Implementing Subprograms

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSI 3120, Implementing subprograms, page 1 Implementing subprograms The environment in block-structured languages The structure of the activation stack.
Advertisements

(1) ICS 313: Programming Language Theory Chapter 10: Implementing Subprograms.
Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms. Copyright © 2012 Addison- Wesley. All rights reserved. 1-2 Chapter 10 Topics The General Semantics of Calls and Returns.
Chapter 9 Subprogram Control Consider program as a tree- –Each parent calls (transfers control to) child –Parent resumes when child completes –Copy rule.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
1 Storage Registers vs. memory Access to registers is much faster than access to memory Goal: store as much data as possible in registers Limitations/considerations:
1 Chapter 7: Runtime Environments. int * larger (int a, int b) { if (a > b) return &a; //wrong else return &b; //wrong } int * larger (int *a, int *b)
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Run time vs. Compile time
Semantics of Calls and Returns
PZ09A Programming Language design and Implementation -4th Edition Copyright©Prentice Hall, PZ09A - Activation records Programming Language Design.
The environment of the computation Declarations introduce names that denote entities. At execution-time, entities are bound to values or to locations:
Chapter 9: Subprogram Control
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms –Semantics of Calls and Returns –Implementing “Simple” Subprograms –Implementing Subprograms with.
1 CSCI 360 Survey Of Programming Languages 9 – Implementing Subprograms Spring, 2008 Doug L Hoffman, PhD.
Week 8-9b spring 2002CSCI337 Organization of Prog. Lang0 A Brief Recap Subprogram benefits, basic characteristics from names to their values  names can.
Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms. Copyright © 2007 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 1–2 Semantics of Call and Return The subprogram call and return.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms –Nested Subprograms –Blocks –Implementing Dynamic Scoping.
Chapter 7: Runtime Environment –Run time memory organization. We need to use memory to store: –code –static data (global variables) –dynamic data objects.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Runtime Environments What is in the memory? Runtime Environment2 Outline Memory organization during program execution Static runtime environments.
CS 2104 Prog. Lang. Concepts Subprograms
Chapter 9 Subprograms Fundamentals of Subprograms
Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms. Copyright © 2012 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-2 Chapter 10 Topics The General Semantics of Calls and Returns.
1 Copyright © 1998 by Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Chapter 9 Def: The subprogram call and return operations of a language are together called its subprogram.
CSC3315 (Spring 2008)1 CSC 3315 Subprograms Hamid Harroud School of Science and Engineering, Akhawayn University
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Implementing Subprograms What actions must take place when subprograms are called and when they terminate? –calling a subprogram has several associated.
Run-Time Storage Organization Compiler Design Lecture (03/23/98) Computer Science Rensselaer Polytechnic.
A.Alzubair Hassan Abdullah Dept. Computer Sciences Kassala University A.Alzubair Hassan Abdullah Dept. Computer Sciences Kassala University NESTED SUBPROGRAMS.
國立台灣大學 資訊工程學系 薛智文 98 Spring Run Time Environments (textbook ch# 7.1–7.3 )
Subprograms - implementation
CSC 8505 Compiler Construction Runtime Environments.
1 Chapter 10 © 2002 by Addison Wesley Longman, Inc The General Semantics of Calls and Returns - Def: The subprogram call and return operations of.
Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms. Copyright © 2012 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1-2 Chapter 10 Topics The General Semantics of Calls and Returns.
10-1 Chapter 10: Implementing Subprograms The General Semantics of Calls and Returns Implementing “Simple” Subprograms Implementing Subprograms with Stack-Dynamic.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Implementing Subprograms
PZ09A Programming Language design and Implementation -4th Edition Copyright©Prentice Hall, PZ09A - Activation records Programming Language Design.
1 Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Subprograms - implementation. Calling a subprogram  transferring control to a subprogram: save conditions in calling program pass parameters allocate.
Chapter Ten: Implementing Subprograms Lesson 10. Implementing?  Previous lesson: parameter passing  In, out, inout  By value  By reference  Passing.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Chapter 10 Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms. Implementing Subprograms  The subprogram call and return operations are together called subprogram linkage.
ISBN Chapter 10 Implementing Subprograms.
Implementing Subprograms
Chapter 10 : Implementing Subprograms
Implementing Subprograms Chapter 10
Implementing Subprograms
Implementing Subprograms
COMPILERS Activation Records
Implementing Subprograms
Implementing Subprograms
Chapter 10: Implementing Subprograms Sangho Ha
Implementing Subprograms
Implementing Subprograms
Implementing Subprograms
PZ09A - Activation records
Implementing Subprograms
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Run Time Environments 薛智文
Runtime Environments What is in the memory?.
Where is all the knowledge we lost with information? T. S. Eliot
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Implementing Subprograms
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Activation records Programming Language Design and Implementation (4th Edition) by T. Pratt and M. Zelkowitz Prentice Hall, 2001 Section
Implementing Subprograms
Chapter 10 Def: The subprogram call and return operations of
Presentation transcript:

Implementing Subprograms Acknowledgement: Mehdi Emadi Dr. Abhik Roychoudhury And …

Objectives To understand the implementation of subprogram calls basic procedure of subprogram linkage activation records static and dynamic chaining

General issues When calling: Save state of calling procedure Determine parameter-passing mechanism for each parameter and arrange access appropriately Allocate storage for local variables Initialize local variable values Arrange transfer of control to procedure Arrange return of control to calling procedure Arrange access to visible non-local variables

General issues (cont.) When Returning: Move final parameter values back to calling arguments (when pass by result) Deallocate storage used for local variables Undo access to visible non-local variables Return control to calling procedure

Activation Records Programs consist of Code, Data, and book-keeping Noncode part is organized in an Activation Record ( Code does not change by each call) Activation record instances can include Parameter definitions Local variables Functional value Return address Other data to be discussed

Fortran 77 A simple situation: Actual code is fixed at compile time Local variables/data are also of fixed size Subprograms cannot be recursive A simple solution: Local variables statically allocated (static activation records) All referencing of non-local variables is through COMMON: a globally accessible static memory space

Fortran 77 Procedure call: Save the execution status of current procedure Carry out parameter-passing Pass return address to callee Transfer control to callee

Fortran 77 (cont.) Procedure return: If using pass-by-value-result, final values of parameters are moved to arguments If subprogram is a function, final value is moved back Execution status of the caller is restored Control is transferred back to caller

Fortran77 Activation Records No more than one can exist for a procedure AR Instances can be statically allocated Either separate or interleave code and data Code Return address Local variables Main Procedure A Parameters Common

Algol-like Languages New complexities over Fortran 77 Parameters can be passed in different ways (value or reference) Subprogram variables may be dynamically allocated Recursion legal: multiple activation records may exist simultaneously Scope rules (usually static) determine visibility of non-local variables

Algol-like Languages Activation records Format and size is known at compile time since all local variables and their size is statically fixed Instances of activation records are dynamically generated at run-time

Contents of Activation Records Return address Pointer to code segment of caller and offset address of instruction Static link: A pointer to the activation record of static parent Used to support non-local variable access Dynamic link: A pointer to activation record of caller Used in static scoped languages to support procedure return (indicates how much of stack to remove) Used in dynamic scoped languages for non-local variable access

Activation Records (continued) Parameters: Either values or addresses provided by caller Local variables: Scalars stored directly within activation record Non-scalars (structures) stored elsewhere References to locals can be via offset from beginning of record: known at compile time Functional Value (if a function) Place to put the returned value of the function (In some languages the function name can be treated like a local variable)

Activation Record Example procedure sub (var tot: real); var sum : real; begin : end; A new activation record is created each time sub is called Run-time Stack holds activation records Stack discipline is appropriate for conventional procedures But not for co-routines Return Address Local Parameter Dynamic Link Static Link sum tot Start of record Offset of sum }

Factorial Example Return (fact) Functional: ? Parameter n=1 Dynamic Link Static Link Return (main) Functional: ? Parameter n=3 Local value = ? Parameter n=2 Return (main) Functional: ? Parameter n=3 Dynamic Link Static Link Local value = ? Return (fact) Functional: ? Parameter n=2 Return (main) Functional: ? Parameter n=3 Dynamic Link Static Link Local value = ?

Factorial Example Return (fact) Functional: 1 Parameter n=1 Dynamic Link Static Link Return (main) Functional: ? Parameter n=3 Local value = ? Functional: ? Parameter n=2 Factorial Example Return (main) Functional: ? Parameter n=3 Dynamic Link Static Link Local value = ? Return (fact) Functional: 2 Parameter n=2 Return (main) Functional: 6 Parameter n=3 Dynamic Link Static Link Local value = ?

Non-local references Reference to a non-local variable requires a two step process: Find the activation record instance where the variable was allocated Use local offset to access the variable within the record Finding the ARI (under static scoping) is not straightforward

Non-local references program Prog; int i=0; procedure A; int i=1; B(); end; procedure B; int i=2; C(); end; procedure C; i=3; end; A(); end; Show the set of activation records in existence when the statement ‘i=3’ is encountered. Which declaration of ‘i’ will be updated? Following the dynamic chain will find the wrong ‘i’!

Static Chains A link from each procedure’s activation record to its parent’s activation record with respect to static scope The static chain is different from the dynamic chain: The static parent of C is Prog. The dynamic parent of C is B.

Static Chains (continued) No need to search for variable: number of static links is known at compile time (why?) Static Depth: nesting level of scope Chain Offset (Nesting Depth): difference between static depth of reference environment and static depth of declaration environment References represented as (chain_offset, local_offset) Locals can be handled with chain_offset=0

Maintaining Static Chains At subprogram call: Correct parent known at compile time Must find most recent activation record of parent Avoid search of dynamic chain by using existing static chain to find parent (treat procedure reference like variable At return: just remove record from stack

Cost of Static Chains Static chains allow references to non-local variables to be resolved, but at a cost: References to non-local variables “above” parent are slow Time to resolve a reference is difficult to predict, and sensitive to source code changes

Summary: MacLennan terminology State of a procedure: A fixed program part A variable activation part The ep (environment part), the context to be used for this activation of the procedure, local and nonlocal context The ip (instruction part), the current instruction being (or to be) executed in this activation of the procedure

Review of scope rules Q and T are declarations of procedures within P, so scope of names Q and T is same as scope of declaration a. R and S are declarations of procedures in Q. U is a declaration of a procedure in T. Storage managed by adding activation records, when procedure invoked, on a stack.

Activation record stack

Scope rules Scope rules: The scope of a variable are the set of statements where the variable may be accessed (i.e., named) in a program. Static scope: Scope is dependent on the syntax of the program. Dynamic scope: Scope is determined by the execution of the program.

Scope rules Static nested scope: A variable is accessible in the procedure it is declared in, and all procedures internal to that procedure, except a new declaration of that variable name in an internal procedure will eliminate the new variable's scope from the scope of the outer variable. A variable declared in a procedure is local in that procedure; otherwise it is global.

Activation record stack

Activation record stack Problem is: How to manage this execution stack? Two pointers perform this function: 1. Dynamic link pointer points to activation record that called (invoked) the new activation record. It is used for returning from the procedure to the calling procedure. 2. Static link pointer points to the activation record that is global to the current activation record (i.e., points to the activation record of the procedure containing the declaration of this procedure).

Program a(…); var N: integer; procedure b(sum: real); var i: integer; avg: real; Data: array[1..10] of real; procedure c(val: real); begin … writeln(Data[i]); end {c}; end {b}; begin … end {a}

Accessing a variable At run-time skip down the static chain (how many skips? Static distance) to get to the activation record of the variable. The address of the variable is obtained by adding the fixed offset of the variable to the address obtained in step 1.

Static distance(static nesting level:snl) and offset of the variable are computed by the compiler at compile time. Symbol table ----------------------------------------- Name Type Snl Offset N int 1 1 Sum real 2 1 i int 2 2 Avg real 2 3 Data real array 2 4 Val real 3 1

Implementation of subprogram storage: more examples Each subprogram has a block of storage containing such information, called an activation record. Consider the following C subprogram: float FN( float X, int Y) const initval=2; #define finalval 10 float M(10); int N; N = initval; if(N<finalval){ ... } return (20 * X + M(N)); } Information about procedure FN is contained in its activation record.

Activation records

Dynamic nature of activation records Each invocation of FN causes a new activation record to be created. Thus the static code generated by the compiler for FN will be associated with a new activation record, each time FN is called. A stack structure is used for activation record storage.

Dynamic nature of activation records

Activation record structure

Example of act. record stack Declarations Var A in P B in Q C in R

Activation record example 1 Ex 1. In R: C := B+A;  C local, A,B global For each variable, get pointer to proper activation record. Assume AR is current act.record pointer (R). 1. B is one level back: Follow AR.SL to get AR containing B. Get R-value of B from fixed offset L-value 2. A is two levels back: Follow (AR.SL).SL to get activation record containing A. Add R-value of A from fixed offset L-value 3. C is local. AR points to correct act record. Store sum of B+A into L-value of C

Activation record example 2 Example 2. Execution in procedure Q: A := B  B is local, A global Assume AR is current activation record pointer (Q) 1. B is now local. AR points to activation record Get R-value from local activation record

Activation record example 2 2. A is now one level back AR.SL is activation record of P Store R-value of B into L-value of A Compiler knows static structure, so it can generate the number of static link chains it has to access in order to access the correct activation record containing the data object. This is a compile time, not a runtime calculation.

Setting the static link …

Displays: an alternative Static links are in a separate array One element per static depth Exactly two steps per reference: (display_offset, local_offset) When a subprogram at a given static depth is called, save and replace the link at that depth Efficiency compared to Static Chains: Deeply nested references more efficient Maintenance of subprogram calls less efficient Yet most programs are not deeply nested (three in practice)

Display Example Static Depth 0 Display Static Depth 3 Static Depth 2 Sub1 Sub2 MAIN Static Depth 0 Display Static Depth 3 Static Depth 2 Static Depth 1 Sub1 Sub5 Sub4 Sub3 Sub2 MAIN

Dynamic Scoping Deep Access (NOT same as deep binding): References to non-local variables are be resolved by following dynamic links Easy to implement Search down call chain may be slow Activation records must store variable names

Shallow Access (shallow binding method) Like FORTRAN, each procedure is statically allocated one copy of its activation record. Containing the most recent activation of that procedure. Variable access is efficient. In the case of recursive cal, push the activation record on the stack. Activation records are allocated statically, their size is fixed (=> cannot be used for languages with dynamic arrays …)

Implementing Subprogram as Parameters Two major problems: Static type checking Full specification for formal parameter shall be present: type of the function, the number, order, and type of each parameter. Nonlocal references (free variables) what is the nonlocal environment used when a function is invoked?

Program Main; var X: integer; Procedure Q(var I:integer;function R(J:integer):integer); begin X:=4; I:=R(I); end; Procedure P; var I: integer; function FN(K:integer):integer; X:=X+K; FN:=I+K; I:=2; Q(X,FN); X:=7; P; End.

What should be the nonlocal environment used when FN is invoked within Q (Formal parameter R in Q)? The nonlocal environment is the same as the one that would be used if the call R(I,X) were simply replaced by the call FN(I,X) in subprogram Q. The nonlocal environment is the same as the one that would be used if the subprogram FN were invoked at the point where it appears as an actual parameter in the parameter list (in calling Q(X,FN)).

Procedural parameters are represented by closures. The ip field: entry address of the actual parameter The ep field: a pointer to the environment of definition of the actual procedure

Statement labels as parameters Which activation should be used? jump to the proper label in proper activation How to implement it? Pop all the activations to get to the right place

Nonlocal GOTOs Nonlocal gotos require environment restoration.