© 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or excerpted without the University’s.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACS102 Week Five With Librarians Diane Granfield, Don Kinder and Sonny Banerjee.
Advertisements

© 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or excerpted without the University’s.
Fostering Intellectual Engagement Through Critical Reading.
Review of Related Literature By Dr. Ajay Kumar Professor School of Physical Education DAVV Indore.
Quote for the Day © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or excerpted without.
Chapter 1 What is Science
Wrap Up, Takeaways, Final Thoughts © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed.
1-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved C H A P T E R ONE Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie Successful Corporate,
Reading Strategies For ACTIVE reading.
Teaching American History
INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING. “There are multiple decisions which you have to make entirely by yourself. You can’t lean on anybody else. And a good.
USING AND PROMOTING REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT AS STUDENT LEADERS ON CAMPUS Patricia M. King, Professor Higher Education, University of Michigan.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Reporting
IS112 Internet Research Skills Evaluating Internet Research Internet has quickly become primary medium for.
Quote of the day “Almost no one expected what was coming. It’s not fair to blame us for not predicting the unthinkable.” Daniel H. Mudd, former CEO of.
Assignment 2 Case Study. Criteria Weightage - 60 % Due Date – 11 th October 2012 Length of Analysis – 2500 words Leverage % including appendices,
WRITING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
© 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or excerpted without the University’s.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.
Quote of the day “Chance favors the prepared mind” Louis Pasteur 1854 Scenario Development Methods © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.
POINT OF VIEW IN HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION & ANALYSIS October 16, 2013.
BA 30310: Foresight in Business & Society © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed.
The Research Process Mr. Burt—Southwest HS—El Centro, CA.
To look at how to critically examine issues and how to effectively write essays in Physical Education studies.
Comments on Nontechnical ABET Criteria J. W. V. Miller 6/30/08 Adapted from the University of Delaware Civil and Environmental Engineering Website
© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Teaching and Communicating Controversial Topics in Science: Ongoing Challenges & Opportunities THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES National Academy of Sciences National.
Writing a Book Review Danika Rockett University of Baltimore Summer 2009.
Literature Review. What is a literature review? A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area, and sometimes information.
1 Research Paper Writing Mavis Shang 97 年度第二學期 Section VII.
Chapter 11: Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research Design
EVALUATING SOURCES. THE NEED FOR EFFECTIVE SOURCES Lend credibility to your arguments Support your points with researched information A source is only.
APUSH ‘themes’ (B.A.G.P.I.P.E.)
Presented by REACH 2009 A Student Success Seminar (Your success is our goal!)
Opposing Viewpoints Teaching American History In Miami-Dade County December 14, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
How to read a scientific paper
Copyright © 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Section 1-4 Critical Thinking.
Baseline Forecasting Workshop © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Literature Review Taken From: University of Washington Psychology Writing Center.
Strategic Reading Step 2 SCAN. Review from yesterday Preview- practice with Hamlet Oedipal Complex.
Cognitive Processes Chapter 8. Studying CognitionLanguage UseVisual CognitionProblem Solving and ReasoningJudgment and Decision MakingRecapping Main Points.
Enhancing Literacy through Primary Sources Library of Congress.
The Social Approach Focus on Section C questions.
© 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 2 The Research Process: Getting Started Researcher as a detective –Seeking answers.
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2014 SKILLS STRATEGIES. READING BEFORE Set a purpose for reading Ask questions Predict Use prior knowledge.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 6 Communication.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
Synthesizing Historical Significance – Responding to Text The BLaST IU 17 Liberty Fellowship November 15, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
How to be a successful APES student. Do Assigned Reading 1.Get perspective 2.First Reading 3.Review of First Reading 4.Second Reading.
Stages of Analysis How concepts, facts and analysis lead to conclusions and recommendations A. de Koning/E. Desmarais.
THE STUDY AND WRITING OF HISTORYTHE STUDY AND WRITING OF HISTORY What is history? How the course works, Vocabulary, Preventing PlagiarismWhat is history?
Creating Effective Business Messages Chapter 5 © 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not.
Chapter 7 Researching Your Speech. Researching your speech: Introduction Researching your topic and providing strong evidence for your claims can make.
Chapter 2: Thinking and Reading Critically ENG 113: Composition I.
1 WRITING A DBQ: AP * U.S. History. 2 What Is a DBQ? An essay question that asks you to take a position on an issue that has several possible answers.
Preparing the Final Group Project (For Group Work Day on April 14 th )
Strategies for Generating Topics/Questions If you are researching a topic on which you already have definite opinions, you may have a thesis in mind before.
Using Primary Sources to Meet Literacy Standards
Literature Review Dr. Mozaherul Hoque Abul Hasanat.
Writing the Research Paper
Critical / Academic Reading
Critical / Academic Reading
How to Become an Expert on Any Topic!
Basic concepts curriculum Curriculum development Curriculum analysis Curriculum evaluation Elements of curriculum Educational objectives content.
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. This PowerPoint presentation may not be duplicated, distributed or excerpted without the University’s advance written consent. Class 2: Environmental Scanning

 To understand the concepts of Framing and Scanning;  To understanding of scanning methods used by to spot weak signals of change;  To understand the cognitive pitfalls that hinder interpretation in the scanning process;  To begin scanning. © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Framing  Framing  Identify a Topic or category of importance for the future  Define the interaction of the System in play  Build Consensus on goals and objectives  Contextualize your topic © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved.

Scanning  Scanning  Gather signals of change from “ Experts”  Assess the reliability of the signal source  Interpret the meaning of the signal  Synthesize the information from a systems perspective © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

FramingScanning Iterative Process © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Environmental Scanning (Radar) Deep Dives (Research) Ongoing, continuous Broad scope Project-specific Focused scope (i.e. crisply framed) © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 WEAK SIGNALS of change  It needs to be relevant  But if it is TOO relevant, it is not a WEAK signal  “Diamonds in the Rough” signals that are repeated across scanned sources 8 © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 Adopt a Systems Perspective  Scan The Environment  Assess the Source  Keep an Open Mind 9 © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 DEGEST  Demography  Economy  Government  Environment  Society  Technology STEEP –Social –Technological –Economic –Environment –Political © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Demographic Societal Governmental Technological Environmental Economic Synergies, Contradictions, Questions © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Companies tend to narrow their field of view… …Interesting change tends to occur at the periphery …Blind spots also occur at the periphery © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

To develop good peripheral vision… Explore Unfamiliar and “Uninteresting” areas Seek out “Remarkable People” Know your “Adjacencies” © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

© 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Websites I recommend: © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Break up into groups of 3-4 Scan the Foresight web page for an interesting scanning hit What business sectors will it affect? © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Primary Questions to Consider: 1.How knowledgeable is the source? 2.Is sufficient evidence provided? 3.Does the source have any bias? Methods to Validate your source: 1.Scuttlebutt: listen in on what others are saying about your source (blogs, etc) 2.Laddering – step down one or more rungs into your source’s references © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Purposes Sources ASSERTION OF FACTS IDEAS & INTERPRETATIONS OPINIONS AuthoritativeBESTPossibleMaybe Contended (peer reviewed) Possible, but be careful BESTPossible Contended (not peer reviewed) Possible, but be very careful Possible, but be carefulBEST Popular/FringeNot recommendedPossible, but be very careful BEST © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

For your scanning hit… Who is the source? How might you validate? Expertise? Evidence? Bias? © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Keep an Open Mind! © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Seeing What One Has Learned to See How is this relevant to our class? © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 The more expertise one has in a given field, the less likely that person will be to see a solution outside of the framework within which that person was taught to think. © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 “Knowing so much about what you know that you are the last person to see it differently” Edie Weiner, Futurist  “Each of us responds, not to the world, but to our image of the world.” Peter Schwartz, The Art of the Long View  E.g. Engineers will look for a technical solution within their area of expertise © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Can you spot how they do it? The Amazing Changing Color Card Trick 95&feature=iv&src_vid=voAntzB7EwE&v=v3iPrBrGSJM © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 The more focused we are on a challenge, the more likely we are to overlook obvious information © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Anchoring “It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain Causes us to “Judge Too Soon” Confirmation Bias Availability Bias © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Selective Perception Educated Incapacity Anchoring Confirmation Bias Availability Bias © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 Consider new and contradictory information  Challenge your own beliefs  See the world through “Alien Eyes”  Challenge the assumptions and conclusions  Invert “Figure and Ground”  Defer judgment © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Figure-Ground …Factors that can distort our perspective © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 Scanning improves with a structured approach – Core Competency  Cognitive Biases need to be managed  Always Be Scanning… Sometimes Dive Deep (“Radar”) (“Research”) 30 © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 For Next Class…  Read – State of the Future Exec. Summary  Homework Assignment  Scanning for a trend ▪Graph, Photograph, Paragraph ▪Due _______________ © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Student Name: Section: © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

 Bill Marquard “Finding The AND”  7 PM Date TBD  102 DeBartolo As a consultant, Bill Marquard has advised some of the world's most influential and forward-thinking companies. Having also served as a C-level leader, he has walked the executive's path. © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved

Posted Electronically  Scan for Evidence of Change  Categorize Your “Scanning Hit”  Assess the Evidence and Source  Discuss Implications for Business  3 Rounds of Entries  New Scanning Hit – Due _____  Respond to a Posted Scanning Hit – Due ____  Another New Scanning Hit – Due _____ © 2013 University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved