1 Non-Line of Sight Cannon Precision Strike Annual Review 21 April 2004 Major Darby McNulty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

Overcoming Customer Constraints on Requirements Documents Presented by: Robert Smole Presented by: Robert Smole November 5, 2008 Sub-Optimization of Systems.
Optimize tomorrow today. TM Cost and Affordability approach at Development Planning stage 1.
S Y S T E M S E N G I N E E R I N G.
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Hybrid Electric Vehicles Tri-Service Power Exposition July 16, 2003.
Anthony Cannone Mechanical Engineer
1 6/11/2015 8:34:35 PM Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Case GOVT , 02 October 2006 Future Combat Systems SOS Characteristics.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
Commodity Architectures and Army Research Challenges Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (EDGE) 24 May 2006 J. Michael Coyle Program.
1 Introduction to System Engineering G. Nacouzi ME 155B.
Trade Study Training Need and Goals Need Consistent methodologies and practices performing trade studies Pros/cons, advantages/disadvantages, customer/management.
Cooling System Architecture Design for FCS Hybrid Electric Vehicle
Systems Engineering Management
TECH 101 Product Design and Manufacturing. TECH 1012 System Life-Cycle Engineering 2 Major phases in almost all products and in many cases services –Acquisition.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
WILLIAM S. CHEN Bill Chen joined United Defense on December 16, He is currently Vice President, Division Engineering, Armament Systems Division,
The program work breakdown structure (WBS) establishes the essential
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
John Gruetzmacher, Lockheed Martin
1 9/9/2015 1:25:01 AM USASAC - NDIA Partnering Day Rick Pinos Senior Manager Industry Synchronization Future Combat Systems Approved for Public Release,
Manned Ground Vehicles 2004 Combat Vehicles Conference
From Research Prototype to Production
Page 1 May 2010 © Siemens AG 2010 Industry / Drive Technologies Innovative Hybrid Drive Systems for Commercial Vehicles Industry – Drive Technologies Innovative.
Software System Engineering: A tutorial
1 Lecture 5.2a: SEF Ch 8 SE Outputs Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
FCS Manned Ground Vehicles
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. Outline Project Scheduling.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT. A project is one – having a specific objective to be completed within certain specifications – having defined start and end dates.
Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the 2004 National Defense Industrial Association Combat Vehicle Conference and to Fort Knox, the Home.
May 11, Ordnance and Tactical Systems Advanced Crew Served Weapons (ACSW) 2004 Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition National Defense Industrial Association.
Keynote Address 2004 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference
Copyright by Rheinmetall W&M GmbH Modular Naval Artillery Concept 155mm Dr. Kruse, S-1, MONARC - 155mm Artillery for Frigate Size Ships Presentation.
TESTING LEVELS Unit Testing Integration Testing System Testing Acceptance Testing.
Overview of Information and Signal Processing Program 24 January 2007 Liyi Dai, Program Manager Computing & Information Sciences Division Mathematical.
Soldier Systems Technology Roadmap: Project Update Soldier Human and Systems Integration Workshop Château Cartier, Gatineau, September 21-22, 2010 LCol.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
PM UA Networks System Integration 2004 Combat Vehicles Conference
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Combined Test Organization
ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) and Army Acquisition.
 CMMI  REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT  SPECIFIC AND GENERIC GOALS  SG1: Develop CUSTOMER Requirement  SG2: Develop Product Requirement  SG3: Analyze.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Project Management Strategies Hidden in the CMMI Rick Hefner, Northrop Grumman CMMI Technology Conference & User Group November.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Bringing together leading research institutions to advance electric ship concepts. Bringing together leading research institutions to advance.
1 Lecture 2.3: SE Process (SEF Ch 3) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Standard Design Process Overview
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Breakdown Work Structure Applying Management Tools to a Project.
FSCS/TRACER Wheels v. Tracks 19 January 2000 LTC Jack Reiff DPM FSCS
DoD Template for Application of TLCSM and PBL
Supportability Design Considerations
System Engineering Considerations (See Chapters 3 and 9)
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Program Manager, FCS Lethality
Lesson 6 Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction Exercise Team #
PROGRAM SCOPE Design, Build and Test 2 Vehicles with alternative forms of energy MULE Purpose: Evaluate energy demands and packaging restraints to traverse.
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
United States Army Chief of Transportation
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Presentation transcript:

1 Non-Line of Sight Cannon Precision Strike Annual Review 21 April 2004 Major Darby McNulty

2 NLOS Cannon Agenda NLOS Development Team FCS/UA Increment 1 NLOS Cannon - Family of Vehicles (FoV) & System of Systems (SoS) Commonality Across FoV FCS Requirements Flow (From System to Platform) NLOS Cannon CTD Efforts & Accomplishments SDD Efforts – NLOS Cannon Specs and Design Drivers SDD Trade Studies and Analyses (MGV & NLOS Cannon) Gun Caliber Efforts (155mm versus 105mm) Path Forward – MGV SRR and SFR Efforts SRR Efforts – 17 Criterion PIDs (Prime Item Development Specifications) BTA (Best Technical Approach)

3 United Defense – NLOS Vehicle Integrator MGV Common Subsystems -NBC / ECS – GDLS -Structure/Armor – UDLP/GDLS -Crew Stations – UDLP -Propulsion – UDLP -Suspension – GDLS -Vetronics – GDLS -Signature Reduction/Def Arm’t – UDLP -Common Integration – UDLP/GDLS -Other… GDLS / UDLP NLOS-C Mission Module Unique Subsystems -Structure – UDLP -Active Protection – UDLP -Signature Reduction – UDLP -Mission Equipment – UDLP -Electronics – UDLP -Armor – UDLP -Resupply – UDLP -Other… – UDLP Supportability -Logistics – Northrop Grumman -Decision Support Systems – Northrop Grumman -Platform Soldier Mission Readiness – Honeywell -Integrated Computer – GDLS C4ISR -Ground Sensor Integrator -- Raytheon -ISR Sensor – Lockheed Martin / Oricon Defense / GDLS -Fusion / Sensor Data Mgmt – Lockheed Martin / Oricon Defense / GDLS -Battle Mgmt & Mission Execution – Raytheon -Warfighter Machine Interface – Boeing -SOSCOE - Boeing Training -Training Support Package – Dynamics Research Corp / Computer Science Corp / Northrop Grumman -Planning and Preparation - GDLS -Situation Understanding – Austin Information Systems -Ground Platform Communication -- BAE Systems Vehicle Integrator Contributions Other Contractor Contributions System of Systems Engineering – Boeing/SAIC Operational/Architectural development & functional allocation of Eng requirements Process Control and Program Management Risk and Control Management Supports FCS Tenet of Bringing Together Best of Industry

4 FCS Increment 1

5 NLOS-Cannon Requirements BAND 1: (7) FCS KPPs BAND 2: (23) Requirements Underpinning KPPs BAND 3: (126) Requirements that Underpin COICs BAND 4: (240) Threshold Requirements BAND 5: (156) Objective Requirements Verify Ammunition Auto load/fire current/future munitions Direct Fire Capability Manual Download Capability Rearm Times Information Exchanges Ammunition Payload Emplaced Response Time Outside Traverse Limits Moving Response Time Maximum Rate of Fire Maximum Range Minimum Range Accuracy Requirement Receive Joint Fire Missions Compute Own Firing Solution Future Munition Technologies There Are Requirements In Every Band That Affect NLOS-Cannon. There are 17 Specific NLOS-Cannon Requirements

6 Summary The NLOS-Cannon is one of the Future Combat System’s family of systems. NLOS-Cannon has 147 PCD requirements to meet. Seventeen of these are cannon specific. The Army has developed a FCS ORD structure placing FCS ORD requirements within a band structure. FCS ORD bands facilitate the decision process allocating key requirements decisions to the appropriate level. All NLOS-Cannon requirements decisions will be made based on a systems of system approach.

7 Multi-Role Resupply Large Caliber Ammunition Module Dry Cargo Module Analysis Conducted Recoil System Analysis and Design G-Loads Structural Analysis (FEA) System Model Vehicle Thermal Transient Analysis (VTT) Mobility Vehicle Dynamic (DADS) Analysis Crew Gun Fire Shock Tolerance NLOS-C CTD Effort Jib Crane Most Preferred Stretched Activities Phase 2 System Demonstrator Testing/Firing Completed in February 2004 NLOS-C Loader Brassboard Start in January (SRR Design) Estimated Completion – 30 June 2004 NLOS-C Vertical Propellant Brassboard Start in January (SRR Design) Estimated Completion – 31 May 2004 CTD Insights to Date C-130 weight constraints is the greatest technical challenge, but achievable…with significant trades on survivability and lethality requirements. Caliber: Both calibers (105mm, 155mm) are viable 105mm caliber and zone excursions being conducted 155mm caliber and zone excursions being conducted Wheels versus Tracks: Both options are viable (Tracks Recommended) Truck Mounted Crane

8 Activity Complete Delivered to YPG 30 July First Shot26 Aug Stabilized Zone 1&2Completed Un-stabilized Zone 1&2Completed Limited Zone 2 ROF (6.1 RPM)Completed Zone 3 Completed Stabilized Zone 4&5Completed Un-stabilized Zone 1&3Completed Demonstrator Correlation Used To Fine Tune BTA Models Demonstrator Being Using To Explore Performance. RoF Vehicle Dynamics G-Loads on Crew Areas Discover And Resolve Concept Issues Early. Demonstrate New Concepts Propellant Retention Device (PRD) Automated Cannon Cooling System (ACCS) System Demonstrator Accomplishments (Not a Prototype)

9 Summary NLOS-C CTD Accomplishments. NLOS-C System Demonstrator Completed and in Test Multi-role Resupply Concepts Developed Detailed Concepts Established (PRO-E Master Models) –Preliminary Concepts Of Projectile And Propellant Magazines And Shuttles, Gun Mount, Ammunition Loader/Rammer, Lower Mission Module, Turret Shell, Gun Pointing, And Ammo Upload Underway. –Basic Physical, Electrical And Software Architectures Defined –Weight And Space (Volume) Allocations And Estimates –Pit Stop Engineering Models Developed Significant Requirement Analysis Conducted Established Foundation for NLOS-C and MGV SDD (Prep for SRR and SFR) SDD Effort Underway. Boeing/SAIC - Lead System Integrator United Defense Is The Variant Integrator For NLOS-Cannon FCS Manned Ground Vehicles (MGV) SRR & SFR Focus First Prototype Vehicles In Jun 07 FCS IOC In 2010 For Increment I (6ea NLOS-C)

10 NLOS - Cannon Requirements: The FCS FoS must be Joint interoperable FCS network must enable Battle Command and provide situational awareness Networked lethal and non-lethal effects Transportable worldwide by air, sea, highway, and rail Achieve significant logistics footprint reduction Embedded individual and collective training Provide essential protection to mounted and dismounted soldiers Characteristics: Fires km Fires rounds per min Responds to fire mission when moving in sec Responds to fire mission in sec when emplaced Carries rounds Rearms with crew under armor in 5-12 min NLOS Cannon must meet 147 FCS Requirements – 17 of these requirements are unique to the NLOS-C Member of a Family of Systems that Includes : Active Protection System (APS) Defensive Armament System (DAS) C4ISR JTRS Radio Systems NBC/ECS Systems Common Crew Station Common Chassis Propulsion system Thermal Management System Suspension

11 NLOS-Cannon “Top Ten” Design Drivers 1. C130 Transport – Establishes Weight And Volume Constraint 2. ECC Weight (Flyweight) Definition – Establishes Required Weight Allocation For Ammo/Fuel (Projectiles On Board Weigh More Than Any Other Component) 3. Survivability – Requires Integral Medium Cannon And Heavy Machine Gun Armor 4. Mine Protection – Drives Armor Design And Interior Volume Availability 5. C4ISR – Drives Overall Vehicle Weight & Internal Volume 6. Reliability – Overall Design And Weight Impacts 7. Silent Watch – Drives Power Capacity And Battery Weight 8. Maximum Range- Drives Cannon Weight And Associated Structure. 9. Maximum and Sustained Rate Of Fire – Drives Structure/Subsystems Weight & Thermal Considerations 10.Automated Rearm Capability - Drives Overall Vehicle Weight & Internal Volume ECC Weight/C130 Requirements Are “The Eye Of The Needle” For All MGVs

12 MGV Tier 1 and 2 Decisions Air Transportability - C130 w/ or w/o Waivers - ECC Definition - Design Weight Mobility Arrangement - Wheels Vs Tracks - Propulsion Type & Location - Engine Type - Energy Storage Type Crew Arrangement - Size - Location - Configuration Mission Equipment Arrangement - Gun Caliber (MCS, NLOS-C, ICV) - C4ISR Suite (All Variants) - Sensor Suite (RSV) - Ammunition Load - Infantry Squad Equipment (ICV) Vehicle Configuration Survivability Suite - Crew & Passenger Protection* - Mission Equipment Protection* - Integral or Add-on - Active Protection System - Defensive Armament System Sustainment Equipment - MHE for Re-supply & Cross-Leveling - Water Generation - On-board Fuel Load - Days of Rations/Water/Ammo *Includes Armor / Structure Recipe

13 NLOS Cannon Caliber Analysis Comprehensive Effort Underway to Determine Cannon Caliber NLOS Cannon Requirements are Demanding – must explore all possible options/combinations Since C-130 Transportability (i.e. 19 Ton ECC) Is a Firm Requirement, Then Our Exercise Is a Balancing of Weight and Performance – Constrained by Cost and Schedule Weight Performance Lethality Survivability Reliability On-Board Storage ECC Weight/Capability FCC Weight/Capability

14 Cannon Caliber Analysis 155mm Concept 105mm Concept Comprehensive Analysis (Much larger decision than Cannon Caliber) Significant Modeling and Simulation Efforts (UAMBL, Fort Sill, TRAC) Analysis Includes Lethality, Range, Ammunition, Propellant, Fuses, Technology Maturity

15 SRR Efforts – Working 17 Key Criterion 1. Requirements Basis 2. Significant System Design Constraints Addressed 3. Key System Trade Studies 4. Operational Scenarios 5. Functional Decomposition 6. Initial System Architecture 7. Draft Life Cycle Process 8. Identify Internal and External Interfaces 9. Technical Risks 10. Technical Performance Measurements 11. System Integration and Verification 12. Supplier Requirements Specification (PCD’s) 13. System Technical Processes and Plans 14. Initial System Software Architecture 15. System Performance Model 16. System & Software Safety Plans 17. Initial Cost Allocations Evaluated

16 Major Configurations Trades Approved Tier 1 Decisions Preliminary Tier 2 DDMs Requirements Baseline PIDS Singularized / Allocated / Derived Installation Allocations & Estimates (By Installation) WeightRAM CoolingPower CostSpace Claim Design Parameter Document (Design Guidance) Installation & Platform Models Architectures Draft Part 2 ICDs by Installation Supporting Analyses BTA Path Forward Process (Primary Inputs and Key SFR Documentation) SDD-24 Final Trade Study Results POD Allocations & Guidance MGV Tier 2 Trade Study DDMs Results of SoS Trades PCD Exception Resolution Results Design Concept Review (DCR) Point of Departure (POD) Mid Course Correction MGV Whole System Trades Architectures & ICD Development SFR End Products