Performance Based Funding Formula. SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNIVERSITIES FY 2015 Spring 2014 State Share of Instruction.
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
Promoting Degree Completion Through Financial Incentives Teresa Lubbers, Commissioner November 9, 2009.
1 Changes in the State Share of Instruction FY 2008 and Beyond Presented by: The Office of Administrative Services.
Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
The Florida College System House Bill 7135: Relating to Postsecondary Education Julie Alexander & Carrie Henderson April 20,
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Budget & Performance Funding Formula Overview August 19, 2011.
Issues and Implications OCTEO SPRING CONFERENCE April 2, 2008.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
One Plus One: Credit Equivalency Process Jamilah Jones Tucker Director, Career Technical Initiatives 12/17/2013.
Southern Regional Education Board Cheryl Blanco, Vice President, Special Projects Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)
Louisiana Public Postsecondary Education Governance Commission Budget, Formula Funding, & Efficiencies September 28, 2011.
1 State University System Tuition and Fees. 2 Florida Tuition Within proviso in the General Appropriations Act and law, each board of trustees shall set.
New Aid Officer Training Cathy Crawley Georgia College & State University.
8 HB ELEMENTS FOR SETTING THE INITIAL FUNDING ALLOCATION OCTOBER 21, 2014 MODEL DESIGN Features/Mechanics.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 “…will allow students … to get a vision of what can be achieved, what they can do in technical.
University of Toledo: University Council Higher Education Funding.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: The Indiana Experience Teresa Lubbers, Indiana Commissioner for Higher.
Advanced Opportunities Programs Overview and Implementation Discussion Matt McCarter Director, Student Engagement & Postsecondary Readiness
Colleges can provide all Washingtonians access to 2-year post secondary education Measures: Enrollments in community and technical colleges Rate of participation.
CARL D. PERKINS SPRING INFORMATIONAL SESSION for NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2003 OHIO BOARD OF REGENTS MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM NEW PERKINS COORDINATORS.
1 Oregon Community College Distribution Formula. 2 What is the Distribution Formula?  The method the State Board of Education and CCWD use to allocate.
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Analysis of States’ Use of Student Enrollments and Performance Criteria in Higher Education Funding May 2012 R EPORT FOR THE N EVADA L EGISLATURE ’ S C.
Understanding Subsidy Budget Planning Council
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Credit Transfer: Cornerstone of the University System of Ohio.
Charting the Course for Student Completion December 5, 2013.
Pennsylvania Department of Edward G. Rendell Governor, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dr. Gerald L. Zahorchak Secretary of Education.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas
2013 Legislative Session: Challenges and Outcomes Kathleen A. Conaboy Steve Canavero, PhD Nevada State Public Charter School Authority Presentation to.
Developmental Education Initiative (DEI). What is DEI? o Three-year project aimed at improving developmental education outcomes o Funded by Gates and.
TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD WEBINAR APRIL 9, 2014 Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
IBHE Presentation 1 Proposed Four-Year University Performance Funding Model Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2011 Dr. Alan Phillips.
2011 Annual Report. People – Manage a system with appropriate quantity of students, instructors, administrators and staff Product – Prepare and maintain.
What you need to know about Dual Credits Team Challenge 2015.
University System of Ohio. Strategic Plan for Higher Education The State of Ohio increase its educational attainment to compete in a global economy that.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: Implementation in Massachusetts Richard Freeland, Commissioner Massachusetts.
International Symposium October 15,  Graduate more people  Keep them here after graduation  Attract more talent.
90-Day Goal Performance Funding Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education April 12, 2011.
Emerging Trends in Community College Finance Morris W. Beverage, Jr., E.D.M. President Lakeland Community College.
IBHE Presentation 1 Illinois Higher Education Performance Funding Model IBHE Board Meeting February 7, 2012 Dr. Alan Phillips.
Understanding State Share of Instruction and Resource Analysis Jay Johnson Assistant Director, Higher Education Information (HEI) (614)
SUS Performance Funding Institute for Academic Leadership Joe Glover October 2015.
Maryland’s Process for Projecting Enrollments in Higher Education Michael J. Keller Director of Policy Analysis and Research Maryland Higher Education.
Monitoring and Oversight: College Completion and Attainment Dr. Kevin Reilly & Dr. Sheila Stearns AGB Consultants December 7th, 2015.
Community and Technical Colleges The Hub of Modern Workforce Systems Hans Meeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Vocational and Adult Education United.
Budget Approved. 2 Contents State Funding Picture3 Effect on North Central State College4 Board of Trustees’ Planning Goals5 State Share of.
Presentation to the House Education Committee January 13, 2011.
Student success is the highest priority of every community college in Texas and our legislative priorities reflect this core principle. The member colleges.
CHE Higher Education Budget Recommendation State Budget Committee Meeting December 14, 2010.
The Future of Higher Education in Texas Dr. Larry R. Faulkner Vice-Chair, Higher Education Strategic Planning Committee Presentation to Texas Higher Education.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Major Policy Discussion Achieving the Goals of 60x30TX: College Readiness and Dual Credit April 28, 2016 College.
Transfer Course Credit – Institutions of Higher Education Credit for Prior Learning Industry Recognized Credentials/Test Credit AGC – March 2016.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Higher Education Leadership Conference Rich Petrick, Vice Chancellor for Finance Ohio Board of Regents 6/12/2016.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
Draft Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature.
One System…One Mission Edison State College Randy Hanna Chancellor Florida College System.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Curriculum and Instruction BOOTCAMP!
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
Joshua Garrison Director of Policy and Legislation
Impact and Implementation of Budget and Legislative Changes
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Strong Workforce Program Incentive Funding Overview
Performance Funding Model Overview
Implementation dashboard Phase I January-june 2009
BOARD of GOVERNORS State University System of Florida
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Performance Based Funding Formula

SSI History SSI Overview University Formula Performance Changes OTC Funding Formula 2

Performance Based Funding Formula –Performance Funding Commission Established Commission of university and community college Presidents formed to guide the process. Commitment made to simplify the policy drivers in the formula. Guiding Principles agreed to and distributed early in the process. Detailed recommendations vetted and voted on by campus CFOs. Initial goal was to get full agreement on the recommendations from the commission members. Aspirational goal was to get full agreement from all Presidents.

Performance Based Funding Formula –Guiding Principles Incentivize colleges and universities to improve graduation rates, the number of graduates and time to completion Raise participation rates in higher education among Ohio high school graduates Attract best and brightest to learn and work in Ohio Encourage colleges and universities to attract, prepare and graduate non-traditional and at-risk students Ensure college is affordable for students and families

University Funding Formula SSI –$1.789 Billion – FY14 - $38.4 Million Increase (2.1%) $411,247,477 – Community Colleges $1,372,968,020 – Universities –$116,181,104 – Regional Campuses –$5,474,764 – Bridge Funding/Main and Regional Campuses –$1.821 Billion – FY15 - $32.0 Million Increase (1.8%) $419,101,428 – Community Colleges $1,399,124,069 – Universities –Regional Campuses Merged –$3,100,000 – Bridge Funding/Community Colleges –FY10 - $1,706.3 –FY11 - $1,710.3 (.20%) –FY12 - $1,735.5 (1.5%) –FY13 - $1,751.2 (.90%) 5

University Funding Formula FY2014 For FY 2014, the weighted degree cost component is 50% of the FY 2014 value for the State Share of Instruction for main campuses. Set Asides Doctoral Set-Aside Allocation = 11.79% Medical 1 Set-Aside Allocation = 1.48% Medical 2 Set-Aside Allocation = 6.41% FY 2009 Access Challenge Allocations for Access Institutions (University of Akron, University of Cincinnati, Cleveland State University, Central State University, Shawnee State University, Youngstown State University) The remaining amount is allocated to the course completion component of the formula. Out of State Student Degrees A weight of 0.25 is applied to out-of state degree costs. A degree or graduate is considered out of state if the student was reported as non-resident in all terms they attended a public Ohio university. $116.2 Million to Regional Campuses 6

University Funding Formula FY2014 –Degrees Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Professional degrees (excepting Medical degrees) awarded at university main campuses STEM weighting for degrees Associate degrees awarded at main campuses that received Access Challenge funding in FY2009. –FY14 Associate Degree Earnings - $9,462,815 »Akron - $4,287,680 »UC - $1,011,156 »Shawnee St - $2,446,368 »Youngstown St - $1,717,611 –Access Challenge - $3,923,764 Kept in formula through FY15 Was supposed to be removed in FY16 but looking at phasing out in next biennium 7

University Funding Formula FY2014 –Plant, Operation, Maintenance (POM) Removed in FY16 UT $811,326/Central State $1,619,418 –Stop loss Removed Stop Loss One year Bridge Funding for universities that would receive less than 96% of FY2013 funding –Three year average for all data in formula –Doctoral – $161.7 Million 62.5%/55% - Share of FTE 25%/30% - Share of Degrees 12.5%/15% - Share of Research Grant Activity –Medical - $108.3 Million Med I - $ OSU – Veterinary/Dental Med II - $88.0 Million 8

University Funding Formula Distribution of University SSI for FY14 – $1,256.8 Billion/$1,372.9 Billion –28.2% Course Completions - $354.4 Million/$470.6 Million (34.3%) At-Risk Factors STEM weighting –50% Degree Attainment - $628.4 Million/45.8% when UB Added At-Risk Factors Added STEM weighting for degrees STEM weight for degree matches STEM weight for courses –21.5% Doctoral/Medical – $270.1 Million/19.7% when UB Added Percentage based so increase with additional appropriations Remove Quality Measures and include in Historical component 9

University Funding Formula Revised Distribution of SSI for FY15 –50% Degree Attainment Risk Factors student based –Based on graduation rate of a particular category of at-risk students compared to the graduation rate of students with no risk factors, leading to 15 individual at-risk weights STEM weighting –30% Course Completions Risk Factors STEM weighting –Remove separate funding for regional campuses Regional campus students included in university performance metrics Emphasis on graduation 10

University Funding Formula Risk Factors student based 11

University Funding Formula 12

University Funding Formula Revised Distribution of SSI for FY15 All Universities eligible for Associate Degrees awarded at All Campuses Previously only eligible if awarded by main campus of Access Challenge funding schools Stackable degrees Proportional degree funding Splits degree funding based on cost of courses at IUC Institutions Bonus of cost of degree from outside IUC to degree granting institution Degree funding awarded to universities for out-of-state students remaining in Ohio to work or continue education Weighted at 0.5 IF the graduate remains in Ohio Must be employed or enrolled in a USO school Will use a rate so as not to delay funding of these degrees 13

University Funding Formula –Proportional Degree Funding –Degree costs divided amongst IUC institutions based on courses taken at each IUC institution –“Bonus” to degree granting institution if total degree costs are less than statewide average cost for that degree Typically when there are transfer in credits from outside the USO, exam based credits … If it is the student’s first degree at that level Bonus credits are not included in the at-risk add-on –Degree selection will need to be done at OBR 14

University Funding Formula Revised Distribution of SSI for FY15 Out of State degree earnings based on degree cost and percentage of students who stay in state (stay in state rate) 15

University Funding Formula 16

University Funding Formula 17

University Funding Formula 18

University Funding Formula 19

University Funding Formula

OTC Funding Formula SECTION POST-SECONDARY ADULT CAREER- TECHNICAL EDUCATION The foregoing appropriation item , Post-Secondary Adult Career- Technical Education, shall be used by the Chancellor of the Board of Regents, in consultation with the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Governor's Office of Workforce Transformation, to support post-secondary adult career- technical education. The Chancellor of the Board of Regents, the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the Governor's Office of Workforce Transformation, or their designees, shall hold a series of consultations with the Ohio Technical Centers during fiscal year 2014 to develop an appropriate funding formula to distribute these funds based on student outcomes, beginning in fiscal year

OTC Funding Formula In FY 2015, the State of Ohio appropriation for the Ohio Technical Centers is $15,817,547. $400,000 is to be distributed to the Ohio Central School System; $48,000 will be used for accreditation assistance for Ohio Technical Centers; and, $975,000 shall be distributed to the 39 Ohio Technical Centers that provide business consultation with matching local dollars. Centers meeting this requirement will receive an amount not to exceed $25,000 per center. The OTC Performance Funding Consultation Group proposed the remainder be disbursed through a performance-based formula in FY 2015 calculated with a three-year average and based on a full- time equivalent of 450 clock hours on four major performance metrics - retention, completion, credential, employment. 22

OTC Funding Formula Retention – 20% shall be distributed based each Center’s full-time equivalent students who complete 50 % of an approved program of study as a measure of student retention. Completion – 25% shall be distributed based on each Center’s full-time equivalent students who successfully complete a post-secondary workforce training program approved by the Chancellor with a grade of C or better or grade of pass if pass/fail basis. Credential – 5% shall be distributed based on the proportion of each Center’s full-time equivalent students to the total full-time equivalent students who have earned a credential from an industry recognized third party. Employment – 50% shall be distributed based on each Center’s full- time equivalent students who have found employment, military service or additional post-secondary education and training. The calculation for eligible full-time equivalent students shall be based on students who have completed at least 50 percent of a program of study. 23

THANK YOU