Dr. Jackie Sack NCTM Annual Meeting March 23, 2007 B u ild I t D raw It I n t er p r e t It.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOMETRY AND SPATIAL SENSE IN THE EARLY CHILDHOOD CURRICULUM
Advertisements

P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
Geometry.
X = ax= b f(x) Calculus students’ understanding of area and volume in calculus- and non-calculus contexts Allison Dorko Masters of Science in Teaching.
Agenda. Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments.
How Are New Turkish Textbooks Presenting Geometric Concepts? An Analysis of the Turkish New Elementary Mathematics Curriculum and Textbooks in Terms of.
3-D: The Foundation for Developing Geometric Thinking Dr. Jackie Sack RUSMP Spring Networking Conference February 24, 2007.
Developing Geometric Thinking: Van Hiele’s Levels Mara Alagic.
Shapes and the Coordinate System TEKS 8.6 (A,B) & 8.7 (A,D)
CI 319 Fall 2007 Mara Alagic 1 Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels Adapted from Van Hiele, P. M. (1959). Development and learning process.
Van Hiele’s Learning Theory Mara Alagic. 2 June 2004 Levels of Geometric Thinking Precognition Level 0: Visualization/Recognition Level 1: Analysis/Descriptive.
Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels Adapted from Van Hiele, P. M. (1959). Development and learning process. Acta Paedogogica Ultrajectina.
VDW Ch 20: Geometric Thinking
The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought
3-D Visualization: Why? When? How? CAMT Conference Dallas, TXJuly 9-11, 2008 Jacqueline SackIrma Vazquez Rice University School Mathematics Project Houston,
Dr. Jackie Sack & Irma Vazquez NCTM Regional Meeting Houston, November 30, 2007 B u ild I t D raw It I n t er p r e t It.
1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and.
Grade 10. Benchmark 10.3.E Draw and construct representations of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects using a variety of tools, such as straightedge,
1. An Overview of the Geometry Standards for School Mathematics? 2.
Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
THE ONTARIO CURRICULUM GRADES 1-8 (read p 1-9 of the mathematics curriculum) FIVE STRANDS:  Number Sense and Numeration  Measurement  Geometry and Spatial.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Build, Draw, and Interpret: 3-D Visualization Activities Using Somas and Cubes NCTM Annual Meeting Salt Lake City, April 10, 2008 Jacqueline Sack Rice.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Compose Shapes Unit of Study: 3-Dimensional Shapes Global Concept Guide: 2 of 3.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
Mathematics Standard 4.4 Spatial Sense and Geometry.
An Ideal van Hiele Web- based Model for Computer Programming Learning and Teaching to Promote Collaborative Learning Dr. J. Wey Chen, Professor Department.
Term Transformation Describe The change in the position of a geometric figure, the pre-image, that produces a new figure called the image Representation.
Chapter 15 To accompany Helping Children Learn Math Cdn Ed, Reys et al. ©2010 John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
Geometry EDN 322. NCTM’S STANDARD FOR GEOMETRY  analyze characteristics and properties of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects and develop mathematical.
MH502: Developing Mathematical Proficiency, Geometry and Measurement, K-5 Seminar 1 September 28, 2010.
Teaching children to reason mathematically Anne Watson Ironbridge 2014 University of Oxford Dept of Education.
Using GSP in Discovering a New Theory Dr. Mofeed Abu-Mosa This paper 1. Connects Van Hiele theory and its levels of geometric thinking with.
 Van Hiele Levels Math Alliance September 14, 2010 Kevin McLeod Chris Guthrie.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Motion Geometry and Tessellations Chapter 14.
Teaching Young Learners with the Ohio Early Mathematics Standards in Mind Sponsored by the Ohio Department of Jobs & Family Services in collaboration with.
THE NEW CURRICULUM MATHEMATICS 1 Foundations and Pre-Calculus Reasoning and analyzing Inductively and deductively reason and use logic.
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) Ontario Association of Mathematics Educators (OAME)  The primary professional organization for teacher.
Geometry 1 st Grade Geometry Lesson. Content Strand Addressed Geometry Strand Students will: use visualization and spatial reasoning to analyze characteristics.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Geometry standards MATH 124. Kindergarten Identify and describe shapes. CCSS.Math.Content.K.G.A.1 Describe objects in the environment using names of shapes,
Shape and Space in Geometry. Geometry Geometry is the mathematics of shape and space. It is about the properties of objects (their angles and surfaces,
CHAPTER 20 Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts
Program Description Comprehensive middle school mathematics curriculum primarily used in grades 6-8. Development of the curriculum was funded in part by.
Making Sense of Geometry in Grades 3–5 Classrooms
Chapter 8 Geometry: Properties of shapes; position and direction.
Developing Geometric Thinking and Spatial Sense
Creating, Describing, and Comparing Shapes
Developing Geometric Thinking: The Van Hiele Levels
Dr. Jackie Sack & Irma Vazquez
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
CHAPTER 15 Geometry Tina Rye Sloan To accompany Helping Children Learn Math10e, Reys et al. ©2012 John Wiley & Sons  
Levels of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele Levels
Dr. Lee Wai Heng & Dr. Ng Kok Fu
Exploring Transformations
M.Ed Mathematics Student No: 15m8814
Pearson Unit 2 Topic 8: Transformational Geometry 8-5: Compositions of Rigid Transformations You will need a piece of patty paper for today’s notes.
Rice University School Mathematics Project
3-D Visualization: Why? When? How?
Shape and Space Reflections
Shape and Space Reflections
School Book Page By: Geni Solis.
Meaningful geometry education
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Jackie Sack NCTM Annual Meeting March 23, 2007 B u ild I t D raw It I n t er p r e t It

2-D:The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought Levels Language Phases  Visual  Descriptive  Relational  Deductive  Rigor  Information  Guided Orientation  Explicitation  Free Orientation  Integration

3-D Frameworks  Yakimanskaya  van Niekerk

What skills are needed?  Turn, shrink and deform 2-D and 3-D objects.  Analyze and draw perspective views, count component parts and describe attributes that may not be visible but can be inferred.  Physically and mentally change the position, orientation, and size of objects in systematic ways as understandings about congruence, similarity and transformations develop. (NCTM, 2000)

Does it make sense to begin with 2-D figures?  Rectilinearity or straightness?  Flatness?  Parallelism?  Right angles?  Symmetry?  Circles?  Similarity?

3-D Models

Conventional-Graphic Models

Conventional-Graphic Models: Functional Diagrams

Conventional-Graphic Models: Assembly Diagrams

Conventional-Graphic Models: Structural Diagrams

Intervention Program

Soma Pieces

Three visual modes  Full-scale or scaled-down models of objects  Conventional-graphic models  Semiotic models

Framework for 3-Dimensional Visualization 3-DIMENSIONAL MODEL CONVENTIONAL GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF THE 3-D MODEL VERBAL DESCRIPTION OF THE 3-D MODEL (oral or written) REBUILD IT TALK ABOUT IT REPRESENT IT ABSTRACTLY DRAW OR RECOGNIZE IT IN A PICTURE topfrontside SEMIOTIC OR ABSTRACT REPRESENTATION OF THE 3-D MODEL This slide is not to be reproduced in any form without the express permission of Jackie Sack.

3-Dimensional Model Stimulus Which piece? Can you rebuild it using loose cubes?

3-Dimensional Model Stimulus Rebuild it using loose cubes. Draw it. Explain how to build it. Can you make this figure using two Soma pieces?

Draw it…

2-D Conventional Graphic Model Show how these two Soma pieces can be combined to create this figure. Rebuild it using loose cubes. Draw it. Explain how to build it.

2-D Conventional Graphic Model Show how these two Soma pieces can be combined to create this figure.

2-D Conventional Graphic Model Show how these three Soma pieces can be combined to create this figure. + +

2-D Conventional Graphic Model Which two Soma pieces were combined to create this figure?

2-D Conventional Graphic Model Which two Soma pieces were combined to create this figure?

Describe it verbally Use Soma pieces 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. 5 and 4 go on the lower front. Stand 3 behind 5, three cubes tall; and 2 next to 3 with its short leg on the ground pointing toward the front, next to 4. 1 goes on top of 2 and

Represent the figure abstractly

Upper level Lower level

Represent the figure abstractly + +

 How many and which Soma pieces do you need to build this figure?  Build the figure.

Beyond cubes…

Describe the figure’s net C

Describe the 3-D figure Y

U

2-D Implications: Reflections

2-D Implications: Rotations

Transformations: 2-D Geometry

180 o Transformations: 2-D Geometry

.9cos15 o.9cos105 o sin15 o.9sin105 o Transformations: Pre-Calculus – Calculus

Transformations: Back to Geometry

References Crowley, Mary L. “The van Hiele Model of the Development of Geometric Thought.” In Learning and Teaching Geometry, K – 12, 1987 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), edited by Mary M. Lindquist, pp Reston, VA: NCTM, Freudenthal, Hans. Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel, Fuys, David, Geddes, Dorothy and Tischler, Rosamond. The van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry among Adolescents, Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 3, Reston, VA: NCTM, NCTM. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM, van Hiele, Pierre. M. Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, van Niekerk, (Retha) H. M. “From Spatial Orientation to Spatial Insight: A Geometry Curriculum for the Primary School.” Pythagoras, 36 (1995a): van Niekerk, Retha. “4 Kubers in Africa.” Paper presented at the Panama Najaarsconferentie Modellen, Meten en Meetkunde: Paradigmas's van Adaptief Onderwijs, The Netherlands, 1995b. van Niekerk, Retha. “4 Kubers in Africa.” Pythagoras, 40, (1996): van Niekerk, (Retha) H. M.. “A Subject Didactical Analysis of the Development of the Spatial Knowledge of Young Children through a Problem-Centered Approach to Mathematics Teaching and Learning.” Ph.D. diss., Potchefstroom University for CHE, South Africa, Yakimanskaya, I. S. The Development of Spatial Thinking in School Children. Edited and translated by Patricia S. Wilson and Edward J. Davis. Vol. 5 of Soviet Studies in Mathematics Education, Reston, VA: NCTM, 1991.