Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Advertisements

Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Grants Administrative Changes under the New EDGAR
Raúl Soto Ph.D., Associate Director CTE 1 CTE Funding & OMNI Circular.
Charter Schools: Grants Management Compliance and OMB Uniform Grants Guidance Changes NYSED – September 2014 Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
External Auditors – Common Findings in Federal Programs Allen, Green & Williamson, LLP.
Grants Administration Updates - OMB’s Uniform Guidance Division of Grants Administration Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance Texas Education.
The Super Circular – “Omni Circular”
TIFFANY R. WINTERS, ESQ. BRETTE KAPLAN WURZBURG, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC OCTOBER Grant Allowability Changes Under the OMB.
Grant Guidance Changes
New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 “The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21 st Century Education Program” Presented.
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards University Senate Meeting Martha Taylor.
Key Aspects of the New Omni Circular
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Financial and Grants Management Institute - March 18-20, Federal Grants Management for Fiscal Staff.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Purchasing Changes 2 CFR OSU Grants & Contracts Financial Administration.
Omni Circular Key Area #5 Indirect Costs and the Omni Circular: What to Expect Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
The Uniform Grants Guidance - Compliance Starts Now Are You Ready? Virginia Department of Education Roanoke, VA July 2015 Leigh Manasevit Brustein & Manasevit,
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
FHWA Implementation 2CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards September 2015.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
The Impact of OMB Circulars (Super or Otherwise) on Federal Programs Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
2008 California AmeriCorps Conference1 Federal and Grants Management for Program and Fiscal Staff.
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
August, 2013 Grants Circular Reform Update Office of Management and Budget For more information visit
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS REGION 3 FISCAL FORUM ATLANTA, GEORGIA APRIL 26-29, 2005.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit November Federal Grants Administration Changes Under the New EDGAR.
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Financial and Administrative Management
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
Office of Grants Fiscal
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Avoiding Financial Management Pitfalls: The Mississippi Story
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
The Impact of Deregulation on Compliance
To Accountability…and Beyond
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC The Uniform Grant Guidance: Background, Financial Management and Allowability Changes Presented by: Leigh Manasevit, Esq. lmanasevit@bruman.com Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2014

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Reasons for the Change? Simplicity Consistency Obama Executive Order on Regulatory Review Increase Efficiency Strengthen Oversight Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Who crafted the changes? “COFAR” Council on Financial Assistance Reform, and Key Stakeholders www.cfo.gov/cofar Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Who is covered? All “nonfederal entities” expending federal awards Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC What is included? A-102: Administrative Rules - State/Local Part 80 – EDGAR A-110: Administrative Rules - Postsecondary and Nonprofits Part 74 – EDGAR A-87: Cost Rules - State/Local A-21: Cost Rules - Postsecondary A-122: Cost Rules - Nonprofits A-133: Audit Rules Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Key Dates: Key Dates February 1, 2013 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking December 26, 2013 Published Rule in Federal Register http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-26/pdf/2013-30465.pdf June 26, 2014 Draft Regulations Due to OMB August 29, 2014 COFAR Releases FAQs December 26, 2014 Final Regulations Published Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Date of Applicability of Revised Rules Guidance applies to all new awards and incremental funding made on or after 12/26/2014 OMB stated on 12/20/13 All additions after December 26, 2014 ? ? ? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

COFAR Updates – FAQs - August 29, 2014 Applies to new federal awards if a federal awarding agency considers its incremental funding actions to be opportunities to change terms and conditions of previously made awards. Federal awarding agencies may apply the Uniform Guidance to the entire Federal awards that is uncommitted or unobligated as of the Federal award date or first increment after 12/26/14. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

COFAR Updates – FAQs - August 29, 2014 (cont.) What about subawards? The effective date is the same as the effective date of the Federal award from which the subaward is made. Does not matter when the subaward is made – but the original Federal award from the Federal awarding agency. There Is a Procurement “Grace Period” of 1 year. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Inconsistency Between Program Statute and Guidance If federal program statute differs from Uniform Grant Guidance, then statute/regulation governs. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC A Significant Change Shift from focus on compliance to focus on PERFORMANCE!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Performance Auditors (A-133 + Federal OIG) and Monitors (Federal and State Pass-Through) must look more to “outcomes” than to “process” Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Most Significant Change ??? The Uniform Grant Guidance has a MAJOR emphasis on “strengthening accountability” by improving policies that protect against waste, fraud and abuse Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

New: Required Certifications 200.415 NEW: Official authorized to legally bind the non-federal entity must certify on annual and final fiscal reports or vouchers requesting payment: “By signing this report, I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the report is true, complete and accurate and the expenditures, disbursements and cash receipts are for the purposes and objectives set forth in the terms and conditions of the federal award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent information or the omission of any material fact, may subject me to criminal, civil or administrative penalties for fraud, false statements, false claims, or otherwise.” Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Structure of Uniform Grant Guidance (p. 78608) 2 CFR Part 200 Structure of Uniform Grant Guidance (p. 78608) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Uniform Grant Guidance Sections (p. 78608) Subpart A – Definitions Subpart B – General Provisions Subpart C – Pre Award Requirements Subpart D – Post Award Requirements Subpart E – Cost Principles Subpart F – Audit Requirements Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Key Definitions (Examples) Cognizant Agency for Audit 200.18 (78611) Cognizant Agency for Indirect 200.19 (78611) Cooperative Audit Resolution 200.25 (78612) Improper Payment 200.53 (78614) Internal Control Over Compliance 200.62 (78615) Major Program 200.65 (78615) Modified Total Direct Cost 200.68 (78615) Non-Federal Entity 200.69 (78615) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Financial Management Changes 200.302(b) (NEW) Identification of Awards Financial Reporting Accounting Records (Source Docs) Internal Control Budget Control (NEW) Written Cash Management Procedures (NEW) Written Allowability Procedures Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Identification of Awards (New) All federal “awards” received and expended The name of the federal “program” Identification of award CFDA Title and Number Federal Award I.D. # Fiscal Year of Award Federal Agency Pass-Through (If S/A) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Financial Reporting New shift to OMB approved performance metrics Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Financial Reporting (cont.) Accurate, current, complete disclosure of financial results of each award (Old) in accord with the financial reporting reqs of the grant (New) in accord with 200.327 and 200.328 200.327 – Federal awarding agency can only collect OMB approved data elements, no less than annually, no more than quarterly 200.328 – Non-federal entity must submit performance reports at intervals required by federal agency or pass-through. Annual performance reports due 90 days after reporting period; Quarterly performance reports due 30 days after reporting period Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Financial Reporting (cont.) Performance Metrics: Compare actual accomplishments to objectives (quantify to extent possible) Reasons goals were not met if appropriate Additional pertinent information (e.g., analysis and explanation of cost overruns, high unit costs) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Financial Reporting (cont.) OMB Allows ED to waive “performance metrics” not required. How will ED reconcile performance metrics with accountability/performance indicators of ESEA, IDEA, CTE, AEFLA Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Accounting Records (Source Documentation) Combines current requirements: Source Documentation Must Be Kept On: Federal Awards Authorizations Obligations Unobligated balances Assets Expenditures Income Interest (New) (Eliminated liabilities) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Internal Controls Essentially same as current requirements: Effective control over and accountability for: All funds Property Other assets Must adequately safeguard all assets Use assets solely for authorized purpose Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Internal Controls (cont.) Cross reference 200.303 (New) Internal Controls must ensure compliance with federal statutes, regs, terms of the award Entities must: Evaluate and monitor compliance; Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified; and Safeguard protected personally identifiable information (PII) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Budget Control Same as current rules Comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each award Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Cash Management Procedures (New) Written Procedures to implement the requirements of 200.305 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) For states, payments are governed by Treasury – State CMIA agreements 31 CFR Part 205 No Change For all other non-federal entities, payments methods must minimize time elapsing between draw from G-5 and disbursement (not obligation) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Written procedures must describe whether non-federal entity uses: Advance Payments (preferred) Limited to minimum amounts needed to meet immediate cash needs Reimbursement Pass-through must make payment within 30 calendar days after receipt of the billing Working Capital Advance The pass-through determines that the non-federal entity lacks sufficient working capital Allows advance payment to cover estimated disbursement needs for initial period Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Advances must be maintained in insured accounts Pass-through cannot require separate depository accounts Accounts must be interest bearing unless: Aggregate federal awards under $120,000 Account not expected to earn in excess of $500 per year Bank require minimum balance so high, that such account not feasible Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Cash Management Procedures (cont.) Interest earned must be remitted annually to HHS Interest amounts up to $500 may be retained by non-federal entity for administrative purposes Currently $250 for IHEs and NonProfits and $100 for State and local governments Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Written Allowability Procedures (New) Written procedures for determining allowability of costs in accord with Subpart E – Cost Principles (see p. 78639 – 78662) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Factors Affecting Allowability of Costs 200.403 All Costs Must Be: Necessary, Reasonable and Allocable Conform with federal law & grant terms Consistent with state and local policies Consistently treated In accordance with GAAP Not included as match Net of applicable credits (moved to 200.406) Adequately documented Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Applicable Credits 200.406 Those receipts or reduction-of-expenditure type transaction that offset or reduce expense items – must be credited to the Federal award as either cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate. Examples: purchase discounts, rebates or allowances, recoveries or indemnities on losses, insurance refunds or rebates, adjustments of overpayments Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Profit 200.400(g) Non-federal entities may not earn or keep any profit resulting from federal financial assistance, unless expressly authorized by the terms and conditions of the federal award. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Prior Written Approval 200.407 NEW: In order to avoid subsequent disallowance: Non-federal entity may seek prior written approval of cognizant agency (for indirect cost rate) or Federal awarding agency in advance of the incurrence of special or unusual costs Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Program Income 200.307 Non-Federal entities are encouraged to earn income to defray program costs where appropriate. Costs of generating program income may only be deducted if: Authorized by federal regulations or the federal award; Costs are incidental and not charged to the federal award. Property from the sale of real property or equipment is not program income – apply post award property rules. NEW: Program Income Must Be Deducted from Total Allowable Costs With prior approval may dd to Federal Award. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Direct v. Indirect Costs 200.413 NEW: Salaries of administrative and clerical staff should be treated as “indirect” unless all of following are met: Such services are integral to the activity Individuals can be specifically identified with the activity Such costs are explicitly included in the budget Costs not also recovered as indirect Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Contract vs. Grant 200.330 No change from the current requirement. Entities must clearly determine what is a subgrant and what is a contract. Note the difference!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Selected Items of Cost The Uniform Grant Guidance has 55 specific items of cost! 200.420 Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Selected Items of Cost Examples Advertising/PR 200.421 (Clarified) Allowable for programmatic purposes including: Recruitment Procurement of goods Disposal of materials Program outreach Public relations (in limited circumstances) Alcohol 200.423 Not allowable Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Selected Items of Cost (cont.) Collections of Improper Payments 200.428 (New) The costs incurred by the non-Federal entity to recover improper payments are allowable as either direct or indirect costs, as appropriate. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Selected Items of Cost (cont.) Entertainment Costs 200.438 (Clarified) Cost of entertainment are unallowable Amusement, Diversion, Social Activities Except where costs might otherwise be considered programmatic and are authorized or have prior written approval of the federal awarding agency. Fines, Penalties, Damages and other Settlements 200.441 If related to violation, alleged violation or failure to comply with Federal, state, tribal, local or foreign law and regulations then unallowable. Except with prior written approval of federal awarding agency. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Selected Items of Cost (cont.) Travel Costs 200.474 (Changed) Prior rule: allowable with certain restrictions Travel costs may be charged on actual, per diem, or mileage basis Travel charges must be consistent with entity’s written travel reimbursement policies Grantee must retain documentation that participation of individual in conference is necessary for the project Travel costs must be reasonable and consistent with written travel policy/or follow GSA 48 CFR 31.205-46(a) Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC

Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC