Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors After Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, Ronald S. Petralia, Shahid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Activity-dependent tuning of inhibitory neurotransmission based on GABAAR diffusion dynamics Hiroko Bannai, Sabine Lévi, Claude Schweizer, Takafumi Inoue,
Advertisements

Antonio Sanz-Clemente, Jose A.Matta, John T.R. Isaac and Katherine W. Roche. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes.
Driving AMPA receptors into synapses by synaptic activity (LTP) or spontaneous activity during early postnatal development.
Novel Treatment of Excitotoxicity: Targeted Disruption of Intracellular Signalling From Glutamate Receptors.
Background Long Term Potentiation. EGTA. NMDA Receptors.
BRIAN PHAN DR. JANE ISHMAEL DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES SUMMER 2010 Characterization of LC8 Interaction with NR1 subunit of NMDA Receptors.
Neural Mechanisms of Memory Storage Molecular, synaptic, and cellular events store information in the nervous system. New learning and memory formation.
BIPN 148 Lecture 13. Biochemical Basis of LTP Interaction Between AMPAR, Stargazin, and PSD-95 Stargazin interacts with AMPA receptors in an intracellular.
By Eamon Quick. The Rundown Long-Term Potentiation (LTP): activity-dependent increase in synaptic activity –Dependent upon NMDA receptor activation Favors.
BIPN 148 Lecture 12. Biochemical Basis of LTP Interaction Between AMPAR, Stargazin, and PSD-95 Stargazin interacts with AMPA receptors in an intracellular.
Long term potentiation (LTP) of an excitatory synaptic inputs is input specific.
The authors of this paper propose two main points. These are: 1)The existence of silent synapses in hippocampal area CA1 2)The effective desilencing of.
BIPN 148 Lecture 16. Remembering Jennifer Anniston.
Stargazin Regulates Synaptic Targeting of AMPA Receptors.
BIPN 148 Lecture 12. CaMKII delivers GluR1 to silent synapses GluR2(R586E)-non-conducting GluR1(Q582E)-non-conducting GluR2(R586Q)-conducting, rectifying.
Neu 200 Molecular Mechanisms of Plasticity. Biochemical Basis of LTP.
Vertebrate Models of Learning
Neural Plasticity: Long-term Potentiation Lesson 15.
synaptic plasticity is the ability of the connection, or synapse, between two neurons to change in strength in response to either use or disuse of transmission.
From Mechanisms of Memory, second edition By J. David Sweatt, Ph.D. Chapter 9: Biochemical Mechanisms for Information Storage at the Cellular Level.
High/Correlated activity HighCalcium LTP Low/uncorrelated activity Moderate Calcium Calcium LTD LTD Magic High NMDA-R activation Moderate NMDA-R activation.
The Thorny Side of Addiction: Adaptive Plasticity and Dendritic Spines Judson Chandler Department of Neurosciences Medical University of South Carolina.
Slide 1 Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 3rd Ed, Bear, Connors, and Paradiso Copyright © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Bear: Neuroscience: Exploring.
Trends in Biomedical Science Making Memory. The following slides are mostly derived from The Brain from Top to Bottom, an Interactive Website about the.
Neural Mechanisms of Learning & Memory Lesson 24.
Long Term Potentiation
LTP LTD LTP LTD High/Correlated Low/uncorrelated High Calcium Moderate
A Brief History of Long-Term Potentiation
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (July 2003)
Dopaminergic Stimulation of Local Protein Synthesis Enhances Surface Expression of GluR1 and Synaptic Transmission in Hippocampal Neurons  W. Bryan Smith,
Hiroshi Makino, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Andres Barria, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Jason Aoto, Christine I. Nam, Michael M. Poon, Pamela Ting, Lu Chen 
Clathrin Adaptor AP2 and NSF Interact with Overlapping Sites of GluR2 and Play Distinct Roles in AMPA Receptor Trafficking and Hippocampal LTD  Sang Hyoung.
The Retromer Supports AMPA Receptor Trafficking During LTP
Anuradha Rao, Ann Marie Craig  Neuron 
John T.R. Isaac, Michael C. Ashby, Chris J. McBain  Neuron 
Subunit-Specific NMDA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (July 2003)
Visualization of Subunit-Specific Delivery of Glutamate Receptors to Postsynaptic Membrane during Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation  Hiromitsu Tanaka,
Role of AMPA Receptor Cycling in Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity
Maria E Rubio, Robert J Wenthold  Neuron 
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Dendritic Spine Geometry: Functional Implication and Regulation
Zhenglin Gu, Jerrel L. Yakel  Neuron 
The Two Sides of Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Plasticity
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (June 1999)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
PKA-GluA1 Coupling via AKAP5 Controls AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation and Cell- Surface Targeting during Bidirectional Homeostatic Plasticity  Graham H.
Cecile Bats, Laurent Groc, Daniel Choquet  Neuron 
NMDA Receptor-Dependent Activation of the Small GTPase Rab5 Drives the Removal of Synaptic AMPA Receptors during Hippocampal LTD  Tyler C. Brown, Irwin.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (June 1999)
Takashi Hayashi, Gavin Rumbaugh, Richard L. Huganir  Neuron 
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Subunit-Specific Rules Governing AMPA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons  Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, José A. Esteban,
Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA Receptors
Nomadic AMPA Receptors and LTP
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages R31-R36 (January 2010)
Dendritic Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease
Presentation transcript:

Rapid Spine Delivery and Redistribution of AMPA Receptors After Synaptic NMDA Receptor Activation Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, Ronald S. Petralia, Shahid H. Zaman, Robert J. Wenthold, Karel Svoboda, Roberto Malinow 11 June 1999 Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, Ronald S. Petralia, Shahid H. Zaman, Robert J. Wenthold, Karel Svoboda, Roberto Malinow 11 June 1999

Group 4  Nickisa Hodgson, Ben Kelley, Pablo Inzunza, My Hanh Huynh, Aria Jafari, Riley Landreth, Francis Hwee, Jessica Hoffman, Teresa Kim, David Kee, Anna Karstens, Amanda Hodge, Lindsay King, Wen-Hsin Jiang

Abstract  Tetanus induces two changes:  Delivery of GluR1 to spines  Clustering of GluR1 in the dendritic shaft.  Postsynaptic trafficking requires NMDA receptor activation  Tetanus induces two changes:  Delivery of GluR1 to spines  Clustering of GluR1 in the dendritic shaft.  Postsynaptic trafficking requires NMDA receptor activation

What was known:  Excitatory synaptic transmission is mediated by AMPA and NMDA-glutamate receptors  Repetitive synaptic activity activates NMDAR and triggers LTP, expressed as an increase in AMPAR function  Excitatory synaptic transmission is mediated by AMPA and NMDA-glutamate receptors  Repetitive synaptic activity activates NMDAR and triggers LTP, expressed as an increase in AMPAR function

What was not known:  Molecular basis for activity-induced changes in AMPAR function  Possible reasons:  Changes in channel conductance  Delivery of AMPAR to synapses  Hypothesis: Increase in number of AMPAR at synapses may occur rapidly during NMDAR dependent synaptic plasticity  Molecular basis for activity-induced changes in AMPAR function  Possible reasons:  Changes in channel conductance  Delivery of AMPAR to synapses  Hypothesis: Increase in number of AMPAR at synapses may occur rapidly during NMDAR dependent synaptic plasticity

First Control: Kidney (HEK)293 cells show that GluR1-GFP is functional

HEK Transfection  First tagged GluR1 at the N-terminus with GFP  Plasmid-based mammalian expression vector with lipofectin to transfect GluR1-GFP  Immunoblot to verify that GluR1-GFP is expressed  Advantages to HEK (Human Embryonic Kidney) cells  Easy to culture and transfect  HEK cells would only display transfected channel electrophysiology  First tagged GluR1 at the N-terminus with GFP  Plasmid-based mammalian expression vector with lipofectin to transfect GluR1-GFP  Immunoblot to verify that GluR1-GFP is expressed  Advantages to HEK (Human Embryonic Kidney) cells  Easy to culture and transfect  HEK cells would only display transfected channel electrophysiology

Viral Infection of Neurons  Introduce GluR1-GFP into neurons via Sindbis Viral Expression System  Follows characteristic viral life cycle to insert DNA into targeted cell  High efficiency  Following incorporation, neurons were observed to have normal passive membrane properties  Introduce GluR1-GFP into neurons via Sindbis Viral Expression System  Follows characteristic viral life cycle to insert DNA into targeted cell  High efficiency  Following incorporation, neurons were observed to have normal passive membrane properties

Immunostaining  Fix cells with Paraformaldehyde (PFA) in Phosphate Buffered Solution (PBS)  Allows for detection of surface epitopes  Treat with Triton-X in PBS  Allows for detection of intracellular epitopes  Follow with blocking solution, primary, and secondary antibody, conjugated with fluorescent particle or gold  Immunostaining also detects colocalization  GFP and red flourescence overlay and diplay a yellow signal  Fix cells with Paraformaldehyde (PFA) in Phosphate Buffered Solution (PBS)  Allows for detection of surface epitopes  Treat with Triton-X in PBS  Allows for detection of intracellular epitopes  Follow with blocking solution, primary, and secondary antibody, conjugated with fluorescent particle or gold  Immunostaining also detects colocalization  GFP and red flourescence overlay and diplay a yellow signal

Second Control: Expression of GluR1-GFP in dissociated neurons is targeted to synapses.

GluR1 Expression in organotypic hippocampal slice culture is primarily intracellular

AMPA Receptor Distribution  Experimental (GluR1- GFP)  88% Dendritic Shaft (a)  9% Dendritic Shaft Surface (b)  2% Spines (c)  0.4% PSD (d)  Experimental (GluR1- GFP)  88% Dendritic Shaft (a)  9% Dendritic Shaft Surface (b)  2% Spines (c)  0.4% PSD (d)  Control (Endogenous GluR1)  71% Dendritic Shaft (a)  20% Dendritic Shaft Surface (b)  8% Spines (c)  3% PSD (d)

Changes in AMPAR distribution: spine delivery  Empty Spines:  Before: 200 AU  After tetanus: 1737 AU  Active Spines:  Before: 1023 AU  After tetanus: 2210 AU

Changes in AMPAR distribution: clustering in dendritic shaft

NMDAR activation required for redistribution of AMPAR

What has been proven?  GluR1-GFP is functional  Before tetanus, GluR1-GFP is localized in the dendritic tree  After tetanus, GluR1-GFP clustering in dendritic shaft and delivery to spine are observed  Spine delivery and clustering of tagged AMPA requires NMDA activation  Data suggests redistribution is involved in the increase in synaptic transmission  There is link between receptor recruitment and activity-induced forms of plasticity  Clusters may represent a structural modification serving as a long- lasting memory mechanism  GluR1-GFP is functional  Before tetanus, GluR1-GFP is localized in the dendritic tree  After tetanus, GluR1-GFP clustering in dendritic shaft and delivery to spine are observed  Spine delivery and clustering of tagged AMPA requires NMDA activation  Data suggests redistribution is involved in the increase in synaptic transmission  There is link between receptor recruitment and activity-induced forms of plasticity  Clusters may represent a structural modification serving as a long- lasting memory mechanism

First control Demonstrate GluR1-GFP is functional

Second Control GluR1-GFP expressed at synapses and dendritic tree

GluR1 Expression in organotypic hippocampal slice culture is primarily intracellular

Changes in AMPAR distribution: spine delivery  Empty Spines:  Before: 200 AU  After tetanus: 1737 AU  Active Spines:  Before: 1023 AU  After tetanus: 2210 AU

Changes in AMPAR distribution: clustering in dendritic shaft

NMDAR activation required for redistribution of AMPAR

Critique and Further Experiments  Demonstrate AMPAR insertion into the membrane.  More electrophysiological experiments to support hypothesis  Use a Universal GFP tag for all GluR subunits (GluR1-GluR4)  Experiment did not rule out possibility of an increase in AMPAR conductance  Demonstrate AMPAR insertion into the membrane.  More electrophysiological experiments to support hypothesis  Use a Universal GFP tag for all GluR subunits (GluR1-GluR4)  Experiment did not rule out possibility of an increase in AMPAR conductance

Any Questions? Thank you! Any Questions? Thank you!

GluR1 Delivery to SpinesClustering of GluR1 in dendritic shaft