ARIADNE is funded by the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme The ARIADNE project Advanced Research Infrastructure for Archaeological Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
Advertisements

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Common Assessment Framework for Adults Demonstrator Site Programme Event to Support Expressions of Interest.
CORDIS presentation at the 2 nd Istria Economic Forum 31st March 2009 Official source of information on the 7th Framework Programme! CORD IS CORDIS: The.
EU-funded Digital Preservation Research APA 2014 Conference Brussels, 22 October 2014 Dr. Manuela Speiser European Commission DG CONNECT, unit "Creativity"
Cultural Content and Digital Heritage Bernard Smith European Commission INFSO/D2.
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Welcome to the Conference !! Juan Bicarregui Chair, APA Executive.
Digital Collections: Use, Value and Impact Lorna Hughes University of Wales Chair in Digital Collections, National Library of Wales Aberystwth University.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Open Data Towards a European Open Data Ecospace v Abu Dhabi, 28 April 2014.
DEVELOPMENT OF A EUROPEAN NETWORK OF LIBRARIES Hans Geleijnse Director of Library and IT Services & CIO Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Antonia P. Recchia Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Activity Objectives of ERA-NET for coordination of European Research on Cultural Heritage 8 th EC.
Scenarios and models for Training Pilots Andrey Ruskov Petko Ruskov, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”
Preservation and Long-term access through Networked Services Adam Farquhar, The British Library iPres2006 Cornell University, October 2006.
Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting Higher and Further Education Development of an Information Environment for UK Learning and Teaching NOF-Digitise.
‘european digital library’ (EDL) Julie Verleyen TEL-ME-MOR / M-CAST Seminar on Subject Access Prague, 24 November 2006.
1 Workshop on Metadata Interoperability for Electronic Records Management November 15, 2001 Archives II, College Park, MD.
First part: Objectives (15 minutes) Second part: Work groups (20 minutes) Third part: Proposal of work groups (10 minutes) REPORT OF WORK METHODOLOGY.
Intute and Organic.Edunet Jackie Wickham ALLCU, Oxford, July 2008.
CEN/ISSS DC workshop, January The UK approach to subject gateways Rachel Heery UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is.
Mary Rowlatt AccessIT Project Coordinator MDR Partners
The Potentials and Limitations of Coastal Web Atlases Valerie Cummins, Director Coastal Zone ‘07, Oregon.
15/11/2011EVA Minerva Jerusalem1 Linked Heritage : Coordination of standards and technologies for the enrichment of Europeana Marie-Véronique Leroi Ministry.
Metadata, the CARARE Aggregation service and 3D ICONS Kate Fernie, MDR Partners, UK.
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
Consolidating the European Library Space Luxembourg November 1999.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
ENABLER, BLARK, what’s next? Steven Krauwer Utrecht University / ELSNET.
December 2010iTEC - Designing the future classroom1 אלף כיתות משתתפות במיזם לעיצוב כיתת הלימוד העתידית – iTEC דב וינר iTEC – Designing the future classroom.
Mary Rowlatt AccessIT Project Coordinator MDR Partners
The Knowledge Exchange Presentation to CNI April 2005 Bas Cordewener, SURF Sigrun Eckelmann, DFG Norman Wiseman, JISC.
34 th IAMSLIC Conference, September, Suva Fiji Access to Pacific marine information for the Pacific Islands Countries and Territories Panel Discussion.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web services Interoperability for Geospatial decision.
Using Joinup as a catalogue for interoperability solutions March 2014 PwC EU Services.
Integrated Projects & Networks of Excellence Examples in IST.
Publications Office Metadata Registry (MDR) INSPIRE Registry and Registers Workshop Willem van Gemert Publications Office of the EU Dissemniation and Reuse.
European Commission - DG Research - Directorate B – “Structuring the European Research Area” Jean-David MALO – Bucharest, February 12-13, NOT LEGALLY.
1 Direction scientifique Networks of Excellence objectives  Reinforce or strengthen scientific and technological excellence on a given research topic.
A Data Category Registry- and Component- based Metadata Framework Daan Broeder et al. Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics LREC 2010.
The MICHAEL Project is funded under the European Commission eTEN Programme The multilingual catalogue of digital cultural heritage in Europe.
17th January 2003Essex County Council DIP meeting 2 / 8 Mary Rowlatt, Strategic Information Manager January 17th 2003 E-government ESSEX COUNTY COUNCIL.
Archiving microdata Standards and good practices United Nations Statistics Commission New York, February 26, 2009 Olivier Dupriez World Bank, Development.
The DEER The Distributed European Electronic Resource.
Fourth IABIN Council Meeting Support to Building the Inter-American Biodiversity Information Network.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
Open Archive Forum Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
Metadata and eGovernment The Danish Approach and Experience Palle Aagaard National IT and Telecom Agency, Denmark ERPANET training Seminar September 3-5,
Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Cultural Heritage in Tomorrow ’s Knowledge Society Claude Poliart Project Officer Cultural Heritage.
2004 National Spatial Data Infrastructure Cooperative Agreements Program (CAP) Category 1 - Metadata Implementation Assistance (13) Category 2 – Metadata.
Open Science and Research – Services for Research Data Management © 2014 OKM ATT 2014–2017 initiative Licenced under.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
1 Open Discovery Space Overview Argiris Tzikopoulos, Ellinogermaniki Agogi Open Discovery Space [CIP-ICT-PSP ][elearning] A socially-powered and.
PARTHENOS-project.eu EOSC market demand for art, humanties and cultural heritage Amsterdam– EGI Conference– 7/4/2016 Franco Niccolucci Scientific Coordinator,
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
The European Transport Research Alliance - ETRA Prof. G. A. Giannopoulos Chairman, ETRA.
MICHAEL and the European Digital Library: promoting teaching, learning and research The MICHAEL Project is funded under the European Commission eTEN Programme.
Linked Open Data Approaches within the ARIADNE project
An Overview of Data-PASS Shared Catalog
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Integrating Data for Archaeology
Davor Kozmus, MHEST Steering Platform Meeting 29. October 2009, Zagreb
Christian Ansorge Arona, 09/04/2014
Eurostat D2 – Regional Indicators and Geographical Information
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
BUILDING A DIGITAL REPOSITORY FOR LEARNING RESOURCES
Bird of Feather Session
Increasing Preparedness Capacities across the Mediterranean - IPCAM 2 Luigi D’Angelo Italian Civil Protection Department Brussels, 18 January 2017.
Presentation transcript:

ARIADNE is funded by the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme The ARIADNE project Advanced Research Infrastructure for Archaeological Data Networking in Europe Franco Niccolucci PIN Project Coordinator Franco Niccolucci PIN Project Coordinator

What is ARIADNE ARIADNE is a Research Infrastructure aiming at the integration of archaeological datasets in Europe Four years’ duration Starting 1 st February partners Coordinated by PIN-U. of Florence (IT) ARIADNE is a Research Infrastructure aiming at the integration of archaeological datasets in Europe Four years’ duration Starting 1 st February partners Coordinated by PIN-U. of Florence (IT)

The ARIADNE Partnership Coordinator Partner Associate

Why ARIADNE Huge number of archaeological data available in digital format Large number of non-communicating archaeological datasets Increasing interest of the research community for data sharing, both passive (“access”) and active (“provide”) Social pressure for opening data vaults Huge number of archaeological data available in digital format Large number of non-communicating archaeological datasets Increasing interest of the research community for data sharing, both passive (“access”) and active (“provide”) Social pressure for opening data vaults

Project Goals Enable sharing, accessing, using and re-using archaeological datasets Overcome fragmentation Foster dataset interoperability Establish accepted standards and common protocols (e.g. for the quality of digital replicas) Enable resource discovery and faceted searches Explore new methods Create useful tools for searching and browsing Connect, not assemble Enable sharing, accessing, using and re-using archaeological datasets Overcome fragmentation Foster dataset interoperability Establish accepted standards and common protocols (e.g. for the quality of digital replicas) Enable resource discovery and faceted searches Explore new methods Create useful tools for searching and browsing Connect, not assemble

Project Activities Networking: establishing collaboration among archaeologists to overcome fragmentation Collecting, recording and providing information on – What is available  The Project Registry – What is going on  Liaisons and Cooperation – What needs to be done  The Project Innovation Plan Training on innovation Joint Research on – Standardization of metadata and reference works (thesauri, gazetteers, authority lists) – Tools for data access and services – Data lifecycle: acquisition, management, long-term preservation – New methodological tools Networking: establishing collaboration among archaeologists to overcome fragmentation Collecting, recording and providing information on – What is available  The Project Registry – What is going on  Liaisons and Cooperation – What needs to be done  The Project Innovation Plan Training on innovation Joint Research on – Standardization of metadata and reference works (thesauri, gazetteers, authority lists) – Tools for data access and services – Data lifecycle: acquisition, management, long-term preservation – New methodological tools

The ACDM The ARIADNE Catalog Data Model (ACDM) aims at describing datasets, services, and resources in the archaeological domain – So far it addresses databases, collections, thesauri, with plans for covering all relevant resource types Based on DCAT (W3C recomm.) and other widespread ontologies Data collected into a registry, using a data acquisition tool To be used internally to support integration design Conceived to became a publicly available service and to be extended to other domains (e.g. conservation/restoration/management) The ARIADNE Catalog Data Model (ACDM) aims at describing datasets, services, and resources in the archaeological domain – So far it addresses databases, collections, thesauri, with plans for covering all relevant resource types Based on DCAT (W3C recomm.) and other widespread ontologies Data collected into a registry, using a data acquisition tool To be used internally to support integration design Conceived to became a publicly available service and to be extended to other domains (e.g. conservation/restoration/management)

20 countries 24 languages 1,500,000+ database records 40,000+ grey literature files 20 countries 24 languages 1,500,000+ database records 40,000+ grey literature files Overview of Partners’ Datasets 38% DBMS 20% Structured data (datasets) 9%Collections 9%Multimedia 9% Sparse files 15% GIS

Metadata Schemas There is great disorder under heaven, the situation is excellent Eight partners (SND, KNAW-DANS, DISCOVERY, MiBAC-ICCU, INRAP, ADS, CYI-STARC) have adopted formal metadata standards for their datasets. The metadata standards reported are: DDI, DataCite, MARC/UNIMARC, TriDAS, Dublin Core application profiles, INSPIRE, ISO 11915, CARARE, LIDO, CIDOC-CRM. Ten partners (ZRC SAZU, MiBAC-ICCU, ADS, AIAC, MNM-NOK, CYI-STARC, ARUP-CAS, ATHENA RC, NIAM-BAS) have developed proprietary metadata schemas for some of their datasets. However, all these can be mapped onto CIDOC-CRM. Four partners (DISCOVERY, INRAP, ARHEO, OAEW) reported some datasets for which a metadata definition is not currently available but could be derived from the database structure. There is great disorder under heaven, the situation is excellent Eight partners (SND, KNAW-DANS, DISCOVERY, MiBAC-ICCU, INRAP, ADS, CYI-STARC) have adopted formal metadata standards for their datasets. The metadata standards reported are: DDI, DataCite, MARC/UNIMARC, TriDAS, Dublin Core application profiles, INSPIRE, ISO 11915, CARARE, LIDO, CIDOC-CRM. Ten partners (ZRC SAZU, MiBAC-ICCU, ADS, AIAC, MNM-NOK, CYI-STARC, ARUP-CAS, ATHENA RC, NIAM-BAS) have developed proprietary metadata schemas for some of their datasets. However, all these can be mapped onto CIDOC-CRM. Four partners (DISCOVERY, INRAP, ARHEO, OAEW) reported some datasets for which a metadata definition is not currently available but could be derived from the database structure.

Research & Management Make datasets created for Management use – available – usable/useful for Research use Make tools and methods created for Research use – available – usable/useful for Management use Establish a common Agenda for Digital Archaeology Make datasets created for Management use – available – usable/useful for Research use Make tools and methods created for Research use – available – usable/useful for Management use Establish a common Agenda for Digital Archaeology

The (current) datasets lifecycle Archaeological Work (Field & Lab) Research Data Research Data Research Management Rescue excavations, Conservation, Restoration, Presentation Research Questions Management Data Management Data

The (interim) datasets lifecycle Archaeological Work (Field & Lab) Research Data Research Data Research Management Rescue excavations, Conservation, Restoration, Presentation Research Questions Management Data Management Data INTEROPERABILITY

The (ideal) datasets lifecycle Archaeological Work (Field & Lab) Research Data Research Data Research Management Rescue excavations, Conservation, Restoration, Presentation Research Questions Management Data Management Data Archaeological Data Archaeological Data

Examples of Collaboration Mapping the metadata schema and the thesauri of ICCD (Italian Central Institute of MIBAC for Catalogue and Documentation) to ARIADNE standards to achieve future interoperability with SIGEC Accessing “grey” literature, e.g. excavation reports (UK) Using ARIADNE visual tools for virtual restoration Mapping the metadata schema and the thesauri of ICCD (Italian Central Institute of MIBAC for Catalogue and Documentation) to ARIADNE standards to achieve future interoperability with SIGEC Accessing “grey” literature, e.g. excavation reports (UK) Using ARIADNE visual tools for virtual restoration

A Potential for Collaboration Incorporate the EAC Agenda in the ARIADNE Innovation Plan Share expertise on standards and data management Support other activities of common interest Develop pilot applications Propose new ambits for research of special interest for EAC Establish cooperation agreements with individual national institutions – often, but not necessarily, involving also a local research institution Establish overall cooperation at European level Incorporate the EAC Agenda in the ARIADNE Innovation Plan Share expertise on standards and data management Support other activities of common interest Develop pilot applications Propose new ambits for research of special interest for EAC Establish cooperation agreements with individual national institutions – often, but not necessarily, involving also a local research institution Establish overall cooperation at European level

Q&A  Will the ARIADNE data infrastructure be accessible by anybody?  YES. Registration may be required to access some reserved data  How will ARIADNE protect sensible data?  Via “identity federation” of registered users. The access policy of each dataset will be jointly established with the data owner  Is the ARIADNE infrastructure designed for anybody?  NO. It is intended for professional use: researchers, professionals, practitioners, heritage managers etc.  Can anybody add a repository to the ARIADNE network?  NO. This must be done upon arrangement with ARIADNE to protect the integrity and quality of the data infrastructure. However, interesting datasets will be usually accepted.  Will the ARIADNE data infrastructure be accessible by anybody?  YES. Registration may be required to access some reserved data  How will ARIADNE protect sensible data?  Via “identity federation” of registered users. The access policy of each dataset will be jointly established with the data owner  Is the ARIADNE infrastructure designed for anybody?  NO. It is intended for professional use: researchers, professionals, practitioners, heritage managers etc.  Can anybody add a repository to the ARIADNE network?  NO. This must be done upon arrangement with ARIADNE to protect the integrity and quality of the data infrastructure. However, interesting datasets will be usually accepted.

Q&A  Will ARIADNE consider only archaeological datasets?  Officially, YES. But on a case-by-case decision  Why should we (ministry, heritage agency, university department, company) join ARIADNE?  For many good reasons, among others:  You will have a voice in a EU supported initiative and bring in your requirements  You will increase accessibility to your datasets  You will avail of the ARIADNE technology and services for free  Can we get support from ARIADNE?  Cash, NO. Services, YES: e.g. travel & subsistence costs for participating in meetings and for attending training. In special cases ARIADNE may fund a joint scholarship  Will ARIADNE consider only archaeological datasets?  Officially, YES. But on a case-by-case decision  Why should we (ministry, heritage agency, university department, company) join ARIADNE?  For many good reasons, among others:  You will have a voice in a EU supported initiative and bring in your requirements  You will increase accessibility to your datasets  You will avail of the ARIADNE technology and services for free  Can we get support from ARIADNE?  Cash, NO. Services, YES: e.g. travel & subsistence costs for participating in meetings and for attending training. In special cases ARIADNE may fund a joint scholarship

OK!  Good, we are convinced, what should we do now?  Contact me at either of the s below for a preliminary contact to discuss your participation:  Good, we are convinced, what should we do now?  Contact me at either of the s below for a preliminary contact to discuss your participation:

ARIADNE is a project funded by the European Commission under the Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, contract no. FP7- INFRASTRUCTURES The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Contact: ARIADNE is a project funded by the European Commission under the Community’s Seventh Framework Programme, contract no. FP7- INFRASTRUCTURES The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Contact: