CAPRI Restrictions and Input Coefficients in the regional supply models CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income Update December 2005.
Advertisements

Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
CAPRI Premium payments in CAPRI Torbjörn Jansson* *Corresponding author Department for Economic and Agricultural Policy.
CAPRI 3 rd CAP-STRAT Workshop, 24./ , Bologna Farm Type Models For CAPRI - Wolfgang Britz, IAP, Bonn - CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional.
Meaning of Tariffs Types of Tariffs Effects of Tariffs
Nontariff Trade Barriers
Introduction to IMPACT. Models Models are logical constructs that represent systems Models can: – Simplify a complex system – Provide insights to the.
PROJECT GCP/SYR/006/ITA – Phase II “Assistance for Capacity Building through Enhancing Operation of the National Agricultural Policy Center” seminar on.
Workshop on CAP reform impact analysis, Bruxelles CAPRI Farm Type Models For CAPRI Development of models and tools for assessing the environmental.
JRC-AL: EC4MACS kickoff, IIASA GHG-AFOLU and EC4MACS Adrian Leip Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Climate.
1 i-sim CZ i-sim PL i-sim HU i-sim Simulating Policy Effects of EU Accession on Hungarian Agriculture Idara Policy Simulation Model (i-sim)
Bio-Science Engineering Department of Agricultural Economics Impact of alternative implementations of the Agenda 2000 Mid Term Review An application of.
Farm policy instruments and their effects Niek Koning Wageningen University Agricultural Economics & Rural Policy.
Government Intervention in Agriculture
CHAPTER 14 Perfectly Competitive Markets: Short-Run Analysis.
Evaluation of Economic, Land Use, and Land Use Emission Impacts of Substituting Non-GMO Crops for GMO in the US Farzad Taheripour Harry Mahaffey Wallace.
CAPRI EU GHG Monitoring Workshop, 27th-28th February 2003, Copenhagen Projections of herd sizes with the CAPRI system - Wolfgang Britz - Institute for.
Chapter 5 - Trade & Macro 5.1 Macroeconomic Factors – exchange rates – interest rates – government fiscal balance 5.2 International Agricultural Trade.
Agriculture statistics in Israel in Israel Jamal Medlege Hana Tubi, MOAG CBS may 2011.
Nutrient Budgets For CNMPs Nutrient Management Planners Training March 31, 2009 Bobby Smith County Extension Coordinator UGA Cooperative Extension Morgan.
Ministry of Agriculture LATVIA Agricultural reform in Europe: 2013 and beyond May 14, 2008 Tallinn.
N-flow in Danish agriculture And FarmAC in Amazonas Ib Sillebak Kristensen & Nick Hutchings Aarhus University Dept. of Agroecology Foulum. Denmark 10.
CAPRI Mathematical programming and exercises Torbjörn Jansson* *Corresponding author Department for Economic and Agricultural.
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances Anne Miek Kremer & Kees Olsthoorn from statistical and administrative data Statistics Netherlands A Working.
Malé Declaration 1 ST emissions inventory workshop AIT, Bangkok, 3rd – 5th July 2006 Part 6 – Compilation of emissions from Agriculture (Sector 8) Harry.
The Chinese Agricultural Sector after Admittance to the WTO Won W. Koo Director and Professor Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies North Dakota.
CAPRI 3 rd CAP-STRAT Workshop, 24./ , Bologna CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact Abatement cost curves for global warming gases.
Estimating Supply Response in the EU Carlos Arnade, David Kelch, and Susan Leetmaa ERS Economists.
Economic Assessment Results Markus Kempen. Cross Compliance Assessment Tool Outline Scenarios Definition Agricultural Income Effects Main Market Effects.
CAPRI 3 rd CAP-STRAT Workshop, 24./ , Bologna Improvement of the Crop Supply specification - Wolfgang Britz & Torbjörn Jansson, IAP, Bonn - CAPRI.
CAPRI EC4MACS Kick Off meeting, Laxenburg, Peter Witzke, EuroCARE The role of EuroCARE and Bonn University in EC4MACS The role of EuroCARE.
Government Intervention in the Market. Government Intervention in the Market The Control of Prices.
CAPRI 3 rd CAP-STRAT Workshop, 24./ , Bologna Sensitivity Analysis with the supply System of CAPRI - Wolfgang Britz and Torbjörn Jansson, IAP,
Spatial disaggregation in CAPRI
1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.
How to forecast rice production and consumption in Korea? Tae Ho, Lee.
Gaseous Emissions from Irish Agriculture Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Teagasc Dublin.
Supply Response in the EU as a Result of CAP Reform What have we learned? ERS Modeling Workshop New Challenges in Modeling EU Agriculture and Agricultural.
Model Comparison Subgroup July 15, Comparison to CBO scoring CBO need to know effects of the ‘policy’ – Marginal effects of policy implementation.
CAPRI EAA workshop on agricultural projection for RAINS, , Brussels CAPRI Background Information regarding Herd Size Projections for RAINS based.
Gross nutrient balances: German experiences Volker Appel, BMELV-425 WORKING PARTY "AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT" OF THE STANDING.
1 CAPRI CAPRI training session 2005, Bonn Tuesday, Session 3 CAPRI-Training Session 2005 Exogenous projections (the reference run) Wolfgang Britz, University.
GLOWA-Elbe II Statuskonferenz 14. Dez Potsdam Horst Gömann, FAL-LR Horst Gömann & Peter Kreins Institute of Rural Studies, Federal Agricultural Research.
Regional Gross Nutrient Balances Hungary RISSAC HCSO.
1 Economic Partnership Agreements, WTO negotiations and the seemingly never ending “banana war” Giovanni Anania Department of Economics and Statistics.
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
Organic farming in CZ – more detailed description Research Institute of Agricultural Economics (VUZE)‏ Pavla Wollmuthová Andrea Hrabalová Summer Academy,
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Agriculture Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Ankara, March 2016.
Chapter 9 Sales and Operations Planning
Data Needs for Agricultural R&D Evaluation Liangzhi You
The cost of reducing nutrient loss from agriculture
Antonella Finizia (Ismea) Riccardo Magnani (Cepii, Paris)
The Fluctuation in the price of rice market
The Impact of Trade Protection
Process of conversion from inputs to outputs
Overview of existing excretion factors
Nutrient balance for nitrogen TAPAS action – Statistics Belgium in collaboration with the Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research 11 June 2009.
Task Force on Material Flow Accounts 3-4 May 2012
Expert session grassland
Agricultural production in Finland up to 2020
International Trade Economics 101.
Excretion factors Task 2: In-depth analysis of methodologies for calculation and presentation Léon Šebek, 28 March 2014.
International Trade Economics 101.
Tariff Rate Quotas with endogenous mode of competition:
Fodder – Anne Miek Kremer
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances
Agriculture: Links between water and air IEAs
LEARNING UNIT: 9 MARKET STRUCTURES: PERFECT COMPETITION.
Nutrient Management Planning
Other Topics – Anne Miek Kremer
Presentation transcript:

CAPRI Restrictions and Input Coefficients in the regional supply models CAPRI Common Agricultural Policy Regional Impact

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Blocks of Restrictions Fixed Resources: arable land, grass land Feed Fertilizer Young animal balance Supply balance Policy restrictions: set aside Production quotas (milk, sugar)

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Blocks of Restrictions

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions - Land + Policy Fixed resources (Area_, Grasa_) Policy restrictions: set aside (Mxseta_, Seta_)

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June N-, P-, K-balances Herd sizes Manure per Head Supply to crop production Losses Mineral fertilizer purchase N, P, K production by animals Export with harvest Over- fertilization ? “availability” factor Biological fixation “overfertilization” factor

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Fertilization module Crop activities demand nutrients which are partially supplied by animal activities (manure): crops enter the equation as ‘consumers’, which need to cover their nitrogen needs through the application of fertiliser Nutrient correction and nutrient availability factors are included and specified in order to calibrate observed data on national mineral fertiliser consumption and regional manure production All sources and sinks of nitrogen in agriculture are introduced into the model (atmospheric deposition, biological fixation, …)  exports and imports of nutrients are considered

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Ammonia module Nitrogen from animals Total crop N Need NH 3 Mineral N N losses on grazings N losses in stable NH 3 N losses in storage systems NH 3 N losses in manure application NH 3

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Calibration step fertilization Herd sizes Manure per Head Supply to crop production Losses Mineral fertilizer purchase N, P, K production by animals Export with harvest Over- fertilization ? “availability” factor Biological fixation “overfertilization” factor Given from statistics or engineering knowledge Calibrated to base year situation

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Counterfactual scenarios Herd sizes Manure per Head Supply to crop production Losses Mineral fertilizer purchase N, P, K production by animals Export with harvest Over- fertilization ? “availability” factor Biological fixation “overfertilization” factor Given from calibration step / engineering knowledge Endogen in model run

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions – Feed module Animal activities demand nutrients which are supplied by crop feeding activities Energy, protein, fiber and dry matter requirements are calculated for 16 animal activities based on bio-physical equations Two parts: -Need of nutrients by animals and availability of them on feeding aggregates defined: requirement functions for each animal category are estimated depending on the ingestion capacity, live weight, days of production and yields -Fodder prices are estimated for non tradable feeding compounds in the model.

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions - Feed I Balance for feeding stuff (Feduse_) Requirements for animals (Reqs_) Prices for feeding stuff

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions - Feed II Minimum dry matter intake (MinShr_) Maximum dry matter intake (MaxShr_)

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions - Young animals Balance for young animals (Inpani_) Prices for young animals

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Restrictions - Supply balance Supply balance (Supbal_) Prices of products

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Production Quotas Introduce a new restriction: nettrd om  Q – Works for milk – Sugar regime requires more complex approach

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Main components of the CMO 2 Quota system (A and B) 3 prices for sugar beets (A,B and C) prohibitive tariffs to avoid sugar imports Preferential imports from certain countries (ACP countries, India, Western Balkans, Brazil) Intervention combined with subsidised exports

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Sugar production in the EU15 (A398) 52% 71% 88% +25% +20% +5% +33% +4% +6% +16% +28% +26% +9% -17% +7% +4%

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June The quota/levy mechanism A quota ~ domestic demandB quota Intervention price for sugar P I Sugar world market price Prices Export costs Levy C sugar Sugar quantities A beet price P A B beet price P B C beet price P C

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Profit maximisation General agreement: marginal production costs exceed C beet prices Profit maximising behaviour insufficient to explain observed production quantities in most EU countries Marginal production costs = p C ? qAqA q A+B pCpC pBpB pApA x0x0 p A,B,C = A,B,C beet prices q A,A+B = A and A+B quota x 0 = observed supply Sugar beet production Sugar beet prices

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Expected Profit maximisation Possibility to reconcile higher marginal cost with observed production but High C sugar shares still unexplained qAqA q A+B pCpC pBpB pApA x0x0 Sugar beet production Sugar beet prices Marginal production costs = expected marginal revenue ? x1x1 p A,B,C = A,B,C beet prices q A,A+B = A and A+B quota x 0 x 1 = observed supply EMR depends on: Prices Quotas Yield variance Expected marginal revenue

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Shifting expected marginal revenues P A,B,C = A,B,C beet prices MC est = marginal cost (estimates) EMR = expected marginal revenues X = sugar beet supply Assumption: Yield underestimation PAPA PBPB PCPC Beet prices X0X0 QAQA Q A+B EMR 0 MC 1 Beet supply MC est XPXP

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Can expected profit maximisation explain observed C sugar quantities (1) Assume each EU Member State is a single farm faced with the national quota endowment national average prices national average yield variation (FADN) national average marginal costs (Estimates)

CAPRI CAPRI Training Session, Warsaw, June Change in regional sugar beet production