2012 MIS Conference. 1. Assigned Educator Primary teacher assigned to student HQT 2. Teacher of Record Precise accounting of instructional time responsibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P-20 Data Collaborative Grant University/College Work Group February 24, 2010.
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Introduction to Acuity. Acuity Agenda Introductions Student Experience Educator Experience – Test Assignments – Manual Score – Reports – Custom Tests.
Teacher Student Data Link Idaho’s Solution Joyce Popp, Idaho SDE Glynn Ligon, President, ESP Solutions Group Steve King, Chief Technical Architect, ESP.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Development of the P erformance A ssessment of C ontributions and E ffectiveness of Speech-Language Pathologists.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Administrative Student Learning Objectives.
Link Before You Leap Ohio RttT Webinar Presented by Battelle for Kids June 9, 2011 Race to the Top.
Bloom-Vernon Schools OHIO TIF Bloom-Vernon’s TIF Award Model Overview.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.
Science This school year, all of my 6 th grade science students will demonstrate measurable growth in their ability to apply the scientific practices.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
Student Impact Rating Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Daviess County Public Schools.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Our Shared Agenda: Empowering Effective Teaching Florida Educational Negotiators Annual Conference.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
School Improvement Plans School Improvement  The Vision  Progress  Plan Components  Problem-Solving What is our vision for school improvement.
Linking Students and Teachers SED collects data to connect students and teachers : Districts identify one or more full-time teachers with primary.
Ohio TIF A collaboration of 24 Ohio districts, ODE and Battelle for Kids Five-year grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
D62 Response to Intervention
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
KSIS End of Year Training, 5/1/13 Kentucky Department of Education May 1, 2013.
David Simpson ONGL – Division of Next Generation Professionals BOY July 24- PM………………………Begins at 1:00.
Teacher Access to Student Performance (TASP) and Student Growth Measures Curriculum Directors April 25, 2014.
Data for Action 2011: Implications for Teacher Effectiveness February 16, 2012 Laura Sonn Associate, State Policy Initiatives Data Quality Campaign.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.
Title II, Part A, Division Improvement Procedures for Compliance with Section 2141 of Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
SEPT 2014 Administrator Student Growth Goal Planning.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
O HIO E DUCATION R ESEARCH C ENTER : I NFORMING I NNOVATION Jill L Lindsey, Ph.D. Director of Operations & Research Ohio Education Research Center The.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Townsend Elementary NWEA MAP TEST. Who is NWEA? Northwest Evaluation Association Incorporated as non-profit in ,100 Educational Partners Worldwide.
MIS Conference February 16, TSDL Project Update Continued support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to assist State and Local Education Agencies.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Student Learning Objectives!
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
State Board of Education Progress Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Goal Progress Measure 1.1 Update September 26, 2017 Academics Division
Update on UDL Implementation Measurement and GD Comparison Districts
Assessment Practices in a Balanced Assessment System
Small School Master Scheduling with Big School Aspirations
Presentation transcript:

2012 MIS Conference

1. Assigned Educator Primary teacher assigned to student HQT 2. Teacher of Record Precise accounting of instructional time responsibilities Teacher-level Value-Added 3. Contributing Professional Any/all professionals who work with a student Access to Instruction Improvement Sytstem (IIS) data

 An Assigned Educator is the educator assigned to a student, usually for HQT assignment purposes. In some cases, this translates into the teacher responsible for assigning a grade.

 A Teacher of Record is an educator who is responsible for a significant portion of a student’s instructional time (based on enrollment) within a given subject or course that is aligned to a state assessment.

 A Contributing Professional works with/has responsibility for a student and/or teacher, and should be specifically linked with relevant students.

 Verify rosters to accurately identify teachers for a subject/course and track their contribution(s) to student achievement.  Provide data for the teacher evaluation components of RttT-participating districts, as well as HB 153 requirements for teacher evaluation.  Provide data for the required teacher evaluation components of SIG grantees.

 Allow a school district to identify team teachers, pullout teachers, assistant teachers, etc., and better track their individual contribution(s) to student achievement.  Enable school districts to better identify the instructional practices and programs that are most and least effective.  Plan and evaluate professional development.  Support accountability and models (such as TIF) that reward educators for positive student outcomes.

 Evaluate teacher prep programs across colleges, universities and other program providers using student outcome data.  Support accountability growth models based on longitudinal data that can link contributions to positive student outcomes to multiple teachers, programs and schools.  Identify highly effective teachers for collaborative support of others.  Allow for targeted access to student data.