A & S March 9, 2010.  Secondary  Isolated to one district  Elementary  All schools received both calibration and non-calibration tests forms  Non-calibration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Journey – Improving Writing Through Formative Assessment Presented By: Sarah McManus, Section Chief, Testing Policy & Operations Phyllis Blue, Middle.
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Instructional Decision Making
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Heather Zavadsky, Ph.D. Bringing School Reform to Scale: Moving From Islands of Greatness to Successful Systems.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
The 8-Step Continuous Improvement Model
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Got Data? Using your ACT tools to improve performance on all levels, moving students to College and Career Readiness.
Department of Assessment Bill Thompson, Director Cherie Boone, Assessment Manager – Dr. Carla Kendall, Online Assessment Manager Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
Lesson Study Races to the Top in Florida A Report on Lesson Study Initiatives In The Sunshine State Collaborate Plan Align Learn Motivate Share.
Differentiated Accountability Strategies and Support Dr. Maria P. de Armas Assistant Superintendent Curriculum and Instruction (K-12 Core) Curriculum.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Changes and Impacts A & S May  Accountability History  Accountability Changes and Impact  Discussion 2.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Shereen Henry Math Instructional.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR SUCCESS CAO November 13, 2012.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
FOCUS… Formative, Ongoing, Classroom Understanding of Students and Standards An assessment system giving new directions to schools desiring to positively.
Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Top-performing urban school district in Florida State Assessment & Accountability.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
Timberlane Regional School District
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
A & S Meeting January 11, Agenda AYP FY11 and FY12 for NCLB EDW usage Aligning instruction with FY11 FLDOE testing programs.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Key System Features and Next Steps. Features: Computer Adaptive Testing Adaptive assessment provides measurement across the breadth of the Common Core.
Imagine School at Town Center Academic Update June 17, 2014.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
FY12 Winter Diagnostic Reports DRE. Families>Test Results and Other Assessment Information >Diagnostics New Levels 4 Ways Reports –Reading –Math –Science.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
RESEARCH BINGO!. Compared to teachers in a flexible block schedule, teachers in a traditional, fixed-period schedule are more likely to implement a variety.
Sol C. Johnson High School Wednesday September 23, 2015 (11:00am and 5:30pm) Auditorium.
1 Instructional Decision Making. Iowa Department of Education2 Instructional Decision Making in Brief The Instructional Decision Making (IDM) structure.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
ACT College-Readiness Measures: Explore, Plan and the ACT Hal L. Sanderson, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment Evidence-Based Learning.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PaTTAN-Harrisburg Update Angela Kirby-Wehr Director, PaTTAN-Harrisburg Response to Instruction and.
Journey toward a Balanced Assessment System.  Clarified reasons for  balanced assessment system  CORE K-12 will be provider of the comprehensive formative.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
 School Grade: First 800 points – FCAT  High Standards  Learning Gains  L25%  HS Bonus Points  AYP  FY11 Targets  Graduation Rate criteria.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
MID-YEAR STAKEHOLDER’S ASSESSMENT REVIEW TWIN LAKES ACADEMY ELEMENTARY JANUARY 23, 2014.
KCPS Board Workshop October 8, 2014 Academic Division BP 1.1 “Transitioning to the NWEA Assessment”
S TAR Assessment New Teacher Orientation
Lessons Learned. Communication, Communication, Communication Collaborative effort Support of all stakeholders Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students,
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Florida Standards Assessment
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
Assessments: Beyond the Claims
A Model for Building and Using Professional Learning Communities
Presentation transcript:

A & S March 9, 2010

 Secondary  Isolated to one district  Elementary  All schools received both calibration and non-calibration tests forms  Non-calibration forms required rulers  Therefore, calibration schools needed rulers  FDOE solution: Provide calibration schools with rulers

Toward a Balanced Assessment System March 9, 2010

Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT

Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT

Summative & Formative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) Assessment FOR Learning (Formative) Reason for Assessing REPORT ACHIEVEMENT STATUS PROMOTE MORE LEARNING To Inform OTHERS ABOUT STUDENTS STUDENTS ABOUT THEMSELVES Focus of the Assessment ACHIEVEMENT STANDARDS ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS THAT UNDERPIN STANDARDS Driving ForceACCOUNTABILITYIMPROVEMENT

CURRICULUM/ ACADEMIC GOALS STAFF SELECTION/ CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMS/PRACTICES/ ARRANGEMENTS MONITORING RECOGNITION/ INTERVENTION © National Center for Educational Accountability Jean Rutherford, Ed. D. Director of Educational Initiatives, NCEA June 24, 2004 The Practices of High-Performing School Districts

State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Poor Practice

State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Poor Practice > Achievement < Gaps

* The average gain in percentile points of the average student in the experimental group compared to the average student in the control group. Marzano, R., 2000; Borman, G.D.; Hewes, G.M. et al., 2000 Research-Based Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum: Opportunity to Learn Percentile Gain* Opportunity to Learn affects student achievement more than double any other school factors.

 Articulates a rigorous curriculum (clear target)  State Standards; FCAT Item Specs  Scope and Sequence  Monitors extent teachers cover the curriculum  Learning Team Meetings  Collaborative Planning  Has assessments based on the curriculum  Diagnostic Tests  Benchmark Assessments What to teach? Is it being taught? Are students learning?

 In classrooms where teachers used formative assessment  Rate of learning is double that found in other classrooms  Impact larger than most other educational interventions.  Particularly effective for students who have not done well in school (OECD, 2005) Black and Wiliam (2004 & 2008)

FCAT Tests Diagnostics Common Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts FY09

 Over 70% of the schools voluntary used the common assessments

 Students with the highest usage of the Assessment Center  Elementary schools:  gains in reading and math statistically higher than SDPBC mean.  High schools:  gains in reading statistically higher than SDPBC mean. SDPBC,DREA, 2009

School X

FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL School administers screening, diagnostics, and provides remediation, acceleration, and enrichment.

FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL District ensures real-time access to student achievement. District prescribes formative (Benchmark mini- assessments) and summative (Benchmark baseline and mid-year) assessments in reading, mathematics, and science for Level 1- 3 students.

FLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL Data chats are conducted between district administration and school administration; school administration and teachers; and teachers and students following baseline, mini-, and mid-year assessments.

 4.2 Develops and implements a comprehensive assessment system for assessing progress toward meeting the expectations for student learning  4.3 Uses student assessment data for making decisions for continuous improvement of teaching and learning processes

 Formative assessment is a national research- based best practice  Local research supports the national research  External agencies require formative assessments

 Responses received  Vendor selected  Negotiations not yet begun

 Marc Baron – Chief of Performance Accountability  Bill Thompson – Director, Assessment  Liz Perlman – Elementary District Director, Curriculum Development & School Improvement  Hernando Celada – Director, Infrastructure and System Support  Debbie Battles – Principal, North Grade Elementary School  Sandy Jinks – Principal Palm Springs Middle School  Carla Kendall – Manager, Online Assessment  Mark Howard – Manager, Educational Technology  Heidi Galloway -- Analyst, Diversity and Business Practices

 Currently negotiating

 Diagnostic Test  Too little time between administrations  Some items too difficult  Some misalignment of items and benchmarks  Tests/items repeated each year  Disagreement about correctness of answers  Fall Science more difficult than Winter Science

 Embedded Assessments  Print (PDF) format not consistent with online  Science text too complex (Lexile)  Printing scanner sheets burdensome  Problems with teacher logins  Rosters don’t match classes  Assessments not aligned to instruction  Window too early, late, short

 Embedded Assessments  Too many tests  Not enough time to prepare for test administration  Occasional errors in scoring  Unclear about relationship to grading  Online technical difficulties  Test creation issues  Scanner operation issues

 Fix technology  Provide new tests /multiple forms  Offer a variety of tests (benchmark and multiple benchmark)  Plan tests for entire year  Align tests with the Scope and Sequence  Provide Diagnostic Assessments for all schools and students

 Provide schools more flexibility in scheduling tests  Align schedule with school and student needs

 Research-based best practices  Research  Differentiated Accountability  SACS/CASI Accreditation  Local Feedback

Mathematics Reading Science Writing Algebra I Geometry Biology US History Key: FT = Field Test SS = Standard Setting B = Baseline

FCAT Tests Diagnostics & EOCs Mini Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts FY11

FCAT Tests Diagnostics & EOCs Mini Assessments Daily skills assessments, student work, observation State: Assessment District: Benchmark Assessments School: Unit Tests Teacher: Daily Monitoring State: Assessment Teacher: Daily Monitoring NCEA Practices of High-Performing School Districts Provide Diagnostics & EOCs Provide Mini Assts Provide item bank for teachers ITN

Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items

Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items

Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access

Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Data transfers Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items

Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests Data transfers Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items

Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide Assessment Center test delivery/collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access Provide resources for PD and community outreach Provide program management for service, support and PD Data transfers Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items

Provide NGSSS mini assessments 13,500 items Provide NGSSS teacher item bank 27,000 items Provide NGSSS Diagnostics & EOCs 180 tests

SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school Minis $9.28/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees

SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees

4.Provide Assessment Center test delivery, collection (via computer, scanning, and clickers), scoring, reporting, links to instructional materials, and parent access

Central Data Server Test Item data bank Test Item Authoring Tool Test Assembly Tool INTERNET Test Administration 130k students take tests created by teachers or administrators via computer, scanners, clickers Test Development Test Delivery Access to Results Test Scoring and Reporting Immediate access to student reports by teachers, administrators, and parents Instruction Implications Links to resources for students, teachers, administrators, and parents Data transfers and security protocols Instructional Decision Making

SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student Assessment platform $12.22/student (2 yr. build) $9.51/student (per year) * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees

SDPBC ProvidesCORE K-12 Teacher item bank $3,800*/school$774/school Minis $9.28/student$.93/student Diagnostics** $6.30/student$2.87/student Assessment platform $12.22/student (2 yr. build) $9.51/student (per year) $5.30/student * Progress testing- aka FCAT Test Maker **includes 1-time printing fees

 Formative assessment is a national research- based best practice  Local research supports the national research  External agencies require formative assessments  CORE K12 won ITN

 Planning and alignment  Multiple tests  School schedule based on needs of school/student  Enable district and differentiated accountability schools to meet differentiated accountability assessment requirements  Provide non-differentiated accountability schools access to the CORE K12  Diagnostics for all schools and students