Strengthening the Gopher Tortoise CCA Matt Hinderliter U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 21, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Lands for Wildlife WLFW. Focal Areas by Species.
Advertisements

Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
THE YAZOO DARTER : DISCUSSIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHY POPULATIONS STREAM ECOLOGY LAB, OXFORD, MS., SEPTEMBER , 2012 Daniel J. Drennen Mississippi.
Range-wide Conservation Strategy for the Gopher Tortoise (DRAFT)
Gopher Tortoise Minimum Viable Population and Minimum Reserve Size Workshop March 2013 Background Participants Process Findings Photo by Dirk J.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Fish, Wildlife & Marine Resources Briefing on Proposed Amendments to Endangered Species Regulations.
Management Plans Wildlife Conservation Wildlife Conservation.
Alexis A. Suazo Research Assistant Public Lands Institute University of Nevada Las Vegas.
Fire in Florida And Community Succession © Harold E. Malde.
“Pennsylvania Perspectives” Allegheny SAF Winter Meeting February 11, 2011 Dan Devlin, State Forester Conserving Penn’s Woods.
Population Dynamics. Case Study of the Peninsular Big Horn Sheep.
Gabrielle Horner U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region June 2012.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
Wildlife Learning Objectives Birds, Mammals, Amphibians and Reptiles Species Identification: Identify wildlife species common to NS and the.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Endangered Species Act
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
Populations and Home Range Relationships of the Box Turtle Emily Marquardt February 15, 2007 Emily Marquardt February 15, 2007.
Population Dynamics of the Northern Spotted Owl Reasons for Listing, Current Status, and Recovery Strategy May 8, 2014.
Preventing Endangered Species Listings with the Tongass Conservation Strategy Steve Brockmann U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.
STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR AN AFRICAN ELEPHANT ACTION PLAN An Overview.
404 Species Mega-petitioned from Center of Biological Diversity: Where are we now? Presented by: Channing St. Aubin US Fish and Wildlife Service Panama.
CSG West Energy and Environment Committee July 28, 2015 Dustin T. Miller Governor’s Office of Species Conservation.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Conservation Design and the Sagebrush Ecosystem Russell George Executive Director Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IN NEW BRUNSWICK. WHY MANAGE WILDLIFE? Provincial MANDATE to manage populations of all wild species, their habitats and use, for the.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
The Invasive Species Threat. The National Strategy and Implementation Plan for Invasive Species Management -Forests Out of Balance- The Impact of Invasive.
Proposed Action Purpose and Need A proposal to authorize, recommend, or implement an action in response to the need identified in the Purpose and Need.
1988 – Search for new landfill site began, 11 potential sites evaluated Balu Forest Acquisition and Management History 1997 – Site Echo purchased.
Biological Status Review for the Gray Wolf in Oregon and Evaluation of Delisting Criteria April 24, 2015 Russ Morgan Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Local Implementation Team Update Andrew Schock Longleaf Partnership Council Okefenokee/Osceola Longleaf Implementation Team April 25, 2013.
ASSESSING AND MANAGING WILDLAND RECREATIONAL DISTURBANCE Stephen J. DeMaso, Fidel Hernández, and Leonard A. Brennan Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute,
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
Forestry in the 2008 Farm Bill and Associated Federal Acts Craig McKinley NREM, OSU-Stillwater.
Fire in Florida. Themes l The Natural Role of Fire in Florida l Two Kinds of Fire in Florida l Prescribed Fire l Protecting Florida Homes from Fire.
Local Implementation Team Update Mark Hainds & Vernon Compton Longleaf Partnership Council April 8, 2014.
August 2009 Presented By: Tim Brodeur The Benefits of Keeping our Native Beauty Intact - Area IV Water Conservation Committee Model Native Plant Ordinance.
Federal Actions and Greater Sage-Grouse The Current Status: Proposed High Voltage Transmission Lines.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
America’s Longleaf Restoration Initiative 2013 Range-Wide Accomplishment Report Findings and Recommendations.
Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Wildlife What causes some species to become rare or extinct? How does management of rare, threatened, & endangered species.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
A New Currency for Conservation: Markets and Payments for Ecosystem Services from Our Nation’s Forests and Farms Featuring Special Sessions on Conservation.
Photo by Mike Danzenbaker.  Proposed rules to add Gunnison sage-grouse to the list of threatened and endangered species and designate critical habitat.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Land, Public and Private Chapter 10. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change.
Agriculture has an important role Well-managed livestock grazing and other traditional ranching practices are not considered major threats to sage-grouse.
Population Balance FLOW CHART Finish up yesterdays assignment Finish up yesterdays assignment Notes Notes.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Natural Ecosystems and Native Species. Natural Ecosystems and Communities  Multiple populations  Interaction between populations  Natural  Pre-Columbian.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 12, 2012 Randy Botta South Coast Region/Wildlife Program Bighorn Sheep in the Peninsular Mountains Photo by J.
Land, Public and Private. Human Activities Affecting Land and Environment  Extensive logging – mudslides  Deforestation – climate change  Paving –
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
Panther Reviews and Habitat Conservation Trust Resources South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Spencer Simon Trust Resources Supervisor.
County Forest - Overview Strategic Plan Silvicultural Operations Plan Trail Management Plan Volunteer Management Plan Emerald Ash Borer Management Plan.
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
Chapter 55 Conservation Biology.
Biodiversity, Conservation & Sustainability
Ology Conservation Biology.
Presentation transcript:

Strengthening the Gopher Tortoise CCA Matt Hinderliter U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service June 21, 2012

Initial Objectives from the Memorandum of Intent (pre-CCA) In the MOI the signatories agreed that: Gopher tortoise populations and habitat are in need of assistance Action is needed to improve gopher tortoise status range-wide Each party could benefit from reversing the declining trend in gopher tortoise populations

The Gopher Tortoise CCA: Why change it? The conservation strategy of the CCA: The landscape and local-level conservation actions are designed to be adaptable and implementable by all Parties in a collaborative environment… Information obtained from surveys and monitoring will increase the understanding of the gopher tortoise and its management needs. This knowledge will be applied using the concepts of adaptive management that periodically assess and modify conservation actions

The Gopher Tortoise CCA: Why change it? Change of status: the 12-month finding From population modeling efforts, we can draw two very general conclusions: First, gopher tortoise populations are likely to decline in the future under a wide array of demographic and environmental conditions that exist today. Second, gopher tortoise populations, although declining, and in some cases functionally extinct, will persist for 100 to 200 years. The effect of these may be that tortoises will be seen for long periods of time throughout their range, not because their populations are stable or increasing, but because they are long-lived.

The Gopher Tortoise CCA: Why change it? Change of status: the 12-month finding Range-wide Conservation Strategy For each of the 5 factors, identify and assign the following: Primary threats to the species Actions needed to address specific threats Other species that could benefit Policy/regulatory partners Implementation partners Leads (FWS & State agency) Due dates

Conservation Objectives and Action Plans Establish a consensus between research and management communities about defining proper surveying/monitoring techniques; and habitat management goals Identify, prioritize, and protect viable tortoise populations Increase the size and/or carrying capacity of those viable population areas through applied management, land acquisition, or incentives to adjacent landowners Maximize the amount of acreage appropriately maintained by prescribed fire Locate areas of “secondary priority” where re-stocking and restoration can most effectively be accomplished by creating large, contiguous tracts or habitat corridors Identify and reduce the factors negatively impacting juvenile tortoise recruitment Encourage the development and implementation of a model CCAA/HCP (preferably one that is state-wide and programmatic) that details effective conservation objectives and habitat management goals.

Status of the Species: What do we know now? Effectively assessing the status (i.e., whether it is increasing, decreasing, or stable) of the gopher tortoise throughout its range requires evaluation of: Distribution of populations How many tortoises/population How many populations Population demography Trends in population growth

CCA reporting framework Standardized reporting framework  Acres included by protection level  Acres managed and/or restored  Invasive exotics treated/eradicated  Population trends/survey results  Population manipulation  Research  Land conservation  Education and outreach  Legal protection measures

Threats to the species (5 factors) (A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (climate change, herbicides, road mortality, invasive species).

(A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; habitat fragmentation by roads (potentially causing road mortality, reproductive isolation, small and discontinuous populations, and edge effects such as increased predation) habitat destruction from activities such as urbanization, phosphate strip-mining, and sand extraction (potentially causing direct mortality and/or displacement of tortoises to undesirable habitats); habitat modification (either deliberately or from inattention), including conversion of longleaf pine forests to other silvicultural or agricultural habitats, shrub/hardwood encroachment (mainly from fire exclusion or insufficient fire management), and establishment and spread of invasive species (potentially causing the aforementioned indirect effects due to canopy closure and decline of available forage/groundcover).

(A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; habitat fragmentation by roads (potentially causing road mortality, reproductive isolation, small and discontinuous populations, and edge effects such as increased predation) habitat destruction from activities such as urbanization, phosphate strip-mining, and sand extraction (potentially causing direct mortality and/or displacement of tortoises to undesirable habitats); habitat modification (either deliberately or from inattention), including conversion of longleaf pine forests to other silvicultural or agricultural habitats, shrub/hardwood encroachment (mainly from fire exclusion or insufficient fire management), and establishment and spread of invasive species (potentially causing the aforementioned indirect effects due to canopy closure and decline of available forage/groundcover).

(A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; habitat fragmentation by roads (potentially causing road mortality, reproductive isolation, small and discontinuous populations, and edge effects such as increased predation) habitat destruction from activities such as urbanization, phosphate strip-mining, and sand extraction (potentially causing direct mortality and/or displacement of tortoises to undesirable habitats); habitat modification (either deliberately or from inattention), including conversion of longleaf pine forests to other silvicultural or agricultural habitats, shrub/hardwood encroachment (mainly from fire exclusion or insufficient fire management), and establishment and spread of invasive species (potentially causing the aforementioned indirect effects due to canopy closure and decline of available forage/groundcover).

Threats to the species (5 factors) (A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence (climate change, herbicides, road mortality, invasive species).

Standardized reporting framework  Acres included by protection level  Acres managed and/or restored  Invasive exotics treated/eradicated  Population trends/survey results  Population manipulation  Research  Land conservation  Education and outreach  Legal protection measures (A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (C) Disease or predation; (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence

(A)The present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; Acres included by protection level, Acres managed and/or restored, Invasive exotics treated/eradicated, Population trends/survey results, Research, Land conservation, Education and outreach (B) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; N/A (C) Disease or predation; Research, Invasive exotics treated/eradicated (if applicable) (D) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; Acres included by protection level, Population manipulation, Legal protection measures (E) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence New information from DOTs, Federal Highways?

Loss and alteration of gopher tortoise habitat from fire exclusion or fire suppression has a significant effect on survival of the gopher tortoise. Tortoise population life expectancy was shorter than normal in fire- suppressed savanna communities. Researchers recorded a decrease of 1.5 tortoises per hectare every 5 years on an unburned site for 16 years. Fire exclusion may reduce tortoise numbers by 60 to 80 percent in 8 years or 100 percent in 16 years. In south-central Florida, sandhill and scrubby flatwoods were abandoned by gopher tortoise after about 20 years of fire exclusion.

Some suggested amendments for the CCA: Incorporate the amendments from the 2012 Florida GT Management Plan

Fire returnMax. CanopyShrubHerb Communityinterval (years)Cover (%) Dry prairie >10 Upland pine1-350<10>50 Sandhill >25 Scrubby flatwoods Scrubvariable <5 Recommendations (preliminary) for 2012 FL GT Management Plan

Fire returnMax. CanopyShrubHerb Communityinterval (years)Cover (%) Dry prairie >10 Upland pine1-350<10>50 Sandhill >25 Scrubby flatwoods Scrubvariable <5 Recommendations (preliminary) for 2012 FL GT Management Plan

Fire returnMax. CanopyShrubHerb Communityinterval (years)Cover (%) Dry prairie >10 Upland pine1-350<10>50 Sandhill >25 Scrubby flatwoods Scrubvariable <5 Recommendations (preliminary) for 2012 FL GT Management Plan

Some suggested amendments for the CCA: Incorporate the amendments from the 2012 Florida GT Management Plan Increase the percentage of growing season prescribed fire (by acreage) (potential goal of burning more acres during the growing season vs. dormant season within 3-5 yrs?)

Some suggested amendments for the CCA: Incorporate the amendments from the 2012 Florida GT Management Plan Increase the percentage of growing season prescribed fire (by acreage) (potential goal of burning more acres during the growing season vs. dormant season within 3-5 yrs?) LTDS method, range-wide surveys every 10 years?

Some suggested amendments for the CCA: Incorporate the amendments from the 2012 Florida GT Management Plan Increase the percentage of growing season prescribed fire (by acreage) (potential goal of burning more acres during the growing season vs. dormant season within 3-5 yrs?) LTDS method, range-wide surveys every 10 years? Currently providing acreage estimates of permanently protected, short-term, and unprotected tortoise habitat: can we include previous years’ data to track trends?