1970 Lotus Europa Front Suspension Redesign ME 462 Capstone Design Spring 2007 Sponsor: Bishop Steering Technology Kel Tiedman, Jason Wou Tom Filipucci.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suspension Mechanisms
Advertisements

Getting there in comfort
STEERING SUSPENSION ALIGNMENT
SAE BAJA TEAM MEMBERS: CHAD CHANDLER JOE COFER NATHAN ERAMIAN
Suspension.
Alignment Fundamentals Part One
Wheel Alignment CASTER.
Team UDFSAE: Suspension Group
Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher
Moonbuggy Rear Suspension Analysis ME450: Computer-Aided Engineering Analysis Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI Instructor: Dr. Koshrow Nematollahi.
Nick Twombly Nathaniel Tyler Michael Haeuber Ng Kay Chong Matthew Haeuber Brian Watters Azim Nasser.
© Copyright 2011 Hunter Engineering Company Diagnostic Angles.
Why do cars need Alignment
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
Transportation Training Wheel Alignment Why Align the Wheels? Correct Wheel alignment is essential to vehicle safety.  Improve Handling Ability  Maximum.
Ashley Wyatt Xavier Thompson Matt Galles Bobby Costen Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher ODU FSAE Car.
Suspension Design Case Study
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
Team Members: Jarret Vian Bryan Rowley John Murray ME 191 Final Presentation Spring 2009.
Airbag Suspension Parameters for PBS
Fifth Wheel Test Machine Project Progress Group members: Jonathan Eckart Wayne Farley Rob Grace Chris Bozarth Academic advisor: Dr. Faryar Etesami.
Enhancement of a Vintage Muscle Car’s Suspension Jonathan Hoffman Advisor: Professor Bucinell
Dune Buggy Suspension and Steering Design
Ashley Wyatt Xavier Thompson Matt Galles Bobby Costen Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher ODU FSAE Car.
Ashley Wyatt Xavier Thompson Matt Galles Bobby Costen Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher ODU FSAE Car.
Suspension System Supports the weight. Provides a smooth ride.
Front Suspension Greg Habiak, Nicole Simon, Joe Vuto.
Suspension Systems Consumer Auto.
NASA moon buggy project
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals Chapter 60 Page 875.
McPherson Strut Service and Diagnosis
Basic Utility Vehicle (BUV) ME 462 Capstone Design Presentation Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI December 14, 2005 Presented by: Tom Peters.
A-1 ADM740, Appendix A, June 2007 Copyright  2007 MSC.Software Corporation APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ANALYSES.
Suspension D.J. Conroy.
1 Alpha 6.5: The Great Moonbuggy Race 2006 Russell Alberts Scott Coll Haison Nguyen Jason Zaloudek Sponsored by: CBU Department of Mechanical Engineering.
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Midterm Report.
Frame Trade Study Nathaniel Peza August 4, 2015.
Suspension Peter Morabito Michael Paliga Brian Ross Drivetrain Kenny Elliot Patrick Mooney Dylan Quinn Frame Dan D’Amico Curtis May Greg Schafran.
Front Suspension Systems
Team 14: The Design and Construction of an Ackerman-Steered Robot Members: Kyle Quinn Julio Sosa Robert Steel Trevor Woods.
A torsion bar is a spring that is a long, round, hardened steel bar similar to a coil spring except that it is a straight bar. Continued Figure 85–26 A.
Automotive Chassis Systems, 5/e By James D. Halderman Copyright © 2010, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1995 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ All.
Redesign of Lotus Europa Front Suspension ME 450: Finite Element Analysis Spring 2007 Presented by: Bart Sudhoff, Zachary Lightner, Jim Milligan, Brian.
Front Suspension Design Final Report Solomon Metcalf Kevin Beckford Jumaane Palmer Daniel Atsyor.
Front Suspension Design Final Report Solomon Metcalf Kevin Beckford Daniel Atsyor.
WyoBaja 2011 SAE Mini Baja Competition Team Leader Suspension Frame
Chapter 25 Wheel Alignment. Objectives Define the term “wheel alignment” Inspect tires, steering, and suspension systems before alignment Check and adjust.
By : Rohini H M USN : 2VX11LVS19.  This system includes sensors for measuring vehicle speed; steering input; relative displacement of the wheel assembly.
The Suspension System Dampers Strut Assembly.
SAE Baja - Front Suspension Team
Design of an Off-Road Front Suspension and Steering System
Automotive Steering, Suspension and Alignment, 5/e By James D. Halderman Copyright © 2010, 2008, 2004, 2000, 1995 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle.
Steering &Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670
FIGURE 18.1 A pull is usually defined as a tug on the steering wheel toward one side or the other.
Angles and Protractors
Mini Baja Suspension Design
APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ANALYSES
Suspension System Supports the weight. Provides a smooth ride.
Mini Baja Suspension Design
The Design and Construction of an Ackerman-Steered Robot
Duct Insulation Attachment Team
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
U of I Clean Snowmobile Front Suspension Model
Chapter 47 Wheel Alignment.
Mini Baja Suspension Design
Moonbuggy ME Capstone Design Project SP 2006
Suspension Systems - 2 Topics covered in this presentation:
Presentation transcript:

1970 Lotus Europa Front Suspension Redesign ME 462 Capstone Design Spring 2007 Sponsor: Bishop Steering Technology Kel Tiedman, Jason Wou Tom Filipucci Frank Faulkenberg Brian Schludecker David Giles Team Members May 3, 2007

Project Background 1970 Lotus Europa 1470cc, 4-cylinder engine producing 78 hp 120 mph top speed 13-inch wheels 2-piece control arms Stamped & welded Bolt-on ball joints Coil-over shock & spring arrangement

Customer Requirements Maintain suspension geometry Provide stable 200 mph ride Maintain 5 inch ride height Utilize 15 inch Audi wheels Utilize current frame mounting points Maintain wheel-to-wheel dimension Attempt to utilize stock shock and spring size Minimal bodywork modifications

Engineering Targets Engineering RequirementsTargetUnits Scrub Radius10mm Roll Center Height50-100mm Car Ride Height5in Anti-Dive25% Steering Axis Inclination7deg Caster Angle4deg Camber Angle-0.5deg Caster Trail15-35mm

Final Design

Upper Arm = 5.60 in Lower Arm = in Scrub = 10 mm Steering Axis = 16.5º Rotor Clearance = 0.69 in

Design Animation

Design Evaluation Suspension Analysis Four-bar Mechanism

Design Evaluation “Fourbar” Program – Norton Evaluate each control arm length iteration Rough wheel motion “Four-bar Mechanism” - Matlab Quantitative wheel motion ProEngineer Mechanism output to Excel “Camber Curve” - Matlab Camber curve comparison

Design Evaluation Iteration Method 2 Iteration Sets First Set – 11 possibilities Manipulated Variables Scrub radius Steering axis Second Set – 6 possibilities Same Variables Smaller scrub radii Larger steering axes

Design Evaluation Case 5: Steering Axis – 16.5° Scrub radius – 10.0 mm Upper arm – 5.60 in Lower arm – in Case 1: Steering Axis – 16.0° Scrub radius – 11.0 mm Upper arm – 5.70 in Lower arm – in

Design Evaluation

FEA Results

Final Evaluation Engineering RequirementsTargetResultGoal Met Scrub Radius10 mm Roll Center Height mm50.8 mm Car Ride Height5 in Anti-Dive25% Steering Axis Inclination7º16.5º Caster Angle4º12º Camber Angle-0.5º Caster Trail15-35 mm25 mm

Conclusion & Recommendations Conclusion Kinematic motion requirements met Verified some physical packaging requirements Recommendations Further finalization of arm shapes In-depth finite element analysis Close examination of control arms and knuckle attachment One team for knuckle/brake and suspension design

Questions?