Managing Networks A GIS & Project-Based Network Management System for Highways and Transit Presented to 12 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrological information systems Svein Taksdal Head of section, Section for Hydroinformatics Hydrology department Norwegian Water Resources and Energy.
Advertisements

Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Cost Estimation System Tool
Key-word Driven Automation Framework Shiva Kumar Soumya Dalvi May 25, 2007.
Konstanz, Jens Gerken ZuiScat An Overview of data quality problems and data cleaning solution approaches Data Cleaning Seminarvortrag: Digital.
Lecture 1 Introduction to the ABAP Workbench
Case Tools Trisha Cummings. Our Definition of CASE  CASE is the use of computer-based support in the software development process.  A CASE tool is a.
Presented to Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Feng Liu, John (Jay) Evans, Tom Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. May 8, 2011.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Human Computer Interface. HCI and Designing the User Interface The user interface is a critical part of an information system -- it is what the users.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
A Decision Support System For Civil Protection Prof. Thanasis Ziliaskopoulos University of Thessaly Hellenic Institute of Transport International Conference.
Term Project User Interface Specifications in a Usability Engineering Course: Challenges and Suggestions Laura Leventhal Julie Barnes Joe Chao Bowling.
Database Design Concepts Info 1408 Lecture 2 An Introduction to Data Storage.
1 Location-Based Services Using GSM Cell Information over Symbian OS Final Year Project LYU0301 Mok Ming Fai (mfmok1) Lee Kwok Chau (leekc1)
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
1 Software Requirements Specification Lecture 14.
Conflating Multiple Trueshape Networks for an Enterprise GIS Qiang Li, Daniel Consulting, Inc. Subrat Mahapatra, Maryland State Highway Administration.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
GIS Techniques and Algorithms to Automate the Processing of GPS- Derived Travel Survey Data Praprut Songchitruksa, Ph.D., P.E. Mark Ojah Texas A&M Transportation.
Developing a Regional GIS Enterprise & Decision Support Tool for Transportation Planning – TELUDE Felix Nwoko, Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro (DCHC) MPO 13.
TEAPAC Complete Version 8 The Ultimate Integrator.
Challenge 2: Spatial Aggregation Level Multi-tier Modeling in Ohio Attempts to Balance Run Time and Forecast Granularity Gregory Giaimo, PE The Ohio Department.
CASE Tools And Their Effect On Software Quality Peter Geddis – pxg07u.
WorkPlace Pro Utilities.
Cube Enterprise Database Solution presented to MTF GIS Committee presented by Minhua Wang Citilabs, Inc. November 20, 2008.
An Object-Oriented Approach to Programming Logic and Design
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
A Case Study in the Deployment of a Web-based Service as a Stakeholder Involvement Tool to Support the Development of a Travel Demand Model 14 th Annual.
SWC Spring 2010 Application Version SWC Spring 2010 Select Folder 2.
1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007.
TELE202 Lecture 5 Packet switching in WAN 1 Lecturer Dr Z. Huang Overview ¥Last Lectures »C programming »Source: ¥This Lecture »Packet switching in Wide.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Esri Roads and Highways: Integrating and Developing LRS Business Systems Tom Hill.
QuikTrac 5.5, a validated Motorola Software Solution, allows you to take your Host ERP screens and extend them out to fixed or mobile devices including.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY DTA Anyway: Code Base & Network Development Lisa Zorn DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th, 2012.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Enterprise Data Model for Transportation Planning Presentation to 2009 TRB Planning Application Conference Minhua Wang, Ph.D. Citilabs, Inc.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
LBR & WS LAB 1: INTRODUCTION TO GIS.
Using MS Excel to validate & load your data into Oracle EBS.
Software Engineering Chapter: Computer Aided Software Engineering 1 Chapter : Computer Aided Software Engineering.
GIS TRANSIT NETWORK CODING SYSTEM 2 nd National GIS in Transit Conference Tampa, Florida May , 1999 (TRANCOS) Gustavo A. Baez Jingke Chen Chunxi.
User Data : Enhancements This document s intended only for AX conference attendees and their parent companies, holding a valid AXIS ERP license from.
PowerPoint Presentation for Dennis, Wixom, & Tegarden Systems Analysis and Design with UML, 5th Edition Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights.
1 Travel Times from Mobile Sensors Ram Rajagopal, Raffi Sevlian and Pravin Varaiya University of California, Berkeley Singapore Road Traffic Control TexPoint.
Reconciliation of regional travel model and passive device tracking data 14 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Leta F. Huntsinger Rick Donnelly.
Announcements Today –RAID –Begin Indexes Program 1 due Friday –Office Hours today 2-3 pm –I’ll have limited contact over the weekend –later today.
START Application Spencer Johnson Jonathan Barella Cohner Marker.
GroupRocket.net. Years back checking s in the morning was the first ever thing most of the professionals would start their day with. And with the.
Chapter 27 Network Management Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
TUGIS March 15, 2016 Next Generation 911 Data Management TUGIS 2016.
McGraw-Hill©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Muhammad Waseem Iqbal Lecture # 20 Data Communication.
Travel Modelling Group Technical Advisory Committee
Algorithms II Software Development Life-Cycle.
Network Attributes Calculator
Architecture Concept Documents
System Design Ashima Wadhwa.
Unified Modeling Language
Packets and Making a Reliable Internet
Presented to 2017 TRB Planning Applications Conference
Midwestern District ITE 2017 Conference
Distributed computing deals with hardware
ESS.VIP VALIDATION An ESS.VIP project for mutual benefits
End User Training: Call Park and Retrieve
WisTMP 2.0 Update Andy Heidtke, PE Statewide Work Zone Design Engineer
Presentation transcript:

Managing Networks A GIS & Project-Based Network Management System for Highways and Transit Presented to 12 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Houston, TX Bing Mei, P.E. Triangle Regional Model Service Bureau NCSU May 19, 2009

Introduction  Initially developed in 2006 for creating and managing highway and transit networks for the Triangle Regional Model  Improved during the past couple of years  Extensively used in 2008 and 2009 for  2035 Long Range Transportation Plan studies 37 scenarios Total 800+ highway projects and phases coded 300+ ~ 600+ transit routes in each scenario  Regional Transit Vision Plan studies (multiple scenarios)  by Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO), Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro (DCHC) MPO, Triangle Transit (TT), NCDOT, and consultants

Goal  A highly interactive tool that improves network coding efficiency, especially for transit  If not handled properly, being interactive means being  user error prone  logic hole prone  challenged frequently by unthought-of situations  A highly interactive tool should  first of all, work & work correctly  be user-friendly and easy to use  be well balanced between flexibility and reliability  be well thought-out for all possible situations and hence robust  be able to capture, prevent, and/or handle user errors before they crash the system or cause problems later

System Structure  Two major components:  Highway network management  Project based  ONE universe highway network: base year network, plus ALL future year projects as a pool  A scenario network = base year network + projects selected from the pool  Transit network management  Specific scenario highway network based Why not ONE single universe highway network based? Does not exclude the use of the universe highway network as an option (turned out to be a great option for the Triangle Region)  Transit routes can be Created from scratch Revised from existing, or Borrowed from other scenarios  A whole transit route system can be easily recreated after the background highway network has been significantly altered

Highway Management  Two subcomponents:  Project Tool: creating and managing highway projects  projects are basic building blocks for creating a scenario highway network  definition of projects (e.g. extension of I-540 from I-40 to NC 55)  project data management: project ID project description project open to traffic time predecessor and successor projects road section attributes (e.g. #lanes, posted speed, median type, signal density, etc.) special case: road closure

Highway Management (2)  Scenario Tool: creating and managing highway scenario networks  A scenario network = base year network + selected projects  Selection of projects: From the universe project pool  manually one by one (or several by several)  by open to traffic time From project list table(s)  by reading a project list defined in an external spreadsheet file  by inheriting projects from other scenarios Use of the four approaches can be combined

Highway Tools Project Tools Scenario Tools

 The real challenging part! Why?  Highway project: one or multiple roadway sections are involved, but don’t have to be in sequence or even connected  Transit route: mostly multiple roadway sections are involved, and more importantly they must be connected to one another in sequence  Transit routes are usually represented as a series of highway sections in software packages  But the underlying highways change!  If a section is no longer part of a highway project, simply drop it and the project still has a valid representation in the software  Can we simply drop that section from a transit route? NO!  Furthermore, what about other changes: Transit Management Before After Split Merge Re-align More complicated…

Transit Management (2)  Two subcomponents:  One for creating transit routes and the route system  Create from scratch  Revise from existing, or  Borrow from other scenarios GIS functionality is critical Saves a huge amount of time than coding from scratch  One for re-creating route systems  When the underlying highway network has gone through significant editing  When borrowing a large number of transit routes from other transit route systems that already exist  When creating a subset of a transit route system with an altered highway network  GIS, GIS, and GIS!!  Hundreds of hours saved for CAMPO and DCHC LRTP modeling

Transit Tools Create Routes & Route System Re-create Route System

Warning Message Examples

Acknowledgement  Good suggestions from TRM Service Bureau colleagues:  Chao Wang  Joe Huegy  Leta Huntsinger (DCHC MPO currently)  Others

Contact Info  Bing Mei:

Thanks!