RIA Target Station Design and Infrastructure Presented by: Reg Ronningen (MSU) Prepared by Tony Gabriel and Dave Conner (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNS Experimental FacilitiesOak Ridge Target Systems for the Spallation Neutron Source Presented by John R. Haines at the High-Power Targetry for Future.
Advertisements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science under Cooperative Agreement DE-SC , the State of Michigan.
Iván Fernández CIEMAT 2 nd EU-US DCLL Workshop, University of California, Los Angeles, Nov th, 2014.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
NTOF11 Hg System Design Status Van Graves Tony Gabriel, Phil Spampinato Collaboration Meeting – Princeton University Apr 2005.
A Neutrino Factory Target Station Design based on Solid Targets J. R. J. Bennett STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Science.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Hg Jet Nozzle Analysis M. W. Wendel Oak Ridge National Laboratory February 7-8, 2005.
MERIT Collaboration Meeting ISSUES RELATING TO THE Hg-JET TARGET SYSTEM P.T. Spampinato V.B. Graves T.A. Gabriel Princeton University November 17, 2005.
MERIT Hg System Design Update V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato T.A. Gabriel MERIT Collaboration Meeting Princeton University Nov 17-18, 2005.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Hg Target System Controls V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National Laboratory February.
NUMI NuMI Hot Handling Jim Hylen (FNAL) NBI02 March 13, 2002 Page 1 NuMI Target Hall Radioactive Component Handling NuMI Target Hall Utilizes Three Basic.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
MERcury Intense Target (MERIT) Overview Van Graves, ORNL Syringe Procurement Kickoff Meeting Airline Hydraulics Bensalem, PA Oct 28, 2005.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Hg Target Interface with Solenoid V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Design Requirements, Interfaces, and Schedule P.T. Spampinato V.B. Graves T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National.
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Equipment Installation at CERN V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National Laboratory February.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
Target Design Meeting Nozzle & Hg Collection Tests, Design Requirements, Instrumentation, Containment, Windows, Diagnostics, Controls, Base Support Structure,
Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) Remote Maintenance Concepts Dave Conner Oak Ridge National Laboratory RIA R&D Participants: Argonne National Lab: J. Nolen.
Remote manipulations / diagnostics in radioactive areas and handling of radioactive material Workshop, Geneva, Switzerland 6 th May 2013 THE REPLACEMENT.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
Assembly, Installation and Interfaces Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RFCC Module Design Review October 21, 2008.
NTOF11 Collaboration Meeting Non-Design Issues for the Mercury Jet Target P.T. Spampinato V.B. Graves T.A. Gabriel Princeton University April 29-30, 2005.
Simulations in support of RIA Target Area R&D Reg Ronningen NSCL/MSU Igor Remec ORNL 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop October 10–14, 2005 Oak Ridge, TN.
Summary of Hg System Review at CERN Van Graves 13 Sep 2005.
EURISOL DS Target Meeting, CERN, CHY.KADIMarch 10-11, EURISOL DS PROJECT Task#2: MULTI-MW TARGET 1st year planning Y. Kadi (AB/ATB) European Organization.
High-Power Density Target Design and Analyses for Accelerator Production of Isotopes W. David Pointer Argonne National Laboratory Nuclear Engineering Division.
Nuclear Energy Options and Project-X Shekhar Mishra Fermilab Yousry Gohar ANL June 7 th 2010.
NuMI NBI2006 September 9, 2006 NuMI Repairs for Hot Components Jim Hylen / FNAL Page 1 NuMI Repairs for Hot Components (1 sievert = 100 rem) Problem On.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 SNS 2 Meeting Opening Remarks, Purpose Glenn R. Young Physics Division, ORNL August 28,
Development of a Positron Production Target for the ILC Positron Source Capture Optics Positron beam pipe/ NC rf cavity Target wheel Vacuum feedthrough.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 GRAPHITE SUBLIMATION TESTS with Inert Gas Mitigation C. C. Tsai, T. A. Gabriel, J. R.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
N_TOF Technical Report INTC, CERN 21 May 2007 P. Cennini AB-ATB n_TOF Technical Coordinator Status of the old Target Removal Status of the old Target Removal.
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
October 9th, 2007 Daresbury – Positron Kick-Off Meeting Slide 1 Remote Handling Vinod K. Bharadwaj SLAC October 9th, 2007.
ARIEL Building Pierre Bricault. Proton Beam specification The proton beam energy must be between 450 to 500 MeV. 200 µA with proton beam intensity losses.
BENE/EURISOL-DS Joint Meeting, CERN, SwitzerlandFebruary 22, Progress in the Liquid Mercury Multi-MW Target Design Studies Y. Kadi On behalf of.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
Mu2e Mu2e Remote Handling Review Comparisons: Costs, Risks & Maintainability Ryan Schultz Deputy L3 Manager Target Station 3/3/2015.
An Integrated Remote Target Handling System for CERN’s MEDICIS Radioactive Isotope Production Facility Keith Kershaw, Stefano Marzari, Jean-Louis Grenard.
Possible Layout of Positron Target Region Peter Sievers and Kaoru Yokoya MiniWS, KEK 2016/4/19 Target Region Layout, Yokoya 1.
Target Proposal Feb. 15, 2000 S. Childress Target Proposal Considerations: –For low z target, much less power is deposited in the target for the same pion.
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
Task # 3 Task # kW Target Station Layout proposal Presented by L.Bruno CERN AB Experimental Areas, Targets and Secondary Beams Group.
The target handling concept of the pbar- separator at FAIR M. Helmecke, V. Gostishchev, R. Hettinger, K. Knie 6th High Power Targetry Workshop Oxford.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
November 12, 2007 J.C. Sheppard/SLAC Slide 1 Thoughts on Remote Handling (taken largely [almost entirely] from Vinod Bharadwaj) (also a RIA movie from.
Liquid targets for positron production - ??? Jerry Nolen Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory POSIPOL Workshop Argonne National Laboratory September.
Developing a Reconfigurable Spallation Target System – Using the Experience from the SNS Tony Gabriel University of Tennessee April 2013 Neutron Oscillation.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
St. George Infrastructure
EffiCAS Efficient Facility for Ions at CAS
Liebert DSE High efficiency thermal management
IFMIF/DONES Project: opportunities for the industry
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
Presentation transcript:

RIA Target Station Design and Infrastructure Presented by: Reg Ronningen (MSU) Prepared by Tony Gabriel and Dave Conner (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) RIA R&D Participants: Argonne National Lab: J. Nolen Lawrence Berkley Nation Lab: L. Heilbronn Lawrence Livermore National Lab: L. Ahle, J. Boles, S. Reyes, W. Stein Los Alamos National Laboratory: Dave Viera Michigan State University: I. Baek, G. Bollen, M. Hausmann, D. Lawton, P. Mantica, D. Morrissey, R. Ronningen, B. Sherrill, A. Zeller Oak Ridge National Lab: J. Beene, T. Burgess, D. Conner, T. Gabriel, I. Remec, M. Wendel 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop October 10–14, 2005 Oak Ridge, TN

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 2 RIA Overview  R&D Activities  Overall Layout and Parameters  Remote Maintenance Requirements  ISOL Target Design and Analysis  Fragmentation Beam Dump Design  Project Status

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 3 Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) DOE Sponsored R&D Areas  Beam Simulation  Front End  Driver Linac (2 nd Stripper Region RH Considerations)  Isotope-Separator-on-Line (ISOL)  Fragment Separation- for Fragment Separators  Fragment Separation- for Gas Cell  Post Acceleration  Multi User Considerations

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 4 ISOL Target  Analysis and evaluation of target concepts (Mercury, Tungsten/Water Cooled)  Identification of required utilities and corresponding remote maintenance capabilities  Activation and Heating Calculations  Target Gallery layout and optimization for maximum availability

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 5 Fragmentation Target  Development of simulation codes for heavy ion transport  Evaluation of Beam Dump for full range of production scenarios [Cu (water or gas cooled), Lithium Stream]  Development of high-power target concepts  Simulation of radiation doses to magnets and other components  Development of concepts for remote maintenance for damaged components  Materials Research

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 6 Multi-User Considerations  Incorporate capability for simultaneous independent experiments  Multiple target vs. Cost Optimization  Maximize availability

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 7 The RIA facility schematic layout and areas of R&D

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 8 A Possible RIA Site Layout

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 9 RIA Parameters List WBSParameterBaseValueUnitComments 1.0 GLOBAL PARAMETERS 1. 0.Maximum beam power on target400kw 1. 0.Primary beam kinetic energy on target1.0GeV protons 400 MeV/u uranium 1. 0.Beam FrequencySteady State 1. 0.Protons/sec2.5x Ion TypesH thru Uranium 1. 0.Front end lengthTBD 1. 0.Linac LengthTBD 1. 0.HEBT LengthTBD 1. 0.RTBT LengthTBD Maximum uncontrolled beam loss1 W/m 1. 0.ISOL Target materialHg,W,Ta,Ucx … Fragmentation target materialLi, Graphite, ?? 1. 0.Number of ISOL targets2(3rd optional) Number of Fragmentation targets Number of stripper stations Initial number of instruments??

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 10 85m x 60m 75m x 16.5m RIA Target Gallery Layout

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 11 RIA Beam production area ISOL type beams Fast fragment beams High-power target design (ANL, ORNL, MSU) Development of overall concepts for the beam production areas (MSU, ORNL, LLNL, LBNL, LANL, ANL) Challenges: High power + high power density Frequent target changes Challenges: High power + high power density Frequent target changes

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 12

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 13 HIGH BAY AREA DUAL SERVOMANIPULATORS (SHOWN IN STORAGE POSITION) TRANSFER CELL (HANDS ON MAINT.) BASEMENT/ WASTE DISPOSAL INCELL SHIELD DOORS ISOL TARGET STATIONS FRAGMENTATION TARGET STATIONS FRAG SHIELDED STORAGE AREA FRAG MAINTENANCE/DECON CELL 50 TON GALLERY CRANE 100 TON HIGHBAY CRANE ISSUES CELL ACCESS (CONTAMINATION) SHIELD DOORS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 14 SHIELDED HOTCELL ISSUESMODULE SIZE DOSE LIMITS?

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 15 BRIDGE MOUNTED SERVO MANIPULATOR

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 16 ISOL BEAMS FRAGMENTATION BEAMS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 17 FLIGHT TUBE BEAM DIANOSTICS LI TARGET QUADRAPOLE SET DIPOLE BEAM DUMP SHIELDING ISSUESCOMPONENT SIZE LIFETIME COUPLINGS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 18 HIGHBAY CRANE TARGET GALLERY CRANE AUXILLARY CRANE (WEDGE REGION 30T) 19m 12m

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 19 INSTALL ALL ACTIVE TARGET SYSTEMS TARGET SERVICE TRAYS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 20 STEEL SHIELDING

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 21 COVER SHIELDING

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 22 BEAM DUMP ISOL TARGET BEAM DIAGNOSTICS ELASTOMER VACUUM SEALS ISSUESMODULE SIZE HEATING SEALS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 23 ION OPTICS DIPOLE / SWITCHYARD

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 24 ISOL TARGET UTILITIES HEAVY WATER DELAY TANK LIGHT WATER DELAY TANK VACUUM SYSTEM POWER / INSTRUMENTATION PRESSURIZED GASES NOTE: HEAVY WATER MAY NOT BE REQUIRED

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 25 SECONDARY VACUUM (BLUE) PRIMARY VACUUM (RED)

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 26 LIGHT WATER JUMPERS HEAVY WATER JUMPERS POWER / INSTR JUMPERS GAS FLEXIBLE HOSES THERMOCOUPLE CONNECTORS LIFTING FEATURES SPRING LOADED CAPTURED BOLTS

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 27

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 28 Requirements for RIA Target Building Remote Maintenance  Large Hot Cell Remote Handling Equipment  Large Hot Cell Configuration and Function  Component Design for Remote Handling  Remote Tooling

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 29 Remote Handling Manipulators  There are three basic types of manipulators:  Wall Mounted Master-Slave Manipulator  Power-arm mounted on bridge  Servomanipulator mounted on bridge

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 30 Master-Slave Manipulator (MSM)  Advantages  Highly dexterous  Force reflecting  Inexpensive  Reliable (HD models)  Work well with a shielding window  Disadvantages:  Limited reach  Small effective working volume  Require a shielding window workstation  Can be overloaded by operator

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 31 Bridge Mounted Servomanipulator  Advantages:  Highly dexterous handling  Force reflecting  5 to 8 X hands-on task times  Reduces need and cost of special remote handling features on components  Moderately powerful  Can be equipped with an auxiliary hoist to assist with material handling  Disadvantages:  Expensive  Complex and potentially unreliable  Mechanically compliant arm limits positioning accuracy in robotic mode

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 32 Hot Cell Video Cameras - Rad Tolerant Radiation hard IST/REES R981 Cameras (industry standard )  Advantages  Wall and bridge mountable  Can include lights and cameras  Rad resistance to >10 5 rads  Reliable  Disadvantages  High cost  Hands-on maintenance required  Black and White only  Relatively poor visual quality  Limits hot cell background

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 33 Hot Cell Functions  Hot cells have two primary functions 1.Radiation Control; passive elements such as concrete, shielding windows and vault doors. 2.Contamination Control; active systems  high efficiency ventilation  low level liquid waste water treatment  Solid waste treatment, handling and shipping  Each of the three active systems is expensive and large

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 34 Hot Cell Material Handling  Gravity is our only friend; therefore…..  Virtually all material handling is accomplished by bridge cranes; as a result:  Cells tend to be high to provide head room, hook height and clearance over servomanipulator bridges.  Cells tend to be long and narrow to reduce the bridge width and allow for easier monitoring of bridge motions.  Working areas of cell determined by bridge coverage; thus crowning of the cell is advantageous.  Cell modules should be designed for the minimum possible load since larger cranes have less coverage.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 35 Crane and Servomanipulator Combinations  Overhead bridge crane is mounted above the servo bridge  Servomanipulator and transporter with Aux hoist must be able to pass bridge crane to operate on both sides of the hook  Retrieving tools and lift fixtures is difficult and time consuming  RIA will probably require multiple cranes and servo systems to provide backup and reduce turn-around times.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 36 Personnel Access vs. Fully Remote  A Fully Remote Hot Cell Is Completely Different from a Personnel Accessible Cell in Cell Design, Component Design, Layout, Tooling, and Operation.  A Cell Designed To Operate Partially Hands-on Cannot Be Easily Converted To Full RH.  Cooling water vaults can be entered after 1-3 days of radiation cool-down if filters and IX columns have local shielding.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 37 Remote Maintenance Design  Process components modularized based on expected maintenance frequency  Remote handling interfaces incorporated to facilitate remote disassembly and assembly of modules with standardized remote tooling and lift fixtures  Maintenance accomplished by replacement of failed component Motor module Pump module Sump tank SNS Hg Pump

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 38 Identification of Tasks Remote handling tasks must be identified early; the list is the basis of design for the RH system and the components

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 39 Remote lift fixture examples

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 40 Two-step fission targets for  100 kW beam power Choice of converter type has impact on design of target area  Investigation of neutron/fission yields, beam and decay heating, radiation damage for 400 kW 2-step target Conceptual design studies of cooling schemes Are there alternatives to Li +W ? (MSU, ORNL, LLNL) 1)Mercury as target and coolant 2)Water-cooled W Original proposal (J. Nolen, ANL): Li-cooled W converter ? Principle of 2-step fission targets: Neutron converter for neutron production and dissipation of beam power Surrounding blanket of fissionable material for rare isotope production

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 41

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 42 Axial flow Design Water velocity of 18.2 m/s Grid 1Grid 2 W Volume80% Velocity18.2 m/s Inlet Temperature 40ºC Outlet Temperature 62ºC Pressure Drop 97 psi100 psi Max W Temperature 224ºC214ºC Max D2O Temperature 143ºC 75/210ºC 134ºC 76/191ºC

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 43 two wheels and one stationary beam dump

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 44 Example of a RIA Pre-Separator Beam Target Dipole Quad-Triplet Isotope Slits Wedge Beam Dump Power Densities Radiation Fields Optics design

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 45 AIR INLET/OUTLET JUMPERS TARGET MODULE VACUUM ENCLOSURE

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 46 HEAT EXCHANGER AIRFLOW PIPES SHIELDING 6” REMOTE PIPE COUPLINGS UTILITY CONNECTIONS VACUUM SEAL

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 47 floor between dump motor and vacuum space

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 48 Beam dump section; magnet vacuum space extended to top of above floor.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 49 RIA Project Status  CD0 granted  Unfunded Mandate—Construction start Sept 2008