Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Advertisements

Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
3D Target Simulations with Front Tracking/Ghost Fluid Method Wurigen Bo (Sept. 9, 2009) Brookhaven National Lab.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
1 3D Simulations for the Elliptic Jet W. Bo (Aug 12, 2009) Parameters: Length = 8cm Elliptic jet: Major radius = 0.8cm, Minor radius = 0.3cm Striganov’s.
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 17-19, 2008, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
1 Front End Capture/Phase Rotation & Cooling Studies David Neuffer Cary Yoshikawa December 2008.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Institutional Logo Here Harold G. Kirk DOE Review of MAP (FNAL August 29-31, 2012)1 The Front End Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Lab August 30, 2012.
Muons within Acceleration Acceptance Cuts at End of Transverse Cooling Channel TOWARDS A GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF THE MUON ACCELERATOR FRONT END H. K. Sayed,
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 31, 2015.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory Muon Meeting BNL January 26, 2004.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET. (From STUDY II to IDS120f geometries) NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (BNL)‏ ‏ 1.
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
K. McDonald NFMCC Collaboration Meeting Jan 14, The Capture Solenoid as an Emittance-Reducing Element K. McDonald Princeton U. (Jan. 14, 2010)
KT McDonald MAP Front End Meeting March 3, Finalizing the C- and Hg-Target Configurations for 6.75-GeV Proton Beams Present studies are for a carbon.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 17, 2015.
Proton Delivery to Target Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP 2012 Winter Meeting March 7, 2012.
FRONTEND DESIGN & OPTIMIZATION STUDIES HISHAM KAMAL SAYED BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY June 26, 2014 Collaboration: J. S. Berg - X. Ding - V.B. Graves.
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015.
Stephen Brooks / RAL / May 2004  Optimisation of the RAL Muon Front End Design.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 3, 2015.
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Program Collaboration Meeting Columbia University June 11, 2003.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Institutional Logo Here July 11, 2012 Muon Accelerator Program Advisory Committee Review (FNAL July 11-13, 2012)1 The Front End.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
Context of the Neutrino Factory Neutrino factory (2018) –4MW proton driver –p +   +   +  e + e  Linear e + e − collider (2014/5) –Leptons at 0.4.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
Simulation of High-Power Mercury Jet Targets for Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider R. Samulyak, 1,2 H.C. Chen, 1 H.G. Kirk, 2 K.T. McDonald 3 1 Stony.
1 Front End – gas-filled cavities David Neuffer May 19, 2015.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer December 4, 2014.
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
IDS120h: PROTON P0-P14 TRAJECTORY FOOTPRINT
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ * Work supported in part by US DOE Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH Abstract An alternative capture-solenoid field is presented for the mercury jet target for a neutrino factory or muon collider. A peak solenoid field of 15 T at the mercury-target location is studied in comparison to the current baseline value of 20 T. The magnetic-field profile tapers down to 1.5 T in the Front End, nominally beginning 15 m downstream of the target. This field profile is optimized to maximize the “useful” muons 50 m downstream from the target within a kinetic-energy window of MeV. Two parameters are considered for the optimization study: the length z end of the tapered field and the field strength in the front end. The axial-magnetic-field profile is specified analytically using an inverse-cubic equation and the off-axis field is computed from a series expansion based on derivatives of the axial field. The simulation is performed using the MARS15 code.  Mercury-Target Parameters  Angle of target to solenoid axis θ target = rad  Target radius r target = cm  Proton Beam Parameters  E = 8 GeV  θ beam = rad  σ x = σ y = cm (Gaussian distribution)  Solenoid Field  20 T peak field at target position (z = cm)  Aperture at Target, r = 7.5 cm,  Aperture at Front End, r = 30 cm  z end = 1500 cm, where B z =1.5 T  Muons within kinetic-energy cut of MeV  N muons at z = 50 m = 3.27  10 4 (N initial protons = 10 5 ) Mercury Target – Proton Jet Baseline Parameters (from optimization by X. Ding using MARS15)  Particle-capture requirement (P t ≤ GeV/c)  B × r = 20 T × 7.5 cm = 150 T-cm  B × r = 15 T × 10 cm = 150 T-cm  Fixed-flux requirement (Aperture requirement)  B × r 2 = 20 × = 1125 T-cm 2  B × r 2 = 15 × 10 2 = 1500 T-cm 2  MARS simulations with 15-T peak field & new aperture settings (taper radius r = 30 cm at all z) Analytic Form for Tapered Solenoid Inverse-Cubic Taper, defined by initial & final axial fields (B 1 & B 2 ), their derivatives, and position of end of taper (z end ): Off-axis field approximation:  Beam Pipe with constant r = 30 cm.  Beam Pipe material changed to “MARS-Blackhole” to speed calculation.  Added subroutine to m1510.f (FIELD) to calculate the field an using inverse-cubic fit. RESULTS Muon count at 50 m for kinetic energy within MeV: Tapered field using inverse-cubic field (P = 1) Conclusion Muon Production IDS120h 15 T MARS 1510 Simulation Setup  Promising results for 15-T peak field at the target, particularly if increase z end beyond 15 m and the Front-End magnetic field above the 1.5-T baseline.  To be done:  Investigate transmission through the downstream phase rotator & cooling sections, using ICOOL. Hg jet Proton beam θ Beam θ Target Solenoid axis Hg jet Proton Beam B z (z=0,r=0) = 15 T Beam Pipe B z [T] z [cm] r [cm] z end [cm] B z [T] z [cm] r [cm] IDS120h (R. Weggel) B z (r=0) = 15 T