California Integrated Waste Management Board Biennial Review Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference The EAB: Past, Present and Future David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 13, 2008.
Advertisements

Working Toward Accreditation Joan Ellison, Public Health Director Mary Margaret Stallone, Director Center for Preventive Services Livingston County Department.
1 Board Workshop: Overview Of The Integrated Waste Management Act (IWMA) Waste Management Planning And Review Process.
Solid Waste Systems Planning Develop Scenarios for future Solid Waste Management Create a review process for the TAC Organize the Subgroup proposals to.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Update On 2000 Bureau of State Audits Report Item L; March 10, 2003 Permitting & Enforcement Committee Item J; March 12, 2003 Budget & Administration Committee.
Recycling and Waste Prevention at San Jose State University Terri L. Ramirez Integrated Waste Management, Recycling & Moving Services Specialist Facilities.
California's Global Warming Act Presented by: Jila Priebe Statewide Transit Planning & Research Branch Division of Mass Transportation California Department.
California Venue and Event Recycling Legislation Review of AB 2176 Model Ordinance For Waste Reduction at Venues and Events.
1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REDISTRICTING 2011.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Initiating a Zone Designation Cycle in 2006 Committee Item H (Board Agenda Item 17) March 7, 2006.
Update On The ERO Transition Activities To Comply With The 2005 EPAC ERCOT TAC Meeting March 9, 2006 Sam Jones, COO.
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division Historical Progress, Achievement Of Diversion Goals And Future Program Implementation Efforts Board MeetingAgenda.
Policy Drivers AB % diversion requirement for jurisdictions AB % reduction, recycling, composting statewide goal by 2020 Not transformation.
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
0 Technical Study Implementation Potential Disagreements Content of Progress Report Request for Modification to Approved Studies Request for New Study.
July 2002 Board Meeting: Agenda Item 55 Discussion and Request for Direction on the Board Approved SB 2202 Work Plan Recommendation on Jurisdiction Diversion.
You are here.. Kern Council of Governments PM 10 Control Measures Workshop: Identifying the Best Available Control Measures to Local Government for Mobile.
California Integrated Waste Management Board November 10, 2008 Item #2 Discussion And Request For Direction Regarding The Board's Fulfillment Of The Requirements.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Understanding SB 1016 Solid Waste Per Capita Disposal Measurement Act 1.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Scope Of Work, Contractor, And Augmentation Of Contract Allocation For The At-Store Recycling.
OMB’s Management Watch List (MWL) & High Risk Projects List How to More Effectively Track, Analyze and Evaluate Your Agency IT Investments October 9, 2007.
1 Diversion Rate Measurement System April 4, 2006.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 California Integrated Waste Management Board Meeting Agenda Item 1 Michael Leaon November.
Taking the Compliance Out of Improvement Planning David Cook, Cheri Meadows, & Erin McGee KDE.
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Adoption & Approval Process prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared by:
California Integrated Waste Management Board Update On Long-Term Postclosure Maintenance And Corrective Action Financial Assurances Activities Permitting.
Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams Monitoring and Reporting Provisions for Water Rights Victoria Whitney Deputy.
RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.
Premium Payment Policy John Hiber, Chief Financial Officer | September 19, 2013 Board Meeting.
Consideration of Approval of New Projects for the Solid Waste Disposal and Codisposal Site Cleanup Program Board Meeting Agenda Item 19 (Revised) January.
Report to the Legislature Required by Senate Bill 2202 (due January 1, 2002) Board Briefing June 13, 2001 Agenda Item 5 Attachment 1.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration of Revised Model Programs and Procedures for the Collection and Proper Disposal of Pharmaceutical.
1 Reporting Section Update North Carolina Accountability Conference February 11-13, 2008 Greensboro, NC.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Consideration of Model Programs and Procedures for the Collection and Proper Disposal of Pharmaceutical.
Status Report On Staff Review Of Board Regulations For Alternative Daily Cover, Food And Green Waste Composting, Farm And Ranch Composting, Compostable.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Discussion of Priority Activities for Next Eighteen Months Action Plans.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Presentation Of Findings On Phase II Of The Do-It-Yourself Oil Changers Research (FY 2001/2002 Used Oil.
Adult Education Block Grant Webinar January 22, 2016.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division Historical Performance Automated Systems Measurement Accuracy The Future Board MeetingAgenda Item 27.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part A Overview May 11, th Annual Juvenile.
Discussion of the 2003 School District Waste Reduction Survey and Findings April 13-14, 2004.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
May 14, Planning Commission Planning Commission May 14, 2015.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
TANKER FORUM May 27, 2016 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE US
Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Senate Bill 5 Amendments
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK DECEMBER 11, 2017 ITEM NO
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
City of Saginaw Curb Side Leaf Collection Update
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
Portfolio Management Process & Customer Request Management
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
LID Guidance and Training for Southern California
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement
Fort Valley State University
Spring Plenary Session, Westin San Francisco Airport
AAHA Compliance Breakout
Presentation transcript:

California Integrated Waste Management Board Biennial Review Process

What is the Biennial Review? At least once every two years, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Board) conducts an independent review of each jurisdiction's progress in implementing its Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and its Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE). At this time, the Board also reviews a jurisdiction's progress toward achieving the 50 percent diversion requirement of the Integrated Waste Management Act (Act).

Why do we conduct a Biennial Review? Statutory Requirement – Public Resources Code (PRC) Section Method to determine compliance with the Integrated Waste Management Act (AB 939)

Who must undergo a Biennial Review? Per the requirements of PRC Section 41825, every city, county and Board-approved regional agency must undergo a biennial review at least once every two years.

When are Biennial Reviews conducted? Past Biennial Reviews (BRs) – For 25% Goal (starting in 1995): 1995/1996 BR 1997/1998 BR – For 50% Goal (starting in 2000): 1999/2000 BR 2001/2002 BR 2003/2004 (current BR)

How is a Biennial Review conducted? Board staff reviews: Each jurisdiction’s progress in implementing programs identified in SRRE, HHWE and subsequent Annual Reports; Types of programs implemented and relativity to waste stream; Whether jurisdiction is meeting goal and relationship of programs to diversion rate.

What information does Board staff use during its Biennial Review? Listing of programs selected for implementation in jurisdiction’s SRRE, HHWE and prior Annual Reports; Program implementation and diversion rate information provided by jurisdictions in the Annual Reports for that BR cycle; Program implementation information collected by Board staff via phone calls and site visits (conducted at least once each BR cycle).

What is the Biennial Review approval process? Board staff conducts a review to determine compliance with the Act (AB 939). Board staff makes a recommendation based on their review. Board staff presents Biennial Review recommendation to Board for consideration.

CIWMP Enforcement Policy - Part II. Basis for Compliance Determination Criteria for determining extent to which a jurisdiction has implemented, or shown a good faith effort to implement, its SRRE and HHWE. Incorporated by reference in PRC Section (c)(1 & 2); Policy first approved by the Board in February 1995; Last updated in August 2001;

CIWMP Enforcement - Scenarios Implementing all or most programs and meeting diversion requirements; Implementing some/all programs, but not meeting diversion requirements; Implementing a small number of programs and meeting diversion requirements; and, Not implementing programs and not meeting diversion requirements.

What are the possible outcomes of a Biennial Review? Possible Board findings: In compliance: – Met 50% Goal – “Good Faith Effort” Not in compliance – Compliance Order and Schedule SB 1066 Time Extension/Alternative Diversion Requirement (sunset 1/1/2006 – not applicable to 03/04 or future Biennial Reviews)

Biennial Review Findings In Compliance: The Board accepts the jurisdiction's implementation of its SRRE/HHWE, and its diversion rate as reported. – Met 50% Goal – "Good Faith Effort"

Biennial Review Findings (cont.) "Good Faith" Effort: – Jurisdiction has not reached 50% or Board- approved reduced goal, but has demonstrated commitment toward that end; – Program implementation and diversion rate are accepted as reported.

Biennial Review Findings (cont.) SB 1066 Time Extension/Alternative Diversion Requirement: – Senate Bill (SB) 1066 modified PRC Section in 1997 to allow jurisdictions to request time extensions (TE) in meeting 50 percent goal. – SB 1066 also modified PRC Section to allow for alternative diversion requirements (ADR). – Sunsetted January 1, 2006 (all Board approved TE/ADRs end 12/31/05).

Biennial Review Findings (cont.) Not In Compliance: Compliance Order and Schedule issued when Board determines a jurisdiction is not complying with the Act. – Local Assistance Plan - includes specific steps for jurisdiction to complete, including program changes, new programs, or studies. – Potential Fines – Failure to comply with compliance order may lead to fines up to $10,000 per day until jurisdiction implements its SRRE and HHWE and complies with the Act [PRC section 41850(a)].

Biennial Review Agenda Items Streamlined (Grouped) Agenda Items: – In Compliance Individual Agenda Items: – In Compliance with New Base Year – Not in Compliance Item Exceptions: – Compliance Orders – SB 1066 Time Extensions/ADR through 2005

Current Biennial Review Cycle – 424 jurisdictions were required to submit annual reports – Anticipate taking staff’s findings for approximately 300 jurisdictions’ BR to the Board for consideration in several “batched” or “streamlined” items starting in September – Approximately 17 will be coming forward to the Board for consideration in individual items

Time Extensions and Biennial Review Time Extensions through December 31, 2005: – 107 had SB 1066 Time Extensions through 12/31/2005 to meet 50% – Jurisdictions that did not implement their SB 1066 Plan of Correction and did not meet the 50% goal will be brought to the Board during the 2003/2004 BR

Conclusion: Questions?