Link Before You Leap Ohio RttT Webinar Presented by Battelle for Kids June 9, 2011 Race to the Top.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kara Hanges, Martha Slamer, Maribeth Pennekamp, Debbie Dye, Rhonda Parker, and Kim Davidson.
Advertisements

2008–2009 ASPIRE Verification and Linkage Process An Introduction for Campus-Based Staff Members.
Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
IU29 Data Quality Council Meeting February 24, 2015.
STAAR Alternate is the state assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
PVAAS TEACHER SPECIFIC REPORTING TIMELINE AND INTENT PVAAS Pilot Roster Verification and Teacher Reporting.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
2012 © 2012, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved. ROSTER VERIFICATION Principal and Support Team Guide.
Special Education Student Information System Project New York City Department of Education | Special Education Student Information System Project 1 Welcome.
2012 MIS Conference. 1. Assigned Educator Primary teacher assigned to student HQT 2. Teacher of Record Precise accounting of instructional time responsibilities.
Bloom-Vernon Schools OHIO TIF Bloom-Vernon’s TIF Award Model Overview.
Curriculum Roundtable February 4, Topics Ohio’s New State Tests Professional Development in the County Visible Learning Conversation.
Guidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect ScoresGuidelines for Claiming Students for Teacher Effect Scores Spring 2014Spring 2014.
© 2014, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved. ROSTER VERIFICATION © 2014, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved. Regional and District Leader Training.
VALUE ADDED DESIGN TEAM Pay For Performance. VA Ideas This power point is to relay ideas that members of the VA design team have developed. No decisions.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS IMPACT Gradebook Core Team Support Guidelines July 7, 2008 Instructional Management Program & Academic Communication Tool I M P.
Value-Added: Then, Now & in the Future Ohio RttT Webinar Presented by Battelle for Kids June 7, 2011 Race to the Top.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
ELECTRONIC TEACHER AND PRINCIPAL EVALUATION SYSTEM eTPES Principal Session: Building Set-Up.
Jim Lloyd_2007 Educational Value Added Assessment System (EVAAS) Olmsted Falls City Schools Initial Presentation of 4 th Grade Students.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
January, 2012 Governing Board Retreat. PUSD Strategic Plan Student Learning Data-Driven Decision Making Capacity Development Community Connectedness.
Strategic Compensation BFKAward® Payout Process Overview August 8, 2012.
© 2014, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved. ROSTER VERIFICATION OVERVIEW © 2014, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
Curriculum Verification and Results (CVR) Reporting Portal User Guide for Principals and Teachers.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Roster Validation Quick Reference Guide for Teachers Office of Achievement and Accountability April
2014 © 2014, Battelle for Kids. All Rights Reserved. ROSTER VERIFICATION Teacher Guide.
APPR Workshop Teacher/Course Collection Presented by Helene Karo Robert E. Lupinskie Center for Curriculum, Instruction and Technology.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
Teacher Access to Student Performance (TASP) and Student Growth Measures Curriculum Directors April 25, 2014.
Roster Verification Process For Principals May, 2013.
ACCESS EMIS Coordinator Meeting March 13, TSDL Project Teacher Student Data Link Project –Roster Verification –Value Added –EVAAS –Battelle for.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Education Data Services & Educator Evaluation Team Reporting Educator Evaluation Information in EPIMS for RTTT Districts April – May, 2013 Robert Curtin.
BELPRE CITY SCHOOLS TIF PROGRAM Presented by: Strategic Compensation Committee August 2011 [insert district logo]
VALUE-ADDED AND THE OIP: What’s new and how do they fit together? October 26, 2011.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Building Capacity Using Value-Added in School Improvement Ohio RttT Webinar Presented by Battelle for Kids June 21, 2011 Race to the Top.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Note: This PowerPoint is for the Roster Verification process ONLY. It should not be.
EVAAS Roster Verification Webinar April 9, 2014 NHCS Testing and Accountability Deaprtment.
EVAAS Roster Verification Responsibilities at a Glance Clover School District 2.
Welcome SC DTCs-Alt Presentation will begin at 10:00AM Please use the chat feature within the webinar to submit questions All questions will be answered.
Using the BFK  Link™ Solution to Generate Teacher-Level Value-Added Reports for SPED and ELL Students July 2010.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 19,
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
Lessons Learned. Communication, Communication, Communication Collaborative effort Support of all stakeholders Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students,
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
EVAAS Roster Verification Process Spring 2013 New Hanover County Schools.
21st Century New Application Navigating the CCIP
SchoolSuccess for Coordinators
Payments Report Verification and Request March 2017
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Leading Student Achievement: Our Principal Purpose What we are learning from this year’s evaluation Kenneth Leithwood.
Implementing Race to the Top
Link/Roster verification Basics 2013 Resource for supporting awareness
Presentation transcript:

Link Before You Leap Ohio RttT Webinar Presented by Battelle for Kids June 9, 2011 Race to the Top

What is Linkage? Why Do We Link? Who Links? When Do You Link? Where Do We Link? Who Can Help Us Link?

What is Linkage? Race to the Top  Linkage is a process that allows teachers to attribute instructional influence on student academic progress and to receive teacher-level value-added reports. The linkage process includes:  Establishing a roster of students taught throughout the year  Indicating the month(s) when students are in and out of the classroom (i.e. mobility)  Reporting the percentage of instruction a teacher has for a given student for a given subject.

Race to the Top What is Linkage? Why Do We Link? Who Links? When Do You Link? Where Do We Link? Who Can Help Us Link?

Discrepancies and Variation in Data Race to the Top  Working with hundreds of districts and thousands of schools across the country, Battelle for Kids has learned that virtually every school has required significant revisions or modifications to:  teaching assignments  number of students taught  mobility of students  instructional responsibility attributed to a single teacher  In spring 2010, more than 125,000 rosters were verified by educators in South Carolina, Texas, Ohio and Oklahoma. Recent analyses of linkage results from schools across the country yield alarming results, including:

Discrepancies and Variation Data Race to the Top

Impact Associated with Inaccurate Data Race to the Top  Without reliable data and information, educators, policy- makers, and others will make inaccurate assumptions about instructional practices and students’ performance.  Inaccurate or incomplete data impact the credibility of school transformation. Stakeholders who support goals for transformation will question every decision if they suspect there are errors in the data upon which decisions are being made.

Value-Added Information Race to the Top  Without accurately linked data between teachers and students, value-added reports will not provide a true picture of what’s happening in the classroom because:  The number of students included in the analysis, as reported through the teacher-student linkage process, has been proven to vary considerably and will have an impact on value-added results, especially with small class sizes (i.e., self-contained elementary or special education classes).  Therefore, the data may reveal ineffective teachers as effective or effective teachers as ineffective by analyzing an inaccurate population of students and their test results.

Misidentification of Subjects Taught Race to the Top  If teachers are not accurately associated with the subjects they taught in the data leading up to analysis, they will be associated with the wrong subject in the analysis. As a result, teachers may be recognized as effective or ineffective in subjects they did not teach or lack analysis in subjects they did teach.

Strategic Compensation Race to the Top  Consider the impact of using incorrect data to drive performance-pay programs for teachers and principals (e.g., TIF awards). With inaccurate data, it is possible for districts to:  Reward the wrong people—ineffective teachers may be improperly rewarded or vice versa  Reward educators for the wrong things (i.e. rewarding a teacher in a content area that teacher never taught while not recognizing a teacher who did)

Educator Evaluation Race to the Top  When using value-added information as a component of an educator’s evaluation, it is imperative to have the most reliable information to ensure that teachers are not misidentified, mislabeled or mistreated due to a flawed analysis based on inaccurate data.

Race to the Top What is Linkage? Why Do We Link? Who Links? When Do You Link? Where Do We Link? Who Can Help Us Link?

Who Participates in the Linkage Process? Race to the Top  Involving principals and teachers in the process helps to ensure that the most accurate teacher student linkages are captured, and that they are captured transparently.  By understanding the data that goes into the linkage system, teachers and principals have more confidence and trust that the information truly reflects his/her classroom and students across the school year.

Who Participates in the Linkage Process? Race to the Top  Year One ( SY)= 30% of Ohio districts and schools  Year Two ( SY = 60% of Ohio districts and schools  Year Three ( SY = 100% of Ohio districts and schools Teachers in Grades 4 through 8 ; Reading and Math Some schools are participating in extended testing and are linking at additional grades and subjects (e.g.; grades 3, social studies, High School)

Principals’ Responsibilities in Managing Linkage Race to the Top  Establish a support team for your school by designating members of your staff who will serve in a supportive role during your school’s linkage process  Upon accessing the online linkage system, review the teachers and classes initially loaded.  Make certain that teachers have the correct list of class rosters, adding and/or deleting where necessary  Facilitate completion of the linkage process  Use available linkage reports to ensure staff are completing linkage successfully, and provide support as needed  Review for accuracy and approve the final linkage data that will be used in the analysis

Race to the Top

Teachers’ Responsibilities in Completing Linkage Race to the Top  Teachers complete the following steps:  Ensure all students are accurately included on each class roster, and modify rosters by adding/deleting students where necessary  Indicate class enrollment by setting student entry and exit dates  Set percentage of instruction provided  Submit class rosters for principal review and approval

Race to the Top

What is Linkage? Why Do We Link? Who Links? When Do You Link? Where Do We Link? Who Can Help Us Link?

When Do We Link? Race to the Top There are three important periods during the linkage process: 1. Principal Set-up Period: Principals gain access to the linkage system to verify their staff list and staff’s class rosters. 2.Teacher Linkage Period: Teachers gain access to the linkage system to verify their class rosters and set linkage attribution—the students they taught, how long they taught them, and the percentage of instruction they provided each student. 3. Principal Approval Period: Principals have one last opportunity to review staff linkages before giving final approval.

When Do We Link? Race to the Top The linkage windows for the 2011 linkage process were: April 18 – May 20 Principal Setup Period May 10 – May 20 Teacher Linkage Period May 23 – May 27 Principal Approval Period

Race to the Top What is Linkage? Why Do We Link? Who Links? When Do You Link? Where Do We Link? Who Can Help Us Link?

Is There Help For Link? Race to the Top Principal and Support Team Member Support  Online: Principals and support team members can submit an electronic support ticket. Once a question is submitted online, be sure to log back into the portal to review responses.  Phone: Phone support is available to principals and school support teams. Principals and support team members may contact the Customer Support Team at , Monday-Friday 8 am to 6pm. Teacher Support  Building-Level: Teachers should seek assistance from their principal and school support team identified by the principal. Your support team is identified on the “My Linkage” page.  Online: Teachers may submit electronic support tickets, available on the “My Linkage” page. Once a question is submitted online, be sure to log back into the portal to review responses.

Race to the Top Questions? For general questions and help: