Monte Carlo Testing of a Gamma Veto System for LUX Ryan Sacks Mentors: Daniel Akerib and Michael Dragowsky Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kathleen Chinetti Sohaila Mali Calibrating Equipment for the Direct Detection of Dark Matter using Noble Element. Scintillation.
Advertisements

Advanced Neutron Spectrometer (ANS) Geant4 Simulations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Simulating Radioactive Decays in Next Generation Geoneutrino Detectors Megan Geen Wheaton College Advisor: Nikolai Tolich August 17, 2011.
Introduction Radon is a radioactive noble gas in the uranium decay chain. It emanates out of many materials due to its very low chemical reactivity. The.
ICECUBE & Limits on neutrino emission from gamma-ray bursts IceCube collaboration Journal Club talk Alex Fry.
Abstract Dark matter is a generic term for an exotic class of particles that might provide sufficient gravity to explain the observed movements of stars.
Status of XMASS experiment Shigetaka Moriyama Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo For the XMASS collaboration September 10 th, 2013.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield, UKDMC ILIAS-Valencia-April Gamma backgrounds, shielding and veto performance for dark matter detectors M. Carson,
Abstract The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) dark matter detector will use a water shield to reduce background events in the detector. However, a high radon.
A Muon Veto for the Ultra-Cold Neutron Asymmetry Experiment Vince Bagnulo LANL Symposium 2006 Outline ● UCNA Experiment ● Muon background ● Proposed Veto.
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer Mentor: Dr. Lauren Hsu [FNAL, CDMS] September.
M. Carson, University of Sheffield IDM 2004, University of Edinburgh Veto performance for a large xenon detector.
Reflectivity Measurements of Critical Materials for the LUX Dark Matter Experiment Theory My experiment was a cyclic process involving software, engineering,
Dark Matter Searches with Dual-Phase Noble Liquid Detectors Imperial HEP 1st Year Talks ‒ Evidence and Motivation ‒ Dual-phase Noble Liquid Detectors ‒
A Muon Veto for the Ultra Cold Neutron Asymmetry Experiment Vince Bagnulo with Dr. Jeff Martin Electrons Ultra Cold Neutrons Cosmic Ray Muons Protons Pions.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
Liquid Xenon Gamma Screening Luiz de Viveiros Brown University.
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Main detector types Multi Pixel Photon Counter (MPPC) and Charge Coupled Devices (CCDs) How does it work? 1. Photon hits a pixel producing electron hole.
The neutrons detection involves the use of gadolinium which has the largest thermal neutron capture cross section ever observed. The neutron capture on.
DARK MATTER Matthew Bruemmer. Observation There are no purely observational facts about the heavenly bodies. Astronomical measurements are, without exception,
PANDAX Results and Outlook
Search for Dark Matter at CJPL with PANDAX
Proportional Light in a Dual Phase Xenon Chamber
Lens ALens B Avg. Angular Resolution Best Angular Resolution (deg) Worst Angular Resolution (deg) Image Surface Area (mm 2 )
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
Dark Matter Facts Baryonic Matter is only 20% of the Universe 80% is Dark Matter Dark Matter doesn’t interact with light or ordinary matter very frequently.
Abstract A time resolved radial profile neutron diagnostic is being designed for the National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX). The design goal is to.
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
Development of A Scintillation Simulation for Carleton EXO Project Rick Ueno Under supervision of Dr. Kevin Graham.
QuarkNet Muon Data Analysis with Shower Array Studies J.L. FISCHER, A. CITATI, M. HOHLMANN Physics and Space Sciences Department, Florida Institute of.
Cosmic Rays: Ever Present and Useful Anthony Gillespie Denbigh High School Mentor: Dr. Douglas Higinbotham Cosmic Rays Using the Cosmic Rays Current Research.
TAUP2007, Sendai, 12/09/2007 Vitaly Kudryavtsev 1 Limits on WIMP nuclear recoils from ZEPLIN-II data Vitaly A. Kudryavtsev Department of Physics and Astronomy.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © DarkSide-50: The Hunt for the Elusive Dark Matter Gary W. Forster Experimental Gravitational and Particle.
Monte Carlo Simulations of a Neutron Detector Laura Boon Case Western Reserve University, Department of Physics Advisor: Daniel Akerib, Department of Physics.
Cosmic Rays The discovery of cosmic rays Discoveries made with cosmic rays Cosmic rays in modern physics education Let’s count cosmic rays around us.
Dark Matter. Zwicky’s Coma In 1933 Fred Zwicky measured the speed of Coma cluster galaxies. –Too fast for the visible stars –Cluster would fly apart Either.
Dark Matter Detection with Liquid Xenon Masahiro Morii Harvard University Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology 21 August
Neutron Monitoring Detector in KIMS Jungwon Kwak Seoul National University 2003 October 25 th KPS meeting.
Neutron scattering systems for calibration of dark matter search and low-energy neutrino detectors A.Bondar, A.Buzulutskov, A.Burdakov, E.Grishnjaev, A.Dolgov,
J.T. White Texas A&M University SIGN (Scintillation and Ionization in Gaseous Neon) A High-Pressure, Room- Temperature, Gaseous-Neon-Based Underground.
A Study of Background Particles for the Implementation of a Neutron Veto into SuperCDMS Johanna-Laina Fischer 1, Dr. Lauren Hsu 2 1 Physics and Space Sciences.
Simulation of the energy response of  rays in CsI crystal arrays Thomas ZERGUERRAS EXL-R3B Collaboration Meeting, Orsay (France), 02/02/ /03/2006.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
Announcements The final exam will be at Noon on Monday, December 13 in Van Allen Hall LR1. Practice questions for unit #5 are available on the class web.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
DARK MATTER & GALACTIC ROTATION 2012 ASTRO SUMMER SCHOOL.
Brian Lowery July 11,  Primary  From space ▪ Lower energy cosmic rays come from sun ▪ Higher energy cosmic rays come from other places in the.
KPS Chonbuk University 2005/10/22 HYUNSU LEE Status of the KIMS dark matter search experiment with CsI(Tl) crystals Hyun Su Lee Seoul National.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Dark Matter Search with Direction Sensitive Scintillators The10th ICEPP Symposium February 16, 2004, Hakuba H. Sekiya University of Tokyo.
WIMP search Result from KIMS experiments Kim Seung Cheon (DMRC,SNU)
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
DARK MATTER SEARCH Carter Hall, University of Maryland.
Detecting shielded nuclear contraband using muon tomography Judson Locke, William Bittner, Leonard Grasso, Dr. Kondo Gnanvo; Adviser: Dr. Marcus Hohlmann.
ZEPLIN III Position Sensitivity PSD7, 12 th to 17 th September 2005, Liverpool, UK Alexandre Lindote LIP - Coimbra, Portugal On behalf of the ZEPLIN/UKDM.
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
Study of the cryogenic THGEM-GPM for the readout of scintillation light from liquid argon Xie Wenqing( 谢文庆 ), Fu Yidong( 付逸冬 ), Li Yulan( 李玉兰 ) Department.
Alex Howard, Imperial College Slide 1 July 2 nd 2001 Underground Project UNDERGROUND PROJECT – Overview and Goals Alex Howard Imperial College, London.
WIMPs Direct Search with Dual Light-emitting Crystals Xilei Sun IHEP International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
BSc (Honours) in Natural Sciences (Physics)
Presentation transcript:

Monte Carlo Testing of a Gamma Veto System for LUX Ryan Sacks Mentors: Daniel Akerib and Michael Dragowsky Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve University Abstract Dark matter detection requires effective reduction and rejection of background events to accurately detect dark matter interactions. The LUX detector consists of a volume of liquid xenon with photo multiplier tubes inside of a sealed container shielded by a medium such as water or liquid scintillater. Upgrading the current LUX water shield would allow for effective detection of high energy gammas in the MeV range that have gone through small angle Compton scattering to produce an event in the main detector. Detection of the high energy gammas in the shield region will allow vetoing of the 10keV signals produced by the Compton scattering. Modeling of the detector will be carried out to ascertain the location of and energy deposition of the gamma events. Determining the ratio of events that are not detectable in the detector to those that are is of critical component to the feasibility of the upgrade. The final product will be to determine what energy level outside of the active Xenon volume will be required to effectively veto an event. Additional PMTs will be required to detect these events as the current set up does not have the required sensitivity to detect gammas in the shielding region. The purpose of the study is to simulate the efficiency of detecting WIMP-like events caused by gamma from contaminants in the PMTs. The study will consider variations in the design to improve veto efficiency. Introduction In the 1930’s Frank Zwicky [1] made observations that galaxies in the Coma cluster had a theoretical mass that is not consistent with the observable mass. The basis of this is derived from the brightness of the clusters which has a direct correlation to the cluster mass. A number of other experiments [2, 3] have also confirmed through the measurement of radial velocity that the luminous mass does not yield enough mass to force the rotational velocity of stars on the outer arms of galaxies to be at their observed values. These results were corroborated by a second type of observation, gravitational lensing. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity [4] states that light coming from a distant object will be deflected by the gravitational well of a massive object. Measurements of Galaxy Cluster Abell 2218 show that a disparity between the mass of the lensing cluster that is observed and the amount required to create the affect seen. Measurements have shown that there is a missing part of the mass of the universe and that observations account for ~4% of the mass-energy of the universe [5]. The hypothesis of dark matter is to account for the “missing mass” that is required for the described observations. Figure 1: A WIMP (purple) interacts with Xenon atom (light blue) The LUX detector uses liquid Xenon to experimentally verify the existence of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPS). The detection method depends on a collision between a WIMP and the Xenon (see Figure 1). The interaction produces two distinct signals, primary scintillation signal from gamma rays and a secondary electron signal [5]. The electrons are drifted through the liquid medium via electrically charged grids and are detected by arrays of photomultiplier tubes (PMTs). The use of both signals gives LUX the ability to pinpoint in 3-D space where the collision took place. The focus of this project is to develop a system through which signals from gamma rays released from radioactive decay within the PMTs can be vetoed. By undergoing small angle Compton Scattering, 1 MeV gamma rays can mimic a dark matter signal. Method The modeling for this project was done using a Monte Carlo code called MCNP- Polimi. The code is based on MCNP5 but instead of dealing with masses of particles tracks the interactions of single particles. The geometry was modeled using MCNP (see Figure 2) and included all areas of liquid Xenon, PMTs, copper shields and all other relevant geometry. After modeling of the detector was completed, runs using a 1 MeV gamma source were preformed. This data was complied and then fed into a specialty written MATLAB code. The code preformed cuts based on energy and geometry in order to single out those interactions that could mimic dark matter signals. After this the code will then determine which of these signals scatters only once in the liquid Xenon. Current measures in place already veto any multiple scatters in the xenon itself, the current focus is to determine a way to veto gamma rays that scatter in the detector volume only once. Results  e-e- Figure 2: The LUX Detector as modeled in MCNP Conclusions and Continuing Work The copper housing around the PMTs suppresses the distance the gammas travel after they have scattered in the detector medium. The copper shields above the upper PMTs (Figure 5) and below the lower PMTs (Figure 4) act as gamma absorbers. For the top PMTs there are a large number of events that occur at the gas/liquid interface. This could be used as a possible veto area. Determine exactly how many of the scatters that deposit energy are single scatters instead of multiple scatters. Investigate the difference between solid copper housings around the PMTs and copper sheets around the PMTs. Investigate the affect of a 1mm gap between the Teflon/Polyethylene wrapper on the inside of the detector and the Titanium wall. Investigate the affect of different materials for the shields above and below the PMT banks. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their help on the project: Daniel Akerib, Mike Dragowsky, Tom Shutt and Alex Bolozdynya. References [1] F. Zwicky, Helv. Phys. Acta, 6, 110 (1933). [2] V. Rubin, W.K. Ford, Astrophysical Journal, 159, 379 (1970). [3] J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk and S. D. M. White, Astrophysical Journal, 490, 493 (1997). [4] R. Hennings-Yeomans, First 5 Tower WIMP-Search Results from the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search with Improved Understanding of Neutron Backgrounds and Benchmarking. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University (2009) [5] LUX Collaboration, Construction of the LUX Dark Matter Experiment at the Sanford Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory. NSF and DOE proposal. (2007) The test results for the detector in Figure 2 are given above. Of the 4000 test particles used in the simulation, 651 deposited energy consistent with a dark matter signal. The energy range of interest is between 0 and 5 keVee. This represents the same energy scale that a dark matter event will give off. Figure 3 shows the distribution of energy depositions within the detector in the target range. This is a fairly even distribution which is to be expected as any large spike or drop off will occur at the Compton Peak which is not in this energy range for Xenon. Figure 4 shows the location of the energy depositions within the detector when the gammas are released at the bottom PMT bank. The blue dots are those that take place in the liquid Xenon and could cause a false-positive. Note that very few of the gammas make it far from the point of origin (yellow dot). This is due to the copper housing around the PMTs. Figure 5 shows the distribution when the gammas are released from the top. Note that there is a gap from the source to a large concentration of blue dots. This is due to the fact there is a 10cm gap of gaseous Xenon between the source and the liquid Xenon detector. Figure 4: A graph of the location within the detector where energy was deposited, bottom PMT bank. Figure 3: A graph of energy deposited by each scattering event Figure 5: A graph of the location within the detector where energy was deposited, top PMT bank. 187 cm