Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration
Advertisements

Work Zone Impact Strategies Module 6. TMP Overview3 Identification of TMP Strategies Should be based on: type of work zone traffic conditions anticipated.
Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Chapter 12 Freeway Driving.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
I-10 Exercise. Project Description Current and anticipated congestion due to rapid growth, one lane in each direction will be added to Interstate 10 from.
1 Freeways and Interchanges CE453 Lecture 33 Source : A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (The Green Book). Washington, DC. American Association.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Virginia Department of Education
I-69 Strategic Planning Corridor Study: Fulton To Eddyville, KY Fulton, Hickman, Graves, Marshall, Livingston, Lyon Counties Public Meeting November 15,
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as collector roads and.
Chap 4 Cross Section Elements (pp.4-1 – 4-66 ) The following topics (pages) are covered in this lecture: Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7) Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7)
TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS: GETTING THE MOST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK! GPA Fall Conference 2013 Garth Lynch, PE, AICP HNTB Corporation October 10, 2013.
INTERSTATE DRIVING Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments
Caltrans Approval Process: Update Van Ness Avenue BRT Citizens Advisory Committee September 8 th, 2009.
February 19, 2015 Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicyclists at Interchanges Draft ITE Recommended Practice: Meghan Mitman, AICP Senior.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) – HDM Ch 16.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Ginger Goodin, Texas Transportation Institute Greg Jones, Federal Highway Administration.
Module 5 Displaced Left Turn (DLT) Intersections
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
I n t e g r a t I n g C S S Practitioner Module 5 1 Module 5: CSS and Livability in Project Development.
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
Martha Moore, P.E. Ghyabi & Associates October 10, 2014
Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users Module 8 Intersection- Interchange Evaluation Process.
INTRODUCTION Grade separation is an effective way of handling intersecting traffic with greatest efficiency, safety, capacity. An interchange is a system.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Roundabout Study and Design EDSM Revisions
1 Context Sensitive Solutions For Designing Urban Thoroughfares Brian Bochner Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute Brian Bochner Senior.
Grade separation.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Design versus Planning Presented by: Bill Kenny, Director, Highway Design, Project Management and Training Section, Technical Standard Branch.
Is Transportation Sustainable?. Objectives By the end of this unit, students will be able to: 1.Examine and prioritize transportation project impacts.
Transportation and Transit Committee 4 December 2002 Albion Road Corridor Study.
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
1 INTERCHANGE SELECTION CE 550 SPRING OBJECTIVE Identify types of interchange by function and geometry Learn process for optimizing the type of.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
Virginia Department of Education
 Links the optimized settings to VISSIM, the operational analysis results is: Synchronization of Intersections This study employs the core logic of MAXBAND.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Virginia Department of Education
Policy for New/Modified Access to Controlled Access Facilities.
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Fairfax County Parkway Corridor Study Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee December 1,
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
DRIVING THE FREEWAYS ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8.
Context Sensitive Solutions Focus Group Session Lynn Purnell Parsons Brinckerhoff Prosperity Church Road Corridor December 8, 2005.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
1 Intersection Design CE 453 Lecture Intersections More complicated area for drivers Main function is to provide for change of direction Source.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Maintenance and Temporary Traffic Control
Preserving the Lost Art of Geometric Design: Tools, Techniques and Talent TRB Workshop - January 23, 2011 Understanding the Art Mark Doctor, PE Federal.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Project Management Team Meeting #3
INTERCHANGE DESIGN Fall 2017
Interchanges Ch. 6.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
Presentation transcript:

Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen

Presentation Overview Interchange Characteristics Process for Interchange Type Selection Service Interchange System Interchange New Type of Interchange Design Process and Details Interchange Attributes to Consider

Interchange Characteristics Two main types of interchanges –Service Interchange – between a freeway or controlled access facility and a lower class roadway such as an arterial or collector (i.e. diamond) –System Interchange – between two or more freeways or controlled access facilities (i.e. cloverleaf)

Interchange Characteristics Attributes of interchange type varies –Traffic Operations –Safety –Physical Impacts (R/W) –Construction Cost –Constructability

Process for Interchange Type Selection Process for Interchange type selection –Data Collection –Planning Framework –Identify and develop Concepts –Evaluate and Screen Alternatives –Select Preferred Alternative

Process for Interchange Type Selection Additional items to consider –Identify and understand key project issues –Design creativity and context sensitivity o required to develop feasible solutions –Maintain fiscal feasibility –Maintain/enhance local access in reconstructing urban system ramp interchanges –Incorporating exclusive HOV lanes or ramps o Complicates the design and increases cost –Constructability o Reconstruction typically requires maintaining all movements

Service Interchange Urban and Suburban Areas (tight R/W constraints) –Single Point Design creativity and context sensitivity o One intersection vs. two along local roadway o Expensive –Compressed or Tight Diamond o Intersections spaced 250’-400’ apart o Similar footprint to SPDI –Operational Characteristics –Determine number of lanes –Traffic operations are key to success

Service Interchange Single Point Diamond Interchange (SPDI)

Service Interchange Urban and Suburban Areas (tight R/W constraints) –Single Point Design creativity and context sensitivity o One intersection vs. two along local roadway o Expensive –Compressed or Tight Diamond o Intersections spaced 250’-400’ apart o Similar footprint to SPDI –Operational Characteristics –Determine number of lanes –Traffic operations are key to success

Service Interchange Compressed or Tight Diamond Interchange

Service Interchange Urban and Suburban Areas (tight R/W constraints) –Implement selection process –12 points for the design of system interchanges o Maintain route continuity o Maintain basic number of lanes o Provide lane balance and continuity o Maintain appropriate ramp spacing o Design ramps for freeway speeds o Select appropriate interchange types o Employ only right-hand entrances and exits o Provide single exit at interchanges o Provide exits in advance of crossroad o Provide decision sight distance in advance of exits o Eliminate weaving within interchanges along the mainline o Provide designs that can be simply signed

New Type of Interchange Diverging Diamond

Design Process and Details Stakeholders –Maintaining Authority –Traveling Public –Impacted Public –Landowners –Environment –Politics –Federal Funding –Be Honest!

Design Process and Details Geometrics –Iterative process –Provide desirables DSD, SSD, etc… –Avoid flat spots and crown transitions –Rollovers –Nearby interchanges –Lane Balance –Barrier Concept –Adequate Signing –Structures - Construction restrictions to traffic

Design Process and Details Traffic –Large trucks –Avoid off-ramp queueing onto freeway –Analysis for staging and permanent conditions. Milwaukee area – Congestion map

Design Process and Details Staging –Finding the optimal balance –Impacts of staging Tie-ins & project length, ROW, Utilities Justify expenditure to provide desirable features –Over the top first –Traffic considerations Seasonal peaks Concurrent projects along corridor

Design Process and Details Staging continued… –Structures Lateral and vertical clearance Construction joints Future fill/cut at footings –Settlement of embankments –Design drainage for winter maintenance –Early project to eliminate complications –Lessons learned

Interchange Attributes to Consider Design –Type, Size: o Single point, trumpet, three leg, one quadrant, diamond, cloverleaf, etc… o Based on typically 6 warrants o Determine # lanes, heavy movements, crash locations.

Interchange Attributes to Consider Design Continued… –Utilities o Existing? Proposed? –Space or R/W constraints –Real Estate –Safety, Safety, Safety o AASHTO Green Book, FDM, AASHTO RDG, MUTCD. How do these affect the design?

Interchange Attributes to Consider Users –Local Facilities –Economics –Travel Times –Utilities - NIMBY –Multi-modal –Environmental/Recreation

Future Considerations –Additional Lanes / Interchange capacity o Future development in the immediate area –Overhead utilities and constructability of structures o OSHA requirement for cranes o Address in utility coordination –Temporary traffic shifts for maintenance and rehab o Leave in crossovers used for construction o Wider, “beefed up” shoulders necessary?

Future Considerations Future Considerations Continued… –Profile gradient should be steep enough to accommodate future barrier wall when highway expanded. –Ramp Metering –Ramp spacing between terminals o Congestion o Queue spillback o Stop and Go travels o Heavy weaving o Poor traffic signal progression

Questions????