Travel Behaviour in the GTA: Trends & Prospects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) © Prof. K. Zografos STEPs STEPs Scenarios for the.
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
SCATTER final seminar, Brussels, 9 November 2004 SCATTER Testing and evaluating potential solutions to control urban sprawl, through simulation.
SCATTER WORKSHOP, Brussels, November 9th 2004 KARI LAUTSO / LT CONSULTANTS SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS Lic.
Overcoming Barriers to Smart Growth: Surprisingly Large Role of Better Transportation Modeling based on a paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study August.
OSG Analysis on the Gloucester County Rail Line Study State Planning Commission December 3, 2008.
Sprawling Cities and TransporT From Evaluation to Recommendations.
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
David L. Skole Center for Global Change and Earth Observations
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
CE 573 Transportation Planning1 Societal Changes and Transportation Planning CE 573 Transportation Planning Lecture 8.
New Trends in Urban Planning and Development and their Impact on Parking, Transit and Community Transportation Presented by: R. C. “Rick” Mobley, ASLA,
1 Moving Right Along: Transportation, Public Health and Social Equity Sherrill Johnson, PhD Population Health Consultant CPHA, June.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist The Spatial Structure of Cities: Practical Decisions Facing Urban Planners Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning.
Compact city policies: a comparative assessment applying a new definition of “urban” TADASHI MATSUMOTO Organisation for Economic Corporation and.
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Healthy Cities Healthy Communities Dr Michael Goodyear, Dept. Medicine, Dalhousie University What we Know – and What we Don’t Heritage Trust, October 2007.
Visions of Transportation and Urban Form in the Greater Toronto Area
Enter Presentation Name Public Works Transportation Division ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Hamilton, Ontario Transit Plenary November, 7, 2012.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Section 1- Urbanization and Urban Growth
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
1 CITY DEVELOPMENT WORLD AFRICA 2006 Johannesburg, South Africa November 6-9, 2006 TEAMWORK: WHY METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC STRATEGY IS THE KEY TO GENERATING.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
Considering land use as a transport policy tool: A London perspective Isabel Dedring, Transport for London IMPACTS Vienna, March 2006.
Mobility energy use for different residential urban patterns in India Anil Kashyap, Jim Berry, Stanley McGreal, School of the Built Environment.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
Joint Development of Land Use and Light Rail Stations The Case of Tel Aviv Regional Science Association International -The Israeli Section Daniel Shefer,
Municipal Finance and Governance: Tools to Affect Land Use Decisions Enid Slack Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance University of Toronto Presentation.
Pacific resource partnership THE POWER OF PARTNERSHIP YDHI-YDA 2015 PACIFIC REGION CONFERENCE John White, Executive Director.
1 Fine Tuning Mathematical Models for Toll Applications Dr. A. Mekky, P.Eng., A. Tai, M. Khan Ministry of Transportation, Ontario, Canada.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Concepts and Frameworks for approaching Urban Sustainability and Planning Module 1 Urban Sustainability and Smart Cities Dr. Asad Mohammed, Director of.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Simulating Cities: An Overview of the ILUTE Approach
Smart Growth and Air Quality: Design Concepts to Protect Human Health David B. Goldstein, Ph.D. Natural Resources Defense Council San Francisco, CA
Transit Oriented Development in Practice Professor Phil Charles | Centre for Transport Strategy TOD Down Under: The Mill Albion.
Portland 2040 Analysis. Portland residents drive less… While per capita vehicle miles traveled is increasing nationally at an average of 2.3% per year,
Nothing But the Facts About Green Building, Density, and Climate Change.
$UBURBANIZATION. Historical settlement throughout US ●Early 1800’s industrial revolution, everyone flocked to city into factories ●Cities made up more.
Travel in the Twenty-First Century: Peak Car and beyond David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Urban Institute Ireland/University College Dublin School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy, Dublin, Ireland Eda Ustaoglu.
Land Use and Urbanization
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Urban Land Values and Urban Form
RPS Modeling Results Second Round
By Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of Unit Economic Analysis Unit,
David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Spatial Models of Urban Land Use (Ch. 13)
What does this pie chart tell us?
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Travel Behaviour in the GTA: Trends & Prospects Eric J. Miller, Ph.D. Bahen-Tanenbaum Professor Interim Chair, Dept. of Civil Engineering Director, UTRAC University of Toronto Presented to the Greater Toronto Transportation Conference November 30, 2007 Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Presentation Outline This presentation discusses the relationship between urban form, travel demand and urban sustainability. Focus is on: current travel trends policy implications Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) Since 1986 a major survey of travel behaviour in the GTA (and beyond) has been undertaken at the University of Toronto, funded by all planning agencies in the survey area. With a 5% sample (135,000 households in 2001), TTS is the largest travel survey program in the world. TTS provides an unparalleled database for urban transportation research. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre In the GTA, as in most cities, all travel trends with respect to auto usage are in the “wrong” direction, moving towards a less sustainable system. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Long-Term GTA Growth Trends GTA population, cars & daily trips all increased by about 33% from 1986 to 2001. Daily auto trips increased by 44%, and the share of auto trips increased by 10% from 72.1 to 79.1% of all trips. Transit ridership only increased by 5% and its market share declined by 28%, from 21.6 to 15.7 of daily trips. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Suburban regions Suburban regions GTA population growth has been largely occurring in lower-density suburban regions: 38-109% in suburban regions 11% in Toronto 15% in Hamilton Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre 1996-2001 increases in: daily trips per person auto ownership auto-drive mode shares (continuation of long term trends) Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Summary: 1. More trips/person 2. More cars/household 3. More auto-driving/trip Trips growing faster than pop. Auto trips growing faster than total travel. Highest growth rates generally in suburban & fringe areas Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Accessibility Transportation affects land use and location choice by providing accessibility to land and activities. Several measures can be used to quantify the concept of accessibility. These measures all are: defined for a specific point in space a function of the magnitude/attractiveness of alternative locations a function of the distance/time required to reach these locations Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Accessibility Measures The simplest measure is the number (or fraction) of jobs (other activities) with x km (or min.) of a point: Ai = å Ej jÎSx|i x i Ai = Accessibility of zone i to employment Ej = Employment in zone j Sx|i = Set of employment zones within x min of zone i Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Employment Accessibility By Car, AM Peak Period Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Employment Accessibility By Transit, AM Peak Period Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Accessibility by Mode Given the way we have built our cities & our transportation systems, the automobile provides much higher levels of accessibility for most people for most activities. Auto-based trips dominate travel, except in special circumstances Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Transit Usage Transit usage depends upon: Auto ownership levels Residential densities Employment densities Transit service levels Socio-economics “Walkability” to/from transit Local transit coverage & connectivity to/from mainline services Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Auto Ownership Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Population Density Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

GTA Employment Distributions 1996 Employment Density (Source: Haider, 2003) 1996 GTA Employment (Source: Haider, 2003) While many employment centres exist across the GTA, from a density perspective, the GTA is still very monocentric. This has strong implications for transit usage. GTA Employment Distributions Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Trip lengths & total auto usage vary with urban form. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre So too does environmental impact. 1996 Avg. Daily CO2 Emissions Per Household Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre … and average annual transportation costs per household Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Macro vs. Micro Design “Urban form” is defined at both a “macro” level (spatial distribution of people, jobs, activities – “land use”) and the “micro” level of detailed neighbourhood design (street layouts, density, fine-grain mix of uses, etc.). Both are important in the determination of travel demand and transportation system sustainability. But, macro location effects tend to dominate micro neighbourhood design impacts. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Macro vs. Micro Design, cont’d 1. Conventional suburban 2. Medium density 3. Neo-traditional Neighbourhood Designs Source: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Urban Travel: Tool for Evaluating Neighbourhood Sustainability, Prepared by IBI Group for CMHC and Natural Resources Canada, Feb. 2000 Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

GTA Growth & Transportation Impacts Pop. Growth Rate In a “Business as Usual” scenario with respect to GTA growth and transit system investment, auto usage is projected to grow faster than population; transit usage will grow at about half the rate of population. Pop. Growth Rate Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Summary of Findings Where we grow is critical to transportation sustainability. Employment concentration along corridors and in nodes critical to transit usage. Mixed-use, neighbourhood design critical to walkability and local transit use. Transit investment critical to transportation sustainability, but it must be: combined with land use design (macro & micro) deal with local distribution as well as long-distance “line haul” Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Policy Implications Three broad, inter-related “meta-issues” exist in urban transportation planning: 1. Sustainability (environmental, economic, social) 2. Efficiency (cost-effectiveness) 3. Equity (distribution of benefits & costs) Motorization/auto usage lies at the heart of each of these issues. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

- + QUALITY OF LIFE Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre Greenhouse Gas Emissions Air Pollution Urban Sprawl Congestion Accidents Lack of Exercise Global Climate Change Respiratory & Other Diseases Loss of Farmland, Natural & Urban Habitat Loss of Productivity & Leisure Time; Stress Injuries/Deaths Productivity/Property Loss Obesity, Other Health Problems - Accessibility to Activities / Mobility + QUALITY OF LIFE Participation in Social, Recreational & Economic Activities Economic Productivity Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications In many respects the GTA taken as a whole is representative of other North American cities: increasing auto ownership increasing person trip rates increasing suburbanization of population and employment increasingly complex travel patterns: more non-work/school trips more non-home-based trips more non-peak-period travel declining transit mode shares Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications, cont’d At the same time, the GTA (City of Toronto in particular) deviates from the North American “norm”: Transit per capita ridership, mode share & cost/revenue ratios still very high by North American standards GO-Transit (commuter rail) very successful in competing for long-distance commuters Continuing strength/vitality of the Toronto Central Area Overall high density & transit orientation within the amalgamated city is highly supportive of transit Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications, cont’d Important to remember/learn from our own experience: Coordinated land use - transportation planning designed to emphasize transit does work It is possible to maintain a strong, livable urban core, which is the economic heart of an extensive urban system serviceable by an attractive, cost-effective transit system supportable without continuously expanding road capacity Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications, cont’d Lessons from the Toronto experience, cont’d: It is possible to build at higher densities without loss of quality of life (indeed, the opposite is true) Regional sub-centre concept works keeps growth within the core within manageable limits new foci for transit network development Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications, cont’d At the same time, there is little evidence from anywhere that low density, auto-oriented, suburban sprawl generates anything other than the consumption of more land, more congestion and the “need” for even more roads. This never-ending, decentralizing spiral of development is simply not sustainable in the long run. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Findings & Implications, cont’d Elements of a sustainable transportation policy include: transit- (and walk-) supportive urban development promotion of non-motorized modes of travel reinvestment in transit infrastructure & services innovative transit services road pricing parking price/supply tax reform …. Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Policies for Sustainability None of the ideas listed on the previous slide are new. What is required is: The political will/leadership to undertake change. A willingness to invest in our transportation infrastructure Taking neighbourhood design seriously Recognizing that change must occur “Business as usual” simply will not work in the future (it isn’t even working now) Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto

Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre THANK YOU. QUESTIONS? Auto Ownership Transit Service Socio- Economics Residential Density Nbhd. Design Employment Density Road Network Demographics Accessibility ILUTE Simulation Model ACTIVITY/ TRAVEL Urban Transportation Research & Advancement Centre University of Toronto