The Implementation of Academic Intervention Services in NYS: Implications for School Organization and Instruction by Kieran M. Killeen, Ph.D., University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Advertisements

1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
NYC SPECIAL EDUCATION REFORM Preliminary Results 1 February 2012.
Advancement Via Individual Determination. The Road to College Rigor, Readiness, and Retention.
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!
Secondary Education Initiative NJ Department of Education.
Examining the Nature and Magnitude of Intra-District Resource Disparities in New York State School Districts Larry Miller and Ross Rubenstein Maxwell School.
Understanding Tiers, Interventions and Supports Presentation Adopted from NESD.
PURSUIT and G/T Response to Intervention (RtI). Shifting our Thinking Wisconsin’s Comprehensive Integrated Gifted Programming Model The basis for the.
Multidisciplinary Teams
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
A Study of Teacher Competencies and Involvement in Transition Services for Middle and High School Students with Disabilities Conducted by: John Mattos.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
Special Data Opportunities in Florida David N. Figlio University of Florida and National Bureau of Economic Research.
Planning, Assessment & Research Analysis and Use of Student Data Part I.
Where are we today? Results of the Administrator Survey.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Planning Time & Florida’s K-12 Comprehensive Reading Program Contractual Provisions.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
How does your program define and measure success? o School counselors get evaluated once a year by a supervisor; mainly the school principle o Teachers.
Accountability and Data-Driven Decision Making The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 8 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Best Counseling Practices for Addressing the Needs of Long Term English Learners June 28, 2013 New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards.
Foothill High School Reading Initiatives. About our School Accredited high school for long-term incarcerated youth.  1 Year Commitments  2 Year Commitments.
+ Equity Audit & Root Cause Analysis University of Mount Union.
The Four Components What’s Wrong? (Quantitative Data) Why? (Focus Group Student Data) Revised Interventions New Interventions Policy Changes Assess.
Nevada Counselor / Psychologist Survey Data Prepared for the Legislative Committee on Education July, By Marina McHatton CTE Counseling and Assessments,
The Road to College: Rigor, Readiness, and Retention.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
SCC 11/11/14. SCC Agenda SCC Training  Acronyms of Education “Educationese”  SCC Roles & Responsibilities Emphasis on: ▫CSIP (Comprehensive School.
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students School
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting October 4, 2012 Creating Effective Student Support Teams.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Challenges using IPEDS for examining the Early Childhood teacher preparation pipeline Abstract The purpose.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
1 Gifted Cluster Model Update October 14, 2014 Mrs. Linda Palles-Thompson, K12 Administrator.
Whittney Smith Adelphi University IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and Special Education.
Accountability and Data-Driven Decision Making The Transformed School Counselor Chapter 8 ©2012 Cengage Learning. These materials are designed for classroom.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
KCS Strategic Plan. Graduation Rate Proficiency Rate Turnover Rate Teacher Working Conditions Survey Short Term Suspension Rate Dropout Rate Funding Strategic.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
1 Building Collaborative Relationships to Improve Student Learning Presented by Auburn Montgomery School of Education.
SAS Student Assistance Services Pierce Early Childhood School Fall 2007.
The Real Scoop. Initial Reactions The counseling staff in our building did not have any issues with having a new evaluation system. Developing measurable.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Whittney Smith Assistant Principal / SCSE Chairperson Mineola Middle School IST RTI CSE The Synergy Needed Between General and.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
The Pathway Leadership Team’s Role Kathleen Harris, Director Technical Assistance and Coaching
An Enhanced Support Model to Promote Mental and Behavioral Wellness among Students in the Avon Public Schools Kelly Grant Director of Pupil Services.
Early Childhood Feasibility Study Presented by Early Childhood Feasibility Committee Members Eileen F. Swan, parent Amy Lupoli, parent Alisa Ruggiero,
Cluster Grouping Presentation to Rockingham County School Board September 9, 2008.
Advancement Via Individual Determination
Green County High School Success Academy
The Road to College: test Rigor, Readiness, and Retention
Comprehensive Planning
Travis Wright, Ed.D April 26, 2018
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Presentation transcript:

The Implementation of Academic Intervention Services in NYS: Implications for School Organization and Instruction by Kieran M. Killeen, Ph.D., University of Vermont John W. Sipple, Ph.D., Cornell University

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Presentation Outline  Research Framework  Findings Identification of Students for AIS Number of Students Receiving AIS Provision of AIS AIS Staffing Instruction  Policy Implications

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Research Framework We attempt to document and analyze school district organizational and instructional practices in response to changes in NYS Learning and Graduation Standards. Equity Implications: How does response vary by wealth, location, and performance? This study builds on previous case, survey, and data analyses conducted since 2000.

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Research Framework AIS Implementation Study  Survey Development  Sampling District, School, and Teacher Level Weighting (To Population of Districts or Students)  Merged with SRC, Ch. 655 databases  Analytical Methods Bivariate, Multivariate

Sampling Framework

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Findings

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Identification of Students for AIS  Identification of students for AIS services relies most heavily on: Standardized tests Report cards Guidance counselor recommendation  NYC schools place greater emphasis on report card grades and report greater involvement of parents and students in AIS programming decisions  Suggestion from Respondents: Need to Identify Students Earlier

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Number of Students Receiving AIS  AIS services provided to a far greater proportion of students in the five large urban districts: 31% of Students in non Big-Five Districts 56% of Students in NYC 51% of Students in Big Four Districts  Students who Qualify but do not receive AIS: 15% in NYC 6% in non-Big Five

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Number of Students Receiving AIS  AIS students Receiving Special Education: One-third of AIS students also receive special education services in non-Big Five One-half of AIS students also receive special education services in Big Five  Example Suggestion(s): Expand program to provide AIS services to students scoring a two. Indicative of difficulty providing AIS to all students Take special education students out of AIS because they already receive tailored education services

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Provision of AIS Questions:  When are AIS services provided?  Are they offered inside the regular subject area classroom, or in more restrictive settings?  Do these placements vary by subject?  Are they considered additive to the regular education program, or are they held in place of those programs?

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT AIS Staffing  55% of Districts use Designated AIS Teachers to Provide AIS Services.  More than 60% of Districts use Special Education Teachers to Teach AIS.  Example Suggestion(s): Single biggest response was to increase the number of staff, reducing class size and allowing for more individualized instruction.

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Classroom Organization  The Classroom Average of 19.6 students 43% (8 students) receive AIS One-third of teachers had no AIS students 14% of teachers had all AIS students 50% reported a mix of AIS and non-AIS students

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Class Sizes

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Instruction  AIS Teachers use small groups and individualized instruction more regularly  Instructing in small groups more than half the time : AIS teachers in 26% of districts Non-AIS teachers in 7% of districts  Lecturing at least once a week: AIS teachers in 66% of districts Non-AIS teachers in 91% of districts

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Multivariate Relationships  How do AIS Structural and Instructional Practices differ by Performance Community Wealth, Enrollment, Student Wealth Location/Urbanicity Teacher Type (AIS vs. Non-AIS)

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Bef/After School In Place of Electives In Addition Reg Class During Reg Class 8th ELA ‘99 + Chg CWR - Enrollment + % FRPL + NYC +- Big 4 -+ Small City -+ Suburban

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT % Time Inst Whole Class TeacherLed Discussion StudentLed Discussion Freq Plan Across Grd 8th ELA ‘99 Chg CWR - Enrollment - % FRPL NYC n/a - Big 4 n/a Small City Suburban AIS Teacher -+

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Conclusions/Policy Implications  Differential Impact of the Need to Provide AIS services. Will this lead to a call for greater resources to support development and implementation of AIS?  Urban districts face greater challenges than Suburban/Rural: Greater proportion of students receiving AIS Greater proportion of students who qualify for AIS but are not receiving these services More Complex Scheduling Issues?

EFRC '02-'03/Condition Study-DRAFT Conclusions/Policy Implications (cont.)  No systematic pattern of which districts offer AIS in place of Electives.  Urban districts are more likely to offer AIS during Regular class time than suburban/rural districts.  Voluntary attendance options limit the ability of districts to reach students who need AIS services. AIS within regular school hours only? How to schedule?  Instructional Strategies Achievement Outcomes