Application of PROCOMAP – Case Study of Mancherial Forest Division, Adilabad Indu K. Murthy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Carbon sequestration: Forest and soil objective of the presentation is to give a general picture on possibilities to achieve standard for accounts for.
Advertisements

Copernicus Institute Sustainable Development and Innovation GHG balances (and costs); integrating energy, products and forests IEA Bio-energy Task 38 Conference.
Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation of Rhizoma Perennial Peanut and Bahiagrass Grown under Elevated CO 2 and Temperature Leon H. Allen, ARS-FL.
Assessing, Measuring, and Monitoring Carbon Sequestration from Changes in Land Management Sandra Brown Winrock International Regional.
Czech Rural Development Programme for forestry.
STRATEGY & METHODS FOR ESTIMATING & PROJECTING CARBON STOCK CHANGES zGOAL: To estimate carbon benefits from forestry mitigation projects yC-stock change.
An Introduction to Carbon Modelling Developing Forestry and Bioenergy Projects within CDM Quito, Ecuador March, 2004.
Economic efficiency criteria n Static efficiency – Maximize net benefits of one optimal rotation n Dynamic efficiency – Maximize net benefits from continuous.
Assessment of Soil Carbon in Forests, Plantations and Wastelands Dr. M.N.Jha Forest Research Institute Dehra Dun Workshop on “ Forestry and Climate Change.
Opportunities to Increase Carbon Sequestration Through Forestry Richard A. Birdsey USDA Forest Service Global Change Research Program Senate Agriculture.
Optimal rotation age (ORA) Dynamic optimization problem Long discussed in economic literature Shorter rotation – benefit arrives earlier – earlier replanting.
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
IMPROVING LUCF GHG INVENTORY and the FAO FRA: the Philippine Case Rodel D. Lasco Environmental Forestry Programme University of the Philippines.
Carbon and forest management Robert Matthews Forest Research Biometrics, Surveys and Statistics Division Alice Holt Research Station, Farnham.
Biomass Carbon Neutrality in the Context of Forest-based Fuels and Products Al Lucier, NCASI Reid Miner, NCASI
Community-based investment in commercial plantation forestry Mike Howard Fractal Forest AFRICA Water & Forestry Support Programme
HFT 2401 Chapter 11 Property, Equipment and Other Assets.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Potential Wood Supply in Swiss.
Baseline Methodology ARNMB0010 Xiaoquan Zhang and Bernhard Schlamadinger.
1 Methodologies of Carbon Estimation By Zahabu, E & Malimbwi, R.E Department of Forest Mensuration and Management (SUA)
Methods for Developing Baseline Scenario and Estimating Carbon Stocks Indu K. Murthy.
Operations Management: Financial Dimensions
Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration: Baselines, Supply Curves, Monitoring and Pilot Projects John Kadyszewski Winrock International September 30, 2003 West.
F7 and FORCLIMIT PROJECTS: The Tropical Forestry and Global Climate Change Research Network Forestry Mitigation Carbon Potential and Costs: Brazil, China,
FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS Project Level Carbon Accounting Toolkit CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products Department of Forestry, Australian National University.
SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF AREA BURNED ON GOALS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT Jimmie Chew, RMRS Christine Stalling, RMRS Barry Bollenbacher, Region One.
Assessing Investment & Financial flows for Mitigation in the FORESTRY Sector UNDP I&FF Methodology Guidebook: Mitigation.
InVEST Tier 1 Carbon Model. In the Tier 1 model we estimate carbon stock as a function of land use / land cover. Storage indicates the mass of carbon.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE year old Loblolly Pine plantation.
Analytical Tools Marginal Discounted cash flow Benefit-cost Supply-demand.
CDM A/R Investors' and Developers' Workshop, Beijing 2010 CDM Afforestation/Reforestation Projects: International workshop for developers and investors.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
METHODS AND GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION PROJECTS UNDER CDM Indu K. Murthy Indian Institute of Science.
Avoided Deforestation through Carbon trading in Buffer Zones of Protected Areas in Northern Lao PDR Pilot Activities and Research in the Lao-German Program.
Methodologies for Moldova Soil Conservation project ARNM0007 Rama Chandra Reddy July 12, 2005.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
IBRD Bio-Carbon Fund Project (TF056658) Facilitating Reforestation for Guangxi Watershed Management in Pearl River Basin, China XIANG Dongyun Professor,
AIT Case Study 2: Afforestation & Reforestation Project Sudhir Sharma, AIT.
Adaptation to CC in African Forests UNDP Accra. Forest Model Climate Outcome Emission Scenario Timber Response Carbon Response Economic Outcome Ecosystem.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
F7 and FORCLIMIT PROJECTS: The Tropical Forestry and Global Climate Change Research Network Forestry Mitigation Carbon Potential and Costs: Brazil, China,
BREAKING BARRIERS FOR A&R PROJECTS IN AGROFORESTRY R C DHIMAN WIMCO SEEDLINGS LTD. KASHIPUR ROAD, RUDRAPUR, UA.
Fig. 10-4, p. 193 Support energy flow and chemical cycling Reduce soil erosion Absorb and release water Purify water and air Influence local and regional.
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,
Integrated And Participatory Approach To Revegetate Village Ecosystems In Karnataka For Carbon Sink Enhancement And Biodiversity Conservation Through Sustained.
Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to Climate Change and Forests Overview of Opportunities for Research and Collaboration Relevant to.
Biomass and carbon stock changes in regenerating forests under JFM Dr. P. Sudha Centre for Ecological Sciences Indian Institute of Science Bangalore –
WP coordinator meeting June 17/ WP3 progress report.
F7 and FORCLIMIT PROJECTS: The Tropical Forestry and Global Climate Change Research Network Climate Change Mitigation: Role of Forests and Forestry Projects.
TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY MODEL Improved Cultivation Technique for High- yielding Bamboo Stands for Industrial Pulp and Paper Production INTERNATIONAL NETWORK.
Overview of a model to estimate the GHG balance of the New Zealand forest industry 22 March 2004 Isabel Loza-Balbuena PhD candidate School of Forestry.
Economic valuation of energy-wood plantations in Northern-Madagascar 7 th International Scientific Conference on Energy and Climate Change 2014 Kostis.
Tool for ex-ante estimation of forestry CERs – "TARAM"
Carbon Markets and Carbon Crediting For Forestry West and Central Africa Tropical Forest Investment Forum – August 28 th to 30 th 2007 Timothy Pearson.
Implementation of Forest Management Planning in forest inventories Project financed by the European Union.
FORESTRY MITIGATION PROJECTS & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Prof. N. H. Ravindranath Indian Institute of Science.
Forest Carbon Calculator Forest Carbon Reporting Initiative of USAID’s Global Climate Change Program Nancy Harris, Winrock International Sandra Brown,
Forest Carbon Calculator Forest Carbon Reporting Initiative of USAID’s Global Climate Change Program.
CLASSIFIED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS MR. MOHAMMED BABIKER - SPRING-15/16 Chapter4 5–15–1.
CARBON LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BIOENERGY CROPS PLANTED IN THE MARGINAL SITES IN LOWER MISSISSIPPI ALLUVIAL VALLEY K.C. Dipesh1, Michael.
Long-term Assets
Carbon sequestration by Forest and soil
REDD+ Project Area Juniperus-Podocarpus Acacia-Comiphora woodland.
Session 6: Forest accounting
Indu K. Murthy Indian Institute of Science
West Virginia University
Harvesting Early Good or Bad?
Don O’Connor NBB Sustainability Workshop September 27, 2018
Presentation transcript:

Application of PROCOMAP – Case Study of Mancherial Forest Division, Adilabad Indu K. Murthy

Objectives Present a case study of application of PROCOMAP model Data Requirement Sources of Data Method or Approach Data Inputs Data Outputs

Land Use Pattern in Mancherial Forest Division Land UseArea in 1996 (ha) Area in 2000 (ha) Geographic area Forest area Dense forest Open forest Scrub Blanks

Afforestation and Reforestation in Mancherial Forest Division

Baseline Scenario Area under forest in 1996 & in 2000 Projected to increase during 2000 to 2012, if funding available and decrease if no funding Afforestation rate in 1996 – very low & in 2000 – high, 2290 ha afforested Projected to increase/decrease during 2000 to 2012, depending on funding

Project Scenario Land category Total area (ha) Mitigation activity Propose d area (ha) Phasing (No. of years) Scrub24395Natural regeneration Blanks8560Short rotation plantation Long rotation plantation 34245

Project Boundary

Data Needs, Source & Methods for Baseline DataSource / Approach Land use- Forest Department Potential area- Scrubs and Blanks Afforestation rates- Forest Department C-stocks- AGB: Field studies (Plot Method) - BGB: Default ratio - Litter: Literature - Soil C: Field sampling and laboratory analysis Investment on blanks, scrub etc. - No dedicated expenditure Income from blanks, scrub etc. - Grass yield: 5 t of fresh grass - Shrubs (twigs): 1 t / ha/yr - Financial value: Rs. 750 (grass) + Rs. 500 (fuelwood)

Data Needs and Methods- Project Scenario Project activity Based on JFM patterns - Teak, secondary forest regeneration Multi-component & objective - Short rotation: FW, income - Long rotation: Timber, income - Sec forest reg.: BD, NTFP Area & rate of A&R - Based on past trends & barriers - Forest division selected as project boundary - Land categories allocated to project activities - Rate/phasing * Aim to afforest in 3 to 5 years * Feasible if investment funds available

Contd… Above Ground Biomass- Field studies in past A&R areas with similar climate and topography - Plot method - Teak, eucalyptus of different age selected, secondary regeneration Below Ground Biomass- Conversion factor Woody Litter- Marginal due to fuelwood extraction - 4 t/ha Soil Organic Carbon- Field sampling - Laboratory analysis Growth Rate- AGB (Teak plantation - BSL) divided by age - SOC (Teak plantation - BSL) divided by age

Financial Data: Costs and Benefits Establishment cost- Forest Department per ha data for 3 years * Land preparation, nursery, planting, gap filling etc. Protection and maintenance cost (Silvicultural practices) - Forest Department records Monitoring- Field studies Harvesting- Forest Department records Allocation of MAI to different components - Literature Outputs & Prices- Survey

Approach Select C-pools Estimate C-stock under baseline & project scenario Estimate C-stock change under project scenario Estimate annual & cumulative net C-stock change Net carbon benefit can be estimated for any selected period Benefit: Cost Discount cash flow analysis Change in C-stock under project scenario – Change in C-stock under baseline scenario

Data Input - Baseline DataUnitDetails Area suitable for the project HaScrub – Blanks – 8560 Phasing of projectYears1 to 5 AGBtons/haShort rotation: 0.87 Long rotation: 0.67 Regeneration: 0.87 BGBtons/haAGB/ha * 0.26 SOCtC/haDegraded lands to Investment CostRs/haNil BenefitsRs/ha1050

Data Inputs: Project Scenario Area (ha)Short rotation (Eucalyptus): 5136 Long rotation (Teak): 3424 Regeneration (Sec forest): MAI (AGB) (t/ha/yr) Short rotation (Eucalyptus): 9 Long rotation (Teak): 7.33 Regeneration (Sec forest): BGB (t/ha/yr)MAI (AGB) X 0.26 Litter (t/ha/yr)Literature SOC (tC/ha/yr)Short rotation (Eucalyptus): 0.3 Long rotation (Teak): 1 Regeneration (Sec forest): 1.2

Cost, Production & Benefit Details TeakEucalyptusNatural regeneration Y1Y2Y3Y1Y2Y3Y1Y2Y3 Initial cost Recurring cost Monitoring cost Monitoring every fifth year only Current prices of timber, pole and fuelwood

C-Stock Changes in Baseline No change in C-stock, remains constant

C-Stock Changes in Project Scenario ~ 41 t/ha accumulated ~ 3.5 t/ha/yr

Net Carbon Benefit ( )

Cost-Effectiveness Project activityInvestment cost (Rs) Life cycle cost (Rs) Per haPer tCPer haPer tC Long rotation Short rotation Natural regeneration Total

Project Level Carbon Benefits