Sandy Raimondo Mace G. Barron Office of Research and Development/NHEERL Gulf Ecology Division 2 November 2005 Development and Improvement of ICE/ACE for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 26, 2005.
Advertisements

Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 30, 2006.
Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Sublethal Limitations Workgroup January 19, 2010 (please sign in and include an address)
Uncertainty in fall time surrogate Prediction variance vs. data sensitivity – Non-uniform noise – Example Uncertainty in fall time data Bootstrapping.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Sensitivity Analysis of a Spatially Explicit Fish Population Model Applied to Everglades Restoration Ren é A. Salinas and Louis J. Gross The Institute.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
1 Development & Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Results of Technical Review of USEPA 2001 Cadmium Criteria Document Basic Standards Workgroup September 10, 2004 September 2004.
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Parameterising Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in Ecological Risk Assessment Carmel A. Pollino Water Studies Centre Monash University Owen Woodberry, Ann.
A Study on Feature Selection for Toxicity Prediction*
III 1 Sorin Alexe RUTCOR, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ URL: rutcor.rutgers.edu/~salexe Datascope - a new tool.
BA 555 Practical Business Analysis
Dose-response relationships Tjalling Jager Theoretical Biology.
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing. Standard Methods  Multiple methods have been standardized (certified) by multiple organizations American Society.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
1 BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods Simple Linear Regression Introduction Case Study: Housing Prices Agenda.
Lecture 16 – Thurs, Oct. 30 Inference for Regression (Sections ): –Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Intercept and Slope –Confidence.
Larry Champagne, TCEQ Margaret Roy, Centerline Env. Consulting
Linear Regression/Correlation
Quantitative Business Analysis for Decision Making Multiple Linear RegressionAnalysis.
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
TCEQ/NUATRC Air Toxics Workshop: Session V – Human Health Effects Nathan Pechacek, M.S. Toxicology Section Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day and Leone Tenth Edition
Evidence Evaluation & Methods Workgroup: Developing a Decision Analysis Model Lisa A. Prosser, PhD, MS September 23, 2011.
PROTECTFP Derivation of Environmental Radiological Protection Benchmarks an overview
MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS OF WILDLIFE BIOLOGY DATA Bret A. Collier 1 and T. Wayne Schwertner 2 1 Institute of Renewable Natural Resources, Texas A&M University,
©CropLife America 2014 Perspectives on the Derivation of Aquatic Life Criteria for Pesticides Jeffrey Giddings 1 and Dwayne Moore 2 on behalf of CropLife.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Introduction to Toxicity and LD50 Based on How Toxic is Toxic
1 INRA, UMR 0985 ESE, INRA/Agrocampus Ouest, Ecotoxicologie et Qualité des Milieux Aquatiques, 65 rue de Saint-Brieuc, Rennes, France INRA, UE 1036.
Analysis Section Research Design. Protocol Overview Background4-5 pages Question/Objective/Hypothesis4 lines Design4-20 lines Study Population0.5-1 page.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Introduction to meta-analysis.
Development of a Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP EPA Development Team Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Water Office of Research and Development.
Reserve Variability – Session II: Who Is Doing What? Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society Spring Meeting San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Water Quality Criteria: Implications for Testing Russell Erickson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA.
Chapter 2 Using Science to Address Environmental Problems.
CWWUC Presentation April 8, 2009 Application of the Integrated Impact Analysis Tool.
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Lesson 14 - R Chapter 14 Review. Objectives Summarize the chapter Define the vocabulary used Complete all objectives Successfully answer any of the review.
Case Study # 2  Problem Formulation  Inter-individual variability in cancer assessment (evaluate default from Silver Book)  Proposed Methods  Critical.
Biology-Based Modelling Tjalling Jager Bas Kooijman Dept. Theoretical Biology.
Educational Research Inferential Statistics Chapter th Chapter 12- 8th Gay and Airasian.
Bootstrapping James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Front page picture Change picture by marking Picture, right click and choose send to front. Click on the icon in the middle of the picture and locate the.
Multiple Regression Reference: Chapter 18 of Statistics for Management and Economics, 7 th Edition, Gerald Keller. 1.
Analysis of Mismeasured Data David Yanez Department of Biostatistics University of Washington July 5, 2005 Biost/Stat 579.
Canadian Bioinformatics Workshops
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
Stats Methods at IC Lecture 3: Regression.
Bootstrap and Model Validation
Aquatic Life Metals Criteria Under Development in OW
JMP Discovery Summit 2016 Janet Alvarado
Ecotoxicology Day 2. Adam Peters and Graham Merrington 2017.
Human Health & Aquatic Life Criteria
Bootstrap in refinement
Outline Bioassay background (5 mins)
Cara Cowan Watts Graduate Student Biosystems Engineering
US Environmental Protection Agency
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing
Marine Biotechnology Lab
EFSA’s Chemical Hazards Database
Developing, understanding and using nutrient boundaries
Presentation transcript:

Sandy Raimondo Mace G. Barron Office of Research and Development/NHEERL Gulf Ecology Division 2 November 2005 Development and Improvement of ICE/ACE for Predictive Toxicology

Overview Background: ICE/ACE development Current Research: ICE/ACE Validation and Improvement

ICE and ACE Software Development Developed by Sonny Mayer (GED) and Colleagues ICE (Interspecies Correlation Estimation) Estimates acute toxicity for a species, genus or family from a surrogate species ACE (Acute to Chronic Estimation) Estimates chronic toxicity from raw acute toxicity data

Significance: Addresses second largest source of variation in toxicity data – variation of species within a chemical Fills data gaps by estimating toxicity of untested species ICE: Interspecies Correlation Estimations

How ICE works LC50: concentration that kills 50% of organisms LD50: dose that kills 50% Uses existing correlations of toxicity values (LC50, LD50) between a surrogate species and a predicted taxa (species, genus, or family)

Acute toxicity estimates using interspecies correlations

ICE estimates LC50 from surrogate species LC50 and available species correlation

Current ICE Uses: EPA Program Offices Office of Water (OW): draft Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) guidelines, endangered species Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP): qualitative use in risk assessment currently being implemented.

Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) Generate species sensitivity distribution Define risk management level Endangered Species Risk Assessment Surrogate test species are toxicologically representative of endangered species (Mayer et al.) ICE can be used to estimate toxicity to T&E species using existing correlations (147 LC50s; 20 species ) ICE: Applications

Provides estimated chronic toxicity for species with only acute data ACE: Acute to Chronic Estimations Significance: Acute: ie.96-hour LC50/ LD50 Chronic: long-term, sublethal

Reduced reliance on acute to chronic ratios based on multiple species and chemicals Being considered by OPP for qualitative use in risk assessment ACE: Acute to Chronic Estimations Application:

How ACE Works

ACE Chronic Mortality Prediction Linear Regression Analysis (LRA) Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) Uses raw survival data to estimate chronic mortality

Limitations of ICE and ACE validation and uncertainty (ICE, ACE) data poor (e.g., ICE wildlife) flexibility-power (ICE)

Expand Datasets (QA/QC) New Software ICE Validation, Refinement, Expansion ACE Validation Improved Tool Functionality Future Direction of ICE/ACE

1.Model Validation: Regression analysis 2.Model Refinement: Stepwise regression 3.Model Expansion: Power and number of models 4.QA/QC: Bootstrap validation 5.Defining Assumptions / Developing user guidelines: multivariate analyses 6.New Software ICE Improvement Procedure

1.Model Validation: Assessment of existing significant correlations Aquatic ICE models (P<0.01) Species: 565 Genus: 195 Family: 291 Validation dataset for aquatics Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) data 88 chemicals (12 pesticides) 279 species 1458 new data points

ICE Validation Example < 3x difference > 3x difference

2. Model Refinement Stepwise Regression Finds the best fit model Quality of data Power of model Mode of action Model improvement through reduction (filter by MOA, species, data quality) ICE Improvement Procedure

3. Model Expansion Increase power of the models Many existing models have N=3 More data increases likelihood of significant correlations Increase the number of significant correlations ICE Wildlife Correlations (P ≤ 0.01) Original Current ICE Improvement Procedure Model improvement through addition (species, chemical)

ICE Improvement Procedure 4. QA/QC of all refined and improved models Bootstrap validation of all improved models data points are randomly removed model is recreated removed data are used to validate model up to 1000 replicates

Multivariate Analysis mode of action chemical class species life history model fit (yes or no) degrees of freedom model R 2, p-value User Guidance ICE Improvement Procedure

6. Updated Software (2007) Selectable datasets Interactive program user can enter in new dataset for species not in ICE (ie. endangered species) and ICE will build predictive model based on internal data Broader applicability Wider user base ICE Improvement Procedure

ACE Validation and User Guidance Validate using expanded dataset Original validation used 30 fish acute: chronic data pairs Expanded validation dataset >150 datasets Define where models are robust MOA Chemical Classes Species Develop new user guidance Multivariate Analyses Improve value to user < 5x difference > 5x difference

Manuscript: Wildlife Toxicity Estimation Manuscript: Validation of ICE Manuscript: Validation of ACE Technology transfer 2007: Updated ICE Software 2006 Anticipated Products & Outcomes: