Soil Moisture from Remote Sensing: METOP ASCAT Soil Moisture Retrieval

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Application of Remote Sensing: CE 6900 Tennessee Technological University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Course Instructor:
Advertisements

Electro-magnetic radiation
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture & Snow Properties with SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa.
Oil spill off NW coast of Spain IKONOS image Oil reaching shore.
The Aquarius Salinity Retrieval Algorithm Frank J. Wentz and Thomas Meissner, Remote Sensing Systems Gary S. Lagerloef, Earth and Space Research David.
European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2012 Vienna, Austria, 22 – 27 April 2012 European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2012 Vienna, Austria,
Near Surface Soil Moisture Estimating using Satellite Data Researcher: Dleen Al- Shrafany Supervisors : Dr.Dawei Han Dr.Miguel Rico-Ramirez.
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
SMOS – The Science Perspective Matthias Drusch Hamburg, Germany 30/10/2009.
Using Scatterometers and Radiometers to Estimate Ocean Wind Speeds and Latent Heat Flux Presented by: Brad Matichak April 30, 2008 Based on an article.
Millimeter and sub-millimeter observations for Earth cloud hunting Catherine Prigent, LERMA, Observatoire de Paris.
Bredbeck Workshop, 7 – 10 July 2003 Jörg Schulz Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn Harald Czekala RPG Radiometer.
Introduction Global soil moisture is one of the critical land surface initial conditions for numerical weather, climate, and hydrological predictions.
Remote Sensing of Soil Moisture Lecture 7. What is soil moisture? Soil moisture is the water that is held in the spaces between soil particles. Surface.
Developing Operational Soil Moisture Processing Chains: The Experience with European Scatterometers and Synthetic Aperture Radars Wolfgang Wagner
Initial Results on the Cross- Calibration of QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 Scatterometers David G. Long Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham.
Remote Sensing and Active Tectonics Barry Parsons and Richard Walker Michaelmas Term 2011 Lecture 4.
Microwave Remote Sensing Group 1 P. Pampaloni Microwave Remote Sensing Group (MRSG) Institute of Applied Physics -CNR, Florence, Italy Microwave remote.
Experiments with the microwave emissivity model concerning the brightness temperature observation error & SSM/I evaluation Henning Wilker, MIUB Matthias.
On Estimation of Surface Soil Moisture from SAR Jiancheng Shi Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
Wade Crow USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory John Bolten NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Thanks: Xiwu Zhan (NOAA NESDIS), Curt Reynolds.
Remote Sensing Microwave Remote Sensing. 1. Passive Microwave Sensors ► Microwave emission is related to temperature and emissivity ► Microwave radiometers.
DOCUMENT OVERVIEW Title: Fully Polarimetric Airborne SAR and ERS SAR Observations of Snow: Implications For Selection of ENVISAT ASAR Modes Journal: International.
Recent advances in remote sensing in hydrology
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
Technical Seminar Presentation-2004 MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING Kishore Kumar ParidaEC [1] Microwave Remote Sensing (MRS) Presented by Kishore Kumar.
Problems and Future Directions in Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Troposphere Dahai Jeong AMP.
Retrieving Snowpack Properties From Land Surface Microwave Emissivities Based on Artificial Neural Network Techniques Narges Shahroudi William Rossow NOAA-CREST.
Pang-Wei Liu 1, Roger De Roo 2, Anthony England 2,3, Jasmeet Judge 1 1. Center for Remote Sensing, Agri. and Bio. Engineering, U. of Florida 2. Atmosphere,
- Microwave Remote Sensing Group IGARSS 2011, July 23-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 M. Brogioni 1, S. Pettinato 1, E. Santi 1, S. Paloscia 1, P. Pampaloni 1,
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
B.-M. Sinnhuber, Remote Sensing I, University of Bremen, Summer 2007 Remote Sensing I Active Remote Sensing Summer 2007 Björn-Martin Sinnhuber Room NW1.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
APPLICATIONS OF THE INTEGRAL EQUATION MODEL IN MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF LAND SURFACE PARAMETERS In Honor of Prof. Adrian K. Fung Kun-Shan Chen National.
William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C-
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
PASSIVE MICROWAVE TECHNIQUES FOR HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS by : P. Ferrazzoli Tor Vergata University Roma, Italy
Soil moisture estimates over Niger from satellite sensors (T. Pellarin, M. Zribi)
Synthetic Aperture Radar Specular or Bragg Scatter? OC3522Summer 2001 OC Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere and Ocean - Summer 2001.
Remote Sensing Microwave Image. 1. Penetration of Radar Signal ► ► Radar signals are able to penetrate some solid features, e.g. soil surface and vegetative.
Synthetic Aperture Radar at The Alaska SAR Facility
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
On Estimation of Soil Moisture with SAR Jiancheng Shi ICESS University of California, Santa Barbara.
Retrieval of Soil Moisture and Vegetation Canopy Parameters With L-band Radar for a Range of Boreal Forests Alireza Tabatabaeenejad, Mariko Burgin, and.
Estimating Soil Moisture Using Satellite Observations in Puerto Rico By Harold Cruzado Advisor: Dr. Ramón Vásquez University of Puerto Rico - Mayagüez.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing. Passive Microwave Radiometry Microwave region: GHz ( cm) Uses the same principles as thermal remote sensing.
Satellite Microwave Radiometry: Current and Future Products Rogre De Roo and Tony England Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Evaluation of the SMAP.
Sarah Abelen and Florian Seitz Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology (ESPACE) IAPG, TUM Geodätische Woche 2010 Contributions of different water storage.
RADAR.  Go through intro part of LeToan.pdfhttp://earth.esa.int/landtraining07/D1LA1- LeToan.pdf.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
DOWNSCALED SOIL MOISTURE DATA FROM THE METOP ASCAT SCATTEROMETER FOR HYDROLOGICAL USERS IN EUROPE Stefan Hasenauer (1), Barbara Zeiner (2), Alexander Jann.
Over 30% of Earth’s land surface has seasonal snow. On average, 60% of Northern Hemisphere has snow cover in midwinter. About 10% of Earth’s land surface.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Cassini Huygens EECS 823 DIVYA CHALLA.
Spring '17 EECS Intro to Radar Systems
Soil Moisture: Synergistic approach for the merge of thermal and ASCAT information 2nd User Training Workshop of Land Surface Analysis Satellite Application.
HSAF Soil Moisture Training
Active Microwave Remote Sensing
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS & RS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ANSWERS
Rolf Reichle1, Gabrielle DeLannoy1,2, and Wade Crow3
Satellite Foundational Course for JPSS (SatFC-J)
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties
Introduction to SAR Imaging
Presentation transcript:

Soil Moisture from Remote Sensing: METOP ASCAT Soil Moisture Retrieval Sebastian Hahn shahn@ipf.tuwien.ac.at Research Group Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation Vienna University of Technology www.ipf.tuwien.ac.at/radar

Outline Introduction to Soil Moisture Microwave properties Remote Sensing of soil moisture SMOS SMAP METOP ASCAT TU Wien Soil Moisture Retrieval Assumption Processing steps Limitations Conclusion

Land Ice Atmosphere Ocean Other

Cross-section of a soil Soil Moisture Definition, e.g. Average Source: Koorevaar et al., 1983 Cross-section of a soil Air Water Solid Particles Thin, remotely sensed soil layer Root zone: layer of interest for most applications Soil profile

Microwaves Microwaves: 1 mm – 1m Band designations Advantages compared to optical/IR range penetrate the atmosphere (to some extent clouds and rain) independent of the sun as source of illumination penetration depth into vegetation and soil Source: Ulaby et al., 1981

Transmission through Atmosphere, Clouds and Rain Source: Ulaby et al., 1981

Microwaves and Water Microwaves All-weather, day-round measurement capability Very sensitive to soil water content below relaxation frequency of water (< 10 GHz) Penetrate vegetation and soil to some extent Penetration depth increases with wavelength The dipole moment of water molecules causes “orientational polarisation”, i.e. a high dielectric constant Dielectric constant of water Source: Schanda, 1986 Relationship between soil moisture and dielectric constant Source: after Ulaby et al., 1986

Active and Passive Microwave Sensors Active remote sensors create their own electromagnetic energy Sensors Altimeters Side-looking real aperture radar Scatterometer (SCAT) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Passive Passive remote sensing systems record electromagnetic energy that is reflected or emitted from the surface of the Earth Sensors Microwave radiometers Source: Gloersen et al., 1992

Observed quantities Radars Radiometers Backscattering coefficient s0; a measure of the reflectivity of the Earth surface Radiometers Brightness temperature TB = e × Ts where e is the emissivity and Ts is the surface temperature Passive and active methods are interrelated through Kirchhoff’s law: e = 1 – r where r is the reflectivity Example: increase in soil moisture content Backscatter ↑ Emissivity ↓

Scattering Mechanisms Surface Scattering Source: Ulaby et al., 1982 Volume Scattering Backscatter from Vegetation Surface-volume interaction Volume scattering Surface scattering (attenuated by vegetation canopy) Source: Ulaby et al., 1982 Source: Bartalis, 2009

Microwave missions for soil moisture 33 years of passive and active satellite microwave observations for soil moisture

SMOS – Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity Launched: Nov. 2009 Passive, L-band, 1.41 GHz, 21.3 cm V and H polarisation Spatial Resolution: 30 – 50 km Swath: 1000 km Daily global coverage: 82 % Multi-angular: 30 – 55° Synthetic Antenna Several (quasi) instantaneous independent measurements SMOS Source: ESA SMOS has demonstrated the concept of Aperture Synthesis Radiometry in Two Dimensions from space, end-to-end, only 3 months after launch. It is a completely new observation technique, that will likely extend in the future to other applications, other frequency bands and other orbits. New retrieval algorithms have been developed for multi-incidence angle wide-field of view observations. The concept is fully scalable and allows to achieve very fine spatial resolution without moving parts. SMOS has also provided science a step forward through the Corbella equation, a real breakthrough in the fundamental theory of radio-astronomy, established in the 60’s. Our major concern, the electromagnetic cleanness of MIRAS itself, vanished after the first tests with the complete instrument, where we achieved unbiased high quality measurements. SMOS will be the first ESA mission flying a complete optical harness, which has contributed to the electromagnetic cleanness of the measurements (optical fibres do not generate electrical noise). In summary, SMOS is a milestone mission in remote sensing. MIRAS, the Microwave Imaging Radiometer using Aperture Synthesis instrument, is a passive microwave 2-D interferometric radiometer measuring in L-Band; 69 antennas are equally distributed over the 3 arms and the central structure. Source: http://www.cesbio.ups-tlse.fr/SMOS_blog/

SMAP – Soil Moisture Active Passive Frequency: 1.26 GHz Polarizations: VV, HH, HV (not fully polarimetric) Relative accuracy (3 km grid): 1 dB (HH and VV), 1.5 dB (HV) Passive Frequency: 1.41 GHz Polarizations: H, V, 3rd & 4th Stokes Relative accuracy (30 km grid): 1.3 K Spatial Resolution: Radiometer (IFOV): 39 km x 47 km SAR: 1-3 km (over outer 70% of swath) Swath width: 1000 km Orbit: Polar, Sun-Synchronous SMAP Source: NASA Conically-scanning deployable mesh reflector shared by radar and radiometer (Diameter: 6 m, Rotation rate: 14.6 RPM) Launch: Nov. 2014

European C-Band Scatterometer ERS Scatterometers  = 5.7 cm / 5.3 GHz VV Polarization Resolution: (25) / 50 km Daily global coverage: 41% Multi-incidence: 18-59° 3 Antennas Data availability ERS-1: 1991-2000 ERS-2: 1995-2011 gaps due to loss of gyros (2001) and on-board tape recorder (2003) METOP Advanced Scatterometer  = 5.7 cm / 5.3 GHz VV Polarization Resolution: 25 / 50 km Daily global coverage: 82 % Multi-incidence: 25-65° 6 Antennas Data availability At least 15 years METOP-A: since 2006

ERS-1/2 METOP ASCAT Source: Bartalis, 2009

TU Wien Change Detection Approach SCAT Measurement

TU Wien Model – Assumptions Linear relationship between backscatter (in dB) and soil moisture Empirical description of incidence angle behaviour Land cover patterns do not change over time Roughness at a 25/50 km scale is constant in time Vegetation cycle basically unchanged from year to year Seasonal vegetation effects cancel each other out at the "cross-over angles" dependent on soil moisture

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Constructing the Discrete Global Grid (DGG) Adapted sinusoidal grid Ellipsoid: GEM6 Discontinuity at 180° meridian Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature time Orbit geometry Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Hamming window Source: Naeimi, 2009 and Bartalis, 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Source: Bartalis, 2006 and Bartalis, 2009 Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Estimated Standard Deviation (ESD) Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Source: Naeimi 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Incidence angle – backscatter behaviour Source: Naeimi, 2009 Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Taylor series (degree 2), expansion point: Freeze/Thaw detection measure slope curvature Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Source: Naeimi, 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Source: Naeimi, 2009 Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection measure slope curvature Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Surface State Flag (SSF) Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Naeimi, V., Paulik, C., Bartsch, A., Wagner, W., Member, S., Kidd, R., Park, S., et al. (2012). ASCAT Surface State Flag (SSF): Extracting Information on Surface Freeze/Thaw Conditions From Backscatter Data Using an Empirical Threshold-Analysis Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Source: Wagner, 1998 Cross-over angle concept Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet ref. Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Source: Naeimi, 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Azimuthal Normalisation Dry reference ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet ref. Wet correction Wet reference Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Source: Naeimi, 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Problem In very dry climates the soil wetness does not ever reach to the saturation point Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) Source: Naeimi, 2009

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Soil moisture calculated relative to historically driest and wettest conditions (Degree of Saturation) Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection σ Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture SSM Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Mean ERS Scatterometer Surface Soil Moisture (1991-2007) Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI)

TU Wien Model – Processing steps Resampling Using the latest x number of surface soil moisture values, calculate the profile soil moisture values using an infiltration model T...characteristic time length (days) 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 60, 100 days Azimuthal Normalisation ESD Calculate Slope and Curvature Incidence angle Normalisation Freeze/Thaw detection Estimation of dry/wet reference Wet correction SSM Surface Soil Moisture Soil Water Index (SWI) SWI

Resumé of the retrieval Soil moisture retrieval method is a data-based approach Starts from the observations, not from theoretical model considerations Nevertheless, the TU Wien method has a solid physical foundation Exploits multiple viewing capabilities Important for modelling the effect of seasonal vegetation growth and decay (phenology) Exploits the availability of long-term data series Change Detection Approach: Accounts for heterogeneous land cover and spatial surface roughness patterns No external/auxiliary datasets are used for the retrieval Soil texture, soil type, land cover, biomass, evapotranspiration, brightness temperature… But raw backscattering signatures in different incidence (viewing) angles

Where does the retrieval go wrong? Low signal-to-noise ratio (known from error propagation) Vegetation Mountainous regions Urban areas Where does the model fail? Frozen ground (Wet) Snow Water surfaces Dry soil scattering Known calibration issues Wet correction in arid environments Differences in sensor calibration Long-term changes in land cover Relative Soil Moisture Noise (%) Source: Naeimi, 2009

ASCAT Soil Moisture Product Families Surface (< 2 cm) soil moisture (SSM) 25 km / 50 km in near-real-time (~135 min) in orbit geometry (EUMETSAT) 25 km irregularly updated off-line time series at a fixed discrete global grid (H-SAF/TU Wien) Profile (~2-100 cm) soil moisture = Soil Water Index (SWI) 25 km off-line (TU Wien) 50 km assimilated soil moisture at fixed grid for Europe (H-SAF/ECMWF) Downscaled ASCAT-ASAR soil moisture 1 km near real-time on fixed grid for Europe (H-SAF/ZAMG/TU Wien) http://www.eumetsat.int http://hsaf.meteoam.it http://www.zamg.at

ASCAT Dataviewer www.ipf.tuwien.ac.at/radar/dv/ascat/

Conclusion Soil moisture is currently topic of international agendas Large and diverse user community ASCAT offers the first operational soil moisture product distributed by EUMETSAT over EUMETCast Many positive validation and application studies Still, product quality can much improved by further developing and improving the algorithms & software Validation, Intercomparisons and Merging International Soil Moisture Network http://www.ipf.tuwien.ac.at/insitu/ Intercomparisons with SMOS, AMSR-E, SMAP, GLDAS, ERA-Interim, ... Combined soil moisture products http://www.esa-soilmoisture-cci.org/

Further Reading Publications Wagner, W., Lemoine, G., Rott, H. (1999): A Method for Estimating Soil Moisture from ERS Scatterometer and Soil Data. Rem. Sens. Environ. 70: 191-207. Wagner, W., Naeimi, V., Scipal, K., de Jeu, R., and Martínez-Fernández, J. (2007): Soil moisture from operational meteorological satellites, Hydrogeology Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 121–131. Naeimi, V., K. Scipal, Z. Bartalis, S. Hasenauer and W. Wagner (2009), An improved soil moisture retrieval algorithm for ERS and METOP scatterometer observations, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 47, pp. 555-563. Naeimi, V., Z. Bartalis, and W. Wagner, (2009) ASCAT soil moisture: An assessment of the data quality and consistency with the ERS scatterometer heritage, Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 10, pp. 555-563, DOI: 10.1175/2008JHM1051.1. Technical Reports (www.ipf.tuwien.ac.at/radar) ASCAT Soil Moisture Product Handbook (Z. Bartalis, V. Naeimi, S. Hasenauer and W. Wagner, 2008) WARP NRT Reference Manual (Z. Bartalis, S. Hasenauer, V. Naeimi and W. Wagner, 2007) Definition of Quality Flags (K. Scipal, V. Naeimi and S. Hasenauer, 2005)