P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 AFP – a fast & easy nuclear polarization reversal ? P. Hautle Paul Scherrer Institut.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Relaxation Time Phenomenon & Application
Advertisements

PHYSICS OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
MR TRACKING METHODS Dr. Dan Gamliel, Dept. of Medical Physics,
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Electron nuclear double resonance (ENDOR)
Lecture 2 1 H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Gas Chromatograph of Molecular Hydrogen at –100 °C Thermoconductivity Detector 12.
MRI. Magnetic Resonance 1.Principle first observed in Used for spectroscopy and imaging 3.Imaging techniques are a form of tomography, where slices.
NMR SPECTROSCOPY.
Institut für Kernphysik Bosen th August 2010 Andreas Thomas Polarised Targets for Photoproduction Experiments.
Psy 8960, Fall ‘06 Introduction to MRI1 Introduction to MRI: NMR MRI - big picture –Neuroimaging alternatives –Goal: understanding neurall coding Electromagnetic.
FMRI: Biological Basis and Experiment Design Lecture 5: non-BOLD MRI Equilibrium and excitation Relaxation rates Image contrast –TE –TR.
Rinat Ofer Supervisor: Amit Keren. Outline Motivation. Magnetic resonance for spin 3/2 nuclei. The YBCO compound. Three experimental methods and their.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometry Chap 19
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometry Chap 19. Absorption in CW Experiments Energy of precessing particle E = -μ z B o = -μ B o cos θ When an RF photon.
A short presentation in the group by Prem Basnet 09/29/04.
Guillermina Ramirez San Juan
Coherent Manipulation and Decoherence of S=10 Fe8 Single- Molecule Magnets Susumu Takahashi Physics Department University of California Santa Barbara S.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basic principles of MRI This lecture was taken from “Simply Physics” Click here to link to this site.
Psy 8960, Spring ’07 Introduction to MRI1 Introduction to MRI: NMR Physics reminders –Nuclei and atoms –Electromagnetic spectrum and Radio Frequency –Magnets.
N. Doshita, Yamagata Univ.1 The COMPASS polarized target for Drell-Yan physics Drell-Yan physics Informal International Workshop on Drell-Yan physics.
Christian Stamm Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center I. Tudosa, H.-C. Siegmann, J. Stöhr (SLAC/SSRL) A. Vaterlaus.
SPIN 2004 Oct. 14, 2004 W. Kim, S.S. Stepanyan, S. Woo, M. Rasulbaev, S. Jin (Kyungpook National University) S. Korea Polarization Measurements of the.
Lecture II Non dissipative traps Evaporative cooling Bose-Einstein condensation.
Tools of the Trade 1- Atomic resolution: X-ray crystallography 2- NMR spectroscopy 3- de novo Modeling and structure determination, Homology modeling 4-
Tony Hyun Kim (Partner: Connor McEntee) 11/17/ MW2-5 Prof. Roland.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Solid Polarized Target Opportunities at JLab Possibilities for Future Experiments.
Magnetic Material Engineering. Chapter 6: Applications in Medical and Biology Magnetic Material Engineering.
COULOMB ’05 Experiments with Cooled Beams at COSY A.Lehrach, H.J.Stein, J. Dietrich, H.Stockhorst, R.Maier, D.Prasuhn, V.Kamerdjiev, COSY, Juelich, I.Meshkov,
Heat Capacities of 56 Fe and 57 Fe Emel Algin Eskisehir Osmangazi University Workshop on Level Density and Gamma Strength in Continuum May 21-24, 2007.
NMR spectroscopy in solids: A comparison to NMR spectroscopy in liquids Mojca Rangus Mentor: Prof. Dr. Janez Seliger Comentor: Dr. Gregor Mali.
An attempt toward dynamic nuclear polarization for liquid 3 He 1. Motivation of the study 2 . Polarizing 3 He in dense form 3. DNP for liquid He3 3 . Doping.
Single spin detection Maksym Sladkov Top master nanoscience symposium June 23, 2005.
Human Functional Brain Imaging Dr. Ryan C.N. D’Arcy NRC Institute for Biodiagnostics (Atlantic)
Motivation Polarized 3 He gas target Solenoid design and test 3 He feasibility test Summary and outlook Johannes Gutenberg-Universit ä t Mainz Institut.
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Basics of …….. NMR phenomenonNMR phenomenon Chemical shiftChemical shift Spin-spin splittingSpin-spin splitting.
Variable Rate Selective Excitation Radio Frequency Pulse in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Stephen Stoyan.
Magnetization dynamics
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance I Magnetization properties Generation and detection of signals.
Polarized Proton Solid Target for RI beam experiments M. Hatano University of Tokyo H. Sakai University of Tokyo T. Uesaka CNS, University of Tokyo S.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
TRIUMF: differential cross sections at 20 – 68 MeV → Roman Tacik PSI: 1. Analyzing powers of scattering at 45 – 90 MeV 2. Total SCX cross sections at 40.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
Resonant dipole-dipole energy transfer from 300 K to 300μK, from gas phase collisions to the frozen Rydberg gas K. A. Safinya D. S. Thomson R. C. Stoneman.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Recent Developments in Polarized Solid Targets H. Dutz, S. Goertz Physics Institute, University Bonn J. Heckmann, C. Hess, W. Meyer, E. Radke, G. Reicherz.
J. Kohlbrecher, Polarized Solid Targets, Honnef 2003 Dynamics Of Nuclear Spin Polarization J. Kohlbrecher Paul Scherrer Institute CH-5232 Villigen Switzerland.
Gavin W Morley Department of Physics University of Warwick Diamond Science & Technology Centre for Doctoral Training, MSc course Module 2 – Properties.
Fund BioImag : Relaxation of nuclear magnetization 1.How is the MR signal detected ? 2.What is the quantum-mechanical equivalent of the rotating.
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Akira Tanaka Department of Physics For Yamagata University PT group.
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Hideaki Uematsu Department of Physics Yamagata University.
NMR and The Designing and Manufacturing of an NMR Probe for 109 Ag in Li x Ag 3 V 4 O 11 Cathode Material, for 0.72
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Glenn Pierce, King’s College London, Department of Physics Introduction Edward Purcell and Felix Bloch were both awarded the.
Polarized Solid Targets for Hadron Beams - Overview Choosing a target for Drell Yan Experiments.
17th Crystal Ball Meeting
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Hideaki Uematsu Department of Physics For Yamagata University PT group.
Dipolar relaxation in a Chromium Bose Einstein Condensate Benjamin Pasquiou Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers Université Paris Nord Villetaneuse - France.
Future Perspectives of the Bonn Polarized Target Since the mid 1980‘s: Bonn is a place of excellence in the field of polarized solid targets ! Still valid.
Biomolecular Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Measurement of parity-violating asymmetries in the reactions of light nuclei with polarized neutrons ( 6.
EMMI Workshop, Münster V.E. Demidov, O. Dzyapko, G. Schmitz, and S.O. Demokritov Münster, Germany G.A. Melkov, Ukraine A.N. Slavin, USA V.L.
Many-Body Effects in a Frozen Rydberg Gas Feng zhigang
The Electromagnetic Spectrum
(Instrument part) Thanundon Kongnok M
Polarized Target Activity at the University of Virginia
Deuteron Vector and Tensor Polarizations
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
(4)ELECTRONIC SUPPORT SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 AFP – a fast & easy nuclear polarization reversal ? P. Hautle Paul Scherrer Institut CH-5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop October 31- November 1, 2010 Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Outline Introduction polarised targets = unique DNP systems Overview of Experimental Data overview of experimental data some details / comments AFP Theory thermodynamic of a nuclear spin system classical picture - rotating frame quantum statistical description – spin temperature which effects set limits on the optimum efficiency Implementation technical and physics constraints what can be expected

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 PSI East PSI West Aare SLS cw Proton accelerator (590 MeV, 2.2 mA) ( , ,  SR  SINQ, UCN) SwissFEL Accelerator Facilities

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov cm 3 „Frozen Spin“ Polarised Target Particle physics experiments on beams of pions, protons, neutrons…..

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov μm thick polystyrene foil cooled to 200 mK by a sub micron thick film of superfluid 4 He cell with two 500 nm thick Si 3 Ni 4 windows “Ultra-thin” polarised solid target [J.P Urrego Blanco et al., NIM B 261 (2007) 1112]

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 suppress background scattering by TOF coincident in situ detection of low energy recoil protons in the target itself polarised nuclei in the scintillating detector itself O N H C H C n CH 3 O N · B. van den Brandt et al., NIM A 446 (2000) 592

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Beam Detector neutron beam Observe DNP build up with small angle neutron scattering through spin contrast variation Europhys. Lett. 59 (2002) 62 Eur. Phys. J. B 49 (2006) 157–165 J. Appl. Cryst. 40 (2007) s106-s110

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 B 0 =2.5T 58 mm d-PS target doped with d-TEMPO Ø 5 mm x 1.2 mm 6 LiF targetholder 45 mm Pseudomagnetic precession of cold neutrons [F. M. Piegsa et al., NIM A 611 (2009) 231]

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Dissolution DNP for MRI / NMR Polarize organic samples labeled with 13 C, 6 Li, 15 N nuclei in solid state (1 K / 5T) image of brain metabolism Dissolve rapidly and inject into rat in imager (9.4 T) => image of brain metabolism Details and List of publications see: http//: sdnpi.epfl.ch

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Nuclear Spin Thermodynamics

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 equation of motion External field ( ~ T) including rf field (~ G) “Local field” which spin i feels because of neighbours (averaged over all orientations and spin states) ~ few G Nuclear spin system (in a solid) in external field FWHM (Gaussian) Magnetization

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Energy – Entropy – Isentropic cooling Curie Law Energy Entropy Applied fieldLocal field constant Isentropic cooling Adiabatic demagnetization (spin energy / thermal energy)

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Isentropic cooling – Adiabatic demagnetization constant HLHL H0H0 precession about H 0 H 0 is decreased precession about H L Important change when H 0  H L : Entropy transferred from polarizationspin-spin ordering polarization to spin-spin ordering Reversibility: Reversibility: change of H 0 slow compared to equilibration time (  H L )  1

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Adiabatic fast passage (AFP)

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 rf field - Rotating frame of reference [F. Bloch, Phys Rev 70 (1946) 460] [A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, 1961] rotating frame External field rf field contains rf field Larmor frequency: static field:rf field: H1H1 HeHe H 0  ω/γ H0H0

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 rf field - Rotating frame of reference [F. Bloch, Phys Rev 70 (1946) 460] [A. Abragam, Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, 1961] rotating frame External field rf field contains rf field Larmor frequency: static field:rf field: H1H1 HeHe H 0  ω/γ H0H0 H e can be rotated by 180° sweeping H 0 or ω through resonance

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Adiabatic Theorem equation of motion For any vector satisfying a similar equation of motion the angle between and remains constant provided the change of direction of in time is sufficiently slow Possible to reverse the magnetization What happens to the magnetization ? Adiabatic Adiabaticity: Fast Faster than relaxation:

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Adiabatic Theorem equation of motion For any vector satisfying a similar equation of motion the angle between and remains constant provided the change of direction of in time is sufficiently slow Possible to reverse the magnetizationconstant What happens to the magnetization ? Thermodynmics in solid sample Adiabtic demagnetization in the rotating frame (ADRF) Isentropic passage Important change when H e  H LR : Entropy transferred from polarizationspin-spin ordering polarization to spin-spin ordering (Zeeman to dipolar ordering) Adiabatic Adiabaticity: Fast Faster than relaxation:

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Estimate the losses - AFP in the spin temperature model [M. Goldman et al., Phys Rev 168 (1968) 301] Provotorov equations describe mixing between Zeeman and spin-spin subsystem: Conditions: High temperatures Low nuclear polarizations Mixing rate: AFP: AFP: variation of  very small during time T 2  D  Evolution of inverse spin temperatures  and  to common value

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Sweep of field / frequency through the resonance Fast sweepshorter Fast sweep – in time much shorter than mixing time W  1 Slightly saturating passage H1H1 Quasiadiabatic fast passagelonger Quasiadiabatic fast passage – in time much longer than mixing time W  1 Quasiadiabatic part Relaxation Sudden to adiabatic transition ~ 5 – 8 % loss, almost independant of Spin-lattice relaxation of the spin-spin (dipolar) interactions

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame Theoretical prediction Sample temperature & dopant concentration !! narrow line width long relaxation time in RF = Spin-lattice relaxation of the spin-spin system

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Experimental results I - Protons effect of sample temperature

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Experimental results II – 7 LiH

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Experimental results III substancenucleusdopant e- conc. [spins/g] T [K]  P max 1-butanol 1H1Hporphyrexide4.0 x  butanol 1H1HCrV EHBA4.0 x  LiH 7 Li irradlow ?0.08  H1H  fluoro-pentanol 19 F TEMPO2.0 x  H1H  0.40 d-butanol 2H2H CrV EDBA6.35 x  H2H0.5  H2H0.08  0.90 d-butanol 2H2HCrV EDBA2.36 x  0.92 Deuterated alcohols are a different story: large quadrupolar coupling small dipolar coupling 1 and ½ sweep to reverse the polarization of the spin 1 system

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Experiment & Theory Data fitted with spin temperature model

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Sample temparature / dopant concentration d-butanol + EHBA(Cr V )-d 22 increase sweep rate for higher temperatures

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Line width / Polarization FWHM (Gaussian)   50 kHz  H LR = 2.9 G

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Line width / Polarization FWHM (Gaussian)   50 kHz  H LR = 2.9 G

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Two nuclear spin species Coupling of the nuclear spin systems through electron non-Zeeman system start microwaves [Cox, Bouffard, Goldman, J Phys C 6 (1973) L100] polarization of both nuclear spin systems should be reversed heat capacity !

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 In practice: polarization reversal AFP vs DNP T =80 mK / B = 2.5 T gain can be dramatic in certain cases (especially at low temperatures) DNP reversal AFP reversal AFP efficiency DNP build up time

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 radiation damping asymmetry of efficiency superradiance e.g. typical AFP parameters for protons: Technical aspects I requirements challanges solutionstune and match the rf coil ? B 1 = 0.3 G perpendicular to static field B 0 homogeneity  B 1 /B 1 ~ 0.5 dB/dt = 10 – 20 G/s or 40 – 80 kHz/s frequency sweep width = 400 kHz – 1 MHz produce the required B 1 amplitude do not excessively heat the sample potential pitfalls

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Technical aspects II radiation damping -> superradiance threshold electromagnetic energy provided by the spins compensates losses in the circuit auto-oscillation Two coupled systems: resonance circuit rotating magnetization damping time constant [S. Bloom, J Appl Phys 28 (1957) 800] [M. Odehnal, V. Petricek, Physica 67 (1973) 377] [Yu. F. Kiselev et al., JETP 67 (1988) 413] AFP gets asymmetric superradiance superradiant polarization reversal  [L.A. Reichertz et al., NIM A 340 (1994) 278] (NH 3, V = 6.5 cm 3 ; Q = 33)

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Technical aspects III Example Example design of a rf irradiation system 5 T / 1 K system (S. Pentilla) magnetic to be rotated to have vertical field sample size polarized target system sample cylinder of 8 cm length/ 1.5 cm diameter ammonia / 6 LiD reversalevery 2 h rf structure rf structure (coil) B 1 ~ 0.3 – MHz G/A large sampletuning not possible (superradiance) solenoid match to 50 Ohm rf power ~ 10 W or more -> heat load !!

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 AFP used by the Standford group AFP 180° pulse (pulsed NMR) need to excite ~ 100 kHz apply strong pulse: H 1 > H L    5  s B 1  11.7 G [F. Bloch, W.W. Hansen, M Packard, Phys Rev 70 (1946) 474] superradiance !!

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010 Conclusion low temperature, T 1 K low concentration of paramagnetic centers experimental conditions sample properties one „free“ parameter : relaxation time in the rotating frame local field H L line width  (dipolar relaxation time T 1D ) dipolar relaxation time T 1D “Strategy“ to get a high AFP efficiency ?? What can be expected (conservative guess) 6 LiD5 T / 1K  P >  T / 80 mK  P ~  0.9 Ammonia 5 T / 1K  P <  T / 80 mK  P ~  0.7 Trade off between AFP efficiency and DNP build up time

P. Hautle, Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop, Nov 2010