Surface Transportation project delivery program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.
Advertisements

National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA).
Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Opportunities Exist to Strengthen FHWAs Coordination Guidance and Oversight of the Tribal Transportation Program October 30, 2013.
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
ADA Update Linda I. Singer ADA Title II Coordinator John Gover ADA Review Team Leader Maryland State Highway Administration 1.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
ODOT – FHWA Environmental Performance Measures February 2012.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
NEPA ASSUMPTION SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DELIVERY PROGRAM.
ODOT’s New PI Manual Kevin E. Davis Environmental Supervisor Office of Environmental Services.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Overview of the Federal Aid Process for Transportation Projects.
ISO Energy Management System Certification
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS EMS AWARENES TRAINING AT NOAA MARINE OPERATIONS CENTER - PACIFC JIM SCHELL, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE OFFICER.
Guiding principles for the Federal acquisition system
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
1 Joint ASIA / BIA / TRIBAL Data Management Committee A Proposed Centralized Data Management Function Sponsored by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs.
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Overview of SAFETEA-LU Sections 6001, 6002, 3005, and 3006 TRB January 13, 2008 Shari Schaftlein FHWA Project Development & Environmental Review Washington,
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
PUSD Governing Board Policies How to access and utilize the newly adopting policies.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Integrity ∙ Excellence ∙ Respect. Overview What is it? Why do it? Benefits & Risks - Alaska DOT&PF Perspective Other States Discussion and Questions NEPA.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Footer Text A Tool for Environmental Scheduling, Accountability and Performance Measurement TxECOS.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Update Region 5 February 27, 2006.
ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: FROM PLANNING TO PROJECT Ohio Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Programmatic Regulations PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
5-1 Lesson 5 | Common Issues & Challenges. Describe how RSAs address project schedule (time), project cost, and agency liability concerns. Explain the.
1 Public Involvement, Access, and Petitions DJ Law EPA Region 8.
Linking Planning & NEPA Overview Mitch Batuzich FHWA Texas Division FHWA Texas Division April 17, 2007.
3/17/2008AMATS: Anchorage Metropolitan Transportation Solutions AMATS Air Quality Advisory Committee Informational Update March18, 2008.
The PDP and Decision-Making
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Integrating Environmental, Safety, and Quality Management System Audits David Skipper UT-Battelle Environmental Protection Services Manager August 27,
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Is FHWA’s Oversight responsibility foggy? Is Oversight relationship to strategic plan clear?
Public Involvement. Why? Who Cares? –What we do matters to the public –Effective PI enables proactive input and enhances the decision- making process.
Public Involvement How to Plan and Conduct Effectively Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation’s Office of Environmental Services.
Project Scoping. Project Scoping – learning objective Who should complete the Project Initiation Package (PIP)? How is PDP Path used in scoping? Task.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Developing a Purpose & Need Statement. Objectives  Understand when the P&N is developed in the PDP  Understand the importance of a well- written/well-justified.
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
Fixing American’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act and NEPA Section 1309 – Program for Eliminating Duplication of Environmental Reviews 23 USC 330 – CEQA/NEPA.
Raising the Bar: Improving the Roles of the State, MPO, and FHWA in Tribal Consultation Tribal Transportation Planning, Partnering and Consultation James.
Roles & responsibilities Involving staff in safety management December 2015 Dr Emer Bell Integrated Risk Solutions.
Enforcement Overview Melissa Cordell, P.G. Enforcement Division Office of Compliance and Enforcement Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental.
1 Vereniging van Compliance Officers The Compliance Function in Banks Amsterdam, 10 June 2004 Marc Pickeur CBFA CBFA.
Building an Effective Paperless Records Management Governance Structure BADM 559 Enterprise IT Governance Professor Michael Shaw By Moh’d A. Obeidat 12/15/2008.
Contract Compliance Training
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Probation and Pretrial Accreditation What is it and how do we get started? Florida Corrections Accreditation Commission July 7, 2016.
Software Configuration Management
Contract Compliance Training
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

Surface Transportation project delivery program NEPA Assignment Surface Transportation project delivery program Presentation to State and Federal Agencies 12/1/14

What is NEPA Assignment? Formal Assignment of FHWA’s NEPA responsibilities to a State who would assume: All NEPA classes of action: CE’s, EA’s and EIS’s All environmental laws, rules and orders Under this program, ODOT is deemed to be FHWA on all projects for environmental matters.

the NEPA Assignment program ODOT assumes legal responsibility and liabilities to ensure compliance with all environmental requirements ODOT agrees to be sued in Federal court ODOT’s Assignment does not change any current legal requirements ODOT is deemed to be a Federal Agency [FHWA] Savings is from reduced reviews - not shortcutting process or legal requirements.

Where has this been done before? CALTRANS since 2006… Positive experience thus far Texas is in the process (MOU almost executed)… Utah and Alaska are beginning the process… Other States may be considering…

Scope of the NEPA Assignment program The MOU defines the range of project actions and environmental responsibilities the State assumes FHWA retains the following: Engineering decisions Project level air quality conformity determinations Government to government Tribal consultation USDOT responsibilities for statewide and metropolitan planning Projects that cross state lines

How will this change the process? Resource Agencies may not see much change. ODOT already handles the program on a day to day basis With this program, ODOT solely becomes responsible and legally liable for their decisions. Processes will be changed to reflect that ODOT has assumed FHWA’s responsibilities. All requirements will be addressed, just as they are today.

How will this impact Fhwa? FHWA retains oversight responsibilities, and will provide the following: Training Program Technical assistance and policy interpretation But no project assistance Audits of ODOT processing and decision making Twice yearly for first 2 years, once a year after Process and Program reviews Reports back to Congress

What are the goals of NEPA Assignment? ODOT Goals of the NEPA Assignment Streamline the Environmental Process-while still meeting environmental protection standards. Deliver program an overall 2,140 days quicker= 20% time savings Save costs to the Department Assignment program will save ODOT $45 million each year

What are the benefits? More efficient environmental review process Time and cost savings by eliminating a layer of review More efficient project delivery program Provides for more efficient consultation between ODOT and our agencies Provides an increased focus on local decision-making Continue ODOT’s leadership of our program

How will this impact Odot? ODOT must comply with its MOU commitments in assuming FHWA’s environmental responsibilities: Maintain detailed files, records and make them available to FHWA Conduct regular self assessments and continuous QA/QC on all actions Maintain the professional and experienced staff to carry out the necessary scope Report all NEPA decisions to FHWA

How does ODOT have to change? “If it’s not written down, it didn’t happen!” ODOT has to effectively document it’s actions. Ensure actions are tracked and accounted for. QA/QC is a must! One document goes thru 2x reviews due to corrections Cost US $10,000 and 30-60 days. Times it by 600 documents yearly! Follow the PDP and it’s supporting guidance Ensure commitments are carried out in the field

What can go wrong? ODOT will be legally responsible and liable for all NEPA decisions ODOT will defend in federal court Required for both on and off the State Highway System- pass thru federal monies are the same as ODOT spending them No more FHWA backstop “The feds are making us do it….” ODOT has to make the right decisions, based on the required process and laws and stand by it. Failure - FHWA can take the program away.

What’s Next? Path to entering NEPA Assignment Limited waiver of sovereign immunity Identify desired scope of Assignment Prepare Application, make available to the public Update existing MOU’s, PA and processes Draft NEPA Assignment MOU, make available to the public Develop auditing tools Train and implement

The Application for NEPA Assignment Draft Application is being developed now The Application identifies: Scope of Assignment Current & Proposed Organization Current & Proposed Procedures, Tools Roles and Responsibilities Training Resources

What are The Next steps for NEPA Assignment? Meet with agencies and associations- 12/2014 Gain support Identify improvement areas/concerns Limited waiver of sovereign immunity- 3/2015 Public Notice of Application- 4/2015 MOU to FHWA- 6/2015 MOU Public Notice- 9/2015 Effective Date of program- 12/2015

Why we will succeed… Experienced environmental team Excellent training, manuals, processes already in place Renewed focus on QA/QC Commitment to make it succeed- savings of $45 mil Commitment to continue to improve and adapt

What can you do to help? Need to understand and address any concerns you may have. One-one-one follow up meetings planned for December and early January. Work with us to update any areas that are necessary. Prepare letters of support during the Application comment period. Help us continue to improve and ensure positive performance of this program!

Surface Transportation project delivery program NEPA Assignment Surface Transportation project delivery program Contacts: Tim Hill, Administrator Office of Environmental Services Tim.Hill@dot.state.oh.us 614-644-0377 Erica Schneider, Assistant Administrator Erica.Schneider@dot.state.oh.us 614-387-0134