Building a Realistic Pyramid of Instructional and Behavioral Supports for Prevention and Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dan Ebbert Paul Cicciarelli
Advertisements

Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Supporting Students with Challenging Behavior in the Classroom
PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. & Linda Bradley University of Missouri Carrie Freeman
RQS Board of education presentation, October 28, 2013
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Keeping the Momentum Going Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
PBIS Overview Wohlwend Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Teaching Social Skills: The Cornerstone of MBI
Program Wide Approaches for Addressing Children’s Challenging Behavior Mary Louise Hemmeter University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Lise Fox University.
Implementing effective social skill instruction across the continuum of SW-PBS supports Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri Lisa Powers, Ph.D. Special.
Helpful-providing aid or service to others that is productive or beneficial. We are… All SettingsClassroomHallwaysCafeteriaBathroomsPlaygroundAssembly.
AGENDA Welcome! 3:10 Meeting Expectations: Be Present Engage
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Name of School Date.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Teaching Social Skills: The Cornerstone of SW-PBS Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Creating School Environments to Prevent Problem Behaviour and Support Students At-Risk and Those with Disabilities through School-wide Positive Behaviour.
Tim Lewis, Danielle Starkey, Barbara Mitchell University of Missouri
School-wide Positive Behavior Supports Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org.
Moving Up the Continuum: Implementing Successful Small Group Supports
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Increasing Social and Academic Success: Positive Behavior Support meets Response to Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on.
Effective Tier II Systems: From Classroom to Small Group Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports.
The Changing Role of the Pupil Services Personnel Ami Flammini, LCSW Technical Assistance Director IL PBIS Network.
Social Skill Instruction as Tier II Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.
Functional Assessment & Positive Behavior Support Plans
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Prevention and Systematic Intervention to Address Social Behavioral Problems: School-wide Positive Behavior Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
Blueprints for Success: Building Sustainable School-wide Systems of Behavioral Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.
School-wide Positive Behavior Supports: Implications for Special Educators Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
Supporting Students At- risk by Implementing a SW Targeted Intervention Teri Lewis-Palmer July 10, 2008.
MO SW Positive Behavior Support MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri.
Charting a New Course for Student Behavior through School-wide Positive Behavior Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.
Differentiated Instruction within Universal Supports: The Need to Address Prior Learning History Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale and Basic Logic Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Myths, Misunderstandings, and Milestones in Implementing School- wide Positive Behavior Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Positive Behaviour for Success (PBS) Universals Pre-Training Session 2012 Positive Behaviour for Success Illawarra South East Region.
Building Safe School Environments through Positive Behavior Supports Tim Lewis, Ph.D. & Barbara Mitchell, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
AUTISM: Methodologies and Recent research Ilene S. Schwartz University of Washington
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Including ALL Students & Positive School Culture Tim Lewis & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS September 18, 2008
PBIS Overview Cedar Hill Elementary. Purposes of Presentation  To provide an overview of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS)  To review.
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS Bob Putnam May Institute National Autism Center Kathy Gould Illinois Autism Training and Technical.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Working with a Few Students at Tier III: Supporting the Individual Needs of Students with Chronic and Severe Behaviors within a SWPBS Framework Tim Lewis,
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive
School-wide Positive Behavior Supports
School-wide Positive Behavior Supports
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
Overview of Individual Student Systems
Presentation transcript:

Building a Realistic Pyramid of Instructional and Behavioral Supports for Prevention and Intervention Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention & Supports pbis.org

The key BEHAVIOR is functionally related to the TEACHING ENVIRONMENT

Context The School Environment Must Support Appropriate Social Behavior School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

The Challenge Students with the most challenging behaviors in school need pro-active comprehensive and consistent systems of support School-wide discipline systems are typically unclear and inconsistently implemented Educators often lack specialized skills to address severe problem behavior Pressure on schools to incorporate national and state initiatives such as Values Education, Anti-Bullying efforts, and Safe Schools. Many often have clear defined outcomes without structures to reach or a framework for deciding what should be implemented when, for whom, and to what degree Typical school response to problem behavior = “punishment” of misbehavior and assumptions about appropriate behavior and/or seek out alternative placements

The Danger…. “ Punishing ” problem behaviors (without a proactive support system) is associated with increases in (a) aggression, (b) vandalism, (c) truancy, and (d) dropping out. (Mayer, 1995, Mayer & Sulzar-Azaroff, 1991, Skiba & Peterson, 1999)

The Good News… Research reviews indicate that the most effective responses to school violence are (Elliot, Hamburg, & Williams, 1998;Gottfredson, 1997; Lipsey, 1991, 1992; Tolan & Guerra, 1994): Social Skills Training Academic Restructuring Behavioral Interventions

Toward a Solution The answer is not the invention of new solutions, but the enhancement of the school’s organizational capacity to: Accurately adopt and efficiently sustain their use of research-validated practices Provide a Seamless continuum of behavioral and academic support for all students Be part of a district wide system of behavior support Increased focus, teacher training, community training, and funding for early intervention

School-wide Positive Behavior Support SW-PBS is a broad range of systemic and individualized strategies for achieving important social and learning outcomes while preventing problem behavior OSEP Center on PBIS

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Social Competence & Academic Achievement

Universal Strategies: School-Wide Essential Features Statement of purpose Clearly define expected behaviors (Rules) Procedures for teaching & practicing expected behaviors Procedures for encouraging expected behaviors Procedures for discouraging problem behaviors Procedures for record-keeping and decision making (swis.org) Family Awareness and Involvement

I am….All SettingsClassroomHallwaysCafeteriaBathroomsPlaygroundAssemblies SafeKeep bodies calm in line Report any problems Ask permission to leave any setting  Maintain personal space  Walk  Stay to the right on stairs  Banisters are for hands Walk Push in chairs Place trash in trash can  Wash hands with soap and water  Keep water in the sink  One person per stall  Use equipment for intended purpose  Wood chips are for the ground  Participate in school approved games only  Stay in approved areas  Keep body to self Walk Enter and exit gym in an orderly manner Respect ful Treat others the way you want to be treated Be an active listener Follow adult direction(s) Use polite language Help keep the school orderly  Be honest  Take care of yourself  Walk quietly so others can continue learning  Eat only your food  Use a peaceful voice  Allow for privacy of others  Clean up after self Line up at first signal Invite others who want to join in Enter and exit building peacefully Share materials Use polite language  Be an active listener  Applaud appropriately to show appreciation A Learner Be an active participant Give full effort Be a team player Do your job Be a risk taker Be prepared Make good choices  Return to class promptly Use proper manners Leave when adult excuses Follow bathroom procedures Return to class promptly Be a problem solver Learn new games and activities Raise your hand to share Keep comments and questions on topic Benton Elementary

Universal Strategies: Nonclassroom Settings Identify Setting Specific Behaviors Develop Teaching Strategies Develop Practice Opportunities and Consequences Assess the Physical Characteristics Establish Setting Routines Identify Needed Support Structures Data collection strategies

Universal Strategies: Classroom Use of school-wide expectations/rules Effective Classroom Management –Behavior management –Instructional management –Environmental management Support for teachers who deal with students who display high rates of problem behavior

Importance of Effective Instruction (Sanders, 1999) The single biggest factor affecting academic growth of any population of youngsters is the effectiveness of classroom instruction. The answer to why children learn well or not isn't race, it isn't poverty, it isn't even per-pupil expenditure at the elementary level. The classroom’s effect on academic growth dwarfs and nearly renders trivial all these other factors that people have historically worried about.

Outcomes of Universal Supports

Group Cost Benefit Office Referral Reduction Across 12 PBIS schools= 5,606 If one Office Referral=15 minutes of administrator time, then 5,606 x 15= 84,090 minutes hours or 233 days of administrator time recovered and reinvested.

Group Cost Benefit Office Referral Reduction Across 12 PBIS Schools = 5,606 If students miss 45 minutes of instruction for each Office Referral, 5,606 X 45= 252,270 minutes hours or 700 days of instructional time recovered!!!!!

Self-contained Special Education Building - St. Louis Enrollment % free and reduced lunch Ages 13 and up Programs Serves 8 component districts Physically Impaired Autism Language Impaired Hearing Impaired Multiple/ Severe Disabilities Emotional/ Behavioral Disorder

Self Contained School Supported by PBS Coach Prior to implementing school-wide system, Identified 33 students (17%) with chronic behavior teachers felt would require intensive individualized plans

Reported Results Reduction in inappropriate behavior (verbal aggression, sleeping in class, off task, disruption) Increased prosocial behaviors and task completion Post universal systems, only 5 students (2%) required intensive individualized support plans

Prevention & Supports For Identified and At-risk Students Social Behavior

Does Implementation of PBIS improve individual interventions? Illinois “profile” analysis. –Assessment of intervention effectiveness Very Low, Low, Med, High, Very High –School-wide –Individual Intervention

N=223 N=169 N=38 N=17 t = (335) p<.0001t = 2.30 (27) p <.03 Partial N=169 Full N=223 Partial N=17 Full N=38

Mental Health Outcomes Does School-wide PBS fit within a comprehensive mental health model of prevention and intervention? Minimizing and reducing “risk factors” by building “protective factors”

Risk and Protective Factor Comparison t = (37) p <.036t = 2.31 (37) p <.026 Partial N=21 Full N=18 Partial N=21 Full N=18

A&D = Alcohol and Drug; ABS = Anti-social Behavior Scale

Impact on Moving Students to More Restrictive Settings Columbia Public Schools Elementary Schools who implement SW-PBS referred students to alternative/special school at lower rates compared to schools who were not implementing SW-PBS (r = , p < 0.01) Elementary Schools who implemented SW-PBS have less recidivism to alternative settings once students returned to home-school

Prevention & Supports For Identified and At-risk Students Achievement

Early Literacy & Behavior (Kelk & Lewis, 2001) What are the effects of three instructional conditions a) social skill instruction, b) phonological / phonemic awareness instruction, and c) a combination of social skill instruction and phonological awareness instruction on the reading related and/or social behavior of at-risk kindergarten children ?

Early Literary Outcome Social Skill Outcomes Phonemic Instruction +/-- Social Skill Instruction -+/- Phonemic and SS Instruction ++ Control Group --

Small Group and Individual Interventions Supporting Students At-Risk and those with Disabilities Within Their Home School

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT

Assessment Focus is on sorting student for service, not “diagnosis and placement.” Social-Behavioral Concerns –Social skills –Self-management Academic Concerns –Peer Tutors –Check in –Homework club Emotional Concerns –Adult mentors

Important Themes Part of a continuum – must link to school- wide PBS system Efficient and effective way to identify students Assessment = simple sort Intervention matched to presenting problem but not highly individualized

SSRS-T Social Skills Non PBSPBS Pre Mean72.8 (56-86)78.3 (70-84) Post Mean80 (61-103)90 (77-125) P Value.11.04* SSRS-T Problem Behavior Non PBSPBS Pre Mean123.6 ( )124.8 ( ) Post Mean121.4 ( )124.7 ( ) P Value * Significance at the.05 P Value Table 1. Pre- and Posttest Scores for Subjects on Dependent Variable (SSRS-T)

Teacher Evaluations The students who participated in the Social Skills Club demonstrated more prosocial behavior. The students who participated in the Social Skills Club showed improvements in the classroom. SchoolVery Much SomewhatNeutralA LittleNot at All PBS50%17%33% Non PBS 60%40% SchoolVery Much SomewhatNeutralA LittleNot at All PBS50%17%33% Non PBS 60%20%

The students who participated in the Social Skills Club demonstrated improvement in non classroom settings. (playground, hallway, bathroom, etc.) Would you recommend this program to another school in your district? Would you recommend your school implement this program again next year? SchoolVery Much SomewhatNeutralA LittleNot at All PBS50%17%33% Non PBS 80%20% SchoolDefinitelyProbablyMight or Might Not Probably Not Definitely Not PBS100% Non PBS 40%20%40% SchoolDefinitelyProbablyMight or Might Not Probably Not Definitely Not PBS100% Non PBS 40%20%40%

Rate the overall usefulness of this program. SchoolExcellentVery Good GoodFairPoor PBS83%17% Non PBS20% 40%20% Rate your overall satisfaction with the Social Skills Club. SchoolExcellentVery Good GoodFairPoor PBS83%17% Non PBS40% 20%

Individual Support Plans When small group not sufficient When problem intense and chronic Driven by Functional Behavioral Assessment Linked to school-wide system

Process (FBA to PBS) Conduct functional behavioral assessment Create plan based on functional assessment outcome Develop infra-structure to support behavior change (school environment must change)

Structural Analysis Setting Factors Assessment Tool Level 1: Classroom Set-up and Structure Level 2: Context Specific Activities Level 3: Instructional Delivery and Tasks Level 4: Student Behavior Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30,

Results SFAT –Significant variables: clarity of expectations & directions; consistency of expectations; accessibility of class schedules; lack of enforced procedures (especially regarding to hand raising and verbalizations or entire class).

FBA – PBS Plan Process Success requires: 1.Individual(s) with expertise in FBA-PBS 2.Fluency with a clear process among all staff including their role 3.A basic understanding of the Applied Behavior Analysis = Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment

Essential Steps to Individual PBS Plans 1.Request for assistance 2.Operationally define problem/replacement behavior 3.Background/archival data/ data collection/Environmental Assessment 4.Functional Behavioral Assessment –Indirect measures –Direct observation 5.Develop hypothesis regarding function of problem behavior 6.Develop a PBS plan –Social skill instruction –Self management –Environmental modifications 7.Implement, Monitor and Evaluate progress

Implications & Conclusion

Implications For Educators Concerned with Children and Youth At-risk and Those with Disabilities Prevention/early intervention Schools w/PBS refer less to alternative school (CPS) Continuum of Behavioral Supports (prevention – effective individual interventions) Generalization – a single system matched to intensity of student need IEP still individualized, behavioral objectives mapped to school-wide expectations Applying basic logic of special education to the entire school system

Implications For Educators Concerned with Children and Youth At-risk and Those with Disabilities Build similar SW-PBS systems to facilitate transition from self-contained settings back to home school Build capacity in schools to support students with academic and social concerns –Technical assistance directing best practice v. simple compliance Blend education and related initiatives –Safe Schools / Achievement / Mental Health

Summary Investing in SW-PBS results in: Change in school discipline systems creates an environment that promotes appropriate behavior Reduction in problem behavior resulting in less staff time dealing with problems, more student time in the classroom Improved perception of school safety, mental health Improved academic performance Improved social behavior performance Improved effectiveness and acceptability of individual interventions

On school reform… Kauffman states “…attempts to reform education will make little difference until reformers understand that schools must exist as much for teachers as for student. Put another way, schools will be successful in nurturing the intellectual, social, and moral development of children only to the extent that they also nurture such development of teachers.” (1993, p. 7).

Resources Association for Positive Behavior Support OSEP Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Maryland Positive Behavior Support Illinois Positive Behavior Support Special School District of St. Louis County PBS