GreenCig/Vis Categories match Pale Green Situational awareness Orange 2 categories off, Multiple impacts Yellow 1 category off, Singular impact Red 3 categories.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Canadian Aviation Forecast Verification
Advertisements

AVIATION WEATHER DEBBIE SCHAUM.
Pilots & Weather Considerations Federal Aviation Administration 1.
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago The views expressed in this presentation are those.
Jet Stream Compression Turbulence Mountain wave Icing IFR ceiling and visibility CWSU Products MIS CWA PIREPS Questions and Comments Created 9/14/2008.
Optimizing WFO Aviation Service & Forecast Performance Dan Shoemaker Aviation Curmudgeon WFO FWD.
Eastern Region – Mt. Holly Regional Aviation Conference Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 6/6/06
$500 What is 30 degrees? A change in wind speed to over/under 12 knots and more than X degrees direction change requires amendment. $500 What is a Wind.
Dan Shoemaker Aviation Curmudgeon, NWS FWD From a 2005 study done with: Rick Curtis, Chief Meteorologist, SWA Paul Witsaman, Southern Region RAM.
Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC) FAQ Session Aviation Services Branch November, 2009.
NWS TAF Verification Brandi Richardson NWS Shreveport, LA.
Lead Time Aviation Verification Onset and Cessation of Ceiling and Visibility Flight Category Conditions (IFR, MVFR, VFR) at FAA Core Airports NWS Aviation.
Airmanship Knowledge Learning Outcome 2 Rules of the Air
1 Introduction to Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC) Joe Jurecka Aviation Program Leader NWS Lubbock, TX Commercial Pilot ASMEL Instrument SAWS III Phoenix,
Approach Charts and Procedures
Airport Approach Simulation
IFR Emergencies.
Airline On Time Performance Systems Design Project by Matthias Chan.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
1 SME NOTEs Slide 75 has changed. The VOR approach at Simmons AAF no longer exists. It depicted dual VOR minima. Henderson, NV has an IAP that depicts.
How a Seemingly Minor Weather Concern Can Have a Significant Economic Impact on the Aviation Industry Aviation Case Study Kim Runk, NWS Las Vegas Southwest.
Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines
Aviation Verification and Convection Chris Leonardi WFO RLX August 31, 2005.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
Warm Season Aviation Weather and Resources National Weather Service Chanhassen, MN Center Weather Service Unit Farmington, MN.
Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) - Uncertainty/Probabilistic Information in the Cockpit Projects July 21, 2014 Gary Pokodner 1 Friends and Partners.
Writing Better Aviation AFDs (or) Do you know who your customer really is ? National Weather Service, Jackson, KY Dustin Harbage And Brian Schoettmer.
Aviation Decision Support InFlight and Ground Icing: what do I need to know? Marcia Politovich, NCAR Flight Planning: –Where is it? Along my planned route.
PRACTICAL TAF WRITING Karen Oudeman NWS – Jackson, KY October 16, 2003.
AVIATION VERIFICATION NWS KEY WEST 2005 Bill South Aviation Program Leader.
Presented to: Orlando Florida Flying Community By: The FAASTeam - Dennis H. Whitley Date: December 9, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration FAASTeam Orlando.
1 Management Confidential Aviation Weather Friends and Partners John Foottit Manager Aviation Weather Services Las Vegas, 13 Oct 2004.
Generation and Application of Gridded Aviation Forecast Parameters in GFE and AvnFPS Chris Leonardi Aviation Focal Point, NWS Charleston WV National Weather.
Rory Salisbury – Dispatcher/Dispatch Trainer
CHRIS LEONARDI NWS CHARLESTON WV Improving Information Presentation to Aviation Users April 15, 2010 ER Subregional Aviation Conference.
Quality Assessment - National Ceiling and Visibility (NCV) Analysis (now, not forecast) Product Tressa L. Fowler, Matthew J. Pocernich, Jamie T. Braid,
Tailwinds Flying Club Spring (Summer) Safety Session – 2009 WEATHER VFR – MVFR - IFR.
Chapter(3) Qualitative Risk Analysis. Risk Model.
1 Introduction to Categorical Amendment Criteria (CAC)
Quantifying Monetary Impacts of Forecasts Rick Curtis Southwest Airlines 11/1/12.
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water Enhanced User and Forecaster Oriented TAF Quality Assessment CAeM-XIV.
Lecture 9: Ecological Factors & Aircraft Performance AIRCRAFT WEIGHT & PERFORMANCE.
Lecture 2: AIRSIDE PART 2 By: Zuliana Ismail.
The Evolution of NWS Aviation Weather Services in Chicago Mike Bardou National Weather Service Chicago.
ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVES TO PRACTICE OR USE THE FOLLOWING: 1.CONTROLS: - buttons, labels, picture boxes, groupboxes, and a form 2. EVENTS: - Click, MouseDown,
Lecture 7: INSTRUMENT LANDING SYSTEM (ILS)
Safer Skies. Weather to Go or Not! Steven Brady Safer Skies.
Aviation AFD Guidance An Airline Perspective Southwest Aviation Safety Workshop Phoenix, AZ Ken Widelski Meteorologist NWS: Lubbock, TX NWS: Lubbock, TX.
Crew Resources Management Lecture 7: Workload Management.
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Burn Ban Program Jim Nolan – Mike Gilroy For the SHB 2261 Wood Smoke Work Group August 1, 2007 Jim Nolan – Mike.
1 CWSU Near-term Improvement Program. 2 Objective Low-cost improvements at CWSUs which will noticeably improve quality of support provided to FAA ARTCCs.
REGULATIONS FOR ARMY AIRCRAFT CW2 ROBERT GOEBEL. Administrative Please turn off all: –Cell phones –Beepers –Palm Pilots –Gameboys –Stereos –Watch alarms.
INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PLANNING
1. 2 TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE Use the DD Form (flight weather briefing) during preflight planning to determine if the mission can be accomplished.
99-11 UH-60 IPC IFR PUBLICATIONS & REGULATIONS WOPA.
NAS WITI vs. Combined WITI-FA and Delta (“forecast goodness”) Negative delta = Under-forecast of weather/traffic impact Positive delta = Over-forecast.
NAS WITI vs. Combined WITI-FA and Delta (“forecast goodness”) Negative delta = Under-forecast of weather/traffic impact Positive delta = Over-forecast.
Collision Avoidance Procedures Soaring Safety Foundation Flight Instructor Refresher Clinic Rich Carlson.
FAA Flight Standards AFS-220/430 FPAW 2017 Summer
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Alaska Air Carrier Association
NOTAMs.
FAA Flight Standards AFS-430 Summer FPAW 2016
Surface Observations for an Operator
Weather Information for Pilots
FAA Flight Standards AFS-430 Fall FPAW 2016
The Private Pilot.
Name: _______________________________
ENGINE-OUT PROCEDURES
Ops Specs The performance data for takeoff and landing an aircraft can be obtained from the aircraft's flight manual or pilot's operating handbook. The.
Presentation transcript:

GreenCig/Vis Categories match Pale Green Situational awareness Orange 2 categories off, Multiple impacts Yellow 1 category off, Singular impact Red 3 categories off, Multiple impacts Purple Greatest customer impact CAC Color Codes TEMPO Non verify > half of its forecast period TEMPO Non verify > 1 hour TEMPO None OR Verified within Previous hour

Forecaster Challenges CAT Color Code PURPLE Customer Impacts Forecast or observed conditions can preclude dispatch/release Ripple affect can create flight delays at multiple destinations Forecast of observed conditions improving above minimums critical to air traffic managers and dispatchers Timing of forecast for conditions to go below minimums used in planning delays or changing routes TEMPO forecasts at destination may or may not impact airline dispatching. Check with your customers for specifics Very narrow thresholds to forecast and remain in category Variable conditions above/below minimums create notification in AvnFPS that can be distracting Challenge to decision making when to amend to add or remove forecast Requires IMMEDIATE attention

Forecaster Challenges CAT Color Code RED Customer Impacts Three categories off creating multiple impacts Regulatory impacts could include: 1.Airfield not being available as an alternate 2. Required alternate airport and additional fuel 3. VFR flights not possible 4.Possible flight delays Potential for loss of confidence in the forecast based on how far off it is from the observation Determining the reason for such a large discrepancy between the forecast and observation: 1. Forecast timing of event off? 2. Observation questionable? 3. Missed forecast? 4. Rapidly changing weather? 5. Highly variable weather? Decision to amend takes time to analyze Decision on when/how to amend: 1. Change timing? 2. Add/Remove forecast element(s)? 3. Add or remove TEMPO forecast? CRITICAL Requires CRITICAL attention Non-regulatory impact could include: 1.Invalid indication to pilots of IFR or MVFR conditions

Forecaster Challenges CAT Color Code ORANGE Customer Impacts PROMPT Requires PROMPT attentionTwo categories off creating multiple impacts Regulatory impacts could include: 1.Airfield not being available as an alternate 2.Required alternate airport and additional fuel 3.VFR flights not possible 4.Possible flight delays Determining the reason for the discrepancy between the forecast and observation: 1.Forecast timing of event off? 2.Rapidly changing weather? 3.Variable weather? Decision on when/how to amend: 1.Change timing? 2.Add/remove forecast elements? 3.Add or remove TEMPO forecast? Non-regulatory impact could include: 1.Invalid indication to pilots of IFR or MVFR conditions

Forecaster Actions/Challenges TPO Color Code ORANGE Customer Impacts IMMEDIATE Requires IMMEDIATE attention to 1.Remove completely 2.Change parameters 3.Adjust timing Determine why TEMPO has not verified for > half valid period? TEMPO forecasts in lower category than predominate creates immediate CAT notification When TEMPO forecast is the cause for out of CAT condition, use TPO notification as timing feature to aid in decision making for when to amend versus CAT notification only Possible flight delays of two hours or more Loss of confidence in forecast Depends on the associated CAT color code as to the severity of the impact(s) possibly imposed

Forecaster Challenges CAC Color Code YELLOW Customer Impacts Requires TIMELY attention One forecast category off creating one of the singular impacts listed below: Regulatory impacts 1.Airfield not available as an alternate 2.Alternate airport and fuel required 3.VFR flights not possible 4.Possible flight delays Non-regulatory impact 1.Invalid indication to pilots of IFR or MVFR conditions Amendment decision can be based on the following: 1. Other sites indicating > impacts? 2. Is the impact regulatory or not? 3. How far off is the forecast? 4. Possible for the forecast to still verify?

Forecaster Actions/Challenges TPO Color Code YELLOW Customer Impacts/Challenges TIMELY Requires TIMELY attention to 1.Remove completely 2.Adjust parameters 3.Change timing Determine why TEMPO has not verified for over an hour

Forecaster Challenges CAC Color Code GREEN Customer Impacts None within the current monitoring time frame. Changing conditions may still warrant a before the fact amendment. None within the next few hours of the TAF

Forecaster Challenges TPO Color Code GREEN Customer Impacts Three possible TEMPO conditions may exists: 1.No TEMPO forecast in TAF 2.TEMPO forecast is currently verifying 3.TEMPO forecast has verified within the past hour Biggest challenge when TPO is green, but CAT is indicating out of category because of the TEMPO forecast is to recognize that this indicates the TEMPO forecast is still valid and the decision to amend the forecast may be delayed if conditions still warrant. Use the TPO monitor feature in decision making process on when to act on a TEMPO forecast that is causing the out of CAT indication. None

Forecaster Challenges CAC Color Code PALE GREEN Customer Impact(s) CAREFUL Requires CAREFUL attention Situational awareness notification for the following possibilities: 1.Only one element in category 2.Varying ceiling or visibility remark in observation indicates a lower condition than represented in the TAF 3.TEMPO forecast is being verified by varying remark in the observation Keep in mind that some airlines may be able to dispatch when the visibility forecast is > the published minimums (CAT A). If only the ceiling is in category and the visibility is expected to remain at, or improve to > these minimums, an amendment may be warranted. For some air carriers, if the visibility is observed to be > the lowest published minimums (CAT A) but this is not represented in the TAF, dispatch may not be allowed creating flight delays or possible cancelled flights. With the exception of the above there are NO CUSTOMER IMPACTS

Forecaster Challenges CURRENT VS PERSISTENCE Amending “BEFORE THE FACT” by focusing on the Right side of AvnFPS “Live on the RIGHT side” Customer Impacts LEFTRIGHT 1.Green on the LEFT and the RIGHT your doing alright! GREENGREEN MAY 2.Not GREEN on left – GREEN on right, you MAY be doing all right. 3.GREENRIGHT 3.GREEN on left – not on the RIGHT decide “before the fact” to ensure forecast timing and parameters are still valid and amend as necessary GREEN LEFTRIGHT 4.Not GREEN on LEFT or the RIGHT – forecast impact is immediate and projected further into the future, amendment decision needed ASAP Comparing the current observation/TAF versus TAF +1 (persistence): No 1.Current ob, TAF, and TAF +1 in category = No short term impact to operations Low 2.Current ob out of category from current hour TAF – TAF +1 hour and current ob in category = Low impact. Take-off and landing based on observation, planning based on TAF Medium 3.Current ob and TAF in category – TAF +1 hour and current ob out of category = Medium impact. Planned flights affected based on regulatory impacts imposed by TAF HIGH 4.Current ob, TAF and TAF +1 out of category = HIGH impact. Current and future operations affected based on regulatory impacts imposed by TAF Comparing the LEFT (current) versus the RIGHT (persistence or TAF + 1)