Blaine J. Fowers, Ph.D. University of Miami
Big Picture 1. Personhood is central 2. Identity core of personhood 3. Identity is social in nature a. Relational identity in infancy b. Relational identity in adulthood 4. Identity serves social functions 5. Aristotle’s function argument 6. The good life for social beings
What is a Person? Agency Rights Dignity Temporal unity Moral responsibility Self-awareness Self-interpretive
The Centrality of Identity Necessary for personhood Identity distinguishes No “I” without “you” No “we” without “them” Identity is relational
Neonate Sociality Facial recognition Synchrony Rhythmic interaction Temporal matching Social contingency Mutual gaze first Body games
Infant Sociality Mutually Responsive Orientation Responsiveness Distress Needs Bids for attention Influence attempts Shared positive affect
“Self”-Regulation Affect regulation Highest positive arousal “External” regulation Mutual regulation Self-regulation Self-recognition Verbal self-reference
Toddler Sociality Committed Compliance Moral self Recognize rules and standards Self-evaluation Moral emotions
Collective Identity Social categorization Individual identity Collective identity Social categorization heuristic Social identity heuristic
Collective Identity Identify who matters Transformation of motivation In-group favoritism Prioritize in-group over self Loyalty heuristic
Group Goal Transformation De Cremer & van Dijk, 2002
Group Loyalty Van Vugt & Hart 2004
Baseball Rivalry Favored Team Success Ventral Striatum Pleasure Ratings Favored Team Failure Anterior Cingulate Cortex Rival Team Failure Rival Team Success Pain Ratings Aggression Endorsement Cikara, Botvinick, & Fiske, 2011
Aristotle’s Natural Ethics Priority of the Good Function argument
Function Argument
Human Social Functions Identity takes enormous energy Social coordination Attachment Cooperation Coordinated activity Norms Particularity Accountability
Ethical Beings Essentially social creatures The Good Life for social beings Ethical questions Social excellences Ubiquity of ethics “We” as important as “I” The Good as an attractor
Acknowledgement This work was funded by a generous grant from the Arsht Ethics Initiatives and the University of Miami Ethics Programs