C. Papadimitriou 1,2,G. Balasis 1, I. A. Daglis 2,1 R. Haagmans 3 1 Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Statistical Properties of Broadband Magnetic Turbulence in the Reversed Field Pinch John Sarff D. Craig, L. Frassinetti 1, L. Marrelli 1, P. Martin 1,

Advertisements

Abstract Using observations at 1-Hz sampling rate from the Greenland west coast magnetometer chain we study ULF waves over a wide frequency band and a.

Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.

Seismo-magnetic studies using the South European Geomagnetic Array (SEGMA) in the frame of the DEMETER projekt. K. Schwingenschuh(1), G. Prattes(2), M.

The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory SHINE 2005, July 11-15, 2005 Transient Shocks and Associated Energetic Particle Events Observed.

Study of Pi2 pulsations observed from MAGDAS chain in Egypt E. Ghamry 1, 2, A. Mahrous 2, M.N. Yasin 3, A. Fathy 3 and K. Yumoto 4 1- National Research.

Session A Wrap Up. He Abundance J. Kasper Helium abundance variation over the solar cycle, latitude and with solar wind speed Slow solar wind appears.

E. E. Titova, B. V. Kozelov Polar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Russia V.Y.Trakhtengerts, A. G. Demekhov Institute of Applied Physics, Nizhny Novgorod,

Electron Acceleration in the Van Allen Radiation Belts by Fast Magnetosonic Waves Richard B. Horne 1 R. M. Thorne 2, S. A. Glauert 1, N. P. Meredith 1.

No. 1 Characteristics of field-aligned currents derived from the Swarm constellation Hermann Lühr, Jaeheung Park, Jan Rauberg, Ingo Michaelis, Guram Kervalishvili.

The Importance of Wave Acceleration and Loss for Dynamic Radiation Belt Models Richard B. Horne M. M. Lam, N. P. Meredith and S. A. Glauert, British Antarctic.

Observation of Equatorial Electrodynamics in Africa using AMBER Magnetometer Network Endawoke Yizengaw Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College,

Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA Space Environment Center 1 CIRES, University of Colorado 2 Paul T.M. Loto’aniu 1,2 and H.J. Singer 1 NOAA.

Spatio-temporal structures of equatorial F-region plasma irregularities & Geomagnetic Regular Daily Variations (Sq, Solar quiet) as seen in space and at.

Which describes a variation of wave frequency ω(t) in a geometric-optic approximation [4]. Here n(ω) is the refractive index of the medium, is the vector.

Statistical Analysis of Electrostatic Turbulences over Seismic Regions T. Onishi and J.J. Berthelier Centre d'Etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires.

Ionospheric Convection and Field-Aligned Currents During Strong Magnetospheric Driving: A SuperDARN/AMPERE Case Study L. B. N. Clausen (1), J. B. H. Baker.

Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.

HF Focusing due to Field Aligned Density Perturbations A. Vartanyan 1, G. M. Milikh 1, K. Papadopoulos 1, M. Parrot 2 1 Departments of Physics and Astronomy,

Observation and Theory of Substorm Onset C. Z. (Frank) Cheng (1,2), T. F. Chang (2), Sorin Zaharia (3), N. N. Gorelenkov (4) (1)Plasma and Space Science.

Radar Remote Sensing Laboratory University of Washington Melissa Meyer, Andrew Morabito, Zac Berkowitz, John Sahr University of Washington Electrical Engineering.

Characteristics of VLF Tweeks Nedra Tounsi & Hassen Ghalila Laboratoire de Spectroscopie Atomique Moléculaire et Applications 1 In this spectrogram recorded.

Abstract The non-dipolar portions of Earth's main magnetic field constitute substantial differences between the geomagnetic field configurations of both.

Workshop on Earthquakes: Ground- based and Space Observations 1 1 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Graz, Austria 2 Institute of Physics,

Stuart D. BaleFIELDS iCDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D.

4 th Swarm QWG Meeting 2 – 5 December 2014GFZ Potsdam/D Data Selection Model Parameterization Results: Statistics, Lithospheric Field, Core Field Perspective.

Theory of Solar Radar Experiments: Combination Scattering by Anisotropic Langmuir Turbulence November 8, Uppsala, Sweeden Licentiate seminar by Mykola.

Comparisons of Inner Radiation Belt Formation in Planetary Magnetospheres Richard B Horne British Antarctic Survey Cambridge Invited.

Stuart D. BaleFIELDS iPDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D.

SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL MONITORING OF THE INTERMITTENT DYNAMICS IN THE TERRESTRIAL FORESHOCK Péter Kovács, Gergely Vadász, András Koppán 1.Geological and.

Graz, June 2007 The DEMETER mission: Objectives and first results M. Parrot LPCE/CNRS 3A, Avenue de la Recherche Orléans cedex 2, France

TYPE IV BURSTS AT FREQUENCIES MHz V.N. Melnik (1), H.O. Rucker (2), A.A. Konovalenko (1), E.P. Abranin (1), V.V. Dorovskyy(1), A. A. Stanislavskyy.

Cold plasma: a previously hidden solar system particle population Mats André and Chris Cully Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala.

Noise and Sensitivity of RasClic 91

Coupling of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere by Alfvén Waves at High and Mid-Latitudes Bob Lysak, Yan Song, University of Minnesota, MN, USA Murray Sciffer,

Chapman Conference “Fundamental Properties and Processes of Magnetotails” 12 March 2013, Tuesday, p.m. Structure of Magnetic Reconnection in the.

A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.

1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,

Pulsations in the Magnetosphere Jacob Schneider David Sibeck.

The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.

Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)

1 ESS200C Pulsations and Waves Lecture Magnetic Pulsations The field lines of the Earth vibrate at different frequencies. The energy for these vibrations.

Foreshock Significance in Generation of ULF Waves Alex Angelo Mentor-Olga Gutynska.

Multi-Spacecraft Observation of Compressional Mode ULF Waves Excitation and Relativistic Electron Acceleration X. Shao 1, L. C. Tan 1, A. S. Sharma 1,

Stuart D. BaleFIELDS SOC CDR – Science Requirements Solar Probe Plus FIELDS SOC CDR Science and Instrument Overview Science Requirements Stuart D. Bale.

Inherent Length Scales and Apparent Frequencies of Periodic Solar Wind Number Density Structures Nicholeen Viall 1, Larry Kepko 2 and Harlan Spence 1 1.

Solar observations with single LOFAR stations C. Vocks 1. Introduction: Solar Radio radiation 2. Observations with single LOFAR stations 3. Spectrometer.

Kinetic Alfvén Waves in the Inner Magnetosphere Triggered by an Interplanetary Shock David Malaspina 1, Seth Claudepierre 2, Kazue Takahashi 3, Allison.

IDPU F1 Test Review FGM Fluxgate Magnetometer Michael Ludlam University of California - Berkeley.

Measurement of Electron Density Profile and Fluctuations on HSX C. Deng, D.L. Brower, W.X. Ding Electrical Engineering Department University of California,

SuperDARN Observations of ULF Pulsations During a Substorm Expansion Phase Onset N. A. Frissell, J. B. H. Baker, J. M. Ruohoniemi, L. B. N. Clausen, R.

5 th Swarm Data Quality Workshop 7 – 10 September 2015IPG Paris/F About ESL Level 2 Processing and Data Products Some Selected Science Results Plasma depletion.

A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.

Evolution of the poloidal Alfven waves in 3D dipole geometry Jiwon Choi and Dong-Hun Lee School of Space Research, Kyung Hee University 5 th East-Asia.

AGILE as particle monitor: an update

Davin Larson, Roberto Livi, Phyllis Whittlesey,

The 3rd Swarm Science Meeting, June 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark

The Instruments Faraday Cup CfA/U of Mich & MIT

Magnetic Splinter Meeting

George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,

The Swarm D NanoMagSat project Latest News

Solar Wind Core Electrons

8th January 2008 Taitung workshop Sachie Shiomi

MAARBLE-CAA status.

Astrid Maute, Art Richmond, Ben Foster

Acceleration and loss of relativistic and ultra-relativistic electrons in the outer Van Allen belt during intense storms: a statistical study. Christos.

Oerstedt+Champ+Swarm → Empirical models →New parameters/knowledge

The SEGMA array: current status

Three Regions of Auroral Acceleration

Presentation transcript:

C. Papadimitriou 1,2,G. Balasis 1, I. A. Daglis 2,1 R. Haagmans 3 1 Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece 2 Department of Physics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

 ULF Waves (Pc3)  TFA Tool Examples  FTP Server & Products  Methodology  Validation Statistics SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

Pulsation classes Continuous pulsations Irregular pulsations Pc 1Pc 2Pc 3Pc 4Pc 5Pi 1Pi 2 T [s] f Hz Hz mHz 7-22 mHz 2-7 mHz Hz 2-25 mHz Compressional Pc 3 dayside upstream relate to wave-particle interaction in the foreshock and shock Toroidal Pc 3 or multi-harmonics dayside upstream field line resonance harmonics in Pc 3 / Pc 4 range, compressional Pc3 as a driver (coupling with the fundamental toroidal mode) SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

Range nT Resolution10 pT Noise level< 50 pT (rms) -3 dB bandwidth0.28 Hz Sample rate1 Hz Absolute accuracy< 0.5 nT Range of ion density ions/m 3 Range of ion temperature K Range of drift velocity0 - 6 km/s Resolution of ion velocity < 1° direction, < 130 m/s speed Sample rates DM mode RPA mode PLP mode 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 HZ 0, 8, 16 Hz 0, 1/15 Hz Overhauser Magnetometer Digital Ion Drift Meter SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

 Read Data (daily files) in a day-to-day basis (+/- a few minutes to avoid edge effects)  Interpolate (small) gaps  Filter (cutoff at 20 mHz)  Wavelet Transform (50 logarithmically spaced frequencies from 20 to 100 mHz)  Track Segmentation [-90, +90] degrees in Mag. Lat.  Event Detection Two - step thresholding  Parameter Extraction  Database Creation  Post Processing Balasis et al. 2013; Earth, Planets and Space SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

Ignoring largest 10% points to minimize spike influence

Balasis et al. ULFwave activity during the 2003 Halloween superstorm: multipoint observations fromCHAMP, Cluster and Geotail missions,Ann. Geophys., 30, , doi: /angeo t peak = 14:42 f peak = 79 mHz Δ t ~ 23’ Power peak = 2 8 nT 2 /Hz Max(|B|) = 5.45 nT Max(| ΔΒ |) = 2.73 nT/sec roughness(n) ~ cm -3 r MAG = (-7 o, 40 o, 401 km) MLT = 13:06, Lshell (ONERA IRBEM LIB) SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

t peak = 14:42 f peak = 79 mHz NOT AT THE EDGES Δ t ~ 23’ Δ t > 2 (1/f peak ) Power peak = 2 8 nT 2 /Hz EXCLUDE WEAK EVENTS Max(|B|) = 5.45 nT Max(| ΔΒ |) = 2.73 nT/sec REMOVE SPIKES Max(| ΔΒ |) vs Max(|B|) roughness(n) ~ cm -3 PLASMA INSTABILITIES r MAG = (-7 o, 40 o, 401 km) MLT = 13:06 Balasis et al. ULFwave activity during the 2003 Halloween superstorm: multipoint observations fromCHAMP, Cluster and Geotail missions,Ann. Geophys., 30, , doi: /angeo SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

t peak = 14:42 f peak = 79 mHz NOT AT THE EDGES Δ t ~ 23’ Δ t > 2 (1/f peak ) Power peak = 2 8 nT 2 /Hz EXCLUDE WEAK EVENTS Max(|B|) = 5.45 nT Max(| ΔΒ |) = 2.73 nT/sec REMOVE SPIKES Max(| ΔΒ |) vs Max(|B|) roughness(n) ~ cm -3 PLASMA INSTABILITIES r MAG = (-7 o, 40 o, 401 km) MLT = 13:06 Balasis et al. ULFwave activity during the 2003 Halloween superstorm: multipoint observations fromCHAMP, Cluster and Geotail missions,Ann. Geophys., 30, , doi: /angeo SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

 1 Hz magnetic field data (ASM scalar & magnitude of VFM vector)  2 Hz electron density data (from LP instrument)  Time span: 15 th May 2014 – 15 th Nov 2014  > 5,000 Tracks [-90, +90] degrees  ~ 1,500 Wave Events per satellite Selected  Additional Data: OmniWeb Service SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam

Automated Detection Methodology Statistics of Wave Parameters Variations of Wave Parameters vs Time Comparison between Instruments Comparison between Satellites  Statistical Validity test (more data)  Propagation/Polarization parameters  Combination of Satellites SWARM 4 th Data Quality Workshop, 2-5 Dec 2014, GFZ Potsdam