Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 1 Niigataken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake and its Influences on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Museum Presentation Intermuseum Conservation Association.
Advertisements

Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Lesson 18 - Decay Heat DEFINE the term decay heat. Given the operating conditions of a reactor core and the necessary formulas, CALCULATE the core decay.
Presented by: Muhammad Ayub Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Safety Enhancement at Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan Prospects of Nuclear Energy in.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Vermont Yankee VSNAP Presentation February 22, 2011 Mike Romeo Director NSA.
A brief history of nuclear energy technologies Barbara Rauter Daniela Wachter.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lessons Learned from the Tailored IRRS Module on Regulatory Implications of the Fukushima Accident Presentation.
STRAGEGY FOR ENHANCING SHARE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY – Ensuring Safety & viability S.S. Bajaj Chairman, AERB 6 th Nuclear Energy Conclave, New Delhi 14 Oct 2014.
EVALUATING NUCLEAR POWER IN THE U.S. AND ITS CLEAN FUTURE Xingzhou Li Introduction to GIS.
2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami (Japan) 11 th March 2011.
1 TEPCO’s In-house Competitions for Improving Radiation Protection Skills Junichi TAIRA Tokyo Electric Power Company Radiation Protection Group ISOE International.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/2 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
1 Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., P.E. Assoc. Vice Chancellor for Research – The University of Texas System Associate Director – Energy Institute, The University.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
1 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2005 October 12, 2006 Shigeyuki Wada Safety Information Division Japan Nuclear Energy Safety.
NFPA 31 Standard for the installation of Oil- Burning Equipment
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 1 Equipment Fragility Tests by JNES 11 March 2009 Incorporated Administrative.
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team 07: Belsheim Joshua Francis Travis He Jiayang Moehling Anthony Ziemkowski Micah 1.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
Nuclear Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP June 2, 2011 Embassy of Japan in Bulgaria.
Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Experience and Future Activities for Introduction of Nuclear Power Masaomi KOYAMA Deputy Director Nuclear Energy.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
International Atomic Energy Agency 1 Grid, Industrial involvement and procurement Akira OMOTO DIR, NENP.
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Regional Meeting on Applications of the Code of Conduct on Safety of Research Reactors Lisbon, Portugal, 2-6 November 2015 Diakov Oleksii, Institute for.
0 Overview of Fukushima-Accident Analysis ERMSAR 2012, Cologne (Germany) March 21 – 23, 2012 JNES Masanori FUKASAWA.
Calder Hall Sellafield Decommissioning Martin Adam Heriot-Watt Edinburgh 2008.
Risk-informed On-Line Maintenance at Cofrentes NPP IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
Low Power and Shutdown PSA IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
MEHB 513 – INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY GROUP ASSIGNMENT TITLE: Impact Evaluation of Fukushima Nuclear Accident on Technology Development of New.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations Lecture 2-2 Lessons Learnt from Occupational.
Unit 2, Genkai Nuclear Power Plant
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
2011 Pan American Health Organization Módulo NUCLEAR EMERGENCY IN JAPON 30 March 2011 Pablo Jiménez Regional Advisor in Radiological Health NUCLEAR.
1.9. Safety assessment “School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety, IAEA - Module 1 Regulatory framework for safety, authorization and inspection.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Version 1.0, November 2015 BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXIII Public Communication Case studies This material was prepared by the IAEA and.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
2010 ISOE Asian ALARA Symposium
Project General Data Beneficiary: Rosenergoatom
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2006
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Diversity analysis for advanced reactor design
WENRA Current activities of WENRA 4th GNSSN Steering Committee Meeting
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XXIII Public Communication Case studies Version 1.0, November 2015 This material was prepared by.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP
Occupational Exposure at Japanese Nuclear Power Plants
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 1 Niigataken Chuetsu-oki Earthquake and its Influences on the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 2 Summary of the Earthquake and Situation of the Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP Summary of the Earthquake –Occurrence: July 16, 2007 at 10:13 am JST –Earthquake Source: 17km below the seabed off Jo-chuetsu area in Niigata prefecture (37°33.4′North 、 138°36.5′East ) Epicenter Distance: 16km from the NPP –Magnitude: 6.8 Situation of the NPP –When the earthquake occurred: Unit 2 was in start-up Unit 3, 4 and 7 were in normal operation Unit 1, 5 and 6 were out of operation for the periodic inspections –Units 2, 3, 4 and 7 were automatically shut down following the high seismic acceleration trip signals Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP Niigata city Epicenter

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 3 Maximum Acceleration measured at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP Maximum Acceleration at the Lowest Floor in the Reactor Building ( Unit: GAL ) Measured ( Designed ) Direction Unit 1Unit 2Unit 3Unit 4Unit 7Unit 6Unit 5 Direction S-N 311 (274) 304 (167) 308 (192) 310 (193) 267 (263) 271 (263) 277 (249) S-N E-W 680 (273) 606 (167) 384 (193) 492 (194) 356 (263) 322 (263) 442 (254) E-W Vertical 408 (235) 282 (235) 311 (235) 337 (235) 355 (235) 488 (235) 205 (235) Vertical

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 4 Rx. Coolant Temp. Unit 2 under Stat up Rx. Water Level 19:40 <100 ℃ Unit 3 100% Power 23:07 <100 ℃ Unit 4 100% Power 7/17 6:54 <100 ℃ Unit 7 100% Power 7/17 1:15 <100 ℃ Unit 1 Unit 5 Unit 6 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 7

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 5 Unit 1 RPV Inspection Schedule AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember Phase 1 Phase 2Phase 3 Visual inspection using under water TV camera 8/218/23

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 6 Unit 1 : Phase 1 Inspection Flange Guide Rod Feed Water Sparger Core Shroud Upper Grid Core Spray Pipe Core Spray Sparger As a result of phase 1 inspection, the abnormality such as the damage / transformation / the falling off was not confirmed.

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 7 Unit 1 : Flange Guide Rod Flange

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 8 Unit 1 :Guide Rod FW Sparger Guide Rod Core Spray Pipe

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 9 Unit 1 :Feed Water Sparger

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 10 Unit 1 :Core Spray Pipe

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 11 Unit 1 :Core Spray Sparger Core Spray Sparger Core Shroud(upper ring)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 12 Unit 1 :Upper Grid LPRM

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 13 Unit 1 : RPV base bolts(A,As)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 14 Unit 1 : Leakage of water into B5 floor Leakage of water into B5 floor of the reactor combination building (Unit 1) Leakage of water into B5 floor of the reactor combination building (Unit 1) Break of Fire Extinguishing Pipe (B,C) B1 Floor B2 Floor B3 Floor B4 Floor B5 Floor Sump Duct Reactor Combination Building Pene Water Flow-in

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 15 Unit 1 : Oil Tank (B,C) Land Subsidence

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 16 Unit 3 :Fire of House Transformer(1/3) As for the duct, cm dropped (B,C)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 17 Unit 3 :Fire of House Transformer(2/3) Bedrock House Transformer Bus Duct 1 – 3 cm dropped 20 – 25 cm dropped

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 18 Unit 3 :Fire of House Transformer(3/3) Unit Unit 3 Main Transformer Unit 3 Main Generator House Transformer Start-up Transformer Emergency Bus Normal Bus Fire of House Trans. was not safety related problem

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 19 Unit 3 : DG(A,As) Upside Downside

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 20 Unit 3 : HCU (A,As) ( Hydraulic Control System (CRD))

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 21 Unit 3 : MSIV (A,As)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 22 Unit 3 : PLR Pump (A,As)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 23 Unit 3 : RHR Pump (A,As)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 24 Unit 3 : Blow-out Panel came off (B,C)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 25 Unit 3 : Displacement of the main exhaust duct (B,C)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 26 Unit 6 : Leakage of water including radioactive materials Leakage of water including radioactive materials into non-controlled area in the reactor building (B,C)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 27 Unit 6 : Leakage of water including radioactive materials Leakage of water including radioactive materials into non-controlled area in the reactor building

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 28 Motor Damaged Unit 6 : Damage of the reactor building overhead crane Damage found on the coupling of the drive axis of the reactor building overhead crane Damage found on the coupling of the drive axis of the reactor building overhead crane

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 29 Unit 7 : Detection of radioactive materials in the main exhaust duct Detection of radioactive materials in the main exhaust duct resulting from loss of the steam seal inside the turbine Main Exhaust Duct Monitoring House Main Exhaust Duct Filter Reactor Building Turbine Building Reactor Turbine Conden- ser Rare Gas Hold -up Equipment Turbine Gland Steam Exhauster Building Ventilation Still Working after Plant Shutdown

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 30 Other (B,C)

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 31 Solid waste storage warehouse

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 32 Influences of the Earthquake on the NPP Inspections have been performed from just after the earthquake, and the followings are main incidents found up to August 30. –Incidents related to radioactive materials Leakage of water including radioactive materials into non-controlled area in the reactor building (Unit 6) Flooding on the operating floor in the reactor building (Unit 1 ~ 7) Leakage of water into B5 floor of the reactor combination building (Unit 1) Displacement of the main exhaust duct (Unit 1 ~ 5) Detection of radioactive materials in the main exhaust duct (Unit 7) etc –Incidents not related to radioactive materials Damage found on the coupling of the drive axis of the reactor building overhead crane (Unit 6) Fire on the house transformer B (Unit 3) Deviations from LCO (Unit 1 ~ 3) Fall of the service platform into the spent fuel pool (Unit 1, 4) Fall down of drums (Solid waste storage warehouse) etc

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 33 The IAEA Mission to the NPP The objectives were to conduct a fact finding mission in relation to the current conditions at the nuclear power plant and to identify the preliminary lessons learned from the event. –Mission Date: August 6 to 10, 2007 –Location: Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP and NISA Headquarter etc –IAEA Review Team: Team Leader (Mr. Philippe Jamet, Director of the Division of Nuclear Installation Safety) and 5 international experts

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 34 Outlines of the IAEA Mission Report Based on the report release dated August 17 on the IAEA HP, main findings and lessons learned are as follows: –Operating plants were automatically shutdown and all plants behaved in a safe manner, during and after the earthquake. The three fundamental safety functions of (a) reactivity control, (b) removal of heat from the core and (c) confinement of radioactive materials were ensured. –Very minor radioactive releases to the environment were estimated to result in an individual dose well below the authorized limits. –Safety related structures, systems and components seem to be in a general condition much better than expected for such a strong earthquake. This is probably due to the conservatisms introduced at different stages of the design process. –In accordance with the new seismic guidelines, a re-evaluation of the seismic safety needs to be done taking into account the effects of the Niigataken Chuetsu-oki earthquake and the potential existence of active faults underneath the site. –The possibility that a component remains functionally available under normal operating conditions but sustains hidden damage, should be considered.

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 35 Approach for Further Actions (1/2) "Subcommittee for Investigation and Response to the Nuclear Facilities affected by Chuetsu-oki earthquake" will be established to make fact-finding on the detailed impacts of the earthquake on the power plant and to identify the responses and issues to be addressed by the government and nuclear operators. The Subcommittee will discuss the following items : –Operator's self-defense fire-fighting system, information communication system and information service for local communities during/after the earthquake –Seismic safety evaluation with account taken of lessons learned from the 2007 Niigataken Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake –Plant operational management and facility integrity during/after the earthquake the 2007 Niigataken Chuetsu-Oki Earthquake, and future actions –Other necessary items The Subcommittee will have 3 meetings by the end of September and one meeting a month from October and on.

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 36 Approach for Further Actions (2/2) The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Subcommittee, Advisory Committee for Natural Resource and Energy The Seismic and Structural Design Subcommittee Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Subcommittee Subcommittee for Investigation and Response to the Nuclear Facilities affected by Chuetsu-oki Earthquake WG on Operational Management and Facility Integrity Evaluation ( Provisional ) WG for Self-Defense Fire Fighting and Information Communication ( Provisional ) (existing) reportingadvice reporting To discuss operator's self- defense fire-fighting system, information communication system and information service for local communities during/after the earthquake To examine plant operational management and facility integrity during/after the earthquake and to discuss future actions

Incorporated Administrative Agency Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization 37 Maximum Acceleration at the Base-Point of Japanese NPPs Unit: GAL Tomari NPP: 370 Kashiwazaki-Kariwa NPP:450 Shika NPP: 490 Tsuruga NPP: 532 Mihama NPP: 405 Takahama NPP: 370 Higashi-Dori NPP: 375 Onagawa NPP: 375 Fukushima Daiichi NPP: 370 Fukushima Daini NPP: 380 Tokai Daini NPP: 380 Sendai NPP: 372 Ikata NPP: 473 Hamaoka NPP: 600 Genkai NPP: 370 Ohi NPP: 405 Shimane NPP: 398