1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
Advertisements

Getting started with the Program Standards David Lawrence EHS III, Fairfax County Health Department Paul Stromp RS/REHS, Lake County General Health District.
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Key Themes/Concepts Jeannie Perron, JD, DVM Covington & Burling LLP.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Import Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Proposed Rule Accreditation of Third-Party Auditors/Certification Bodies
China Stakeholder Session China September 24-27, 2013.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
October 14-16, 2014 by Peter Quinter, Esq. Mobile (954)
SAI K. RAMASWAMY DR. GRETCHEN A. MOSHER NC-213,KANSAS CITY HARPC: Preventive Controls & Food Safety Implications 1 NC-213The U.S. Quality Grains Research.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act
Focus on Prevention FDA Food Safety Modernization Act.
Proposed Rules under the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Version 1/15/2013.
Actionable Process Steps and Focused Mitigation Strategies
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
Preventive Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Focused Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1 Regulatory Impact Analysis Summary.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Proposed Rule for Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
FDA Commissioner Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D says “Preventing problems before they cause harm is not only common sense, it is the key to food safety in the.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Food Safety Modernization Act Proposed Rules Tim Slawinski Food and Dairy Division Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development.
NCHPS Fall Meeting CFR Part 37 Update. Reference: IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE FOR 10 CFR PART 37 PHYSICAL PROTECTION OF BYPRODUCT MATERIAL CATEGORY.
Erik R. Lieberman Prepared for AgroBalt 2014 April 4, 2014
Preparing for the Food Safety Modernization Act
Preventive Controls Rules: Coverage and Farm Definition 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Best Practices: Where Industry Should Lead on Ensuring Proper Testing & Auditing Stephen F. Sundlof, DVM, PhD Senior Advisor for Animal and Food Safety.
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Impact of FSMA on the Regulation of Domestic and Imported Animal Food by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. at Wild Bird Feeding Industry 2011 Annual Meeting Naples,
DISTRIBUTION IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLES AND TOOLS David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 1, 2011.
Focus on Phase 2 FSMA Implementation
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs 1.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Module 2Slide 1 of 26 WHO - EDM Quality Management Basic Principles of GMP Part One.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food to Wild Bird Feed Industry Annual Meeting 2015 by Daniel G. McChesney, Ph.D. Director, Office of Surveillance.
Overview FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Section 104
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
FDA Preventive Control Regulation Ernest Julian, Ph.D., Chief Office of Food Protection RI Department of Health AFDO 2014.
FSMA: Preventative Controls for Human Food Final Rule In this presentation we discuss the Preventative Controls for Human Food rule and compliance dates.
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Overview Leah Wilkinson Vice President, Legislative, Regulatory & State Affairs American Feed Industry Association.
Lowell Randel Vice President, Government and Legal Affairs Global Cold Chain Alliance.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Final Rule Accredited Third-Party Certification 1.
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act Primer on Act and the Final Rules June 8, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
FSMA TRAINING Industry Recall Readiness BEST PRACTICES.
MAMTC (Mid-America Manufacturing Technology Center) helps Kansas manufacturers address challenges and achieve success. We do this by: Connecting manufacturing.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
FSMA Implementation Jennifer Thomas
Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
Food Safety Modernization Act of 2010
What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
FINAL RULE OVERVIEW Prepared By: Danielle Bauer
Presentation transcript:

1 Proposed Rule to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration

2 Proposed Regulations for Focused Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration

3 Key Terms and Phrases Types of Intentional Adulteration –Acts intended to cause massive public health harm –Acts of disgruntled employees, consumers, or competitors –Economically motivated adulteration

4 Key Terms and Phrases Actionable process steps Focused mitigation strategies

5 Key Principles Prevention of acts intended to cause widespread public health harm Considers vulnerabilities and risks related to intentional adulteration Risk-based and flexible

6 Summary of Requirements Written food defense plan, including –Actionable process steps –Focused mitigation strategies –Monitoring –Corrective actions –Verification Training

Proposed Requirements 1. Actionable Process Steps Option 1 Option 2 Assess whether your facility has one or more of these FDA-identified key activity types*: 1.Bulk liquid receiving and loading 2.Liquid storage and handling 3.Secondary ingredient handling 4.Mixing and similar activities Identify actionable process steps for each applicable key activity type Perform a vulnerability assessment using appropriate methods and qualified individual(s) Identify actionable process steps for significant vulnerabilities Identify and prioritize points in food operation that are vulnerable to intentional adulteration 2. Focused Mitigation Strategies Identify and implement focused mitigation strategies at actionable process steps 2. Focused Mitigation Strategies Identify and implement focused mitigation strategies at actionable process steps 3. Monitoring Establish and implement procedures for monitoring focused mitigation strategies 3. Monitoring Establish and implement procedures for monitoring focused mitigation strategies 4. Corrective Actions Establish and implement procedures for corrective actions if focused mitigation strategies are not properly implemented 4. Corrective Actions Establish and implement procedures for corrective actions if focused mitigation strategies are not properly implemented 5. Verification Verify that monitoring is conducted Verify that appropriate decisions about corrective actions are made Verify that focused mitigation strategies are consistently implemented and are effective Conduct reanalysis of the food defense plan, as appropriate 5. Verification Verify that monitoring is conducted Verify that appropriate decisions about corrective actions are made Verify that focused mitigation strategies are consistently implemented and are effective Conduct reanalysis of the food defense plan, as appropriate * FDA identified these key activity types using findings of vulnerability assessments of over 50 food products and processes. These activity types commonly rank high in vulnerability based on various factors, including the ability to physically access the food or process and the potential to adulterate a sufficient quantity of product in order to cause massive public health harm.

8 Who is Covered? Facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food In general, facilities required to register with FDA under sec. 415 of the FD&C Act Applies to domestic and imported food Some exemptions and modified requirements are being proposed

9 Exemptions Manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding food for animals Farms Holding of food, except bulk liquid Packing, repacking, labeling, or relabeling of food where the container that directly contacts the food remains intact Alcoholic beverages at certain facilities (under specified conditions)

10 Modified Requirements “Qualified” facilities: –Very small businesses (less than $10 million in total annual sales) OR –Food sales averaging less than $500,000 per year during the last three years AND –Sales to qualified end users must exceed sales to others

11 Effective and Compliance Dates Effective date –60 days after the final rule is published Compliance dates –Small Businesses – employing fewer than 500 persons would have two years after publication

12 Compliance Dates continued Very Small Businesses – having less than $10 million in annual sales of food would have three years after publication to comply with modified requirements –Very small businesses are considered qualified facilities and subject to modified requirements Other businesses –that do not qualify for exemptions would have one year after publication of the final rule to comply

13 How to Comment on the Proposed Rules Link to rules on Comment period closes on June 30, 2014 Comment periods on major FSMA proposals will be coordinated to enable comment on how the rules can best work together

14 Outreach and Technical Assistance Will Continue Public meetings Presentations Listening sessions Guidance documents Partnerships will be essential

15 More Information Available Web site: Subscription feature available Send questions to