Updates BI-TL MADX Optics Studies C. Bracco. Next Steps from last meeting BHZ40 Nominal beta, -1.4 m dispersion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
Advertisements

New optics for the PSB measurement line J.L. Abelleira Thanks to B. Mikulec, G.P. De Giovanni, Jean-Francois Comblin MSWG, 13 Feb 2015.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
1 M. Popovic NFMC Collaboration Meeting IIT Muon (Pre)Acceleration for 8 GeV Proton Driver Linac Milorad Popovic FNAL 14-March.
MICE Beam Line Design Oct 24 th 2005 Dean Adams, Kevin Tilley Based on TURTLE element definitions by K Walaron, T Roberts and K Tilley.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
1 August 12, 2005 Running 2mrad IR in e-e- mode: BDS constraints A.Seryi August 12, 2005.
Transfer Line Linac4 to PSB: Injection Aperture Limitations.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
New ALICE Beam Pipe: Injection Protection C. Bracco on Behalf of ABT/BTP Acknowledgment: M. Giovannozzi.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
ATF2 Tuning Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept
RCS simulation 現状 と 今後 平成1 8 年 4 月14日 發知. Comparison with Machida’s result Machida’s result (6.72, 6.35) 181 INJ., 0.6 W/O CC W/ CC W/ Mult. of.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
Specifications for PSB Injection System Upgrade C. Bracco, J. Abelleira on behalf of BTP Acknowledgments: E. Benedetto, C. Carli, V. Dimov, L.M. Feliciano,
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
Muon Collider Lattice Design Status Muon Collider Workshop, Telluride CO, June 27 – July Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)  Lattice design TeV c.o.m.
ISIS Upgrade Modelling Dean Adams On behalf of STFC/ISIS C Warsop, B Jones, B Pine, R Williamson, H Smith, M Hughes, A McFarland, A Seville, I Gardner,
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
UPDATE IN PTC-ORBIT PSB STUDIES Space charge meeting ( ) * Vincenzo Forte * Follows LIS meeting presentation 16/04/2012.
Post-LH Diagnostic Line for LCLS-II P. Emma, M. Woodley, Y. Nosochkov, Feb. 26, 2014 Steal beam at Hz with y -kicker after LH (  y = 15 mm) Bend.
Off-momentum DA of RCS 3D_BM & QFF & CC AP meeting / December 8, 2004 Alexander Molodozhentsev Etienne Forest KEK.
Preliminary Design of Electron Beam line F. Velotti, C. Bracco, B. Goddard and M. Meddahi.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Impact of Errors and Damping Wigglers on the Lattice W. Guo 02/26/2009 NSLS-II ASAC Meeting Acknowledgement: M. Borland.
Some ideas to optimise PSB injection chicane Wim, Brennan, Jan, Masamitsu.
D. Raparia2005/01/27-28 MAC Review EBIS Injector Linac Optics I I D.Raparia EBIS Review 2005/01/27-28 HEBT Booster Injection.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
LINAC4 transfer line – optics M. Eshraqi, L. Hein, A. Lombardi (BE-ABP) LINAC4 transfer lines : m (from PIMS out to foil); m new line,then.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Choppers Comparison of three schemes of choppers is made 2.5 MeV and 2.1 MeV beam energies are considered Presented by Boris Shteynas May,
PS2 Orbit Correction - Update Wolfgang Bartmann PS2 Meeting, 26 th March Mar-091PS2 Orbit Correction - Update.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
CLIC 09 Workshop - C. Biscari C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, F. Stulle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
Primary Beam Lines for the Project at CERN
Envelope tracking as a tool for low emittance ring design
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
PSB injection: beam dynamics studies
Status on Work for Splitter FS and Dilution System FS
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Large Booster and Collider Ring
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
FCC-ee Lattice with Misalignments
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
OSC simulation update Suntao Wang 10/06/2017.
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
Optics considerations for PS2
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Transfer Line for EIC.
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Presentation transcript:

Updates BI-TL MADX Optics Studies C. Bracco

Next Steps from last meeting BHZ40 Nominal beta, -1.4 m dispersion

Optics -Lattice manually derived from “Path” output -“s” coordinates not rechecked wrt existing TL -Quads strengths and initial conditions (start of BHZ40, beginning of BI line) (X,BGX') 100%-Emittance [m.rad] 1.62E-05 (X,BGX') 90%-Emittance [m.rad] 1.30E-06 (X,BGX') RMS-Emittance [m.rad] 3.11E-07 (Y,BGY') 100%-Emittance [m.rad] 1.54E-05 (Y,BGY') 90%-Emittance [m.rad] 1.45E-06 (Y,BGY') RMS-Emittance [m.rad] 3.34E-07 (PHI,dE) 100%-Emittance [deg.MeV] 7.58E+01 (PHI,dE) 90%-Emittance [deg.MeV] 1.09E+00 (PHI,dE) RMS-Emittance [deg.MeV] 3.13E-01 (X,X') Alpha [1] 9.89E-01 (X,X') Beta [m/rad] 9.02E+00 (Y,Y') Alpha [1] 1.34E+00 (Y,Y') Beta [m/rad] 4.53E+01 (PHI,dE) Alpha [1] 1.09E+01 (PHI,dE) Beta [deg/MeV] 4.09E+03 dx [m]? – 0 dyp? – 0 dy [m]? – 0 dxp? – 0 Change sign in MADX (H - ) L [m]B [T/m] LargeNominalSmall QFN QDN QFN QDN QFW QDN QFN QDN QFW QDW QFW QDW BI.QN BI.QN BI.QN BI-QN BI-QN BI-QN

Ring SMV BVT -70 SMV BVT +35 SMV BVT

Betax Max  = 2 m Max  = 0.5 rad

Betay Max  = 0.6 m Max  = 0.5 rad

Horizontal Dispersion Max  D = 0.5 m

Vertical Dispersion Max  D = 0.1 m

Strengths RING 1RING 2RING 3RING 4 kDVT kDIS kDIS kDIS kDIS kDVT kSMV kSMV kBVT kQN kQN kQN kQN kQN kQN

Beam Envelope 4   x,y  + D x,y *  p/p + Orbit (normalized r.m.s.  y =0.5 mm mrad) Dp/p = (1.13 MeV longitudinal painting) Orbit = ±2 mm Zoom

Beam Envelope 4   x,y  + D x,y *  p/p + Orbit (normalized r.m.s.  y =0.5 mm mrad) Dp/p = (1.13 MeV longitudinal painting) Orbit = ±2 mm Hor. offset = -10 mm 11 mm

Beam Envelope 4   x,y  + D x,y *  p/p + Orbit (normalized r.m.s.  y =0.5 mm mrad) Dp/p = (1.13 MeV longitudinal painting) Orbit = ±2 mm Zoom

Beam Envelope 4   x,y  + D x,y *  p/p + Orbit (normalized r.m.s.  y =0.5 mm mrad) Dp/p = (1.13 MeV longitudinal painting) Orbit = ±2 mm Max. Vert. offset = ±10 mm Min= 15 mm