Methods Methods ConclusionConclusion Improving Image Quality of Digital Mammographic Images Using an Undecimated Discrete Wavelet Transform Method: Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patient information extraction in digitized X-ray imagery Hsien-Huang P. Wu Department of Electrical Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science.
Advertisements

Object Specific Compressed Sensing by minimizing a weighted L2-norm A. Mahalanobis.
Usefulness of velocity profiles based on 3D cine PC MR used as boundary conditions for computational fluid dynamics of an intracranial aneurysm : investigation.
University of Ioannina - Department of Computer Science Wavelets and Multiresolution Processing (Background) Christophoros Nikou Digital.
The Global Digital Elevation Model (GTOPO30) of Great Basin Location: latitude 38  15’ to 42  N, longitude 118  30’ to 115  30’ W Grid size: 925 m.
School of Computing Science Simon Fraser University
Lecture05 Transform Coding.
A Computer Aided Detection System For Digital Mammograms Based on Radial Basis Functions and Feature Extraction Techniques By Mohammed Jirari Shanghai,
A Computer-Aided Diagnosis System For Digital Mammograms Based on Radial Basis Functions and Feature Extraction Techniques Dissertation written by Mohammed.
Medical Images Texture Analysis Using Waveles. Why Texture Analysis? Method for differentiation between normal and abnormal tissue. Contrast between malignant.
7th IEEE Technical Exchange Meeting 2000 Hybrid Wavelet-SVD based Filtering of Noise in Harmonics By Prof. Maamar Bettayeb and Syed Faisal Ali Shah King.
Detecting Image Region Duplication Using SIFT Features March 16, ICASSP 2010 Dallas, TX Xunyu Pan and Siwei Lyu Computer Science Department University.
Wavelet Transform A very brief look.
Signal Analysis and Processing for SmartPET D. Scraggs, A. Boston, H Boston, R Cooper, A Mather, G Turk University of Liverpool C. Hall, I. Lazarus Daresbury.
A Computer Aided Detection System For Mammograms Based on Asymmetry and Feature Extraction Techniques By Mohammed Jirari Benidorm, Spain Sept 9th, 2005.
February 13, 1997CWU B.Kovalerchuk1 DESIGN OF CONSISTENT SYSTEM FOR RADIOLOGISTS TO SUPPORT BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS.
Automatic Detection And Classification Of Microcalcifications In Digital Mammograms Institute for Brain and Neural Systems Brown University Providence.
(1) A probability model respecting those covariance observations: Gaussian Maximum entropy probability distribution for a given covariance observation.
Despeckle Filtering in Medical Ultrasound Imaging
Face Recognition Using Neural Networks Presented By: Hadis Mohseni Leila Taghavi Atefeh Mirsafian.
ENG4BF3 Medical Image Processing
Image Denoising using Wavelet Thresholding Techniques Submitted by Yang
Wavelets Series Used to Solve Dynamic Optimization Problems Lizandro S. Santos, Argimiro R. Secchi, Evaristo. C. Biscaia Jr. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE,
ENDA MOLLOY, ELECTRONIC ENG. FINAL PRESENTATION, 31/03/09. Automated Image Analysis Techniques for Screening of Mammography Images.
MULTITEMP 2005 – Biloxi, Mississippi, USA, May 16-18, 2005 Remote Sensing Laboratory Dept. of Information and Communication Technology University of Trento.
Wavelet-Based Multiresolution Matching for Content-Based Image Retrieval Presented by Tienwei Tsai Department of Computer Science and Engineering Tatung.
Introduction to Medical Imaging Mammography and Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) Example Guy Gilboa Course
1 Wavelets, Ridgelets, and Curvelets for Poisson Noise Removal 國立交通大學電子研究所 張瑞男
Medical Image Processing Federica Caselli Department of Civil Engineering University of Rome Tor Vergata Corso di Modellazione e Simulazione di Sistemi.
University of Kurdistan Digital Image Processing (DIP) Lecturer: Kaveh Mollazade, Ph.D. Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture,
Fuzzy Entropy based feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data Mahesh Pal Department of Civil Engineering National Institute of Technology.
GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING Dr Joseph Noonan.
Image compression using Hybrid DWT & DCT Presented by: Suchitra Shrestha Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Date: 2008/10/09.
Multiple Image Watermarking Applied to Health Information Management
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory NAPC 1 Noise Adjusted Principal Component Transform (NAPC) Data are first preprocessed to remove system bias.
September 5, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 2: Digital Images 1 Computer Vision A simple two-stage model of computer vision: Image processing Scene analysis.
R. Ray and K. Chen, department of Computer Science engineering  Abstract The proposed approach is a distortion-specific blind image quality assessment.
Human Vision Model to Predict Observer Performance: Detection of Microcalcifications as a Function of Monitor Phosphor Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD Jeffrey.
Part I: Image Transforms DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING.
BARCODE IDENTIFICATION BY USING WAVELET BASED ENERGY Soundararajan Ezekiel, Gary Greenwood, David Pazzaglia Computer Science Department Indiana University.
Image Compression Fasih ur Rehman. Goal of Compression Reduce the amount of data required to represent a given quantity of information Reduce relative.
3. Image Sampling & Quantisation 3.1 Basic Concepts To create a digital image, we need to convert continuous sensed data into digital form. This involves.
Clustering using Wavelets and Meta-Ptrees Anne Denton, Fang Zhang.
The geometry of the system consisting of the hyperbolic mirror and the CCD camera is shown to the right. The points on the mirror surface can be expressed.
Subband Feature Statistics Normalization Techniques Based on a Discrete Wavelet Transform for Robust Speech Recognition Jeih-weih Hung, Member, IEEE, and.
CAIPS 1 Frequency Support of Microcalcifications C I M A T V Taller de Procesamiento de Imágenes Authors: Humberto Ochoa, Osslan Vergara, Vianey Cruz,
Mammographic image analysis for breast cancer detection using complex wavelet transforms and morphological operators.
October 1, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 9: From Edges to Contours 1 Canny Edge Detector However, usually there will still be noise in the array E[i, j],
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Multi resolution Watermarking For Digital Images Presented by: Mohammed Alnatheer Kareem Ammar Instructor: Dr. Donald Adjeroh CS591K Multimedia Systems.
By Dr. Rajeev Srivastava CSE, IIT(BHU)
Effects of Grayscale Window/Level on Breast Lesion Detectability Jeffrey Johnson, PhD a John Nafziger, PhD a Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD b Hans Roehrig, PhD.
Jun Li 1, Zhongdong Yang 1, W. Paul Menzel 2, and H.-L. Huang 1 1 Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS), UW-Madison 2 NOAA/NESDIS/ORA.
Fewer permutations, more accurate P-values Theo A. Knijnenburg 1,*, Lodewyk F. A. Wessels 2, Marcel J. T. Reinders 3 and Ilya Shmulevich 1 1Institute for.
Medical Image Analysis
Compressive Coded Aperture Video Reconstruction
Mammogram Analysis – Tumor classification
Evaluation of mA Switching Method with Penalized Weighted Least-Square Noise Reduction for Low-dose CT Yunjeong Lee, Hyekyun Chung, and Seungryong Cho.
Image enhancement algorithms & techniques Point-wise operations
Impact of SAR data filtering on crop classification accuracy
CS Digital Image Processing Lecture 9. Wavelet Transform
Digital Image Processing
The Use of Wavelet Filters to De-noise µPET Data
The efficacy of using CAD for detection of
Historic Document Image De-Noising using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Local Pixel Grouping (LPG) Han-Yang Tang1, Azah Kamilah Muda1, Yun-Huoy.
Motion-Based Analysis of Spatial Patterns by the Human Visual System
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume 95, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Wavelet transform application – edge detection
A Second Order Statistical Analysis of the 2D Discrete Wavelet Transform Corina Nafornita1, Ioana Firoiu1,2, Dorina Isar1, Jean-Marc Boucher2, Alexandru.
Presentation transcript:

Methods Methods ConclusionConclusion Improving Image Quality of Digital Mammographic Images Using an Undecimated Discrete Wavelet Transform Method: Performance Assessment Eri Matsuyama 1, Du-Yih Tsai 1, Yongbum Lee 1, Haruyuki Watanabe 1, Masaki Tsurumaki 2, and Katsuyuki Kojima 3 1 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan 2 Department of Radiology, Nakajo Central Hospital, Niigata, Japan 3 Graduate School of Business Administration, Hamamatsu University, Hamamatsu, Japan Results Results AbstractAbstract Figure 1 illustrates the flowchart of our proposed method. IntroductionIntroduction Improving image quality in digital mammographic images has clinical impact in order to increase accuracy of detection of breast cancer. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new method for denoising mammographic images. The features of the proposed method include iterative use of undecimated multi-directional wavelet transforms at adjacent scales. In this method, computer-based simulations have been carried out for selecting an optimal wavelet basis function based on mutual information metric. Perceptual experiments on clinical mammograms were conducted. The proposed method was compared with conventional discrete wavelet transform methods to demonstrate its superiority. W e have proposed an effective denoising method for reduction of the noise in mammographic images. We examined the performance of the proposed method. Our research results demonstrated the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Mammography is one of the most effective and reliable methods for early breast cancer detection and diagnosis. However, it is still far from being ideal. One of the major reasons is due to the presence of noise and subsequently resulting in detection failure or misdiagnosis. Hence noise reduction is one of the major tasks in improving image quality in digital mammographic images. Because of the importance of noise reduction from mammographic images, there has been an enormous amount of research dedicated to the subject of noise removal. In this study, we proposed an effective denoising method to attempt to reduce the noise in mammographic images. The method was based on using hierarchical correlation of the coefficients of discrete stationary wavelet transforms. The features of the proposed technique include iterative use of undecimated multi-directional wavelet transforms at adjacent scales. To validate the proposed method, computer simulations were conducted, followed by its applications to clinical mammograms. Mutual information originating from information theory was used as an evaluation measure in this study. Moreover, we conducted a perceptual evaluation of the processed images obtained from the proposed method and other conventional methods for confirmation of the effectiveness of the proposed approach. MaterialsMaterials Fig. 3 Preference ranking map for the three image groups: original, conventional DWT-processed, proposed UDWT-processed mammograms. Figure 2 shows an example of the results of applying the proposed method. Fig. 2 An example showing images and plots of the detailed (vertical) coefficients. (a) Original image (b) UDWT-method processed image (c) Vertical wavelet coefficient of sub-band at level 1 (d) Profile of the coefficient distribution traced from the line indicated in ( c) (e) New coefficients of sub-bands at level 1 (f) Profile of the coefficient distribution traced from the line indicated in (e) Fig. 1 Flow chart of the proposed method. Mammograms were obtained from the data base of the Japanese Society of Medical Imaging Technology. The size of each image was 2510×2000 pixels at 10 bit grayscale, and the spatial resolution was 100μm/pixel. A total of 30 mammograms (14 normal cases and 16 abnormal cases) obtained from the database were used for investigation of the effectiveness of the proposed method. In this study, Scheffe’s method of paired comparison was employed for visual performance analysis. The visual evaluation was conducted by seven experienced radiological technologists (ranging from 15 to 25 years of experience). Figure 3 illustrates visual evaluation results. The results are depicted by a preference ranking map for the three image groups, i.e., original, conventional DWT-processed and UDWT-processed image groups. (d) (f) (a) (c ) (e) (a) (b) H Detail Horizontal Vertical Diagonal Level 1 Level 2 | Level1 H ×Level 2 H | New Level 1 Two dimensional stationary wavelet transform. Original Image Inverse two dimensional wavelet transform Reconstructed image Thresholding Return H Detail V Detail D Detail Approximation Level 1 Approximation New H Detail New V Detail New D Detail | Level1 V ×Level 2 V || Level1 D ×Level 2 D |