Innovative Practices in Juvenile Corrections: Positive Behavior Supports C. Michael Nelson National Center for Education, Disability, and Juvenile Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
SWPBIS and the Changing Role of the Clinician
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Implementing Positive Behavior Supports in Juvenile Corrections C. Michael Nelson Suana Wessendorf David Houchins Megan McGlynn.
Moving School-wide PBIS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 Tennessee School-wide PBIS State Conf Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Reducing Disproportionality in Suspensions and Positive Behavior Supports Suzann Wilson Lori Rogerson.
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Using ODR Data for Decision Making Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Teri Lewis-Palmer Marilyn Nersesian, Jim Watson.
Understanding Office Discipline Referral Data. Steps of Data Collection, Analysis, and Use 1.Identify sources of information and data 2.Summarize/Organize.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Positive Behavior Support in Juvenile Facilities: Webinar Mary Magee Quinn, Ph.D. Principal Research Scientist American Institutes for Research.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Module 2: Schoolwide/Classroom Interventions
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
NDTAC WEBINAR ILLINOIS YOUTH CENTER HARRISBURG, ILLINOIS.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS) Core Behavioral Component The Response to Intervention Best Practices Institute Wrightsville Beach,
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
Moving PBS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 APBS Conference Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Creating a Positive Environment: P ositive B ehavioral I nterventions & S upports Carol Frodge Former Principal, Edmonds School District PBIS Trainer Fierce.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
Review of School-wide Positive Behavior Support Maryland PBIS Summer Institute July 13,2004 Teri Lewis-Palmer.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
MDE- R ESPONDING TO C HALLENGING B EHAVIORS T HROUGH R ESPONSE TO I NTERVENTION.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Positive Behavior Support What it means for Hays High School.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data-based Decision Making: Basics OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports February 2006
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
+ Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Lilja Elementary School Respect. Responsibility. Kindness. Engaged Learning.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Positive Behavior Support (PBS) in St. Vrain Valley School District.
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Module 3: Introduction to Outcome Data-Based Decision-Making Using Office Discipline Referrals Phase I Session II Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Systems Review: Schoolwide Behavior Support Cohort 5: Elementary Schools Winter, 2009.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Practical and Effective Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner University of Oregon TA-Center on.
Using Information for Behavior Support Decision-Making Taken from Rob Horner, Anne Todd, & George Sugai
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Data Driven Decisions: Using the Tools Susan Barrett, Jerry Bloom PBIS Maryland Coaches Meeting October 2007
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support: School-wide Implementation.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
SWPBS - School Wide Positive Behaviours Support
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Practices in Juvenile Corrections: Positive Behavior Supports C. Michael Nelson National Center for Education, Disability, and Juvenile Justice National Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

Overview Background Background Rationale for application of Positive Behavior Support in juvenile corrections Rationale for application of Positive Behavior Support in juvenile corrections Overview of Positive Behavior Support Overview of Positive Behavior Support Description of the juvenile justice/positive behavior support initiative Description of the juvenile justice/positive behavior support initiative

Background Have been a partner in EDJJ and PBIS centers since their inception Have been a partner in EDJJ and PBIS centers since their inception Over my career, have visited, monitored, evaluated, and worked with many programs in the juvenile justice system Over my career, have visited, monitored, evaluated, and worked with many programs in the juvenile justice system PBIS re-competed in 2003, signed on to design a strategy to facilitate use of positive behavior support in juvenile justice programs PBIS re-competed in 2003, signed on to design a strategy to facilitate use of positive behavior support in juvenile justice programs

Why PBS in Juvenile Corrections? Is proving to be an effective and efficient alternative to harsh, inconsistent, and ineffective disciplinary methods in public schools Is proving to be an effective and efficient alternative to harsh, inconsistent, and ineffective disciplinary methods in public schools Discipline provided in many juvenile justice facilities is not any better than in most public schools--often worse, because of inconsistency Discipline provided in many juvenile justice facilities is not any better than in most public schools--often worse, because of inconsistency Decisions about disciplinary systems in juvenile corrections tend not to be linked to data on youth behavior Decisions about disciplinary systems in juvenile corrections tend not to be linked to data on youth behavior

What is Positive Behavior Support? PBS is a broad range of systemic & individualized strategies for achieving important social & learning outcomes while preventing problem behavior.

PBIS “Big Idea” Goal is to establish host environments that support adoption & sustain use of evidence-based practices Goal is to establish host environments that support adoption & sustain use of evidence-based practices (Zins & Ponti, 1990) (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior Positive Behavior Support

Systems

Discipline is…. The actions caregivers take to increase youth success (Charles, 1980). Prevention Rules, Routines, Arrangements Reaction Positive and Negative Consequences

Discipline Works When …. Prevention creates more positive than negative consequences Punishment Reinforcement (success) 4 : 1

Non-classroom Setting Systems Classroom Setting Systems Individual Student Systems School-wide Systems School-wide Positive Behavior Support Systems

Education Program Housing Units Other Programs Facility-wide System Positive Behavior Support Systems in JJS Programs

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

Key word: PREVENTION Primary Primary Reduce # new cases Reduce # new cases Secondary Secondary Reduce # current cases Reduce # current cases Tertiary Tertiary Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases

Does this model apply to programs in the JJS? Does the proportion of incarcerated youth who are discipline problems approximate that found in public schools? √ ~80%-- 1 or 0 discipline reports per month √ 10-15% per month √ 1-5%-- multiple discipline reports Does the proportion of incarcerated youth who are discipline problems approximate that found in public schools? √ ~80%-- 1 or 0 discipline reports per month √ 10-15% per month √ 1-5%-- multiple discipline reports

Facility-Wide Behavior Support System 1. Commitment by >80% of staff to preventative approach to problem behavior 2. Preventive facility-wide systems of proactive discipline Available to all youth, & Available to all youth, & To which >80% of youth respond predictably & successfully To which >80% of youth respond predictably & successfully

Facility-Wide Positive Behavior Support System 3. Facility-wide leadership team to oversee program-wide PBS & discipline 4. Administrative support, leadership, & participation 5. Data-based decision making

Data

Why Collect Discipline Information? Decision making Decision making Professional Accountability Professional Accountability Decisions made with data (information) are more likely to (a) be implemented, and (b) be effective Decisions made with data (information) are more likely to (a) be implemented, and (b) be effective

Key features of data systems that work The data are accurate The data are accurate The data are very easy to collect (1% of staff time) The data are very easy to collect (1% of staff time) Data are used for decision-making Data are used for decision-making The data must be available when decisions need to be made (weekly?) The data must be available when decisions need to be made (weekly?) Difference between data needs at a facility versus data needs for a state Difference between data needs at a facility versus data needs for a state The people who collect the data must see the information used for decision-making. The people who collect the data must see the information used for decision-making.

What data to collect for decision-making? USE WHAT YOU HAVE USE WHAT YOU HAVE Behavior Reports (BRs) Behavior Reports (BRs) Measure of overall environment. Data are affected by (a) youth behavior, (b) staff behavior, (c) administrative context Measure of overall environment. Data are affected by (a) youth behavior, (b) staff behavior, (c) administrative context An under-estimate of what is really happening An under-estimate of what is really happening Collect & analyze # BRs per Day per Month Collect & analyze # BRs per Day per Month Administrative segregation, detention Administrative segregation, detention Other? Other?

Examples of Data- Driven Disciplinary Planning Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Teri Lewis-Palmer Marilyn Nersesian, Jim Watson

Focus on Facility-Wide System if: More than 35% of youth receive 1 or more BR More than 35% of youth receive 1 or more BR Average number of BRs per youth is greater than 2.5 Average number of BRs per youth is greater than 2.5

Focus on Non-Classroom Systems if More than 35% of BRs come from non- classroom settings More than 35% of BRs come from non- classroom settings More than 15% of youth who receive a BR are referred from non-classroom settings. More than 15% of youth who receive a BR are referred from non-classroom settings.

Focus on Classroom Systems if More than 50% of BRs are from classroom settings. More than 50% of BRs are from classroom settings. More than 40% of BRs come from less than 10% of the classrooms. More than 40% of BRs come from less than 10% of the classrooms.

Focus on Individual Student Systems Targeted Group Interventions Targeted Group Interventions If 10 or more youth have 10+ BRs If 10 or more youth have 10+ BRs Example (check-in, check-out BEP) Example (check-in, check-out BEP) Intensive Individual Interventions Intensive Individual Interventions Youth with multiple needs Youth with multiple needs Intense, individualized support Intense, individualized support Wrap Around Wrap Around Personal Futures Planning Personal Futures Planning Functional Assessment Functional Assessment

Data Decision Questions in Juvenile Corrections Programs How many BRs occur Per day? Per week? Per month? How many BRs occur Per day? Per week? Per month? Where do behavior problems occur? Location Time of day Activity Where do behavior problems occur? Location Time of day Activity How are incidents distributed among youth? How are incidents distributed among youth?

Primary Prevention: Facility- Wide Systems for All Youth, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Youth with Repeated Problem Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Youth with Multiple Needs ~80% of Youth ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF FACILITYL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

Practices

All Staff Agree to A consistent set of rules for youth behavior A consistent set of rules for youth behavior Consistent routines, especially for problem areas Consistent routines, especially for problem areas Alter physical arrangements associated with problem areas Alter physical arrangements associated with problem areas

Teach and Reinforce Rules, expectations, and routines across all settings Rules, expectations, and routines across all settings Reward compliance Reward compliance Treat misbehavior as an error--emphasize correction over punishment Treat misbehavior as an error--emphasize correction over punishment Pre-correct--teach routines to prevent problem behaviors in settings where they are likely to occur Pre-correct--teach routines to prevent problem behaviors in settings where they are likely to occur

Emphasize the Positive Increase ratio of positive to negative staff to youth interactions At least 4 to 1 At least 4 to 1 Positive event/interaction every 5 minutes Positive event/interaction every 5 minutes Follow correction for rule violation with positive reinforcer for rule following Follow correction for rule violation with positive reinforcer for rule following

Common Features of School-Wide Behavior Management Systems (Fitzsimmons, 1998) Total staff commitment to managing behavior, whatever approach is taken Total staff commitment to managing behavior, whatever approach is taken Clearly defined and communicated expectations and rules Clearly defined and communicated expectations and rules Consequences and clearly stated procedures for correcting rule-breaking behavior Consequences and clearly stated procedures for correcting rule-breaking behavior An instructional component for teaching students self-control and social skill strategies An instructional component for teaching students self-control and social skill strategies A support plan to address the needs of students with chronic challenging behavior A support plan to address the needs of students with chronic challenging behavior

The Juvenile Corrections PBS Initiative Develop a blueprint/self-assessment tool to guide implementation of PBS in programs for juveniles Develop a blueprint/self-assessment tool to guide implementation of PBS in programs for juveniles Establish a network of trainers/coaches to facilitate implementation Establish a network of trainers/coaches to facilitate implementation Evaluate impact of PBS in juvenile programs Evaluate impact of PBS in juvenile programs

How Juvenile Programs Differ from Public Schools 24-hour day 24-hour day Multidisciplinary staff Multidisciplinary staff Primary focus is security Primary focus is security Educational personnel not in charge of discipline Educational personnel not in charge of discipline Others? Others?

Issues Belief that incarceration shouldn’t be “positive” Belief that incarceration shouldn’t be “positive” Data on youth behavior aren’t systematically collected or used for decision-making Data on youth behavior aren’t systematically collected or used for decision-making Data aren’t centrally collected or analyzed Data aren’t centrally collected or analyzed Staff don’t communicate across disciplines Staff don’t communicate across disciplines Others? Others?

Next Steps Team visits sites in which PBS is being implemented to identify barriers, issues, & strategies (7/05) √ Observe √ Interview staff, youth √ Conduct focus groups √ Meet with state Juvenile Justice leaders Team visits sites in which PBS is being implemented to identify barriers, issues, & strategies (7/05) √ Observe √ Interview staff, youth √ Conduct focus groups √ Meet with state Juvenile Justice leaders Develop initial draft of blueprint Develop initial draft of blueprint Circulate to PBIS work group for review and input Circulate to PBIS work group for review and input

Your Suggestions & Comments