Calibration for different trigger sources (DT,CSC,RPC) S.Bolognesi for the Torino group (with a big help from M. Dalla Valle) DT Cosmic Analysis meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15-Apr-15 Muon HLT Meeting C. Diez L2 Muon Trigger Status Report: L2 seeding study B. de la Cruz, C. Diez (CIEMAT, Madrid) Muon HLT Meeting 17th April,
Advertisements

Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
CMS week mar 051 Results of the Analysis of 2004 DT Test Beam C. Battilana and S. Marcellini – INFN Bologna Trigger Performance: -Single Muons -Di-Muons.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured by nuclei, emitting a photon Compton scattering.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Neutron Background Simulation R. Wilkinson. 2 Neutron Background Simulation Long-lived neutrons created, diffuse around collision hall They get captured.
DT calibration status A. Vilela Pereira for the DT calibration team (Università degli Studi di Torino & INFN Torino) Muon Barrel Workshop – July
Commissioning data are taken with individual chambers TP data autotriggered Cosmic rays data  ( different configuration) Different cosmic track angle.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
A.meneguzzo, 03 april 2002 LNL- MB3 chamber test with cosmic triggers Some results on the tests performed on the MB3 chambers produced in Legnaro are presented.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
NSW background studies Max Bellomo, Nektarios Benekos, Niels van Eldik, Andrew Haas, Peter Kluit, Jochen Meyer, Felix Rauscher 1.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Response of AMANDA-II to Cosmic Ray Muons and study of Systematics Newt,Paolo and Teresa.
11 Sep 2009Paul Dauncey1 TPAC test beam analysis tasks Paul Dauncey.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
21 Jun 2010Paul Dauncey1 First look at FNAL tracking chamber alignment Paul Dauncey, with lots of help from Daniel and Angela.
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
4 Dec 2008G. Rakness (UCLA)1 Online Software Updates and RPC data in the RAT …including Pad Bit Mapping and Efficiency… Greg Rakness University of California,
IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
Notes in preparation by the Torino group Sara BolognesiDT Cosmic Meeting 01/11/2007  MTCC note:  calibration section  DQM section  Internal note about.
US AFEB timing in CSCs in splash events, run N. Terentiev, CMU CSC Synchronization meeting Nov. 16, 2009, CERN.
M. LefebvreATLAS LAr week, November 19th HEC-EMEC beam test data analysis Filtering weight synchronization and timing issues TDC timing Cubic timing.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
1 EMCAL Reconstruction in Pass pp 900 GeV 29/03/2010 Gustavo Conesa Balbastre.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
RPC Simulation software Raffaello Trentadue. RPC Digi producer RPC Digitizer RPC Synchronizer RPC Simulation model Average model Parametrized model Parametrized.
Study of 1D Hit Error Assignment Marco Terranova, Filippo Pisano, N. Amapane, G. Cerminara.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
DT calibration software: tentative release schedule S.Bolognesi & S.Maselli & G.Mila Alignement&Calibration Meeting, 25 January 2008, CERN.
1 HcalAlCaRecoProducers : Producer for HO calibration Outer hadron calorimeter is expected to improve jet energy resolution Due to different sampling/passive.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
Status at CERN 8 fills  ~500/pb since last Tuesday – ~5.3/fb delivered, ~4.8/fb recorded, … SEU workshop on Friday – Different detectors have different.
21/09/2010CALICE Manqi RUAN Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet (LLR) Ecole Polytechnique 91128, Palaiseau Status of DHCAL PFA Study.
Comparison of algorithms for hit reconstruction in the DTs: Test of calibration procedures for t trig and drift velocity on Test Beam data Test of calibration.
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
FURTHER STUDIES ON COMMISSIONING DATA
Muon Alignment: Organization
Tracking results from Au+Au test Beam
Calibration Status of the art – the first tTrig calculated from data
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
HARPO Analysis.
Clk_ch4 Clk_ch3 Clk_ch2 Clk_ch1 L1A global L1A _ch T0+T0r
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
DC monitoring - calibration - simulation - corrections
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Comparisons of data/mc using down-going muons
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
J/   analysis: results for ICHEP
Cosmic ray test of RPC for the ATLAS experiment
Calibration of DT-MTCC data
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
SCT Wafer Distortions (Bowing)
Global Trigger Finds Correct BX
Status of DT Local Trigger Commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Calibration for different trigger sources (DT,CSC,RPC) S.Bolognesi for the Torino group (with a big help from M. Dalla Valle) DT Cosmic Analysis meeting (22 November 2006) PRELIMINAR RESULTS

Goal  MTCC phase 2: successful integration between different detectors (triggers synchronization) for the FIRST TIME we can study the dependence of the calibration parameters (ttrig,vdrift) on different trigger sources Do we need different calibration constants for different trigger sources?  NOTE: Different timing of cosmic muons with respect to pp muons:  bunched muons arrive to the DT station always at fixed time (=TOF) with respect to the BX time  cosmic muons have flat arrival time distribution: smearing of 25ns / √12 on digi time Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 2 (to guarantee the best segments reconstruction efficiency)

Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 3 Event selection depending on the trigger source

Event filter on the trigger source In order to divide the event sample on the trigger source basis, a new event filter has been developed and released EventFilter/DTRawToDigi/test/FilterByLTC You need to specify in the cfg the trigger configuration you want: 1 = DT only 2 = CSC only 3 = RPC only 4 = DT && CSC 5 = DT && RPC 6 = CSC && RPC 7 = CSC && RPC && DT 8 = No DT 9 = No CSC 10 = No RPC 11 = DT inclusive 12 = CSC inclusive 13 = RPC inclusive Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 4

Events from MTCC phase 2 run 4398 (B=4T):CSC + RPC + DT HH&HL, 3 sectors, MB1 masked 60.6%18.0%14.2% run 4333 (B off): CSC + RPC + DT 55.7%19.4%14.6%  requested only ONE trigger source to study the trigger effect of each single detector  last runs: after all the re-synchronizations of different trigger sources  DT trigger  CSC trigger on single chamber  RPC trigger coincidence of 5/6 chambers (remaining 5% -10% mainly with DT&&RPC) after all the reconfiguration of ROS/MC -> no (known) problem during data taking Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 5

DT/RPC trigger window To have a trigger you need all your signals (MB2*MB3 or 5 RPC coincidence) being in the same clock interval (i.e. assigned to the same BX)  DT trigger3 ns of TOF between MB2 and MB3 real trigger window ~ 25ns – 3ns = 22 ns  RPC trigger~8 ns of TOF between 5 RPC chambers real trigger window ~ 25ns – 8ns = 17 ns but the signals are separated by the muon TOF this can affect the RPC&&DT trigger efficiency Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 6 (LTC bug: busy of 1BX after a trigger, DT & RPC bit on) -> DT&&RPC trigger efficiency can be overestimated using LTC digi info but it’s not enough to explain the observed values

Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 7 Time Box shape for different trigger sources

Time Boxes CSC distort time box same normalization Time Box (W1, St3, Sec10, SL3)SLPhi same normalization different rising edge (already seen in phase 1) studied in the next slides: due to big track angle? Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 8 plot with B=4T same behaviour for B off (backup sildes) Trigger source: Time Box (W1, St3, Sec10, SL2)SLTheta ttrig,  (ttrig)

CSC triggered events angle ~ deg Time big angle simulated data  > 45 deg DT triggered events Time Boxes (W1, St1, Sec10, SL2) (wheel 2: deg) 9 Time Box (W2, St1, Sec3, SL2) no smearing Request for CSC or DT triggered segment at big angle: (only digi from recHits in 4D reco segments)  residual difference (bigger deep in CSC)  same 3 peaks structure (like in simulated data) different angular distribution effect of BX assignment in CSC triggered events

Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 10 ttrig and  (ttrig) dependence on the trigger source

New feature of TB fitter G. Cerminara We are thinking how to improve the automatic search of the fit seed Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 11 In the calibration package the the CSC distort time boxes cannot be automatically fitted: finding the correct fit seed is difficult a new feature of the package allows setting the fit seed by hand root DTTimeBoxes.root.x loadPlotter.r cd CalibMuon/DTCalibration/.test plotter->setInteractiveFit(1) plotter->plotTimeBox(1,1,10,1,”fit”) the file created running DTTrigCalibration.cfg integers = wheel, station, sector, superlayer insert an estimate of ttrig the plot of the fitted TB is shown and the fit results are printed you can use the ttrig of near superlayers then you can modify the ttrig database using DumpDBToFile.cfg and DumpFileToDB.cfg

ttrig (DT vs CSC) DT/CSC ttrig compatible in W2 DT/CSC ttrig big difference in W1: due to TOF? 12 plot with B = 4T, same behaviour for B off (back-up slides) difference of some ns due to different track angle 3-5 ns of TOF DT ttrig – CSC ttrig (ns)

Events triggered from CSC MB1 W1 Sec10  12 ns ns ns Time of Flight Theta angle ttrig DT - CSC SL1 SL2 SL3 - 3 ns - 6 ns - 3 ns positive and negative differences due to TOF balanced -15 ns Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 13 z y x  

Events triggered from CSC MB2 W1 Sec10  15 ns ns ns Time of Flight Theta angle ttrig DT - CSC SL1 SL2 SL ns - 21 ns - 17 ns ttrig differences compatible with TOF effect Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 14 z y x  

Events triggered from CSC MB3 W1 Sec10  17 ns ns Time of Flight Theta angle ttrig DT - CSC SL1 SL2 SL ns - 29 ns - 26 ns ttrig differences also bigger than the TOF MB4 W1 Sec10 / 14 have the same behaviour Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 15 z y x  

Why the ttrig difference not totally compatible with TOF effect? Probably interplay between: pure TOF effect the BX assigned from the CSC trigger can be different from the BX of the muon arrival time at the DT (effect enhanced if the TOF increases) BX assignment effect time space DT measured time BX choosen by CSC  DT CSC clock Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 16

ttrig (DT/RPC) DT/RPC ttrig difference < 5 ns: DT and RPC trigger some kind of track no TOF effect 17 DT ttrig – RPC ttrig (ns) plot with B off, same behaviour for B=4T (back-up slides)

 (ttrig) B off   (ttrig) RPC smaller because of the very small trigger window Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 18 the smearing due to cosmic flat time distribution is proportional to the trigger window   (ttrig) = standard deviation of the gaussian used to fit the rising edge estimate of the digi time smearing for recHit near to the wire i.e. it measures how much the rising edge is steep  you can’t know what electron arrives as first   (ttrig) CSC bigger because of big angle

Summary & TODO Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 19 get the hit resolutioncalibration of vdrift dependence on different trigger source effect on hit resolution using the same ttrig for all the trigger source  A deep look to the different trigger sources at MTCC  Study of the Time Boxes at big angle  ttrig &  (ttrig) comparison for different trigger sources: DT – CSC difference understood DT – RPC very similar DT&&RPC trigger efficiency still to be completely understood DT and CSC time boxes in reasonable agreement  TODO:

Back up slide Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006)

same normalization Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 21 Time Box (W1, St3, Sec10, SL3)SLPhi Time Box (W1, St3, Sec10, SL3)SLTheta same normalization Trigger source: Time boxes comparison for different trigger sources (B off) same behaviour with B = 4T (slide 7)

B = 4T B off Ttrig comparison for different trigger sources all DT CSC RPC Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006)

 (ttrig) B=4T Sara Bolognesi - DT Analysis Cosmic meeting (21 nov 2006) 23