Mathematics Matters Deriving practices from what constitutes effective learning of mathematics A year-long review, engagement and development project.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

The Revised Frameworks Lighting the Spark Or Fanning the Flames.
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
When Students Can’t Read…
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Customised training: Learner Voice and Post-16 Citizenship.
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
The National Curriculum A guide for parents. The National Curriculum is a framework used by all maintained schools to ensure that teaching and learning.
Continuing professional development for teachers of mathematics: stimulating research partnerships through the NCETM Professor Celia Hoyles Chief Adviser.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling and Profiles Sheila Quigley.
A vision for a new national youth work strategy for Wales I want Youth Services to reach out to all young people and.
Building the Curriculum 5 BHS Parents 18 May. What is Building the Curriculum 5 about? For many years teachers have been concerned that assessment has.
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
Leading, Teaching and Learning through SAMR Monique Simpson LWDT
Implementing Mathematics K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of teacher judgement © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Embracing the challenge, taking the lead A leader in learning – sharing knowledge… Karin Gilbert Nicole Craven.
0 Area Network Day - Summer Agenda 09:15 – 10:30 Assessing Pupil Progress 10:30 – 10:45 Break 10:45 – 12:00Raising Standards in Reading using.
Outcomes Understand the way in which the Australian Curriculum has been structured in these learning areas Spend time familiarising themselves with the.
Curriculum for Excellence Numeracy and Mathematics 18th September 2010
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
Curriculum for Excellence Head of Quality & Curriculum
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
Transforming lives through learning Profiling 3-18.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Teachers Talking About Teaching Mathematics Celia Hoyles Director.
A big picture for Outstanding Citizenship. Three key questions 3 How well are we achieving our aims? 1 What are we trying to achieve? 2 How do we organise.
Professional Development in STEM Education Making a Difference
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
Forfar Academy Curriculum for Excellence Forfar Academy 26 th April 2011.
Connecting Teachers Can there be models of effective practice for teachers with ICT? Chair: Christine Vincent, Becta Presenter: Margaret Cox King’s College.
Curriculum Framework Working Party Overview of Framework and Recommendations.
Mathematics Subject Leader Meeting October 2012.
Transforming lives through learning Curriculum Expectations Sadie Cushley HMIE Feb 2014.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
New Opportunities The new Secondary Curriculum: A curriculum for the future.
Whole School Approach To To Careers Education Information Advice and Guidance INSET 15 th February 2012.
Before the seminar begins you might like to … Register and browse on the NCETM portal (if you haven’t already done so) - ncetm.org.uk Have a go at one.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Enhancing professional development for primary teachers of mathematics June 17th 2008.
Pascale Mompoint Gaillard NET project 1. To offer key elements to support the discussion on teacher recognition within the Pestalozzi Network of.
Afternoon session. Aims  to become familiar with the rationale and structure of the renewed frameworks, including support for planning, teaching and.
Making our curriculum world class Looking after learners, today and tomorrow Mike Rumble Curriculum Adviser.
Secondary Numeracy Project Introductory Workshop Pip Arnold.
Key Principles for Preparing the DCSD Community Plan 1.Integration – Social, Economic, Environmental Well-being focused on outcomes and people centred.
Similarities to my current programme of work Teaching of relevant strategies to be used whenever pupils listen and talk with others (e.g. one person speaking.
SLAV Conference Jennifer Hall BSSC Library Coordinator 17 March 2005.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
A big picture of the curriculum. Adapted with thanks to colleagues at the Council for Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment (CCEA) Working draft July.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Julie Rotchell -Programme Manager PESS Update Partnership Leaders Conference November 18 th 2010.
SLAV Conference Jennifer Hall BSSC Library Coordinator 17 March 2005.
PGCE Primary and a Mastery approach …the journey so far
NCETM: Moving Forwards with a Primary Agenda The National STEM Centre Primary Mathematics Conference 2012 Laurie Jacques Director for Primary.
Curriculum Evening Buckstone Primary 3 rd November 2015.
Key Stage 3: The Wasted Years? Ofsted September 2015 and follow up survey (September 2015 – still to be published) of transition arrangements.
ICT Strategic Leader Forums Ian Brewer. ICT Strategic Leader Forums Outcomes Key outcomes: Improved capacity of Subject Leaders to ensure more effective.
Secondary Curriculum Review New curriculum, new opportunities.
What is assessment for learning?
Secondary Curriculum Review Implications for teacher trainers.
1 Australian Government Policy Website Accessibility OZeWAI 1 December 2004 LaTrobe University, Melbourne Jacqui Begbie, Strategic Directions & Analysis,
Marking and Feedback CPD Follow up to marking. Expectations and ground rules Respect the views of others Give everyone space to make a contribution All.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
© Crown copyright 2007 The new ICT Programmes of Study Key Stages 3 and 4 Session 2.
Inspiring Learning for All Jonathan Douglas Head of Learning and Access Museums, Libraries and Archives Council.
Subject Leaders for Mathematics and Literacy Day 2 February 2010.
Achieving outcomes Ellen Atkinson (NDTi) Nottinghamshire February 2016.
The curriculum aims to enable all young people to become
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Introducing Digital Technologies
Presentation transcript:

Mathematics Matters Deriving practices from what constitutes effective learning of mathematics A year-long review, engagement and development project

Why now? Why the National Centre? 25 years since ‘Mathematics Counts’; 20 years since ‘Better Mathematics’ Time to refresh findings and recommendations in the light of accumulated research and the current educational culture and climate The National Centre is well placed to draw on expertise and experience from both within and beyond the mathematics education community This project sits behind the Centre’s strategic objective to ensure the universal provision of high quality CPD focused on successful pedagogical practices and teacher confidence with mathematics

The Key Question What constitutes the effective learning of mathematics?

The sequence Establish underpinning values, purposes and principles Recognise what research and experience are offering Derive practices

The project plan Stage 1 InitiatingMay 23 rd 2007 Stage 2 InferringSeptember 2007 – February 2008 Stage 3 EngagingApril 2008 – June 2008 Stage 4 Developing (teachers, curriculum, assessment) Stage 5 Embedding Stage 6 Evaluating

The project culture To include the widest community of interested parties in the process. For example, through: The initial invitation conference The five regional colloquia On-going open discussion on the NCETM portal Nation-wide promotion and awareness raising Regular progress reporting Never missing an opportunity to listen (e.g. today!)

Emerging themes from the initial conference Full version of first draft is included in your pack Discussion here today and on the portal will inform revisions to the draft The final draft will be used to inform the second stage of the project that starts in September

Values that underpin mathematics education

Making Mathematics Count Mathematics is of central importance to modern society. It provides the language and analytical tools underpinning much of our scientific and industrial research and development. Mathematical concepts, models and techniques are also key to many vital areas of the knowledge economy, including the finance and ICT industries. Mathematics is crucially important too, for the employment opportunities and achievements of individual citizens. (Smith, 2004 foreword, page v)

Your first task Discuss and then write down what you think are the values and purposes that underpin mathematics education?

Outcomes from learning mathematics that are valued 1.Fluency in recalling facts and performing skills 2.Interpretations for concepts and representations 3.Strategies for investigation and problem solving 4.Awareness of the nature and values of the educational system 5.Appreciation of the power of mathematics in society

Your second task Using the prompt sheet provided, discuss and then write down what you believe the priority order of the mathematical learning outcomes should be. Repeat the exercise and write down the priority order as you believe teachers perceive it.

Further work (to be continued on the portal) Consider any differences between your desired priority order and that which you believe exists in practice What do you think are the causes of these differences? What do you think could be done to narrow the gap between desired and actual?

Mathematics Matters