NCAT Redesign Alliance Annual Conference Orlando March 17, 2008 Dennis Pearl The Ohio State University Cooking for the buffet - Individualizing course content to improve learning

Goal: successful student choice “This is not Burger King TM, You don’t get it your way. You take it our way or you don’t get the damn thing.” - sign in Mary Smith’s diner in Pickerington, Ohio - A Las Vegas buffet

The Buffet Idea Full complement of nutrition (meet all instructional needs) Full complement of nutrition (meet all instructional needs) Serve individual tastes to encourage consumption Serve individual tastes to encourage consumption EEGP-example from life experience, example outside, generalize, practice EEGP-example from life experience, example outside, generalize, practice On-line contract and student tracking On-line contract and student tracking

Learning Styles Distribution

Options in a 3-choice Buffet Problem solving may be replaced by out-of-class problem solving coupled with on-line mastery quizzing. Large group Small groupTuesday/Thursday Option A sensors More hands-on data generation Option B intuitive More applet and simulation activities

Individualized Student Checklist

Nuts and bolts issues Common coverage of learning objectives Common coverage of learning objectives common list of ≈ 10 objectives per week common list of ≈ 10 objectives per week Equalize difficulty Equalize difficulty to remove as decision metric to remove as decision metric Support equitable testing Support equitable testing makes up about 2/3 of grade makes up about 2/3 of grade Cost Reduction (2002 dollars) Cost Reduction (2002 dollars) From $191 to $132 per student enrolled From $191 to $132 per student enrolled From $238 to $155 per completed student From $238 to $155 per completed student

Student Performance Note: class-to-class variability during under the buffet model has been ≈ 1.5%

Student Retention Note: fewer course repetitions means enrollment no longer includes 240 students per year who would be taking the course for the second or third time.

Summary: Components of Success 1. Individualizing presentations 2. Fostering commitment   student contracts   checklists   calendars 3. Increase self-awareness   learning styles   school strategies 4. Explicit learning objectives   integrate components of course   appropriately direct feedback 5. Test what’s important   “test to the teach”

Summary: Components of Success 6. Build peer-to-peer community   global help room   collaborative learning activities 7. Staff training   customer service training for course assistants   teaching courses 8. Campus-wide collaboration   EEGP 9. Feedback   3-minute papers   Mid-term feedback   focus groups   Testimony to inform future students

10. Using humor can increase student interest, recall of material, and conceptual understanding (Friedman et al, 2002; Lomax et al, 1998)