MODIS Science Team Meeting Silver Spring, MD - April 15-16, 2013 MODIS VI Product Suite Status From C5 to C6 Kamel Didan & Armando Barreto Work inherited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Advertisements

Collection 6 Aerosol Products Becoming Available
SNPP VIIRS green vegetation fraction products and application in numerical weather prediction Zhangyan Jiang 1,2, Weizhong Zheng 3,4, Junchang Ju 1,2,
1 C6 Land Science Test and Reprocessing Plan Sadashiva Devadiga (GSFC/SSC) Robert Wolfe, Ed Masuoka (GSFC) MODIS Science Team Meeting April 15-17, 2013.
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
Processing methodology for full exploitation of daily VEGETATION data C. Vancutsem, P. Defourny and P. Bogaert Environmetry and Geomatics (ENGE) Department.
“Using MODIS and POLDER data to develop a generalized approach for correction of the BRDF effect” Eric F. Vermote, Christopher O. Justice Dept of Geography,
MCST – MODLAND Eric F. Vermote –MODLAND representative.
MODIS Collection 6 BRDF/Albedo: Status and Updates Zhuosen Wang 1, Crysal Schaaf 1, Miguel Román 2 1 University of Massachusetts-Boston 2 NASA Goddard.
S. N. Goward, D. L. Williams and E. Denning Landsat Science Team Meeting Sioux Falls, SD August 16-18, 2011.
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Brief Overview of CM-SAF & Possible use of the Data for NCMPs.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Correction of Vegetation Time Series for Long Term Monitoring Marco Vargas¹.
Surface Reflectance over Land: Extending MODIS to VIIRS Eric Vermote NASA GSFC Code 619 MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting, May.
Version 1.3, Feb. 2013Time stepping 1/20WW Winter School 2013 Time stepping Hendrik Tolman The WAVEWATCH III Team + friends Marine Modeling and Analysis.
MODIS Subsetting and Visualization Tool: Bringing time-series satellite-based land data to the field scientist National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Radiometric and biophysical measures of global vegetation from multi-dimensional MODIS data Ramakrishna Nemani NTSG.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
Assessing Climate Changes in Arctic Sweden and Repercussions on Sami Reindeer Husbandry and Culture: Using a MODIS Image Time Series and Key Informant.
Global NDVI Data for Climate Studies Compton Tucker NASA/Goddard Space Fight Center Greenbelt, Maryland
Satellite Cross comparisonMorisette 1 Satellite LAI Cross Comparison Jeff Morisette, Jeff Privette – MODLAND Validation Eric Vermote – MODIS Surface Reflectance.
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.
Estimates of Biomass Burning Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Emissions from the GOES Imager Xiaoyang Zhang 1,2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Chris Schmidt 3 1 NOAA/NESDIS/Center.
1 Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 9 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing
Welcome to the MODIS Land Collection 5 / Long Term Data Record Workshop Chris Justice MODIS Land Discipline Lead.
1 of 26 Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols using Integrated Multi-Sensor Earth Observations Presented by Ratish Menon (Roll Number ) PhD.
Dec 15, 2004 AGUMolly E. Brown, PhD1 Inter-Sensor Validation of NDVI time series from AVHRR, SPOT-Vegetation, SeaWIFS, MODIS, and LandSAT ETM+ Molly E.
7/24/02 MODIS Science Meeting Seasonal Variability Studies Across the Amazon Basin with MODIS Vegetation Indices Alfredo Huete 1, Kamel Didan 1, Piyachat.
Remote Sensing and Image Processing: 4 Dr. Hassan J. Eghbali.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Restoration Monitoring Bruce K. Wylie 1, Steve Boyte.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
“Surface Reflectance over Land in Collection 6” Eric Vermote NASA/GSFC Code 619
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
LDOPE QA Tools Sadashiva Devadiga (SSAI) MODIS LDOPE January 18, 2007.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Vegetation Index Visualization of individual composite period. The tool provides a color coded grid display of the subset region. The tool provides time.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Early Detection & Monitoring North America Drought from Space
Measuring Vegetation Characteristics
STAR Algorithm and Data Products (ADP) Provisional Maturity Review Suomi NPP Surface Type EDR Products X. Zhan, C. Huang, R. Zhang, K. Song, M. Friedl,
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
MODIS Collection-6 Standard Snow-Cover Product Suite Dorothy K. Hall 1 and George A. Riggs 1,2 1 Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA / GSFC, Greenbelt,
Vegetation Indices AVHRR to MODIS to VIIRS Kamel Didan 1, Compton Tucker 2, Armando Barreto 1, Jorge Pinzon 3 Nikolay Shabanov * 1 University of Arizona,
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
1/13 Development of high level biophysical products from the fusion of medium resolution sensors for regional to global applications: the CYCLOPES project.
Kamel Didan 12*, Armando Barreto 12, Javier Rivera 12, Muluneh Yitayew 2 VIP DATA EXPLORER: 30 Years of Vegetation Index and Phenology Observations 1 VIP.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for Surface Reflectance Eric Vermote Sept 04, 2014.
Data Processing Flow Chart Start NDVI, EVI2 are calculated and Rank SDS are incorporated Integrity Data Check: Is the data correct? Data: Download a) AVHRR.
MODIS Science Team Meeting Columbia, MD - April 29-May 1, 2014 MODIS VI Product Suite Status Kamel Didan & Armando Barreto The University of Arizona.
Armando DATA FILTERING PLAN v2 Tucson, AZ 6/30/11.
Monitoring land use and land cover changes in oceanic and fragmented lanscapes with reconstructed MODIS time series R. Lecerf, T. Corpetti, L. Hubert-Moy.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Science Review Panel Meeting Biosphere 2, Tucson, AZ - January 4-5, 2011 Vegetation Phenology and Vegetation Index Products from Multiple Long Term Satellite.
Kamel Didan (UA), Miura Tomoaki (UH), Friedl Mark (BU), Xioyang Zhang (NOAA), Czapla-Myers Jeff (UA), Van Leeuwen Willem(UA), Jenkerson Calli (LP-DAAC),
VEGA-GEOGLAM Web-based GIS for crop monitoring and decision support in agriculture Evgeniya Elkina, Russian Space Research Institute The GEO-XIII Plenary.
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
Vegetation Indices Radiometric measures of the amount, structure, and condition of vegetation, Precise monitoring tool phenology inter-annual variations.
Vegetation Indices Radiometric measures of the amount, structure, and condition of vegetation, Precise monitoring tool phenology inter-annual variations.
Hands on Satellite Data to Monitor Biomass
Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Plant Phenology Response to Rain Events in the Santa Catalina Mountains Katheryn Landau Arizona Remote Sensing Center Mentors:
NASA alert as Russian and US satellites crash in space
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Land surface phenology versus traditional observations
Data Analysis, Version 1 VIP Laboratory May 2011.
Presentation transcript:

MODIS Science Team Meeting Silver Spring, MD - April 15-16, 2013 MODIS VI Product Suite Status From C5 to C6 Kamel Didan & Armando Barreto Work inherited from Alfredo Huete and Kamel Didan The University of Arizona

Outline VIs C5 approach C6 approach C6 Tests Evaluation PI SCF Work – MODIS VI Error Analysis Conclusions MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Background Vegetation makes up most of the Earth land cover and plays a key role in the biosphere and atmosphere functioning Vegetation Indices : Not a physical parameters, but can proxy a long list of physical/biophysical parameters (LAI, fPAR, GPP, LC, Biomass, etc…) – NDVI : Strong history (Google : 70+K pubs, 100K+ of users, 1.1 M hits in Google). Plus historical value of AVHRR (30+ yrs) – EVI an improved/enhanced version that with strong correlation with biomass/Carbon, structure, less background noise – Requires backward compatibility - EVI2 (2 bands only) The value of the Vegetation index data record (30+) to science and research is supported by: – Science claims based on these data record, applications, Ease of access and use, and consistent reliability, no assumption about observations (TOC, TOA, etc…). Can derive Land Surface Phenology (or growing season characterization) from VI data. An excellent Integrator of climate impact and a barometer of change MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Vegetation Indices NDVI – W idely used but has some issues EVI – A complimentary Index that works better over dense canopies/vegetation and addresses background noise – But requires the blue band (not available sometimes), and when available has a poor S/N ratio – EVI has also some issues: Small dynamic range Poor performance over areas with residual cloud, sub-pixel snow, and due to blue band noise (prone to noise) NDVI EVI (b~0.2) EVI (b~0.02) MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Our approach to generating consistent VI data records C2, C3, C4, and currently C5 (Limit changes to necessary and consistency drives the change) – Improved compositing: Not only simple MVC (prone to noise and disadvantageous to EVI). Introduced a simple and effective QA driven Compositing scheme: Eliminates poor quality data first (since most methods are blind to poor data) MVC is the last step – From Collection to Collection we kept changes consistent and aimed at converging towards a stable product suite, irrespective of input related errors and uncertainty (consistency only). We learned many lessons: We learned that QA is key to compositing because MVC performs poorly when poor quality data is not filtered (show example of EVI over cloud and Snow/Ice/Thick Aerosols) We also learned that the MODIS observations are stored in a rather peculiar fashion making them not fully representative of the grid (percent cover that changes from orbit to orbit) Addressed this by reconstructing the pixel/grid value from all available observations (weighing scheme) – Introduced a simpler user friendly approach to QA via the “Pixel reliability”, a simple measure of usefulness (No need for bit manipulation) – VI Global Error and Uncertainty analysis shows a global input related error range of +/- 5% MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

C5 VI Algorithm MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Observation coverage issue MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 Using only the observation with highest overlap/cover Reconstructing a new value from all observations

Convergence towards a consistent product suite This is key to good science MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Starting C6 The Algorithm changed hands due to funding and resources MODAPS maintains the Algorithm code – Started using a new method for compositing – No longer QA based compositing (hallmark of MODIS VI suite, as it was very effective at eliminating poor data) – Used minimum blue compositing (aimed at minimizing aerosol) – VI started using a pre-composited 8-day surface reflectance as input (2x 8-Day) PI-SCF effort focused on – Error Analysis – Creation of Value added VI Data Records MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

C6 Evaluation (Winter scene, ) Evaluation results based on [OLD-NEW] Largest observed change (>+/-10%) over tropics and high latitude regions NDVI and EVI changed differently MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 NDVI Diff EVI Diff

C6 VI Evaluation (Winter scene, ) MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 NDVI EVI New Old VI Histogram distribution

C6 LSR Evaluation (Winter scene, ) SR Histogram distribution MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 Red NIR Blue New Old

C6 Evaluation Composite DOY (Winter scene) Slight shift to selection of earlier days MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

C6 Evaluation (Summer scene, ) MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 NDVI Diff EVI Diff Again OLD-NEW Largest observed change over tropics NDVI and EVI changed differently

C6 VI Evaluation (Summer scene, ) MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 NDVI EVI New Old

C6 LSR Evaluation (Summer scene, ) MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 Red NIR Blue All SR values increased around the tropics (not proportionally) New Old

C6 Evaluation Composite DOY (Summer scene, ) C6 slight shift to earlier days MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

C6 Evaluation MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 ~10% shift OLD NEW NDVI EVI

PI SCF Work focused on 1.“Error and Uncertainty” analysis of the full MODIS VI data record 2.Improving the data Filtering Based on data ranking And long term confidence interval (to eliminate residual noise) 3.Implemented EVI2 for forward and backward compatibility A full EVI2 MODIS record is now available (at CMG resolution) We’re producing a full 1km record 4.Developed the “First good observation” compositing scheme to generate high temporal frequency Vegetation Index data in support of phenology and detection of fast change/disturbance 5.Reanalyzed the full Terra and Aqua MODIS VI Data records to generate reference long term VI ESDRs MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Improved Filtering 1.The objective is to help eliminate poor quality data and noise – Based on Pixel QA ranking Simplify post-processing Categorize the data Automate data filtering – Long term confidence interval Lots of QA error, especially with clouds, snow/ice Mislabeling Residual noise impact change analysis MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013 Input Filtered Final

Error Characterization Framework Error related to input (1) – Based on accurate field validation (sunphotometers) Departure from normal/expected profile (2) – Based on long term standard deviations Temporal profile stability (3) – Based on change about normal/mean Trend Change/Noise MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

LSR Input related error Land Surface Reflectance NDVI = (N-R)/(N+R) We’re not concerned with the VI formulation but the error in the input to this equation. In other words, how close we are to the TOC (Atm. Corr. Performance) – Approach: Use Surface Reflectance validation results & Error analysis over sunphotometers sites (ex: EOS Core sites, LPV). Although, the reported average error is about 2-5% in Red & NIR, we will estimate the impact of a 10% error in Red/NIR on the VI estimation. Max. VI input related Error Vegetated = VI Unit (~1-5-%) Non-vegetated = 0.11 VI Unit (~100%) Max. VI input related Error Vegetated = VI Unit (~1-5-%) Non-vegetated = 0.11 VI Unit (~100%) NDVI Max Envelope Min Envelope MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Apply previous results to Long Term Avg. VI % 25% 50% 75% 100% Absolute Relative Aug. LTAVG Input Error Model LSR Input Error Global Propagation MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Departure from normal/expected profile (2) Approach is to estimate error by long term standard deviation analysis – Error = 0.05 for vegetated and for non-vegetated – Largest over vegetated area and during winter (snow/ice cover) Departure from Normal Related Error JFM AMJ JAS OND JFMAMJ JAS OND MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

Number of peaks and valleys (3) – Assess the number of time the profile crosses the normal/expected profile – Impact on cumulative VI (proxy of Carbon sequestration) – Showing only Start of Growing Season (AMJ) and Start of Senescence (OND) – Insets are standard deviation – AMJ : Lowest over vegetated areas and highest over non-veg and high latitude. – OND : Lowest over vegetated areas and highest over non- veg. Stability of Time Series Profiles OND AMJ OND MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

C6 is different than all previous collections – From a VI perspective it is hard to say which is better – There was no clear convergence in C6. Differences cannot be attributed to a particular improvement – They are simply slightly different data sets – We will be able to answer this with a full time series record Is C5 better? – In some ways may be (consistency) – C6 did not build on previous work Error due to input is well constrained (absolute max ~0.05 or +/-5%). With Small impact on both NDVI and EVI. With EVI showing a slightly larger error Largest error is due to noise (0.1 absolute, 100% over sparsely vegetated areas) Impact on physical/biophysical parameters estimation – 8-10% on Sum-VI (proxy of GPP) – The error is largest during winter (cloud/snow) – Impact on estimating the exact day of event (10-40 days – analysis not shown here) PI SCF is generate a high frequency (quasi-daily) data record Conclusions MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013

BACKUP SLIDES

EVI Seasonal Error Largest error During winter and Over barren, sparsely, or snow/ice covered land JFM AMJ JAS OND LSR Input Error Global Propagation MODIS Science Team Meeting - Silver Spring, MD. April 15-16, 2013