Www.brownrudnick.com an international law firm Corporate Liability under English Law Mark Beardsworth Partner, Brown Rudnick LLP March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Corporate Governance Reform Professor Blanaid Clarke Trinity College Dublin Law Reform Commission Annual Conference 11th December 2012.
Advertisements

Keeping Energy Companies Out of Trouble- Dealing with the SEC Ethical Dilemmas, and Avoiding Criminal Liability Charles Parker Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP.
Essex Business Club. Copyright Flexible HR Ltd  Agency Worker Regulations – Oct 2011  Bribery Act July 2011  Employment Equality (Repeal of.
+ Courtroom Participants. + 2 Fundamental Principles An accused person is innocent until proven guilty. Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Bribery Jon Taylor 24 June What is bribery? Transparency International (a non-governmental anti-corruption organisation) defines bribery as "the.
© 2004 John S. Herbrand, Esq. LEGAL ENTITIES FOR CONDUCTING BUSINESS JOHN S. HERBRAND, Esq. ONE CHASE SQUARE SUITE 1900 ROCHESTER, NEW YORK TEL:
The UK Bribery Act An overview Sammy Fang, DLA Piper Beijing Presentation to CBI China 19 April 2011, Beijing.
What you need to know Presented by Rupert Nevin, DWF LLP
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Presented by Neil R. Ellis Vienna, Austria.
U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 3
Corruption in the Middle East: Jessica Carpenter.
Data Protection Act. Lesson Objectives To understand the data protection act.
Shipping and Corrupt Practices Intertanko Presentation
Company Law — Lecture 22 Corporate liability under defective contracts
BUSINESS WITH CONFIDENCE icaew.com Anne Davis Head of Charity and Voluntary Sector Law and Ethics: key developments.
Why foreign companies need to prepare for the UK Bribery Act Transparency International Belgium Roger Best 3 March 2011.
CHILEAN SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF LEGAL ENTITIES BASIC ELEMENTS OF CRIME PREVENTION (LAW Nº20.393) Pablo Gómez Niada Valparaíso’s Regional Prosecutor.
0 Overview of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Related Corporate Procedures (A312, A312A and A301)
UK DPAs European Criminal Law Association Patrick Rappo June 26, 2013.
Anti-Corruption, the Swedish way Gunnar Stetler Head of the Swedish Anti-Corruption Unit
Conducting Cross-Border International Internal Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel International Legal Affairs Committee Jeffrey D. Clark Willkie.
The Bribery Act 2010 Bribery – no longer a ‘conventional’ way of doing business TELFA CONFERENCE AND GLOBAL LAW FORUM IN CONJUNCTION WITH USLAW MOSCOW.
Bribery Act Essentials for 2012 CICES 28 February 2012 Barry Vitou & Neil McInnes.
Karanovic/nikolic / UK Bribery Act 2010 Zagreb 19/03/2013 Patrick David Callinan.
The Bribery Act 2010 Rhodri DaveyPartner & Head of Employment Team.
Chapter 5 The Court System
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 1977, prohibits Any individual, firm, officer, director, employee, agent of firm, stockholder acting on behalf of firm,
Preparing Russian Companies for UK Bribery Act Enforcement - The Defence of “Adequate Procedures” Nicholas Munday 14 December 2010 Moscow.
DIRECT WORKS FORUM 10 June 2008 Andy Ballard. COMMON LAW MANSLAUGHTER Effectively – Death by gross negligence Test – (a) was a (common law) duty of care.
Business Liability Brad Long. Elements of the Debate Can corporations be held liable for immoral or illegal acts? Are the the kind of entity to which.
ROPES & GRAY LLP BOSTON NEW YORK PALO ALTO SAN FRANCISCO TOKYO WASHINGTON, DC The Ninth Annual Pharmaceutical Regulatory Compliance Congress and Best Practices.
DOJ Perspectives on Effective Compliance and Investigations Maxwell Carr-Howard Husch Blackwell, LLP October 8, 2012.
British anti-bribery legislation Frederico Singarajah.
Audit Director Roundtable, Finance Practice © 2009 Corporate Executive Board. All Rights Reserved. ADR1B2ZMP1 1 The FCPA establishes both anti-bribery.
The Bribery Act 2010 An overview of the Act with reference to the Quick Start Guide published by the Ministry of justice.
Stability Reliability. UK BRIBARY ACT 2010 Surveyor’s Day 24th October 2014.
Of XX Fraud, Investigation, Suspension and Debarment in Government Contracting Frederic M. Levy, Partner, Covington & Burling LLP ©2015 PubKLearning. All.
Chapter 4: Ethics and Business Decision Making Chapter 4: Ethics and Business Decision Making.
CCA Conference on CORPORATE KILLING LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN SCOTLAND.
Underlying principles of criminal liability
Contents What does the law say about bribery and corruption?
UK ANTI BRIBERY ACT TRAINING 2014/2015
Kissing in public is not a crime in Australia, however in Middle Eastern Countries such as Saudi Arabia, kissing someone of the opposite sex in public.
SYDNEY LAW SCHOOL LIBOR, Negotiated Prosecutions and the Pursuit of Accountability 5th International Symposium of the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations,
Fraud and Corruption David Simpson, 3VB
Copyright All rights reserved. Copyright All rights reserved. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) – value added for business or competitive.
Sentencing and Punishment Court Systems and Practices.
The Bribery Act 2010 Anti-Money Laundering and Financial Crime Conference 18 March London Daren Allen & Aaron Stephens.
Democracy and Constitutions The Texas System of Justice p
What is Law and why do we need it? What is the difference between Civil and Criminal Law? What is the Standard of Proof?
Corporate criminal liability – Lessons from across the Irish Sea
Professor Nicholas Ryder Faculty of Business and Law
Elements of a Crime Chapter 2.
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
Corporate Criminal Liability
The Bribery Act 2010.
CISI – Financial Products, Markets & Services
Presentation by Nicholas Ryder Professor in Financial Crime
The Application of Legal Principles in Business
Corporations and Trusts Law Chapter 3 Choosing a Business Structure
CJA/204: Introduction to Criminal Justice
‘Corporate Liability for Economic Crime: A Critical Review’
Corporate Criminal Offences (CCO)
“Differences in Approach between the SFO & the FCA”
Criminal Law and Justice
Philip Hackett Q.C The 36 Group SPEAKER.
Bribery Act 2010.
Dr. Adrian Jung Public Prosecutor
Trying Corporate Actors: Why Not Prosecute?
Presentation transcript:

an international law firm Corporate Liability under English Law Mark Beardsworth Partner, Brown Rudnick LLP March 2015

Brown Rudnick LLP an international law firm BOSTON DUBLIN HARTFORD LONDON NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. CORPORATE LIABILITY  Separate Legal Entity – A corporation is recognised as a distinct legal entity to those legal persons working within such corporation. Therefore, a company may or may not be liable for offences committed by those purporting to act on its behalf.  Example: The Bribery Act 2010 – Companies can be held criminally liable for the offence of failing to prevent bribery pursuant to Section 7. Therefore, a company commits an offence if a person associated with it bribes another person intending to (i) obtain or retain business for the company; or (ii) obtain or retain an advantage in the conduct of business for the company… unless adequate procedures were in place to prevent such conduct. -The “extraterritorial” element – covers wrongdoing committed anywhere in the world by any company which has any nexus to the UK. -Time limitation – only covers conduct undertaken after July  Companies don’t commit crimes, people do… – “[i]t follows that those who have a high level role in the organisation or management and by their own pleas or by the jury's verdict are shown to have been knowingly involved in corruption must bear a heavy responsibility in the criminal law” (Judge Goymer in the Innospec leaded fuel corruption case).  What next? The UK government is currently considering plans to introduce a new corporate offence of failing to prevent economic crime, broader in scope than the corporate offence of failure to prevent bribery under Section 7. Theoretically, this would make it easier to prosecute corporations for corruption-related offences.

Brown Rudnick LLP an international law firm BOSTON DUBLIN HARTFORD LONDON NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. INVESTIGATION OF CORPORATES  Main investigator: -The Serious Fraud Office. Focuses on serious and complex fraud, or “the top strata of economic crime” (David Green). At the end of 2014, Green listed the following investigations as the current focus for the SFO: Barclays Bank plc’ alleged payments to Qatar Holdings LLC, Rolls Royce, GPT, GlaxoSmithKline, G4S, Serco, Alstom and the Sweett Group. -Other authorities: For example, the Financial Conduct Authority or the Crown Prosecution Service may alternatively bring actions.  Difficulties with establishing corporate liability: -Except for where specific criminal regimes exist (i.e. for corporate manslaughter, bribery), it can be difficult to attach criminal liability to a corporate body. -The identification principle: Under this principle, only acts of those who represent the directing mind and will of the company can be imputed to the company itself – in a large multi-tiered entity, this is virtually impossible.

Brown Rudnick LLP an international law firm BOSTON DUBLIN HARTFORD LONDON NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DPAS  A recent addition…. -Deferred Prosecution Agreements (“DPAs”) were introduced to the UK in 2014 pursuant to the Crime and Courts Act This is essentially an agreement struck between prosecutors and corporations which facilitates a suspension of criminal prosecution provided certain conditions are met (e.g. co-operation in prosecuting an individual, paying a fine, disgorging profits). -Authorities want more transparency and to encourage corporations to self-report wrongdoings. -DPAs and Non-Prosecution Agreements (“NPAs”) are frequently used in the U.S. During the first half of 2014, DOJ entered into 11 agreements to resolve a variety of alleged conduct spanning multiple DOJ divisions and sections. The SEC entered into one agreement. Of the 12 agreements total, 5 were NPAs and 7 were DPAs. “In the United States we are often able to achieve much more through a settlement – a negotiated settlement – than we could achieve following conviction at trial,” (Assistant Attorney General Lisa Caldwell).  And in the UK… -Judicial oversight: All DPAs must be approved by a judge who will consider whether preliminary terms are fair, reasonable and proportionate BEFORE the DPA is agreed. -Public interest test: Prosecutor must consider whether entering the DPA as opposed to prosecuting the corporate will be in the public’s interest.

Brown Rudnick LLP an international law firm BOSTON DUBLIN HARTFORD LONDON NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON, D.C.  Increased Collaboration: There is increased coordination between international investigative bodies to ensure improper conduct is punished irrespective of where it occurs, and as a result, companies may be face actions from several different international enforcement agencies simultaneously.  Example: Asltom – Alstom is a French conglomerate has been/is currently being investigated by the SFO, U.S., Swiss and French authorities for bribery and corruption.  Example: R v Innospec Ltd [2010]: a US company with a UK subsidiary agreed settlements with both UK and US prosecutors in lieu of prosecution for offences of corruption. UK and US authorities jointly agreed the sentence. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

an international law firm