile sensor to track a spill event -- Determine direction and time of travel -- Monitor in sensitive areas -- Identify and predict the duration of time of the post spill events

Stream Velocity in Columbia River at Beaver Army Terminal, WY 2013

Estimate of oil plume 4 hours after spill at Beaver Army Terminal (RM 54) Beaver Army Terminal Spill Location RM miles upstream after 4 hours at -2 ft/sec RM miles down- stream after 4 hours at 4-5 ft/sec RM 42 Down- stream Columbia River

Columbia Reach Impacted by Spill Beaver Army Terminal PLUME

USGS Continuous WQ Monitors USGS operates continuous WQ monitors across the country USGS operates over 200 sites in Oregon (streamflow, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, turbidity, TDG, chlorophyll, blue-green algae, FDOM, and/or nitrate) Follow strict USGS protocols Provides continuous data for real-time management of water resources by our cooperating agencies. Columbia River at Bonneville Dam, photo U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Water Temperature About 110 Continuous Temperature Monitors

Use of Continuous Oil Monitor Data Early detection system – WaterAlert Triggering emergency response and sample collection Estimating concentrations of unmeasured constituents Providing data for modeling plume movement Assessing water quality Detecting temporal variations Increasing process-based knowledge of rivers Kalamazoo River Oil Spill, 2010, USGS photos

Oil Monitoring Many hydrocarbon sensors are available (Wetlabs, ECO, AquaTracka, Turner Designs) Dynamic range of detection limits, and wavelength configurations Low detection limits ~300ppb Sensor responses are linear over a range of concentrations Sensors work well for tracking floating oil in the water column, (best for light crude oils—e.g. Bakken oil) Deepwater Horizon, USGS

Path Forward Assess needs and funding for Columbia River -- Types of oils transported in the Region Propose continued investigations – Confounding effects with interferences – Understanding behavior and fate of oil – Investigate coal contaminant tracking Sensor data may be used for model development (for example, time of travel tracer studies for tracking plumes) Complimentary/supplementary sensors – Particle size tracking – Hydroacoustics – Turbidity Columbia River, USGS photo

Jami Goldman, Biologist Northwest Carbon Center, Project Coordinator References Wagner, R., et al., Guidelines and Standard Procedures for Continuous Water-Quality Monitors: Station Operation, Record Computation, and Data Reporting, pubs.usgs.gov/tm2006/tm1D3/. Conmy, R. et al., Submersible Optical Sensors Exposed to Chemically Dispersed Crude Oil: Wave Tank Simulations for Improved Oil Spill Monitoring, ES&T, 48 (3), USGS Contacts James Crammond, Center Director Joe Rinella, Supervisory Hydrologist Stewart Rounds, Hydrologist/Water Quality Modeler Chauncey Anderson, Water Quality Specialist

SMART plan Tier I: A trained observer, flying over the oil slick and using photographic job aids or advanced remote sensing instruments, assesses dispersant efficacy and reports back to the Unified Command. Tier II: Tier II provides real-time data from the treated slick. A sampling team on a boat uses a monitoring instrument to continuously monitor for dispersed oil 1 meter under the dispersant-treated slick. The team records and conveys the data to the Scientific Support Team, which forwards it, with recommendations, to the Unified Command. Water samples are also taken for later analysis at a laboratory. Tier III: By expanding the monitoring efforts in several ways, Tier III provides information on where the dispersed oil goes and what happens to it. Two instruments are used on the same vessel to monitor at two water depths. Monitoring is conducted in the center of the treated slick at several water depths, from 1 to 10 meters. A portable water laboratory provides data on water temperature, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. In Situ Burning For in situ burning operations, SMART recommends deploying one or more monitoring teams downwind of the burn, at sensitive locations such as population centers. The teams begin sampling before the burn begins to collect background data. After the burn starts, the teams continue sampling for particulate concentration trends, recording them both manually at fixed intervals and automatically in the data logger, and reporting to the Monitoring Group Supervisor if the level of concern is exceeded. The Scientific Support Team forwards the data, with recommendations, to the Unified Command.