ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology The application of Human.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation
Advertisements

Why use AAC Support communication Augmentative/ Alternative
User Interfaces 4 BTECH: IT WIKI PAGE:
Addressing Patient Motivation In Virtual Reality Based Neurocognitive Rehabilitation A.S.Panic - M.Sc. Media & Knowledge Engineering Specialization Man.
Relating Error Diagnosis and Performance Characteristics for Affect Perception and Empathy in an Educational Software Application Maria Virvou, George.
AAC Assessment 5/13/2015 AAC Assessment 1 “a process whereby data are collected and information is gathered to make intervention and/or management decisions.”
G063 - The Model Human Processor. Learning Objective: describe the user interface designers tool known as the ‘Model Human Processor', describe how the.
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Decision Making.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
Task Analysis (continued). Task analysis Observations can be done at different levels of detail fine level (primitives, e.g. therbligs, keystrokes,GOMS.
Cognition in the virtual world. Which is easiest to read? What is the time?
Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. Korea Univ. Division Information Management Engineering UI Lab. Human Interface PERCEPTUAL-MOTOR.
User Psychology ITKP103 Human Being and Information System Sacha Helfenstein Lectures ,
Objectives Define predictive and descriptive models and explain why they are useful. Describe Fitts’ Law and explain its implications for interface design.
Predictive Evaluation Predicting performance. Predictive Models Translate empirical evidence into theories and models that can influence design. Performance.
Some questions of hypermedia and CHI Josep Blat Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Analytical Evaluations 2. Field Studies
Research Methods for HCI: Cognitive Modelling BCS HCI Tutorial 1 st September, 2008.
Hardware Specialised Devices
Chapter 3 Computer Science and the Foundation of Knowledge Model
IT Job Roles Task 20. Software Engineer Job Description Software engineers are responsible for creating and maintaining software of various different.
©2011 1www.id-book.com Analytical evaluation Chapter 15.
Revision Lesson : DESIGNING COMPUTER-BASED INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
Chapter 5 Models and theories 1. Cognitive modeling If we can build a model of how a user works, then we can predict how s/he will interact with the interface.
Understanding Movement Preparation
User Models Predicting a user’s behaviour. Fitts’ Law.
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
INTEGRATED SYSTEMS 1205 Technology Education A Curriculum Review Sabine Schnepf-Comeau July 19, 2011 ED 4752.
UNDERSTANDING USERS: MODELING TASKS AND LOW- LEVEL INTERACTION Human-Computer Interaction
Slides based on those by Paul Cairns, York ( users.cs.york.ac.uk/~pcairns/) + ID3 book slides + slides from: courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i213/s08/lectures/i ppthttp://www-
COMPUTER ASSISTED / AIDED LANGUAGE LEARNING (CALL) By: Sugeili Liliana Chan Santos.
1 Brief Review of Research Model / Hypothesis. 2 Research is Argument.
Ch 14. Testing & modeling users
Stanford hci group / cs October 2008 Inp ut Scott Klemmer.
User Modeling 1 Predicting thoughts and actions. Agenda Cognitive models Physical models Fall 2006PSYCH / CS
Behaviour Models There are a number of models that predict the way in which an interface or user will behave.
Gary MarsdenSlide 1University of Cape Town Human-Computer Interaction - 6 User Models Gary Marsden ( ) July 2002.
Testing & modeling users. The aims Describe how to do user testing. Discuss the differences between user testing, usability testing and research experiments.
Validation / citations. Validation u Expert review of model structure u Expert review of basic code implementation u Reproduce original inputs u Correctly.
Identifying needs and establishing requirements
Demonstration and Verbal Instructions
User Modeling of Assistive Technology Rich Simpson.
How Solvable Is Intelligence? A brief introduction to AI Dr. Richard Fox Department of Computer Science Northern Kentucky University.
Human Computer Interaction CITB 243 Chapter 1 What is HCI
Assistive Technology in the Classroom Setting Rebecca Puckett CAE6100 – GQ1 (24494) Dec. 7, 2009.
Cognitive Modeling 1 Predicting thougts and actions
KAMI KITT ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY Chapter 7 Human/ Assistive Technology Interface.
Modeling Visual Search Time for Soft Keyboards Lecture #14.
1 Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception Sandra Anacleto uOttawa.
The characteristics of skilful movement. Key processes in physical education Developing skills in physical activity. Making and applying decisions. Developing.
The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.
© Simeon Keates 2009 Usability with Project Lecture 14 – 30/10/09 Dr. Simeon Keates.
ITM 734 Introduction to Human Factors in Information Systems
Evaluation Using Modeling. Testing Methods Same as Formative Surveys/questionnaires Interviews Observation Documentation Automatic data recording/tracking.
Cognitive Models Lecture # March, 2008Human Computer Intercation Spring 2008, Lecture #10 2 Agenda Cognitive models –KLM –GOMS –Fitt’s Law –Applications.
마스터 제목 스타일 편집 마스터 텍스트 스타일을 편집합니다 둘째 수준 셋째 수준 넷째 수준 다섯째 수준 The GOMS Family of User Interface Analysis Techniques : Comparison and Contrast Bonnie E. John.
Understanding Movement Preparation Chapter 2. Perception: the process by which meaning is attached to information (interpretation) Theory 1: Indirect.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
User Interface Evaluation Introduction Lecture #15.
Cognitive views on learning
Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5
Human Computer Interaction
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment and Intervention
Human-Computer Interaction Introduction to HCI
GOMS as a Simulation of Cognition
Evaluation.
HCI Evaluation Techniques
Testing & modeling users
Presentation transcript:

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Electronic Assistive Technology Simon Judge MEng, MIET Clinical Scientist Access to Communication and Technology, Birmingham, UK

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Contents My role The use of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) models for Electronic Assistive Technology (EAT) –Examine literature behind an EAT activity (switch access) –Introduce the Model Human Processor (MHP) as a potentially relevant model –Provide examples of applicability Implications for Assistive Technology Future suggested work/direction

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology My role Clinical Scientist Within specialist NHS Electronic Assistive Technology (EAT) team in the UK Clinical role: wide range of client contact (any age, any condition) Assess for and provide: –Communication aids –Environmental Control systems –Computer Access equipment A unique insight into man-machine interaction and the use of AT devices

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Hypothesis The evidence base for Electronic Assistive Technology (EAT) is small and immature Technology and techniques used in other fields are not readily transferred to EAT products or practice EAT provision is not necessarily based on evidence or theory To develop the EAT evidence base, the field should use models and theories from other fields.

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Assistive Technology Assistive Technology field is concerned with: “Assistive Technology (AT) is any product or service designed to enable independence for disabled and older people." King's Fund Consultation (14th March 2001)

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Electronic Assistive Technology No clear definition of Electronic Assistive Technology (EAT). To derive a definition: “Electronic systems designed to enable independence for disabled and older people”

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Human Computer Interaction The Human Computer Interaction (HCI) field is involved with: “Human Computer Interaction is a discipline concerned with the design, evaluation and implementation of interactive computing systems for human use…” ACM SIGCHI

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology HCI - EAT HCI should, thus, obviously be heavily involved with EAT? Lets use switch access as an example…

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Switch Access 101 Part of a spectrum/bandwidth of input Using a single binary source to transmit information [ DEMO ]DEMO Input Bandwidth

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Switch Access Within EAT switch access is an important method of access Specialist services have a lot of contact with switch access. Generally single switch auto-scan is the default. Jones and Stuart (2004) 1 At the moment switching is a ‘clinical black art’ Even the literature is not based on evidence. Robbers and McDonald, Communication Matters (2005)

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Switch Access – Questions: What is the most effective type of switch access for different people? What are the pre-requisite skills required to scan What is the cognitive load of different scanning techniques How is input bandwidth laid out at the switch end? Input Bandwidth

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Switch Access Evidence Comprehensive Literature Search General search terms Published and unpublished work: –22 papers (!) of over 1000 searched –17 published in peer-reviewed journals –~1% of published work on Assistive Technology. –Few directly related to switch access –Few involved user trials (mostly case studies) Equivalent (independent) work found similar results - few papers and lack of evidence in literature. Robbers and McDonald (2005)

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Models Models allow a theory to be better understood: “By it’s nature a model is a simplification of reality. However, a model is useful if it helps in designing, evaluating, or otherwise providing a basis for understanding the behaviour of a complex artefact such as a computer system.” MacKenzie (2003) Few, if any, models in Assistive Technology. Models used extensively to evaluate HCI tasks Model Human Processor is one such model

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Model Human Processor (MHP) Three components: –Perception –Cognition –Motor Principles for each component and rules which describe components and their interaction. Card, Newell & Moran (1983)

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Perception MHP says: –Response time of perceptual processor is proportional to intensity of stimulus –Information is stored in memory according to the type of stimuli (e.g. acoustic, visual) –Information ‘decays’ from working memory and may be stored in long term memory About 100msec Measure by determining smallest perceivable event (e.g. moving image on film) Time to perceive an event e.g. perceive pattern of letter S

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Cognition MHP says: –Cognitive processor time decreases with practice (Power Law of Practice) –Cognitive processor time decreases with task load. About 70msec Measured by ‘matching’ tests Time to “connect inputs from the perceptual system to the right outputs of the motor system” e.g. pattern S is equal to letter S

MHP :: Motor MHP says: –Time to move to a target depends on distance and size of target (Fitts Law) About 70msec Measured by repetitive motor tasks Time taken for ‘micro-movements’ to translate thought into patterns of voluntary movement e.g. hit key that has S on it

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Principles Fitts Law Predicts time to move hand to target given the distance and size of the target T pos = I M log 2 (2*Distance/Size) –i.e: Time is longer the further the target is away and the smaller it is. Fitts law shown to match use of mouse well How about a user with motor impairments?

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Principles Hick-Hyman Law Predicts the “choice reaction time” RT = a + b log 2 (number of choices) –i.e. The more choices the longer it takes to react. The reaction time to a choice depends on it’s likelihood – the more likely the option, the quicker the reaction

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Principles Power Law of Practice Predicts the effect of performing a practiced task. Tn = T1n- –i.e. Time decreases (exponentially) with practice

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP :: Example –T P – Perceptual Processor Perceive the second symbol and store in working memory visual store –T C – Cognitive Processor Tc * 1 Match symbol to previous (or not) Tc * 2 Decide to press YES or NO –T M – Motor Processor Process the signal to push the button –Total: T p + 2T C + T m User is shown a series of symbols – she has to press ‘YES’ when two identical symbols are shown in a row and ‘NO’ otherwise (I.e. a game of Snap!).

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP for Assistive Technology Koester & Levine (1997): –Used a keystroke-level model to model word prediction tasks. Keystroke level model is a Goals/Operators/Methods/Selecti on Rules (GOMS) model – similar to the MHP Validated the model for use for this task Successfully predicted prediction selection times John P Hansen – other use of GOMS model.

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP for Assistive Technology Keates, Clarkson and Robinson (1998) –Measured the perceptual/cognitive/motor times for range of able bodied and motor impaired users. Slower times for motor-processor (~50%) Slight variation in cognitive-processor Completion of task (pressing key on stimulus) did not conform to the MHP for motor-impaired users. Motor impaired users conformed to modified model with additional cognitive and perceptual processor cycles. No further research indicated…

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology MHP and Switch Access Applies to switching? –Many examples in Card et al. (1983) refer to response to stimuli and selection from lists Some work and reference to MHP in Assistive Technology papers No extensive uptake of the model or any other models noted I propose that the investigation of the model with respect to switch access would provide valuable information.

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Health Warning! I am not: –proposing models as a way of replacing common sense –suggesting that a model will give us all the answers about switching –saying that all users/clients will fit nicely into a set of categories Each person is different and the environment and motivation is almost always the most important factor However, I believe that using HCI models for switch access can provide valuable information and provide a basis for developing an evidence base…

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Modelling Examples Switched Joystick VS P&G Mouse What is quicker? Using 3/4/5 switches as a directional joystick or a Joystick Mouse (e.g. P&G Joystick) –Some (AAC) devices are removing ability to use more than 2 switches. The recommended replacement is to use a mouse device. Is this better or worse?

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Modelling Examples AutoScan VS Inverse Scan Anecdotally, most people use 1 switch AutoScan – why? –Inverse Scan is being dropped by AT products as an option Is the cognitive load of AutoScan more or less that UserScan?

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Research Areas Pre-requisit skills for switching Validate the MHP for different switching tasks Evaluate the cognitive loads of different components and methods of switching Monitor the effect of different methods of teaching on learning switching skills Investigate expert switch/device use Effects of different conditions on the components of the model ………

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Conclusions Used MHP as an example of a model that could be used with switch access EAT could build on the HCI field and apply a number of relevant models and theories Aim is to optimise switch access for users to enable them to be as effective as possible.

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology Other Relevant Work “Switch Access to Technology, a comprehensive Guide”. (Standards and reference manual for switch access) D Colven & S Judge, released shortly. Development of evidence base on Assistive Technology: Open Source software for Assistive Technology:

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology References Citations: tag/switching Main HCI reference: Human Computer Interface; Card, Newell & Moran (1983) Main AT-HCI reference: Use of Model Human Processor for people with motor impairments; Keates, Clarkson and Robinson (1998)

ICCHP 2006 – Young Researchers – Simon Judge The application of Human Computer Interaction principles to Assistive Technology