ABSTRACT Two thousand three hundred and sixty-four high-risk calves were procured through sale barns by three order buyers in Arkansas, Mississippi, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas A&M University System Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Amarillo Manure Concentration of N:P, Animal Performance, and Blood Urea.
Advertisements

Effectiveness Evaluation for Production Drugs Crystal Groesbeck, Ph.D Division of Production Drugs.
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Health and Production Management Practices for Nursing Beef Calves
Disposition – Convenience Trait or Economically Important Darrell Busby ISU Extension Beef Specialist for SW Iowa ISU Armstrong Farm Learning Center Lewis,
Grid Marketing Sorting out the numbers Cattle-Fax Mike Miller Bill Chandler.
Feeder Cattle Market Outlets Lisa Kriese-Anderson Extension Animal Scientist Auburn University.
Statistics in Science  Role of Statistics in Research.
WHOLE BODY ANIMAL GROWTH ANSC 590 ANIMAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Backgrounding Cattle Larry C. Hollis, D.V.M., M.Ag.
“Knowing the Growth Efficiency Potential in the Lamb Crop ” Dr. Jeff Held South Dakota State University.
1 GRADING FEEDER CATTLE The process of grading feeder cattle is a projection of maturity based on frame size, muscling, and the sex of the calf.
GeneMax™ Mark McCully Certified Angus Beef LLC. Supply challenges for future growth?
MARKETING FEEDLOT CATTLE By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
We (practitioners, Extension, beef producers, veterinary colleges…) are constantly making everything we do become obsolete… therefore we better be working.
Ractopamine, Response, Economics, and Issues Allan P. Schinckel Purdue University Department of Animal Sciences.
Value Difference of Feeder Cattle
 Draw growth curves  Explain different changes in body measurements  Explain different changes is body components  Explain different changes in carcass.
Implant Strategies ANS 426. Implants  Perhaps the most studied beef management tool on the planet  Effects on performance well understood  Carcass.
Grid Pricing of Fed Cattle.  Grid prices, or value-based marketing, refers to pricing cattle on an individual animal basis. Prices differ according to.
Statistics Introduction 1.)All measurements contain random error  results always have some uncertainty 2.)Uncertainty are used to determine if two or.
The Genetics of Feedlot Health—an Update R. Mark Enns Department of Animal Sciences Colorado State University.
1 Retained Ownership- Value Added John Marsh Professor Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University July 2006 MB BA M ontana.
Summer Management of Beef Calves Mark F. Spire, DVM, MS, DACT Schering-Plough Animal Health Technical Services Manager Manhattan, KS.
Introduction to the Design of Experiments
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Exploring the Beef Industry
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Economic Benefits of using Genetic Selection to Reduce the Prevalence of Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex in Beef Feedlot Cattle H.L. Neibergs 1, J.S.
Veterinary and Production Consultant Team FHMS
"Clinical Trials and Clinical Endpoints" James R. Bradford, DVM, Dipl. ABVP Pharmacia Animal Health.
The success or failure of an investigation usually depends on the design of the experiment. Prepared by Odyssa NRM Molo.
Jump to first page IeCAB2010 held 1-15 June 2010 Region of Bunch Pruning Influences the Bunch and Fruit Physical Traits of ‘PITA 24’ Plantain (Musa AAB)
The effects of continuous-suckling and supplementation on growth performance of crossbred Katahdin lambs (Birth weight 4.2 ± 0.2 kg) were investigated.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
The ABC’s of Marketing Your Cattle.
Incidence of hospitalisations in both groups Incidence of documented infections Abstract Problem statement: Patients on cancer chemotherapy are at substantial.
1 Scientific Farm Animal Production, 10 th ed Field and Taylor Copyright ©2012, 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
The effects of continuous suckling and supplementation on growth performance and degree of parasitism of pasture- raised crossbred Katahdin lambs were.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
SUMMER SUPPLEMENTATION: PLANT AND ANIMAL RESPONSE – A KANSAS PERSPECTIVE Lyle Lomas and Joe Moyer KSU SE Agricultural Research Center Parsons.
- Typically, retained ownership refers to a producer sending calves/feeders to a feedlot and owning some percentage of them. The calves/feeders can be.
Stocker/Feedlot Example Dr. Randy Harp. Land Cost $60 per acre (custom farming) $20 per acre (lease) Total = $80 per acre.
NE for Growing/Finishing Beef Cattle NE values of feeds + feed intake can be used to: Predict amount of feed required for particular gain (programmed feeding)
Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
The Beef Industry. Beef Products What products can you think of? What products can you think of?
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
IMPORTANCE OF STATISTICS MR.CHITHRAVEL.V ASST.PROFESSOR ACN.
Feeding and Managing Dairy Cattle Part1. Objectives Analyze the production practices involved in the care of dairy calves from birth to weaning. Analyze.
SOLUCIA, INC. 1 Introduction to Predictive Modeling December 13, 2007.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
SP 2015 CP PROBABILITY & STATISTICS Observational Studies vs. Experiments Chapter 11.
Understand quality features of beef, pork and poultry Objective 4.02.
QUALITY GRADING LIVESTOCK Quality Standards for Beef, Pork and Poultry  The United States Department of Agriculture sets forth quality features.
Effects of Two Measures of Disposition on Post-weaning Gain of Beef Calves R. L. Weaber, Ph.D. F. E. Creason.
KSU Cattle Value Optimization Seminar What Feedyards Are Looking For in Cattle They Buy By Tom Brink.
ABIC 2014 – Red Deer, AB February 19-21
The Beef Industry Original Power Point Created by Randal Cales
Exploring the Beef Industry
Growth Promotion Technology in Beef Cattle
Introduction to Feedlots
Joyce,. J. R. ¹, Jeffries, B. H. ², Stewart, Jr. R. L. ³, Segers, J. R
ANS 106 Dr. Sophia Yin Winter 2003
The Beef Industry.
Project Approach and Outreach
Greg Highfill Woods County Extension Educator, Ag/4-H
Delayed Implant Overview
Effect of Time of Birth Within the Spring Calving Season on Performance and Carcass Traits of Beef Calves Fed in the Iowa Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity.
Felipe Barrera-Osorio (HDNED World Bank)
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT Two thousand three hundred and sixty-four high-risk calves were procured through sale barns by three order buyers in Arkansas, Mississippi, and Texas for participation in a day metaphylactic antimicrobial research trial. Of the 2,364 head, 1716 were heifers (mean arrival weight = 512 lb), 299 were steers (mean arrival weight = 523 lb), and 889 were intact males (mean arrival weight = 508 lb). In addition to evaluating treatment effects of the various antimicrobials, one additional objective of this study was to characterize and quantify the impact of castration on animal health, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in growing-finishing cattle. Individual data were collected on each calf including standard animal health parameters, growth performance, and carcass characteristics. Each intact male calf was non-surgically castrated by administering an elastrator band at processing, which occurred within 24 hours of arrival. The morbidity of the intact males (49%) was higher (P<0.01) than the individuals that were castrated prior to arrival (35%). The relative risk of undergoing one morbid episode was 1.42, or 42% greater for intact males than for the steers. Furthermore, 24% of the population’s morbidity can be attributed to being castrated on arrival. The mortality (4.91%) and study rejection (4.91%) of the steers were lower than the mortality (7.1%) and study rejection (8.01%) of intact males, yielding a cumulative rate of loss of 9.82% of steers versus 15.11% of intact males that did not reach a desirable harvest weight. The risk of mortality was 1.42 times greater in the intact male population relative to the steer population. Similarly to the impact on mortality, the intact male population had a relative risk of removal of 1.63, indicating an excess study rejection of 63% compared to the steers. Morbidity was negatively associated with average daily gain, yield grade, hot carcass weight, and quality grade in this study. Intact males had a lower average daily gain at the time of reimplant and at harvest relative to the steers, while the steers had a 33 lb heavier hot carcass weight. The impact of individuals identified to have a pneumonic lung lesion at harvest revealed a reduction in overall average daily gain (.14 lb), yield grade (.13), and hot carcass weight (23 lb) compared with those with no lesions. Lung lesions were identified in 42% of the animals harvested, however 57.4 % of them were never been pulled for treatment, thus illustrating the difficulty and lack of accuracy in detecting respiratory disease in commercial feedyards. Castration at arrival in to the feedlot had substantial negative impacts on morbidity rates, mortality rates, removal rates, average daily gain, yield grade, quality grade, and hot carcass weight. Materials and Methods The results reported herein represent data recorded as part of a metaphylactic study. 2,364 head of high-risk calves were placed between June 20, 2003 and June 27, 2003 in to Cactus Feedyard, Cactus, TX. Calves were penned by load as feasible; however, if pen space became limited, calves were penned by sex according to order buyer and day of arrival. Standard processing was performed and typically occurred within 24 hours of arrival. Pen (treatment) assignments were made for individual animals at processing according to a prepared randomization schedule. Calves were individually weighed with each calf uniquesly identified. If testicles were present, calves were castrated non-surgically by banding (Calicrate®). Horns were tipped if required. Cattle were re-implanted between October 8 and 11, The mean days on feed was 244 days for steers. At harvest, individual ear tag numbers were matched to the packing plant carcass identification numbers and lungs were scored for occurrence and severity of pneumonic lesions and classified based upon degree of lung field involvement: Score 0 = no lesions; Score 1 = 20% involvement. For all statistical analyses, probabilities of less that 5% (P <.05) were considered significant. Discrete variables (number of times pulled, mortality, removal, lung lesion status, dehorn status) were analyzed using Chi-square anlaysis (SAS Institute, Inc.). The Effect of Castration on Animal Health, Growth Performance, and Carcass Characteristics of Intact Male Calves Entering the Feedlot Daniel C. Renfro DVM 1, 2, R. Spencer Swingle Ph.D. ¹, Daniel U. Thomson DVM Ph.D.¹, Mark Branine Ph.D.¹, Guy Loneragan DVM Ph.D.² ¹Cactus Research, Ltd., Amarillo 2 Division of Agriculture, West Texas A&M University, Canyon RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of the males placed, n=1188, 45% were treated for respiratory disease. The morbidity in intact males was 40% greater than steers (n=299) enrolled in the study. The relative risk of undergoing one morbid episode was 1.42 or 42% greater for the population of intact males compared to steers. The risk of mortality was 1.42 times greater in the intact male relative to the steers. 24% of the observed morbidity and mortality were attributable to castration during initial processing in the feedyard. Study rejection was 1.63 times greater for intact males compared to steers. Moreover, 31.8% of study rejections were attributed to castration at arrival. The impact of individuals identified to have a pneumonic lung lesion at harvest revealed a reduction in overall average daily gain (.14 lb), yield grade (.13), and hot carcass weight (23 lb) compared with those with no lesions. Lung lesions were identified in 42% of the animals harvested, however 57.4 % of them were never been pulled for treatment, thus illustrating the difficulty and lack of accuracy in detecting respiratory disease in commercial feedyards. Castrating calves at arrival in the feedyard is associated with adverse effects on morbidity, mortality, and removal rates as well as reductions in feeding performance and carcass characteristics in the intact male population relative to the steers. # of times treated 123SEM HCW (lbs.) YG QG The Effect of Morbidity on Carcass Characteristics (Table 1) a. Values represent the amount of reduction in the corresponding parameter relative to those that were not determined to be morbid through the duration of the study. b. The values shown above all had a Pr>F of <.0001 INTRODUCTION Optimizing the quality of the cattle while minimizing purchase price is recognized as an efficient way to maximize the profitability of cattle during the growing-finishing phase. Historically, intact male calves have been discounted in typical cattle procurement arenas. It is unclear how much discount is appropriate. The objective of this study was to characterize and quantify the impact of castration on animal health, growth performance, and carcass characteristics in intact males castrated at feedlot arrival compared to those castrated prior to arrival. (ADG_1 = ADG to reimplant, ADG_2 = ADG from reimplant to harvest, ADG_3 = overall ADG) Effects of morbid events (treated once, treated twice, or treated three times), castration status, and lung lesion status (present or not) on performance and carcass characteristics were analyzed using the Proc GLM procdure of SAS (SAS Institute, Inc.), using the individual animal as the experimental unit. SEM=.16 SEM=.12 SEM=.10