Performance-Based Monitoring and Interventions April 3, 2008.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Advertisements

Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.

1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.

APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.

Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.

Graduation, Completion, & Dropout. Re-Alignment Accountability Graduation Completion Dropout District Practice PEIMS Reporting.

2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.

2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.

Kick-off Meeting July 7, Provided by Region 4 ESC.

The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.

Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.

Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.

2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.

Vertical Scale Scores.

Adapted from Texas Education Agency PBM ProductDate of 2014 release Projected date of 2015 release PBMAS (Unmasked reports) LEA reports posted.

Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.

State Accountability and Federal Adequate Yearly Progress.

Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.

1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.

AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.

State & AYP Accountability Ratings Highlights District Ratings by Rating Category (including Charter Operators) ACCOUNTABILITY RATING 2009 CountPercent.

ESL Education Program Report Hudson ISD ESL/Content-Based An English program that serves students identified as students of limited English proficiency.

Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS). 34 CFR § : An LEA may not use more than 15 percent of the amount the LEA receives under Part B of.

Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.

1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.

Texas Public School Accountability Presented at Midwinter by the Texas Education Agency.

Texas Projection Measure. What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass.

1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.

Go for the Touchdown with ESC-2

What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.

10/19/2015 Academic Excellence Indicator System Woden ISD.

Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS) January 2005 Update.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.

How Does Special Education Affect School Results? Terry Wyatt Executive Director, Tri-County Co-Op.

 Implementation of certain STAAR Grades 3-8 indicators, as appropriate and contingent on data availability.  Use of the Met Standard performance standard.

The Basics of Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress AYP.

Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)

Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,

Annual Report and Public Hearing January 19, 2010.

Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.

Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.

Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”

2007 & 2008 Accountability Update Session November 12, 2007.

2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.

Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.

1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.

Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.

Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.

HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.

The State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness January 2012.

Effective Programs for Successful Students The Network Summer Summit Presenters: Rachel Harrington (Performance-Based Monitoring Division) Judy Struve.

Harlingen CISD Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.

Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.

State Accountability Update

2012 Accountability Determinations

PBMAS Overview and TAIS Training

Career Technology Education Performance-Based Monitoring Summer Overview Ed Garcia, CTE Specialist Region One Education Service Center (956)

Advancing ELL Progress

AEIS [Our School District]

2013 Texas Accountability System

A-F Accountability and Special Education

OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM

Presentation transcript:

Performance-Based Monitoring and Interventions April 3, 2008

PBMAS Overview The development of the 2008 PBMAS is underway. There are significant changes for this year, many of which are the result of new assessments. Some 2008 PBMAS decisions will be contingent on decisions that will be made in the state and federal accountability systems for 2008.

3 Reminder on Acronyms PL = Performance Level RI = Required Improvement SA = Special Analysis PJSA = Professional Judgment Special Analysis

4 The State Accountability System’s Phase-in Cycle of TAKS (Accommodated) and TAKS Grade 8 Science Performance Results (Report, Report, Use) 2006 Report Only for: Science (5, 8, 10, 11) Science (5 Spanish) Social Studies (8, 10, 11) ELA (11) Math (11) Grade 8 TAKS Science 2007 Report Only for: Science (5, 8, 10, 11) Science (5 Spanish) Social Studies (8, 10, 11) ELA (11) Math (11) Grade 8 TAKS Science 2008 USE: Science (5, 8, 10, 11) Science (5 Spanish) Social Studies (8, 10, 11) ELA (11) Math (11) Grade 8 TAKS Science Report Only for: Reading/ELA (3-10) Reading (3-6 Spanish) Math (3-10) Math (3-6 Spanish) Writing (4 and 7) Writing (4 Spanish)

PBMAS Indicator Preview (April Update) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS CTE #6CTE Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 9-12) PL assigned but SA, PJSA, and RI suspended due to change in dropout definition. Also because of definition change, for 2007 MSR must be met in current year or PL=Not Assigned. Reinstate RI. Reinstate SA. Reinstate aggregation across years to meet MSR. Adjust standard and cut points.

PBMAS Indicator Preview Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #1(i-v)SPED TAKS Passing Rate (M, R/ELA, S, SS, W) PL assigned with RI, SA, and PJSA for reading, math, and science. Add TAKS (Accommodated) results for select grades and subject areas. Add Grade 8 Science results. SPED #2(i-v)SPED YAE TAKS Passing Rate PL assigned with SA. Add Grade 8 Science results.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #3(i-iii)SDAA II Gap Closure (R, M, W) (Grades 3-8) PL assigned for Reading and Math with SA. Writing was Report Only. Delete indicators. The SDAA II is no longer being administered. SPED #4(i-ii)SDAA II Gap Closure (R, M) (Grades 3-10) Report OnlyDelete indicators. The SDAA II is no longer being administered.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #5TAKS Only Participation Rate PL assigned with SA and RI. Delete indicator. This indicator was designed to be phased-out as SPED #6 is phased-in.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #6TAKS/TAKS-I Only Participation Rate Report Only Rename SPED TAKS/TAKS (Accommodated) Participation Rate Move indicator to “live”, using the standard and cut points that were already in place for SPED #5. Allow MSR to be met over two years and aggregate data over three years. Include RI and SA.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #7SDAA II Only Participation Rate PL assigned with no SA, PJSA, or RI. Delete this indicator. The SDAA II is no longer administered.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #8Less Restrictive Environments (Ages 3-5) PL assigned with RI but no SA or PJSA. Add SA. SPED #9Less Restrictive Environments (Ages 6-11) PL assigned with no SA, PJSA, or RI. Due to change in age group, MSR must be met in current year or PL=Not Assigned. Add SA and RI. Allow MSR to be met over two years. SPED #10Less Restrictive Environments (Ages 12-21) PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI. No change.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #11SPED Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-12) PL assigned but SA, PJSA, and RI suspended due to change in dropout definition. Also because of definition change, for 2007 MSR must be met in current year or PL=Not Assigned. Reinstate RI. Reinstate SA. Reinstate aggregation across two years to meet MSR.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #12SPED RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate PL assigned with RI and limited PJSA but no SA. Add SA. SPED #13SPED Graduation Rate Implemented as a new Report Only indicator. Continue as a Report Only indicator.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #14SPED Identification PL assigned with RI. No changes. SPED #15SPED African American Representation PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI. No changes.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #16SPED Hispanic Representation PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI. No changes. SPED #17SPED LEP Representation PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI. No changes.

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #18SPED Discretionary DAEP Placements PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and Add Reason Code 50 (non-illegal knife) SPED #19SPED Discretionary Expulsions PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI. Delete this indicator. PL 0 Distribution: 2004= = = =1195

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #20SPED Discretionary Placements to ISS PL assigned with SA, PJSA, and RI Cut Points: PL 0 = 0 to 16.0 PL 1 = 16.1 to 34.0 PL 2 = 34.1 to 65.0 PL 3 = 65.1 and above Adjust cut points Cut Points: PL 0 = 0 to 10.0 PL 1 = 10.1 to 24.9 PL 2 = 25.0 to 55.0 PL 3 = 55.1 and above

PBMAS Indicator Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Indicator Name2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS SPED #21SPED Discretionary Placements to OSS N/AImplement a new Report Only indicator. SPED #22SPED TAKS-M Participation Rate N/AImplement a new Report Only indicator. SPED #23SPED TAKS-Alt Participation Rate N/AImplement a new Report Only indicator.

PBMAS Preview Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components Minimum size requirements Implemented a numerator control of 30 for SPED Identification. Added a second numerator control of 30 to N1 on all SPED Representation indicators. All indicators were reviewed, and there are no recommendations for changes to minimum size requirements this year.

PBMAS Preview Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components Special analysisPJSA for science was added to one TAKS indicator set per program area. Additional TAKS indicators will have PJSA available for science. Other System Components TAKS Grade 8 Science Grade 8 Science was added to of participation indicators as appropriate Begin incorporating Grade 8 Science results into TAKS performance indicators.

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components TAKS StandardsImplemented 2007 subject-area standards for Academically Acceptable Implement 2008 subject-area standards for Academically Acceptable

TAKS Subject-Area TAKS Standards for Academically Acceptable Reading/ELA2007 = 65% 2008 = 70% Mathematics2007 = 45% 2008 = 50% Science2007 = 40% 2008 = 45% Social Studies and Writing2007 = 65% 2008 = 65%

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components Performance Level Cut Points for TAKS Passing Rate indicators Continued the cut points established in 2004 Adjust cut points for all TAKS passing rate indicators to align with the increases in subject-area standards that have occurred since 2004.

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components Required Improvement calculation for TAKS performance indicators Revised RI calculation for TAKS performance indicators by decreasing the number of years to reach standard from 7 to 6. Make no changes to the 6-year calculation to allow districts another year to continue to make improvement toward meeting the standard in light of increased accountability standards in 2008 and the phase-in of certain TAKS (Accommodated) results.

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components TAKS-IIncluded in the relevant participation indicators Begin to include renamed TAKS (Accommodated) results for select grades and subject areas into PBMAS TAKS performance indicators as appropriate.

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components TAKS-MN/AImplement a new Report Only indicator that reports the number of students taking TAKS-M for all subjects.

PBMAS Preview (continued) Program Area and Number Description2007 PBMAS2008 PBMAS Other System Components TAKS-AltIncluded TAKS-Alt field test takers in the denominators of appropriate participation indicators. Implement a new Report Only indicator that reports the number of students taking TAKS-Alt for all subjects.