Introduction to the disruption JET/MST program E. Joffrin & P. Martin Presented by P. Martin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
G. Arnoux (1/19) SEWG on transient heat loads Ljubljana, 02/10/2009 Heat load measurements on JET first wall during disruptions G. Arnoux, M. Lehnen, A.
Advertisements

Progress with PWI activities at UKAEA Fusion GF Counsell, A Kirk, E Delchambre, S Lisgo, M Forrest, M Price, J Dowling, F Lott, B Dudson, A Foster,
Multiple reconnections and explosive events and in MST and solar flares Gennady Fiksel CMSO workshop, Princeton, NJ, Oct 5-8, 2005.
Analysis of disruption and RE proposals for MST Piero Martin on behalf of MST1 TFLs.
Second Peer Review for New MGI Valves for NSTX-U (Update on Valve Testing) R. Raman, et al. October 29,
Thermal Load Specifications from ITER C. Kessel ARIES Project Meeting, May 19, 2010 UCSD.
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Effects of ICRF conditioning on the first wall in LHD N. Ashikawa, K. Saito, T. Seki, M. Tokitani, Y. Ohtawa 1), M. Nishiura, S. Masuzaki K. Nishimura.
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
The Reversed Field Pinch: on the path to fusion energy S.C. Prager September, 2006 FPA Symposium.
Alberto Loarte 10 th ITPA Divertor and SOL Physics Group Avila – Spain 7/10 – 1 – Update on Thermal Loads during disruptions and VDEs A. Loarte.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
TSC time dependent free-boundary simulations of the ACT1 (aggr phys) plasma and disruptions C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Jan 23-24, 2012, UCSD.
IOS-5.2 Maintaining ICRH Coupling in expected ITER regime Spokes person: M. Goniche M.-L. Mayoral (JET), R. Pinsker (DIII-D), L. Colas (TS), V. Bobkov.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
C Gormezano, S Ide ITPA SSO&EP IEA-LT/ ITPA Collaboration 1 Steady State Operation & Energetic Particles Advanced Scenario need the same development path.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
Disruptions and run-aways E. Joffrin With thanks to P. Lomas.
1 st IAEA Meeting on Fusion Data Processing, Validation and Analysis, June 2015, Nice, France Peter de Vries – © 2015, ITER Organization Page 1 IDM UID:
SIMULATION OF A HIGH-  DISRUPTION IN DIII-D SHOT #87009 S. E. Kruger and D. D. Schnack Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA USA.
ITPA - IOS st Oct Kyoto E. Joffrin JET programme with the ILW in and relations with the IOS Joint experiments.
Divertor/SOL contribution IEA/ITPA meeting Naka Nov. 23, 2003 Status and proposals of IEA-LT/ITPA collaboration Multi-machine Experiments Presented by.
RFX Programme Meeting Feb-2010 Influences of main gas choice on RFP plasmas RFX-mod Programme Planning Workshop, 9 Feb 2011 M Valisa with contributions.
US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.
Rotation effects in MGI rapid shutdown simulations V.A. Izzo, P.B. Parks, D. Shiraki, N. Eidietis, E. Hollmann, N. Commaux TSD Workshop 2015 Princeton,
1 B. C. Stratton, S. von Goeler, J. Robinson, and L. E. Zakharov Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA D. Stutman and K. Tritz.
MHD Limits to Tokamak Operation and their Control Hartmut Zohm ASDEX Upgrade credits: G. Gantenbein (Stuttgart U), A. Keller, M. Maraschek, A. Mück DIII-D.
Resonant magnetic perturbation effect on the tearing mode dynamics in EXTRAP T2R: experimental results and modeling L. Frassinetti, K.E.J. Olofsson, P.R.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
2 The Neutral Particle Analyzer (NPA) on NSTX Scans Horizontally Over a Wide Range of Tangency Angles Covers Thermal ( keV) and Energetic Ion.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
(National Institute for Fusion Science, Japan)
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
MHD Suppression with Modulated LHW on HT-7 Superconducting Tokamak* Support by National Natural Science Fund of China No J.S.Mao, J.R.Luo, B.Shen,
Behaviour of Runaway Electrons during Injection of High Z Impurities/Gas Puffing in HT-7 S.Sajjad INSTITUTE OF PLASMA PHYSICS,HEFEI CHINA.
1 13 th ITPA Transport Physics Group Meeting Naka, 1-3 October 2007 V. Mukhovatov ITER Rotation Issues.
Integrated Operation Scenarios ITPA Remaining duties ITPA CC meeting & IEA/ITPA JE planning meeting –12 – 14 (15) December 2011, Cadarache –Ide, Sips and.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
ITPA Topical Group on MHD, Control, and Disruptions Summary of 5th meeting, Nov. 8-10, 2004 Presented by Ted Strait Workshop on MHD Mode Control Princeton,
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
Hiroshi Tojo, IAEA TM/ISTW2008, Frascati, Italy, October 2008 Features of High Frequency Mode during Internal Reconnection Events on MAST Graduate School.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
RFX-mod Programme Workshop, 20-22/01/09, Padova - T. Bolzonella1 Tommaso Bolzonella on behalf of RFX-mod team Consorzio RFX- Associazione Euratom-ENEA.
Gas Jet Disruption Mitigation Studies on Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D R.S. Granetz 1, E.M. Hollmann 2, D.G. Whyte 1, V.A. Izzo 1, G.Y. Antar 2, A. Bader 1,
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
Seminar in ASIPP, 11 Dec Page 1 Status of ITER Project and Issues of Plasma-Wall Interaction Michiya Shimada With contribution from Richard Pitts.
Role of thermal instabilities and anomalous transport in the density limit M.Z.Tokar, F.A.Kelly, Y.Liang, X.Loozen Institut für Plasmaphysik, Forschungszentrum.
Nonlinear Simulations of Energetic Particle-driven Modes in Tokamaks Guoyong Fu Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ, USA In collaboration.
Recent Disruption Studies in NSTX S.P. Gerhardt. Four Destructive Phenomena Associated With Disruptions Thermal Quench –Extremely Rapid (
HT-7 Proposal of the investigation on the m=1 mode oscillations in LHCD Plasmas on HT-7 Exp2005 ASIPP Youwen Sun, Baonian Wan and the MHD Team Institute.
O. Sauter “Robust” NTM Control: The AMN-system O. Sauter for the TCV and AUG teams Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Centre de Recherches.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Design of a feedback control system for KTX Hong Li, on behalf of KTX team The 17th International RFP Workshop, October , 2015, Hefei 1.
25 th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, St. Petersburg 2014 M. E. Puiatti 25 th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, St. Petersburg 2014 Overview of the RFX-mod.
Disruption Specification in ARIES
The Role of MHD in 3D Aspects of Massive Gas Injection
Huishan Cai, Jintao Cao, Ding Li
T. Markovič1,2, P. Cahyna1, R. Panek1, M. Peterka1,2, P. C
R. Granetz1, S. Wolfe1, D. Whyte1, V. Izzo1, M. Reinke1, J. Terry1, A
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
TH/P4-1 27th IAEA FEC, Ahmedabad October 2018
An ITPA joint experiment to study
EX/P7-12, R&D for reliable disruption mitigation in ITER, M
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the disruption JET/MST program E. Joffrin & P. Martin Presented by P. Martin

Consequences of disruptions Heat loads –When thermal energy is lost from the plasma (thermal quench) and during the current quench phase, as the magnetic energy is converted to heat energy Electromagnetic loads (induced and halo currents) –Current will take the path of least resistance when plasma intercept material surface during VDE Runaway electrons Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 2 JET

Disruption are a very serious issue Max electromagnetic forces expected in ITER order of tens of MN For comparison a couple of weight forces: o AIRBUS MN o Medium size ship 50 MN Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 3

Disruption are a very serious issue In ITER disruption local thermal loads in the worst cases significantly exceed (~10 times) melting threshold of divertor targets and FW panels Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 4

Disruptions and runaways high priority for ITER Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 5

Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 6 Disruption category in ITER

M. Lehnen, 17 th meeting of the ITPA-CC, December 2014 © 2014, ITER Organization Page 7 IDM UID: Q8TSWP When do we need the DMS? Lehnen et al., doi: /j.jnucmat Required from early operation on (heat loads) High current operation requires high mitigation success rate (EM loads) High efficiency needed at high energies Runaway generation during non-active phase not expected for unmitigated disruptions (no impurity influx)

Actions against disruptions Avoidance Drive safely….. Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 8

Actions against disruptions Avoidance Drive safely For fusion not….. always an option Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 9  N =1 2/1 NTMs Tearing Snakes Fishbones Sawteeth NN q min no wall limit with wall limit Hybrid scenarios Advanced scenarios Baseline scenarios

Actions against disruptions Avoidance Drive safely … or.. Active control Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 10

Actions against disruptions Avoidance Prediction Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 11

Actions against disruptions Avoidance Prediction Mitigation Thanks to F. Felici for the car analogy Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 12

Disruption avoidance Stabilization of MHD modes through EC localized injection on resonant surface To be combined with termination strategy Esposito, Maraschek, MST review meeting (2014) Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 13

Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 14 Prediction

Single signal: JET Locked mode amplitude Locked mode amplitude normalized to the total current Product of the two top and lower flux measurement Product of the two top and lower flux measurement normalized by the total current squared. Vertical stabilization amplifier trip signal Current derivative. AUG Locked mode amplitude Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 15

Predictions Statistical tools Neural networks APODIS (classify whether a pulse state is disruptive or non- disruptive and does this through the entire duration of the pulse) Need training! Physics based model needed Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 16

Mitigation: Massive Gas Injection Injecting large amount of noble gas at high pressure using fast opening valves. Can potentially mitigate: o Heat loads o Electromagnetic loads o Runaways electrons Name of presenter | Conference | Venue | Date | Page 17 Hender, Active Control of MHD instabilities in Hot Plasmas, Springer (2015) AUG

Massive Gas Injection Reduction of heat loads by increasing radiated power fraction Issue of radiation asymmetry: need for careful measurements to assess efficiency Olynek et al., Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Disruptions PPPL (2013) C-mod Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 18

Massive Gas Injection Reduction of e.m. loads by reducing halo currents, since current decay is quicker But, if too rapid, eddy currents to high! Lehnen, MST GPM 2013 Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 19

Massive Gas Injection Reduction of heat loads by increasing radiated power fraction Reduction of e.m. loads by reducing halo currents, since current decay is quicker Effect on runaway under investigation Pautasso, Papp – MST review (2014) AUG Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 20

JET does not see RE mitigation with MGI Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 21 JET: no effect on current*, density and HXR (injection location far from RE beam) *delayed decay in current also without 2 nd injection C. Reux, IAEA 2014

MGI and RE generation Reux, 21 th PSI Conf., 2014 JET Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 22

MGI efficiency in “ill” plasmas Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 23 Pre-existing tearing modes decrease pre-TQ duration This reduces fuelling and mitigation efficiency Pautasso, EPS 2013 AUG

MDC-1 (ITPA joint experiment on MGI) Open questions 1.Test feasibility and efficiency of MGI during current quench 2.Asses injection location with respect to TQ radiation efficiency 3.Can TQ radiation 90% radiation efficiency be confirmed? 4.Injection into disruptive plasmas 5.Assess critical impurity density for RE suppression Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 24

Runaway losses and magnetic stochasticity Name of presenter | Conference | Venue | Date | Page 25 Izzo IAEA FEC 2010 Nimrod

Runaway losses and magnetic stochasticity Enhanced losses with externally applied magnetic perturbation Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 26 DIII-D TEXTOR RFX tok ITER Papp PPCF 2012 Lehnen PRL 2008 Hollmann PoP 2010 Gobbin ITPA 2014

MGI system in JET In disruptions mitigation valves o DMV1 installed in 2008 upper vertical port of Octant 1 o DMV2 installed in 2013 horizontal port of octant 3 o DMV3 to be installed in 2015 upper vertical port of octant 5 DMV1:4.6m away from plasma separatrix not DT compatible. DMV2 & DMV3: 3.0 and 2.4m from plasma separatrix DT compatible Name of presenter | Conference | Venue | Date | Page 27

JET disruption diagnostics Vertical and horizontal bolometry camera (KB5V (octant 3) and KB5H (octant 6)) are located next to DMV2 and DMV3 respectively. Old bolometry camera (KB1) diagnostics located vertically in Octant 2, 3, 6 and 7 useful to characterize radiation asymmetries. Available for operations in Fast camera installed in oct 8 has a direct line of sight to the DMV1 gas entry tube –can provide relatively localized information on the DMV2 behavior although not directly in the line of sight. Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 28

MGI system in AUG Piero Martin | GPM 2015 | Lausanne | | Page 29

AUG disruption diagnostic and mitigation systems Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 30

TCV disruption diagnostic and mitigation systems Fast mitigation valve available Diagnostics a complete set of fast poloidal and toroidal magnetic probe arrays One infrared camera with one or two more to be added shortly (MST2 project), which could be used for runaway electron detection. a hard X-ray tomographic spectrometer composed of 3 (soon to be 4) 24-detector cameras with 7 keV resolution in the keV range a runaway (gamma-ray) detector a fast visible camera Piero Martin| 2015 GPM | Lausanne | | Page 31